Phase transitions in the q -voter model with noise on a duplex clique

Physical Review E - Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics

Volumn 92, Issue 5, 2015, Pages

  Chmiel, Anna ^a   Sznajd Weron, Katarzyna ^a  

^a WROCLAW UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Poland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS; MONTE CARLO METHODS; STOCHASTIC SYSTEMS;

COMPLETE GRAPHS; DUPLEX NETWORKS; MULTIPLEX NETWORKS; QUALITATIVE CHANGES; RATE EQUATIONS; SOCIAL CONTEXT; SOCIAL EXPERIMENTS; STOCHASTIC NOISE;

STOCHASTIC MODELS;

EID: 84949255564     PISSN: 15393755     EISSN: 15502376     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.92.052812     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. J. A. Hołyst, K. Kacperski, and F. Schweitzer, Social impact models of opinion dynamics, Annu. Rev. Comput. Phys. 9, 253 (2001). 10.1142/9789812811578-0005
2. C. Castellano, S. Fortunato, and V. Loreto, Statistical physics of social dynamics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 591 (2009). RMPHAT 0034-6861 10.1103/RevModPhys.81.591
3. S. Galam, Sociophysics: A Physicists Modeling of Psycho-Political Phenomena (Springer, New York, 2012).
4. P. Sen and B. K. Chakrabarti, Sociophysics: An Introduction (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2013).
5. D. G. Myers, Social Psychology, 11th ed. (Freeman Press, New York, 2013).
6. P. L. Krapivsky, S. Redner, and E. Ben-Naim, A Kinetic View of Statistical Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2010).
7. C. Castellano, M. A. Muńoz, R. Pastor-Satorras, Nonlinear (Equation presented)-voter model, Phys. Rev. E 80, 041129 (2009). PLEEE8 1539-3755 10.1103/PhysRevE.80.041129
8. S. Galam, Local dynamics vs. social mechanisms: A unifying frame, Europhys. Lett. 70, 705 (2005). EULEEJ 0295-5075 10.1209/epl/i2004-10526-5
9. J. P. Gleeson, Binary-State Dynamics on Complex Networks: Pair Approximation and Beyond, Phys. Rev. X 3, 021004 (2013). 10.1103/PhysRevX.3.021004
10. P. Roy, S. Biswas, and P. Sen, Exit probability in inflow dynamics: Nonuniversality induced by range, asymmetry and fluctuation, Phys. Rev. E 89, 030103 (2014). PLEEE8 1539-3755 10.1103/PhysRevE.89.030103
11. K. Byrka and F. G. Kaiser, Health performance of individuals within the Campbell paradigm, Int. J. Psych. 48, 986 (2013). 10.1080/00207594.2012.702215
12. Handbook of Research Methods in Personality Psychology, edited by R. W. Robins, R. C. Fraley, and R. F. Krueger (Guilford Press, New York, 2007).
13. P. Nyczka, K. Sznajd-Weron, and J. Cislo, Phase transitions in the q-voter model with two types of stochastic driving, Phys. Rev. E 86, 011105 (2012). PLEEE8 1539-3755 10.1103/PhysRevE.86.011105
14. P. Przybyla, K. Sznajd-Weron, and M. Tabiszewski, Exit probability in a one-dimensional nonlinear (Equation presented)-voter model, Phys. Rev. E 84, 031117 (2011). PLEEE8 1539-3755 10.1103/PhysRevE.84.031117
15. A. M. Timpanaro and C. P. C. Prado, Exit probability of the one-dimensional (Equation presented)-voter model: Analytical results and simulations for large networks, Phys. Rev. E 89, 052808 (2014). PLEEE8 1539-3755 10.1103/PhysRevE.89.052808
16. S. E. Asch, Opinions and social pressure, Sci. Am. 193, 31 (1955). SCAMAC 0036-8733 10.1038/scientificamerican1155-31
17. S. Moscovici, E. Lage, and M. Naffrechoux, Influence of a consistent minority on the responses of a majority in a color perception task, Sociometry 32, 365 (1969). 0038-0431 10.2307/2786541
18. D. K. Campbell-Meiklejohn, D. R. Bach, A. Roepstorff, R. J. Dolan, and C. D. Frith, How the opinion of others affects our valuation of objects, Curr. Biol. 20, 1165 (2010). CUBLE2 0960-9822 10.1016/j.cub.2010.04.055
19. P. Moretti, S. Liu, C. Castellano, and R. Pastor-Satorras, Mean-field analysis of the (Equation presented)-voter model on networks, J. Stat. Phys. 151, 113 (2013). JSTPBS 0022-4715 10.1007/s10955-013-0704-1
