Remote sensing image classification

Advances in Environmental Remote Sensing: Sensors, Algorithms, and Applications

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 219-240

  Lu, Dengsheng ^a   Weng, Qihao ^b   Moran, Emilio ^a   Li, Guiying ^a   Hetrick, Scott ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b INDIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84949023324     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (133)

1. Althausen, J. D. 2002. What remote sensing system should be used to collect the data? In Manual of Geospatial Science and Technology, ed. J. D. Bossler, J. R. Jensen, R. B. McMaster and C. Rizos, 276. New York: Taylor & Francis.
2. Amarsaikhan, D. et al. 2010. Fusing high-resolution SAR and optical imagery for improved urban land cover study and classification. Int J Image Data Fusion 1: 83.
3. Aplin, P., P. M. Atkinson, and P. J. Curran. 1999. Per-field classification of land use using the forthcoming very fine spatial resolution satellite sensors: problems and potential solutions. In Advances in Remote Sensing and GIS Analysis, ed. P. M. Atkinson and N. J. Tate, 219. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
4. Asner, G. P., and K. B. Heidebrecht. 2002. Spectral unmixing of vegetation, soil and dry carbon cover in arid regions: Comparing multispectral and hyperspectral observations. Int J Remote Sens 23: 3939.
5. Augusteijn, M. F., L. E. Clemens, and K. A. Shaw. 1995. Performance evaluation of texture measures for ground cover identification in satellite images by means of a neural network classifier. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 33: 616.
6. Bannari, A. et al. 1995. A review of vegetation indices. Remote Sens Rev 13: 95.
7. Barnsley, M. J. 1999. Digital remote sensing data and their characteristics. In Geographical Information Systems: Principles, Techniques, Applications, and Management, 2nd ed., ed. P. Longley, M. Goodchild, D. J. Maguire and D. W. Rhind, 451. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
8. Benz, U. C. et al. 2004. Multi-resolution, object-oriented fuzzy analysis of remote sensing data for GIS-ready information. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 58: 239.
9. Blaschke, T. 2010. Object based image analysis for remote sensing. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 65: 2.
10. Brisco, B., and R. J. Brown. 1995. Multidate SAR/TM synergism for crop classification in Western Canada. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 61: 1009.
11. Canty, M. J., A. A. Nielsen, and M. Schmidt. 2004. Automatic radiometric normalization of multitemporal satellite imagery. Remote Sens Environ 91: 441.
12. Chander, G., B. L. Markham, and D. L. Helder. 2009. Summary of current radiometric calibration coefficients for Landsat MSS, TM, ETM+, and EO-1 ALI sensors. Remote Sens Environ 113: 893.
13. Chavez Jr., P. S. 1996. Image-based atmospheric corrections-revisited and improved. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 62: 1025.
14. Chen, D., and D. A. Stow. 2002. The effect of training strategies on supervised classification at different spatial resolution. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 68: 1155.
15. Chen, D., and D. A. Stow. 2003. Strategies for integrating information from multiple spatial resolutions into land-use/land-cover classification routines. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 69: 1279.
16. Chen, D., D. A. Stow, and P. Gong. 2004. Examining the effect of spatial resolution and texture window size on classification accuracy: An urban environment case. Int J Remote Sens 25: 2177.
17. Cihlar, J. 2000. Land cover mapping of large areas from satellites: Status and research priorities. Int J Remote Sens 21: 1093.
18. Civco, D. L. 1989. Topographic normalization of Landsat Thematic Mapper digital imagery. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 55: 1303.
19. Colby, J. D. 1991. Topographic normalization in rugged terrain. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 57: 531.
20. Congalton, R. G. 1991. A review of assessing the accuracy of classification of remotely sensed data. Remote Sens Environ 37: 35.
21. Congalton, R. G., and K. Green. (2008). Assessing the Accuracy of Remotely Sensed Data: Principles and Practice, 2nd ed, 183. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press/Taylor & Francis Group.
22. Congalton, R. G., and R. A. Mead. 1983. A quantitative method to test for consistency and correctness in photo interpretation. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 49: 69.
23. Congalton, R. G., and L. Plourde. 2002. Quality assurance and accuracy assessment of information derived from remotely sensed data. In Manual of Geospatial Science and Technology, ed. J. Bossler, 349. London: Taylor & Francis.
24. Cushnie, J. L. 1987. The interactive effect of spatial resolution and degree of internal variability within land-cover types on classification accuracies. Int J Remote Sens 8: 15.
