Object-based land cover classification and change analysis in the baltimore metropolitan area using multitemporal high resolution remote sensing data

Sensors

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 1613-1636

  Zhou, Weiqi ^a   Troy, Austin ^a   Grove, Morgan ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT   (United States)

^b USDA FOREST SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

Baltimore; High spatial resolution image; LTER; Object based image analysis; Post classification change detection; Urban landscape

Indexed keywords

AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY; DECISION MAKING; IMAGE RESOLUTION; PIXELS; URBAN PLANNING; WATERSHEDS;

BALTIMORE; CHANGE DETECTION; HIGH SPATIAL RESOLUTION IMAGES; LTER; OBJECT BASED IMAGE ANALYSIS; URBAN LANDSCAPE;

REMOTE SENSING;

EID: 41549145410     PISSN: 14243210     EISSN: 14248220     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/s8031613     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Singh, A. Digital change detection techniques using remotely-sensed data. International Journal of Remote Sensing 1989, 10, 989-1003.
2. Lu, D.; Mausel, P.; Brondizio, E.; Moran. E. Change detection techniques. International Journal of Remote Sensing 2004, 25(12), 2365-2407.
3. Rogan, J.; Chen. D.M. Remote sensing technology for mapping and monitoring land-cover and land-use change. Progress in Planning 2004, 61(4), 301-325.
4. Yuan, D.; Elvidge, C. D.; Lunetta, R. S. Survey of multispectral methods for land cover change analysis. In Remote Sensing Change Detection: Environmental Monitoring Methods and Applications, edited by R. S. Lunetta; C. D. Elvidge, Ed.; Ann Arbor Press: Chelsea, MI, 1998; pp. 21-39.
5. Ridd, M. K.; Liu, J. A comparison of four algorithms for change detection in an urban environment. Remote Sensing of Environment 1998, 63, 95-100.
6. Prakash, A.; Gupta, R. P. Land-use mapping and change detection in a coal mining area-a case study in the Jharia coalfield, India. International Journal of Remote Sensing 1998, 19, 391-410.
7. Howarth, P. J.; Boasson, E. Landsat digital enhancements for change detection in urban environments. Remote Sensing of Environment 1983, 13, 149-160.
8. Gong, P. Change detection using principal component analysis and fuzzy set theory. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing 1993, 19, 22-29.
9. Chen, J.; Gong, P.; He, C.; Pu, R.; Shi, P. Land-use/land-cover change detection using improved change-vector analysis. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 2003, 69, 369-80.
10. Johnson, R. D.; Kasischke, E. S. Change vector analysis: a technique for the multitemporal monitoring of land cover and condition. International Journal of Remote Sensing 1998, 19, 411-426.
11. Dai, X. L.; Khorram, S. Remotely sensed change detection based on artificial neural networks. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 1999, 65, 1187-1194.
12. Rogan, J.; J. Miller; D.A. Stow; J. Franklin; L. Levien; C. Fischer. Land-Cover Change Monitoring with Classification Trees Using Landsat TM and Ancillary Data. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 2003, 69(1), 793-804.
13. Jensen, J. R. Introductory digital image processing: A remote sensing perspective; Prentice-Hall: New Jersey, 2004; pp526.
14. Mas, J. F. Monitoring land-cover changes: a comparison of change detection techniques. International Journal of Remote Sensing 1999, 20, 139-152.
15. Yuan, F.; Sawaya, K. E.; Loeffelholz, B.; Bauer, M. E. Land cover classification and change analysis of the Twin Cities (Minnesota) metropolitan area by multitemporal Landsat remote sensing. Remote Sensing of Environment 2005, 95(2), 317-328.
16. Yang, X. Satellite monitoring of urban spatial growth in the Atlanta metropolitan area. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 2002, 68(1), 725-734.
17. Im, J.; J. R. Jensen; J. A. Tullis. Object-based change detection using correlation image analysis and image segmentation. International Journal of Remote Sensing 2008, 29(2), 399 - 423.
18. Shackelford, A. K.; Davis, C. H. A combined fuzzy pixel-based and object-based approach for classification of high-resolution multispectral data over urban areas. Geoscience and Remote Sensing, IEEE Transactions 2003, 47(10), 2354 - 2363.
19. Zhou, W.; Troy, A. An Object-oriented Approach for Analyzing and Characterizing Urban Landscape at the Parcel Level. International Journal of Remote Sensing. In press.
20. Civco, D.; Hurd, J.; Wilson, E.; Song, M.; Zhang, Z. A comparison of land use and land cover change detection methods. ASPRS-ACSM Annual Conference; 2002.