20. P. Nyczka and K. Sznajd-Weron, Anticonformity or independence? Insights from statistical physics, J. Stat. Phys. 151, 174 (2013). JSTPBS 0022-4715 10.1007/s10955-013-0701-4
21. P. Nail, G. MacDonald, and D. Levy, Proposal of a four-dimensional model of social response, Psych. Bull. 126, 454 (2000) PSBUAI 0033-2909 10.1037/0033-2909.126.3.454
22. S. Boccaletti, G. Bianconi, R. Criado, C. I. del Genio, J. Gómez-Gardeñes, M. Romance, I. Sendiña-Nadal, Z. Wang, and M. Zanin, The structure and dynamics of multilayer networks, Phys. Rep. 544, 1 (2014). PRPLCM 0370-1573 10.1016/j.physrep.2014.07.001
23. S. Gómez, A. Díaz-Guilera, J. Gómez-Gardeñes, C. J. Pérez-Vicente, Y. Moreno, and A. Arenas, Diffusion Dynamics on Multiplex Networks, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 028701 (2013). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.028701
24. C. Granell, S. Gómez, and A. Arenas, Dynamical Interplay between Awareness and Epidemic Spreading in Multiplex Networks, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 128701 (2013). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.128701
25. C. Buono, L. G. Alvarez-Zuzek, P. A. Macri, and L. A. Braunstein, Epidemics in partially overlapped multiplex networks, PLoS ONE 9, e92200 (2014). 1932-6203 10.1371/journal.pone.0092200
26. J. Sanz, Ch.-Y. Xia, S. Meloni, and Y. Moreno, Dynamics of Interacting Diseases, Phys. Rev. X 4, 041005 (2014). 10.1103/PhysRevX.4.041005
27. M. Diakonova, M. San Miguel, and V. Eguíluz, Absorbing and shattered fragmentation transitions in multilayer coevolution, Phys. Rev. E 89, 062818 (2014). PLEEE8 1539-3755 10.1103/PhysRevE.89.062818
28. C. D. Brummitt, K-M Lee, and K.-I. Goh, Multiplexity-facilitated cascades in network, Phys. Rev. E 85, 045102 (2012). PLEEE8 1539-3755 10.1103/PhysRevE.85.045102
29. D. J. Watts, A simple model of global cascades on random networks, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 5766 (2002). PNASA6 0027-8424 10.1073/pnas.082090499
30. K.-M. Lee, C. D. Brummitt, and K.-I. Goh, Threshold cascades with response heterogeneity in multiplex networks, Phys. Rev. E 90, 062816 (2014). PLEEE8 1539-3755 10.1103/PhysRevE.90.062816
31. M. Mobilia, Nonlinear (Equation presented)-voter model with inflexible zealots, Phys. Rev. E 92, 012803 (2015). PLEEE8 1539-3755 10.1103/PhysRevE.92.012803
32. K. Sznajd-Weron, M. Tabiszewski, and A. Timpanaro, Phase transition in the Sznajd model with independence, Europhys. Lett. 96, 48002 (2011). EULEEJ 0295-5075 10.1209/0295-5075/96/48002
33. N. Crokidakis, Phase transition in kinetic exchange opinion models with independence, Phys. Lett. A 378, 1683 (2014). PYLAAG 0375-9601 10.1016/j.physleta.2014.04.028
34. K. Sznajd-Weron, J. Szwabiński, and R. Weron, Is the person-situation debate important for agent-based modeling and vice-versa? PLoS ONE 9, e112203 (2014). 1932-6203 10.1371/journal.pone.0112203
35. M. B. Donnellan, R. E. Lucas, and W. Fleeson, Personality and Assessment at Age 40: Reflections on the Past Person-Situation Debate and Emerging Directions of Future Person-Situation Integration Personality and Assessment at Age 40, special issue of J. Res. Personality 43, 117 (2009). 10.1016/j.jrp.2009.02.010
36. M. Kivelä, A. Arenas, M. Barthelemy, J. P. Gleeson, Y. Moreno, and M. A. Porter, Multilayer networks, J. Complex Networks 2, 203 (2014). 2051-1310 10.1093/comnet/cnu016
37. M. De Domenico, A. Solé-Ribalta, E. Cozzo, M. Kivelä, Y. Moreno, M. A. Porter, S. Gómez, and A. Arenas, Mathematical Formulation of Multilayer Networks, Phys. Rev. X 3, 041022 (2013). 10.1103/PhysRevX.3.041022
38. N. Masuda, Voter model on the two-clique graph, Phys. Rev. E 90, 012802 (2014). PLEEE8 1539-3755 10.1103/PhysRevE.90.012802
39. V. Sood, T. Antal, and S. Redner, Voter models on heterogeneous networks, Phys. Rev. E 77, 041121 (2008). PLEEE8 1539-3755 10.1103/PhysRevE.77.041121
40. S. Galam, Majority rule, hierarchical structures and democratic totalitarianism: A statistical approach, J. Math. Psych. 30, 426 (1986). JMTPAJ 0022-2496 10.1016/0022-2496(86)90019-2