25. Dai, X., and S. Khorram. 1998. A hierarchical methodology framework for multisource data fusion in vegetation classification. Int J Remote Sens 19: 3697.
26. Du, Y., P. M. Teillet, and J. Cihlar. 2002. Radiometric normalization of multitemporal high-resolution satellite images with quality control for land cover change detection. Remote Sens Environ 82: 123.
27. Ehlers, M. et al. 2010. Multisensor image fusion for pansharpening in remote sensing. Int J Image Data Fusion 1: 25.
28. Epstein, J., K. Payne, and E. Kramer. 2002. Techniques for mapping suburban sprawl. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 68: 913.
29. Estes, J. E., and T. R. Loveland. 1999. Characteristics, sources, and management of remotely-sensed data. In Geographical Information Systems: Principles, Techniques, Applications, and Management, 2nd ed., ed. P. Longley, M. Goodchild, D. J. Maguire, and D. W. Rhind, 667. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
30. Foody, G. M. 1996. Approaches for the production and evaluation of fuzzy land cover classification from remotely-sensed data. Int J Remote Sens 17: 1317.
31. Foody, G. M. 2002. Status of land cover classification accuracy assessment. Remote Sens Environ 80: 185.
32. Foody, G. M. 2004. Thematic map comparison: evaluating the statistical significance of differences in classification accuracy. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 70: 627.
33. Franklin, S. E., D. R. Connery, and J. A. Williams. 1994. Classification of alpine vegetation using Landsat Thematic Mapper, SPOT HRV and DEM data. Can J Remote Sens 20: 49.
34. Franklin, S. E. et al. 2002. Evidential reasoning with Landsat TM, DEM and GIS data for land cover classification in support of grizzly bear habitat mapping. Int J Remote Sens 23: 4633.
35. Franklin, S. E., and M. A. Wulder. 2002. Remote sensing methods in medium spatial resolution satellite data land cover classification of large areas. Prog Phys Geog 26: 173.
36. Gallego, F. J. 2004. Remote sensing and land cover area estimation. Int J Remote Sens 25: 3019.
37. Ghimire, B., J. Rogan, and J. Miller. 2010. Contextual land cover classification: incorporating spatial dependence in land cover classification models using random forests and the Getis statistic. Remote Sens Lett 1: 45.
38. Gilabert, M. A., C. Conese, and F. Maselli. 1994. An atmospheric correction method for the automatic retrieval of surface reflectance from TM images. Int J Remote Sens 15: 2065.
39. Goetz, S. J. et al. 2003. IKONOS imagery for resource management: tree cover, impervious surfaces, and riparian buffer analyses in the mid-Atlantic region. Remote Sens Environ 88: 195.
40. Gong, P. 1994. Integrated analysis of spatial data from multiple sources: An overview. Can J Remote Sens 20: 349.
41. Gong, P., and P. J. Howarth. 1992. Frequency-based contextual classification and gray-level vector reduction for land-use identification. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 58: 423.
42. Gu, D., and A. Gillespie. 1998. Topographic normalization of Landsat TM images of forest based on subpixel sun-canopy-sensor geometry. Remote Sens Environ 64: 166.
43. Guerschman, J. P. et al. 2003. Land cover classification in the Argentine Pampas using multitemporal Landsat TM data. Int J Remote Sens 24: 3381.
44. Hadjimitsis, D. G., C. R. I. Clayton, and V. S. Hope. 2004. An assessment of the effectiveness of atmospheric correction algorithms through the remote sensing of some reservoirs. Int J Remote Sens 25: 3651.
45. Hale, S. R., and B. N. Rock. 2003. Impacts of topographic normalization on land-cover classification accuracy. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 69: 785.
46. Haralick, R. M., K. Shanmugam, and I. Dinstein. 1973. Textural features for image classification. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern SMC-3: 610.
47. Harris, P. M., and S. J. Ventura. 1995. The integration of geographic data with remotely sensed imagery to improve classification in an urban area. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 61: 993.
48. Heo, J., and T. W. FitzHugh. 2000. A standardized radiometric normalization method for change detection using remotely sensed imagery. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 66: 173.
49. Herold, M., X. Liu, and K. C. Clarke. 2003. Spatial metrics and image texture for mapping urban land use. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 69: 991.
50. Hubert-Moy, L. et al. 2001. A comparison of parametric classification procedures of remotely sensed data applied on different landscape units. Remote Sens Environ 75: 174.
51. Hudson, W. D., and C. W. Ramm. 1987. Correct formulation of the Kappa coefficient of agreement. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 53: 421.
