The evolution of biofilm-forming Wrinkly Spreaders in static microcosms and drip-fed columns selects for subtle differences in wrinkleality and fitness

FEMS Microbiology Ecology

Volumn 91, Issue 6, 2015, Pages

  Udall, Yvette C ^a   Deeni, Yusuf ^a   Hapca, Simona M ^a   Raikes, David ^a   Spiers, Andrew J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ABERTAY DUNDEE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Bacterial adaptation; experimental evolution; fitness; Pseudomonas

Indexed keywords

BIOFILM; FITNESS; MICROCOSM;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); PSEUDOMONAS; PSEUDOMONAS FLUORESCENS;

BACTERIAL DNA;

ADAPTATION; BACTERIUM ADHERENCE; BIOFILM; DNA SEQUENCE; ENVIRONMENT; EVOLUTION; GENETICS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PHENOTYPE; PSEUDOMONAS FLUORESCENS;

ADAPTATION, BIOLOGICAL; BACTERIAL ADHESION; BASE SEQUENCE; BIOFILMS; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; DNA, BACTERIAL; ENVIRONMENT; PHENOTYPE; PSEUDOMONAS FLUORESCENS; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA;

EID: 84949204448     PISSN: 01686496     EISSN: 15746941     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/femsec/fiv057     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Arendt J, Reznick D. Convergence and parallelism reconsidered: what have we learned about the genetics of adaptation? Trends Ecol Evol 2008;21:26-32.
2. Armitano J, Méjean V, Jourlin-Castelli C. Gram-negative bacteria can also form pellicles. Environ Microbiol Rep 2014;6: 534-44.
3. Bantinaki E, Kassen R, Knight CG, et al. Adaptive divergence in experimental populations of Pseudomonas fluorescens. III. Mutational origins of Wrinkly Spreader diversity. Genetics 2007;176:441-53.
4. Bottero S, Storck T, Heimovaara TJ, et al. Biofilm development and the dynamics of preferential flowpaths in porous media. Biofouling 2013;29:1069-86.
5. Brockhurst MA, Hochberg ME, Bell T, et al. Character displacement promotes cooperation in bacterial biofilms. Curr Biol 2006;16:2030-4.
6. Buckling A, Kassen R, Bell G, et al. Disturbance and diversity in experimental microcosms. Nature 2000;408:961-4.
7. Buckling A, Maclean CR, Brockhurst MA, et al. The Beagle in a bottle. Nature 2009;457:824-9.
8. Buckling A, Wills MA, Colegrave N. Adaptation limits diversification of experimental bacterial populations. Science 2003;302:2107-9.
9. Chen K, Wallis JW, McLellanMD, et al. BreakDancer: an algorithm for high-resolution mapping of genomic structural variation. Nat Methods 2009;6:677-81.
10. Cingolani P, Platts A, Wang le L, et al. A program for annotating and predicting the effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms, SnpEff: SNPs in the genome of Drosophila melanogaster strain w1118; iso-2; iso-3. Fly 2012;6:80-92.
11. DePristo MA, Banks E, Poplin R, et al. A framework for variation discovery and genotyping using next-generation DNA sequencing data. Nat Genet 2011;43:491-8.
12. Ferguson GC, Bertels F, Rainey PB. Adaptive divergence in experimental populations of Pseudomonas fluorescens. V. Insight into the niche specialist fuzzy spreader compels revision of the model Pseudomonas radiation. Genetics 2013;195:1319-35.
13. Ǵomez P, Buckling A. Real-time microbial adaptive diversification in soil. Ecol Lett 2013;16:650-5.
14. Goymer P, Kahn SG, Malone JG, et al. Adaptive divergence in experimental populations of Pseudomonas fluorescens. II. Role of the GGDEF regulator WspR in evolution and development of the Wrinkly Spreader phenotype. Genetics 2006;173:515-26.
15. Graf von der Schulenburg DA, Pintelon TRR, Picioreanu C, et al. Three-dimensional simulations of biofilm growth in porous media. AIChE J 2009;55:494-504.
16. Green JH, Koza A, Moshynets O, et al. Evolution in a test tube: rise of the Wrinkly Spreaders. J Biol Educ 2011;45:54-9.
17. Huang WE, Ude S, Spiers AJ. Pseudomonas fluorescens SBW25 biofilm and planktonic cells have differentiable Raman spectral profiles. Microb Ecol 2007;53:471-4.
18. Iltis GG, Armstrong RT, Jansik DP, et al. Imaging biofilm architecture within porous media using synchrotronbased X-ray computed microtomography. Water Resour Res 2011;47:W02601.