41. S. Galam, Social paradoxes of majority rule voting and renormalization group, J. Stat. Phys. 61, 943 (1990). JSTPBS 0022-4715 10.1007/BF01027314
42. P. L. Krapivsky and S. Redner, Dynamics of Majority Rule in Two-State Interacting Spin Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 238701 (2003). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.238701
43. R. Lambiotte, M. Ausloos, and J. A. Hołyst, Majority model on a network with communities, Phys. Rev. E 75, 030101 (2007). PLEEE8 1539-3755 10.1103/PhysRevE.75.030101
44. K. Sznajd-Weron and K. Suszczyński, Nonlinear (Equation presented)-voter model with deadlocks on the Watts-Strogatz graph, J. Stat. Mech. (2014) P07018. 10.1088/1742-5468/2014/07/P07018
45. D. ter Haar, Collected Papers of L. D. Landau (Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1965), pp. 193-216
46. [originally published in Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 7, 19 (1937)].
47. M. Plischke and B. Bergersen, Equilibrium Statistical Physics, 3rd ed. (World Scientific, Singapore, 2006).
48. M. Cinnirella and B. Green, Does "cyber-conformity" vary cross-culturally? Exploring the effect of culture and communication medium on social conformity, Comput. Human Behav. 23, 2011 (2007). 0747-5632 10.1016/j.chb.2006.02.009
49. M. Rosander and O. Eriksson, Conformity on the Internet The role of task difficulty and gender differences, Comput. Human Behav. 28, 1587 (2012). 0747-5632 10.1016/j.chb.2012.03.023
50. R. B. Cialdini and N. J. Goldstein, Social influence: Compliance and conformity, Annu. Rev. Psych. 55, 591 (2004). ARPSAC 0066-4308 10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142015
51. M. Henkel, H. Hinrichsen, and S. Luebeck, Non-Equilibrium Phase Transitions, Vol. 1: Absorbing Phase Transitions (Springer, Berlin, 2008).
52. J. R. Hackman and N. Vidmar, Effects of size and task type on group performance and member reactions, Sociometry 33, 37 (1970). 0038-0431 10.2307/2786271
53. R. Bond, Group size and conformity, Group Process. Intergroup Relat. 8, 331 (2005). 1368-4302 10.1177/1368430205056464
54. V. Nicosia and V. Latora, Measuring and modeling correlations in multiplex networks, Phys. Rev. E 92, 032805 (2015). PLEEE8 1539-3755 10.1103/PhysRevE.92.032805
55. K.-M. Lee, J. Y. Kim, W.-k Cho, K.-I. Goh, and I.-M. Kim, Correlated multiplexity and connectivity of multiplex random networks, New J. Phys. 14, 033027 (2012). NJOPFM 1367-2630 10.1088/1367-2630/14/3/033027
56. N. A. M. Araujo and H. J. Herrmann, Explosive Percolation via Control of the Largest Cluster, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 035701 (2010). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.035701
57. J. Nagler, A. Levina, and M. Timme, Impact of single links in competitive percolation, Nat. Phys. 7, 265 (2011). 1745-2473 10.1038/nphys1860
58. P. Grassberger, C. Christensen, G. Bizhani, S. Son, and M. Paczuski, Explosive Percolation is Continuous, but with Unusual Finite Size Behavior, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 225701 (2011). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.225701
59. G. Ódor and A. Szolnoki, Directed-percolation conjecture for cellular automata, Phys. Rev. E 53, 2231 (1996). 1063-651X 10.1103/PhysRevE.53.2231
60. A. J©drzejewski, A. Chmiel, and K. Sznajd-Weron, Oscillating hysteresis in the q-neighbor Ising model, Phys. Rev. E 92, 052105 (2015). PLEEE8 1539-3755 10.1103/PhysRevE.92.052105
61. F. Y. Wu, The Potts model, Rev. Mod. Phys. 54, 235 (1982). RMPHAT 0034-6861 10.1103/RevModPhys.54.235
62. N. A. M. Araujo, J. S. Andrade, Jr., and H. J. Herrmann, Tactical voting in plurality elections, PLoS ONE 5, e12446 (2010). 1932-6203 10.1371/journal.pone.0012446
63. L. Chen, F. Ghanbarnejad, W. Cai, and P. Grassberger, Outbreaks of coinfections: The critical role of cooperativity, Europhys. Lett. 104, 50001 (2013). EULEEJ 0295-5075 10.1209/0295-5075/104/50001