52. Hurtt, G. et al. 2003. IKONOS imagery for the large scale biosphere-atmosphere experiment in Amazonia (LBA). Remote Sens Environ 88: 111.
53. Irons, J. R. et al. 1985. The effects of spatial resolution on the classification of Thematic Mapper data. Int J Remote Sens 6: 1385-1403.
54. Janssen, L. F., M. N. Jaarsma, and E. T. M. van der Linden. 1990. Integrating topographic data with remote sensing for land-cover classification. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 56: 1503.
55. Janssen, L. F. J., and F. J. M. van der Wel. 1994. Accuracy assessment of satellite derived land-cover data: A review. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 60: 419.
56. Jensen, J. R. (2005). Introductory Digital Image Processing: A Remote Sensing Perspective. 3rd ed., 526. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
57. Kalkhan, M. A., R. M. Reich, and R. L. Czaplewski. 1997. Variance estimates and confidence intervals for the Kappa measure of classification accuracy. Can J Remote Sens 23: 210.
58. Kashyap, R. L., R. Chellappa, and A. Khotanzad. 1982. Texture classification using features derived from random field models. Pattern Recognit Lett 1: 43.
59. Kontoes, C. et al. 1993. An experimental system for the integration of GIS data in knowledge-based image analysis for remote sensing of agriculture. Int J Geogr Inf Syst 7: 247.
60. Lam, N. S. 2008. Methodologies for mapping land cover/land use and its change. In Advances in Land Remote Sensing: System, Modeling, Inversion and Application, ed. S. Liang, 341. New York: Springer.
61. Landgrebe, D. A. (2003). Signal Theory Methods in Multispectral Remote Sensing. 508. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
62. Lefsky, M. A., and W. B. Cohen. 2003. Selection of remotely sensed data. In Remote Sensing of Forest Environments: Concepts and Case Studies, ed. M. A. Wulder and S. E. Franklin, 13. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic.
63. Li, S., Z. Li, and J. Gong. 2010. Multivariate statistical analysis of measures for assessing the quality of image fusion. Int J Image Data Fusion 1: 47.
64. Lillesand, T. M., and R. W. Kiefer. (2000). Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation. 4th ed., 724. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
65. Liu, Q. J., T. Takamura, and N. Takeuchi. 2002. Mapping of boreal vegetation of a temperate mountain in China by multitemporal Landsat TM imagery. Int J Remote Sens 23: 3385.
66. Lobell, D. B. et al. 2002. View angle effects on canopy reflectance and spectral mixture analysis of coniferous forests using AVIRIS. Int J Remote Sens 23: 2247.
67. Lu, D. 2005. Aboveground biomass estimation using Landsat TM data in the Brazilian Amazon. Int J Remote Sens 26: 2509.
68. Lu, D., and Q. Weng. 2004. Spectral mixture analysis of the urban landscapes in Indianapolis with Landsat ETM+ imagery. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 70: 1053.
69. Lu, D., and Q. Weng. 2005. Urban classification using full spectral information of Landsat ETM+ imagery in Marion County, Indiana. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 71: 1275.
70. Lu, D., and Q. Weng. 2006. Use of impervious surface in urban land use classification. Remote Sens Environ 102: 146.
71. Lu, D., and Q. Weng. 2007. A survey of image classification methods and techniques for improving classification performance. Int J Remote Sens 28: 823.
72. Lu, D. et al. 2002. Assessment of atmospheric correction methods for Landsat TM data applicable to Amazon basin LBA research. Int J Remote Sens 23: 2651.
73. Lu, D. et al. 2004a. Comparison of land-cover classification methods in the Brazilian Amazon basin. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 70: 723.
74. Lu, D. et al. 2004b. Relationships between forest stand parameters and Landsat Thematic Mapper spectral responses in the Brazilian Amazon basin. For Ecol Manage 198: 149.
75. Lu, D. et al. 2008a. Pixel-based Minnaert correction method for reducing topographic effects on the Landsat 7 ETM+ image. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 74: 1343.
76. Lu, D. et al. 2008b. A comparative study of Landsat TM and SPOT HRG images for vegetation classification in the Brazilian Amazon. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 70: 311.
77. Lunetta, R. S., and M. E. Balogh. 1999. Application of multi-temporal Landsat 5 TM imagery for wetland identification. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 65: 1303.
78. Mallinis, G. et al. 2008. Object-based classification using QuickBird imagery for delineating forest vegetation polygons in a Mediterranean test site. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 63: 237.
79. Marceau, D. J. et al. 1990. Evaluation of the grey-level co-occurrence matrix method for land-cover classification using SPOT imagery. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 28: 513.