21. Laliberte, A. S.; Rango, A.; Havstad, K. M.; Paris, J. F.; Beck, R. F.; Mcneely, R.; Gonzalez, A. L. Object-oriented image analysis for mapping shrub encroachment from 1937 to 2003 in southern New Mexico. Remote Sensing of Environment 2004, 93, 198-210.
22. Niemeyer, I.; Nussbaum, S.; Canty, M. J. Automation of change detection procedures for nuclear safeguards-related monitoring purposes. In IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, Seoul, Korea, 27 July, 2003, DVD-ROM.
23. Walter, V. Object-based classification of remote sensing data for change detection. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry & Remote Sensing 2004, 58, 225- 238.
24. Blaschke, T. A framework for change detection based on image objects, In Go'ttinger Geographische Abhandlungen, S. Erasmi; B. Cyffka; M. Kappas, Eds; 2005; pp. 1-9. Available online at http://www.definiens.com/binary_secure/ 213_140.pdf?binary_id=213&log_id=10463&session_id= 63e0a3f4d2bb30984e35e709eb54e658 (accessed 21 December 2007).
25. Frauman, E.; Wolff, E. Change detection in urban areas using very high spatial resolution satellite images-case study in Brussels: locating main changes in order to update the Urban Information System (UrbIS) database. Remote Sensing for Environmental Monitoring, GIS Applications, and Geology V. E., Manfred; M. Ulrich, Eds. Proceedings of the SPIE. 2005, 5983, 76-87.
26. Cadenasso, M. L.; Pickett, S.T.A; Schwarz, K. Spatial heterogeneity in urban ecosystems: reconceptualizing land cover and a framework for classification. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 2001, 5(2), 80-88.
27. Baatz, M.; Schape, A. Multiresolution segmentation: An optimization approach for high quality multi-scale image segmentation. In Angewandte Geographischelnformationsverabeitung. XII; T. Strobl; T. Blaschke; G.Griesebner, Eds; Beitragezum AGIT -Symp. Salzburg, Karlsruhe, 2000; pp12-23.
28. Definiens. Defineins Developer. 2007, Software: http://www.definiens.com/ .
29. Benz, U. C.; Hofmann, P.; Willhauck, G.; Lingenfelder, I.; Heynen, M. Multi-resolution, object-oriented fuzzy analysis of remote sensing data for GIS-ready information. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry & Remote Sensing 2004, 55, 239-258.
30. Congalton, R. G. A Review of Assessing the Accuracy of Classifications of Remotely Sensed Data. Remote Sensing of Environment 1991, 37, 35-46.
31. Goodchild, M.F.; Biging, G. S.; Congalton, R. G.; Langley, P. G.; Chrisman N. R.; F. W. Davis. Final Report of the Accuracy Assessment Task Force. California Assembly Bill AB1580, Santa Barbara: University of California, National Center for Geographic Information and Analysis (NCGIA). 1994.
32. Foody, G. M. Status of land cover classification accuracy assessment. Remote Sensing of Environment 2002, 80, 185-201.
33. Lunetta, R.; C. Elvidge. Remote Sensing Change Detection. Taylor & Francis, 1999; pp320.
34. Murakami H.; Nakagawa K.; Hasegawa H.; Shibata T.; Iwanami E. Change detection of buildings using an airborne laser scanner. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 1999, 54 (2), 148-152.
35. Stow, D. A. Reducing the effects of misregistration on pixel-level change detection. International Journal of Remote Sensing 1999, 20(12), 2477-2483.
36. Fuller, R. M.; Smith, G. M.; Devereux, B. J. The characterization and measurement of land cover change through remote sensing: Problems in operational applications. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 2003, 4, 243-253.
37. Zhou, W.; A. Troy. In review. Development of an object-oriented framework for classifying and inventorying human-dominated forest ecosystems. International Journal of Remote Sensing.
38. Chen, D.; Stow, D. A.; Gong, P. Examining the effect of spatial resolution and texture window size on classification accuracy: an urban environment case. International Journal of Remote Sensing 2004, 25(11), 2177-2192.
39. Thomas, N.; C. Hendrix; Congalton, R.G. A comparison of urban mapping methodsusing high resolution digital imagery. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 2003, 69, 963-972.
40. Cushnie, J. L. The interactive effects of spatial resolution and degree of internal variability within land-cover type on classification accuracies. International Journal of Remote Sensing 1987, 8, 15-22.
41. Congalton, R. G.; K. Green. Assessing the Accuracy of Remotely Sensed Data: Principles and Practices. CRC/Lewis Press: Boca Raton, FL, 1999; pp168.
42. Townshend, J. R. G.; Justice, C. O.; Gurney, C.; McManus, J. The impact of misregistration on change detection. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 1992, 30, 1054-1060.
43. Justice, C. O.; Markham, B. L.; Townshend, J. R. G.; Kennard, R. L. Spatial degradation of satellite data. International Journal of Remote Sensing 1989, 10, 1539-1561.