19. Kassen R, Buckling A, Bell G, et al. Diversity peaks at intermediate productivity in a laboratory microcosm. Nature 2000;406: 508-12.
20. Knight CG, Zitzmann N, Prabhakar S, et al. Unraveling adaptive evolution: how a single point mutation affects the protein coregulation network. Nat Genet 2006;38:1015-22.
21. Koza A, Hallett PD, Moon CD, et al. Characterization of a novel air-liquid interface biofilm of Pseudomonas fluorescens SBW25. Microbiology 2009;155:1397-406.
22. Koza A, Moshynets O, Otten W, et al. Environmental modification and niche construction: developing O2 gradients drive the evolution of the Wrinkly Spreader. Int Soc Microbial Ecol J 2011;5:665-73.
23. Lenski RE, Rose MR, Simpson SC, et al. Long-term experimental evolution in Escherichia coli. I. Adaptation and divergence during 2,000 generations. Am Naturalist 1991;138:1315-41.
24. McDonald MJ, Cooper TF, Beaumont HJE, et al. The distribution of fitness effects of new beneficial mutations in Pseudomonas fluorescens. Biol Lett 2011;7:98-100.
25. McDonald MJ, Gehrig SM, Meintjes PL, et al. Adaptive divergence in experimental populations of Pseudomonas fluorescens. IV. Genetic constraints guide evolutionary trajectories in a parallel adaptive radiation. Genetics 2009;183:1041-53.
26. McKenna A, Hanna M, Banks E, et al. The Genome Analysis Toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing nextgeneration DNA sequencing data. Genome Res 2010;20:1297-303.
27. MacLean RC. Adaptive radiation in microbial microcosms. J Evol Biol 2005;18:1376-86.
28. MacLean RC, Bell G, Rainey PB. The evolution of a pleiotropic fitness tradeoffin Pseudomonas fluorescens. P Natl Acad Sci USA 2004;101:8072-7.
29. Rainey PB, Bailey MJ. Physical and genetic map of the Pseudomonas fluorescens SBW25 chromosome. Mol Microbiol 1996;19:521-33.
30. Rainey PB, Travisano M. Adaptive radiation in a heterogeneous environment. Nature 1998;394:69-72.
31. Robertson M, Hapca SM, Moshynets O, et al. Air-liquid interface biofilm formation by psychrotrophic pseudomonads recovered from spoilt meat. Anton Leeuw 2013;103: 251-9.
32. Schluter D. The Ecology of Adaptive Radiation: Oxford Series in Ecology and Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
33. Shapiro J, David LA, Friedman J, et al. Looking for Darwin's footprints in the microbial world. Trends Microbiol 2009;17:196-204.
34. Spiers AJ. Wrinkly-Spreader fitness in the two-dimensional agar plate microcosm: maladaptation, compensation and ecological success. PLoS One 2007;2:e740.
35. Spiers AJ. Bacterial evolution in simple microcosms. In: Harris CH (ed.) Microcosms: Ecology, Biological Implications and Environmental Impact: Microbiology Research Advances Series. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Publishers, 2013.
36. Spiers AJ. A mechanistic explanation linking adaptive mutation, niche change and fitness advantage for the Wrinkly Spreader. Int J Evol Biol 2014;2014:675432.
37. Spiers AJ, Bohannon J, Gehrig SM, et al. Biofilm formation at the air-liquid interface by the Pseudomonas fluorescens SBW25 Wrinkly Spreader requires an acetylated form of cellulose. Mol Microbiol 2003;50:15-27.
38. Spiers AJ, Deeni YY, Folorunso AO, et al., Cellulose expression in Pseudomonas fluorescens SBW25 and other environmental pseudomonads. In: Van De Ven TGM, Godbout L (eds) Cellulose. Rijeka: InTech Publishers, 2013.
39. Spiers AJ, Kahn SG, Bohannon J, et al. Adaptive divergence in experimental populations of Pseudomonas fluorescens. I. Genetic and phenotypic bases of Wrinkly Spreader fitness. Genetics 2002;161:33-46.
40. Spiers AJ, Rainey PB. The Pseudomonas fluorescens SBW25 Wrinkly Spreader biofilm requires attachment factor, cellulose fibre and LPS interactions to maintain strength and integrity. Microbiology 2005;151:2829-39.
41. Thullner M, Baveye P. Computational pore network modeling of the influence of biofilm permeability on bioclogging in porous media. Biotech Bioeng 2008;99:1337-51.
42. Ude S, Arnold DL, Moon CD, et al. Biofilm formation and cellulose expression among diverse environmental Pseudomonas isolates. Environ Microbiol 2006;8:1997-2011.
43. Wood TE, Burke JM, Rieseberg LH. Parallel genotypic adaptation: when evolution repeats itself. Genetica 2005;123: 157-70.