80. Markham, B. L., and J. L. Barker. 1987. Thematic Mapper bandpass solar exoatmospheric irradiances. Int J Remote Sens 8: 517.
81. Maselli, F. et al. 2000. Classification of Mediterranean vegetation by TM and ancillary data for the evaluation of fire risk. Int J Remote Sens 21: 3303.
82. Mather, P. M. (2004). Computer Processing of Remotely-Sensed Images: An Introduction. 3rd ed. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
83. Mausel, P. W., W. J. Kramber, and J. K. Lee. 1990. Optimum band selection for supervised classification of multispectral data. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 56: 55.
84. Mausel, P. W. et al. 1993. Spectral identification of succession stages following deforestation in the Amazon. Geocarto Int 8: 61.
85. McDonald, A. J., F. M. Gemmell, and P. E. Lewis. 1998. Investigation of the utility of spectral vegetation indices for determining information on coniferous forests. Remote Sens Environ 66: 250.
86. McGovern, E. A. et al. 2002. The radiometric normalization of multitemporal Thematic Mapper imagery of the midlands of Ireland: A case study. Int J Remote Sens 23: 751.
87. Mesev, V. 1998. The use of census data in urban image classification. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 64: 431.
88. Meyer, P. et al. 1993. Radiometric corrections of topographically induced effects on Landsat TM data in alpine environment. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 48: 17.
89. Moran, E. F. (1981). Developing the Amazon. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
90. Moran, E. F., and E. S. Brondízio. 1998. Land-use change after deforestation in Amazônia. In People and Pixels: Linking Remote Sensing and Social Science, ed. D. Liverman, E. F. Moran, R. R. Rindfuss and P. C. Stern, 94. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
91. Moran, E. F., E. S. Brondízio, and P. Mausel. 1994. Secondary succession. Res Explor 10: 458.
92. Moran, E. F. et al. 1994. Integrating Amazonian vegetation, land use, and satellite data. Bioscience 44: 329.
93. Murai, H., and S. Omatu. 1997. Remote sensing image analysis using a neural network and knowledge-based processing. Int J Remote Sens 18: 811.
94. Myint, S. W. 2001. A robust texture analysis and classification approach for urban land-use and landcover feature discrimination. Geocarto Int 16: 27.
95. Neville, R. A. et al. 2003. Spectral unmixing of hyperspectral imagery for mineral exploration: Comparison of results from SFSI and AVIRIS. Can J Remote Sens 29: 99.
96. Oetter, D. R. et al. 2000. Land cover mapping in an agricultural setting using multiseasonal Thematic Mapper data. Remote Sens Environ 76: 139.
97. Okin, G. S. et al. 2001. Practical limits on hyperspectral vegetation discrimination in arid and semiarid environments. Remote Sens Environ 77: 212.
98. Pal, M., and P. M. Mather. 2003. An assessment of the effectiveness of decision tree methods for land cover classification. Remote Sens Environ 86: 554.
99. Platt, R. V., and A. F. H. Goetz. 2004. A comparison of AVIRIS and Landsat for land use classification at the urban fringe. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 70: 813.
100. Pohl, C., and J. L. van Genderen. 1998. Multisensor image fusion in remote sensing: Concepts, methods, and applications. Int J Remote Sens 19: 823.
101. Price, K. P., X. Guo, and J. M. Stiles. 2002. Optimal Landsat TM band combinations and vegetation indices for discrimination of six grassland types in Eastern Kansas. Int J Remote Sens 23: 5031.
102. Rashed, T. et al. 2001. Revealing the anatomy of cities through spectral mixture analysis of multispectral satellite imagery: A case study of the Greater Cairo region, Egypt. Geocarto Int 16: 5.
103. Richards, J. A., and X. Jia. (1999). Remote Sensing Digital Image Analysis: An Introduction. 3rd ed., 363. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
104. Richter, R. 1997. Correction of atmospheric and topographic effects for high spatial resolution satellite imagery. Int J Remote Sens 18: 1099.
105. San Miguel-Ayanz, J., and G. S. Biging. 1997. Comparison of single-stage and multi-stage classification approaches for cover type mapping with TM and SPOT data. Remote Sens Environ 59: 92.
106. Senoo, T. et al. 1990. Improvement of forest type classification by SPOT HRV with 20 m mesh DTM. Int J Remote Sens 11: 1011.
107. Shaban, M. A., and O. Dikshit. 2001. Improvement of classification in urban areas by the use of textural features: The case study of Lucknow city, Uttar Pradesh. Int J Remote Sens 22: 565.
