Is the person-situation debate important for agent-based modeling and vice-versa?

PLoS ONE

Volumn 9, Issue 11, 2014, Pages

  Sznajd Weron, Katarzyna ^a   Szwabiński, Janusz ^b   Weron, Rafał ^a  

^a WROCLAW UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Poland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WROC AW   (Poland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGENT BASED MODELING; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; CALIBRATION; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; MONTE CARLO METHOD; ORIENTATION; PROBABILITY; PSYCHOLOGY; PUBLIC OPINION; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL INTERACTION; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; ALGORITHM; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMAN RELATION; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; SOCIAL SUPPORT;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; MONTE CARLO METHOD; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL SUPPORT;

EID: 84924871598     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112203     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Macy MW, Willer R (2002) From factors to actors: Computational sociology and agent-based modeling. Annual Review of Sociology 28:143-166.
2. Grimm V, Revilla E, Berger U, Jeltsch F, Mooij WM, et al. (2005) Patternoriented modeling of agent-based complex systems: Lessons from ecology. Science 310:987-991.
3. Buchanan M (2009) Meltdown modelling. Nature 460:680-682.
4. Weinberger S (2011) Web of war. Nature 471:566-568.
5. Moussäid M, Kämmer JE, Analytis PP, Neth H (2013) Social influence and the collective dynamics of opinion formation. PLoS ONE 8(11):e78433 (doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0078433).
6. Garcia R, Jager W (2011) From the Special Issue editors: Agent-based modeling of innovation diffusion. Journal of Product Innovation Management 28(2):148-151.
7. Farmer JD, Foley D (2009) The economy needs agent-based modeling. Nature 460:685-686.
8. Kiesling E, Günther M, Stummer Ch, Wakolbinger LM (2012) Agent-based simulation of innovation diffusion: A review. CEJOR 20(2):183-230.
9. Krapivsky PL, Redner S, Ben-Naim E (2010) A kinetic view of statistical physics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. Niss M (2009) History of the Lenz-Ising model: From irrelevance to relevance. Archive for History of Exact Sciences 63:243-287.
11. Niss M (2011) History of the Lenz-Ising model: The role of a simple model in understanding critical phenomena. Archive for History of Exact Sciences 65:625-658.
12. Schelling TC (1971) Dynamic models of segregation. Journal of Mathematical Sociology 1:143-186.
13. Liggett TM (1985) Interacting particle systems. Heidelberg: Springer.
14. Galam S (1986) Majority rule, hierarchical structures and democratic totalitarism: A statistical approach. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 30(4):426-434.
15. Krapivsky PL, Redner S (2003) Dynamics of majority rule in two-state interacting spin systems. Physical Review Letters 90:238701.
16. Sznajd-Weron K, Sznajd J (2000) Opinion evolution in closed community. International Journal of Modern Physics C 11:1157-1165.
17. Niu BL, Wei W (2013) Emergence of abstaining in Glauber opinion dynamics. Applied Mechanics and Materials 347-350:3827-3831.
18. Galam S (2005) Local dynamics vs.social mechanisms: A unifying frame. Europhysics Letters 70(6):705-711.
19. Castellano C, Munoz MA, Pastor-Satorras R (2009) Nonlinear q-voter model. Physical Review E 80:041129.
20. Nyczka P, Sznajd-Weron K (2013) Anticonformity or independence? Insights from statistical physics. Journal of Statistical Physics 151:174-202.
21. Granovetter MS (1978) Threshold models of collective behavior. American Journal of Sociology 83:1420-1443.
22. Mobilia M (2003) Does a single zealot affect an infinite group of voters? Physical Review Letters 91:028701.
23. Galam S, Jacobs F (2007) The role of inflexible minorities in the breaking of democratic opinion dynamics. Physica A 381:366-376.
24. Nyczka P, Sznajd-Weron K, Cislo J (2012) Phase transitions in the q-voter model with two types of stochastic driving. Physical Review E 86:011105.
25. De La Lama MS, Lopez JM, Wio HS (2005) Spontaneous emergence of contrarian-like behaviour in an opinion spreading model. Europhysics Letters 72:851-857.
26. Sobkowicz P (2012) Discrete model of opinion changes using knowledge and emotions as control variables. PLoS ONE 7(9):e44489 (doi:10.1371/journal. pone.0044489).
27. Sobkowicz P (2013) Quantitative agent based model of user behavior in an internet discussion forum. PLoS ONE 8(12):e80524 (doi:10.1371/journal. pone.0080524).
28. Donnellan MB, Lucas RE, Fleeson W (2009) Personality and assessment at age 40: Reflections on the past person-situation debate and emerging directions of future person-situation integration - Personality and assessment at age 40. Journal of Research in Personality 43(2):117-290.
29. Moussäid M (2013) Opinion formation and the collective dynamics of risk perception. PLoS ONE 8(12):e84592 (doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0084592).
30. Van Dolder D, Buskens V (2014) Individual choices in dynamic networks: An experiment on social preferences. PLoS ONE 9(4):e92276 (doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0092276).
31. Perlman SB, Morris JP, Vander Wyk BC, Green SR, Doyle JL, et al. (2009) Individual differences in personality predict how people look at faces. PLoS ONE 4(6):e5952 (doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0005952).
32. Bergmann JHM, Langdon PM, Mayagoitia RE, Howard N (2014) Exploring the use of sensors to measure behavioral interactions: An experimental evaluation of using hand trajectories. PLoS ONE 9(2):e88080 (doi:10.1371/journal. pone.0088080).
33. Asch SE (1955) Opinions and social pressure. Scientific American 193:31-35.
34. Myers DG (2013) Social psychology (11th ed.). New York: Free Press.
35. Kowalska-Pyzalska A, Maciejowska K, Suszczyński K, Sznajd-Weron K, Weron R (2014) Turning green: Agent-based modeling of the adoption of dynamic electricity tariffs. Energy Policy 72:164-174.
36. Sznajd-Weron K, Szwabiński J, Weron R, Weron T (2014) Rewiring the network. What helps an innovation to diffuse? Journal of Statistical Mechanics P03007 (doi:10.1088/1742-5468/2014/03/P03007).
37. Schwartz SH, Cieciuch J, Vecchione M, Davidov E, Fischer R, et al. (2012) Refining the theory of basic individual values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 103(4):663-688
38. Schwartz SH, Melech G, Lehmann A, Burgess S, Harris M, et al. (2001) Extending the cross-cultural validity of the theory of basic human values with a different method of measurement. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 32(5):519-542.
39. Barabási A (2009) Scale-free networks: A decade and beyond. Science 325:412-413.