108. Smits, P. C., S. G. Dellepiane, and R. A. Schowengerdt. 1999. Quality assessment of image classification algorithms for land-cover mapping: A review and a proposal for a cost-based approach. Int J Remote Sens 20: 1461.
109. Solberg, A. H. S., T. Taxt, and A. K. Jain. 1996. A Markov random field model for classification of multisource satellite imagery. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 34: 100.
110. Song, C. et al. 2001. Classification and change detection using Landsat TM data: When and how to correct atmospheric effect. Remote Sens Environ 75: 230.
111. Stefan, S., and K. I. Itten. 1997. A physically-based model to correct atmospheric and illumination effects in optical satellite data of rugged terrain. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 35: 708.
112. Stefanov, W. L., M. S. Ramsey, and P. R. Christensen. 2001. Monitoring urban land cover change: An expert system approach to land cover classification of semiarid to arid urban centers. Remote Sens Environ 77: 173.
113. Stehman, S. V. 1996. Estimating the Kappa coefficient and its variance under stratified random sampling. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 62: 401.
114. Stehman, S. V., and R. L. Czaplewski. 1998. Design and analysis for thematic map accuracy assessment: Fundamental principles. Remote Sens Environ 64: 331.
115. Stow, D. et al. 2007. Object-based classification of residential land use within Accra, Ghana based on QuickBird satellite data. Int J Remote Sens 28: 5167.
116. Stuckens, J., P. R. Coppin, and M. E. Bauer. 2000. Integrating contextual information with per-pixel classification for improved land cover classification. Remote Sens Environ 71: 282.
117. Sugumaran, R., D. Zerr, and T. Prato. 2002. Improved urban land cover mapping using multitemporal IKONOS images for local government planning. Can J Remote Sens 28: 90.
118. Teillet, P. M., B. Guindon, and D. G. Goodenough. 1982. On the slope-aspect correction of multispectral scanner data. Can J Remote Sens 8: 84.
119. Thomas, N., C. Hendrix, and R. G. Congalton. 2003. A comparison of urban mapping methods using high-resolution digital imagery. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 69: 963.
120. Tokola, T., S. Löfman, and A. Erkkilä. 1999. Relative calibration of multitemporal Landsat data for forest cover change detection. Remote Sens Environ 68: 1.
121. Tso, B., and P. M. Mather. (2001). Classification Methods for Remotely Sensed Data. New York: Taylor & Francis.
122. Tucker, J. M., E. S. Brondízio, and E. F. Moran. 1998. Rates of forest regrowth in Eastern Amazônia: a comparison of Altamira and Bragantina regions, Pará State, Brazil. Interciencia 23: 64.
123. Ulfarsson, M. O., J. A. Benediktsson, and J. R. Sveinsson. 2003. Data fusion and feature extraction in the wavelet domain. Int J Remote Sens 24: 3933.
124. van der Sande, C. J., S. M. de Jong, and A. P. J. de Roo. 2003. A segmentation and classification approach of IKONOS-2 imagery for land cover mapping to assist flood risk and flood damage assessment. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf 4: 217.
125. Vermote, E. et al. 1997. Second simulation of the satellite signal in the solar spectrum, 6S: An overview. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 35: 675.
126. Wang, L. et al. 2004. Comparison of IKONOS and QuickBird images for mapping mangrove species on the Caribbean coast of panama. Remote Sens Environ 91: 432.
127. Williams, J. (2001). GIS Processing of Geocoded Satellite Data. 327. Chichester, UK: Springer and Praxis Publishing.
128. Wolter, P. T. et al. 1995. Improved forest classification in the northern lake states using multi-temporal Landsat imagery. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 61: 1129.
129. Xu, B. et al. 2003. Comparison of gray-level reduction and different texture spectrum encoding methods for land-use classification using a panchromatic IKONOS image. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 69: 529.
130. Zhang, J. 2010. Multisource remote sensing data fusion: Status and trends. Int J Image Data Fusion 1: 5.
131. Zhang, Q., and J. Wang. 2003. A rule-based urban land use inferring method for fine-resolution multispectral imagery. Can J Remote Sens 29: 1.
132. Zhang, Q. et al. 2002. Urban built-up land change detection with road density and spectral information from multitemporal Landsat TM data. Int J Remote Sens 23: 3057.
133. Zhou, W., A. Troy, and J. M. Grove. 2008. Object-based land cover classification and change analysis in the Baltimore metropolitan area using multi-temporal high resolution remote sensing data. Sensors 8: 1613.