A comparison of AVIRIS and landsat for land use classification at the urban fringe

Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing

Volumn 70, Issue 7, 2004, Pages 813-819

  Platt, Rutherford V ^a,b   Goetz, Alexander F H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^b GETTYSBURG COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA REDUCTION; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE SENSORS; LAND USE; PHOTOGRAMMETRY; SIGNAL TO NOISE RATIO; URBAN PLANNING;

LAND USE CLASSIFICATION; LANDSATS; SPECTRAL BANDS;

REMOTE SENSING;

AVIRIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; LAND CLASSIFICATION; LAND USE; LANDSAT THEMATIC MAPPER; MAPPING METHOD; URBAN AREA;

EID: 4143144226     PISSN: 00991112     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14358/PERS.70.7.813     Document Type: Review

References (23)

1. Anderson, J.R., E. Hardy, J. Roach, and R. Witmer, 1976. A Land Use and Land Cover Classification System for Use with Remote Sensor Data, U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 964.
2. Ben-Dor, E., N. Levin, H. Saaroni, 2001. A spectral based recognition of the urban environment using the visible and near-infrared spectral region (0.4-1.1 mu/m). A case study over Tel-Aviv, Israel, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 22(11):2193-2218.
3. Chabrillat, S., A.F.H. Goetz, L. Krosley, and H.W. Olson, 2002. Use of hyperspectral images in the identification and mapping of expansive clay soils and the role of spatial resolution, Remote Sensing of Environment, 82:431-445.
4. Congalton, R.G., and K. Green, 1998. Assessing the Accuracy of Remotely Sensed Data: Principles and Practices, Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, Florida, pp. 50-51.
5. Cushnie, J.L., 1987. The Interactive Effect of Spatial Resolution and Degree of Internal Variability within Land-Cover Types on Classification Accuracies, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 8(1):15-29.
6. Di Gregorio, A., and L.J.M., Jansen, 2000. Land Cover Classification System (LCCS) Classification Concepts and User Manual, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.
7. Forster, B.C., 1985. An examination of some problems and solutions in monitoring urban areas from satellite platforms, International Journal of Remote Sensing 6(1):139-151.
8. Gamba, P., and B. Houshmand, 2001. Integration of hyperspectral and IFSAR data for improved 3D urban profile reconstruction, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 67:947-956.
9. Gao, J., and D. Skillcorn, 1998. Capability of SPOT XS Data in Producing Detailed Land Cover Maps at the Urban-Rural Periphery, International Journal of Remote Sensing 19(15):2877-2891.
10. Gastellu-Etchegorry, J.P., 1990. An Assessment of SPOT XS and Landsat MSS Data for Digital Classification of Near-Urban Land Cover, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 11(2):225-235.
11. Green, A.A., M. Berman, P. Switzer, and M.D. Craig, 1988. A transformation for ordering multispectral data in terms of image quality with implications for noise removal, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 26(1):65-74.
12. Green, R.O., M.L. Eastwood, C.M. Sartare, T.G. Chrien, M. Aronsson, B.J. Chippendale, J.A. Faust, B.E. Pavri, C.J. Chovit, M.S. Soils, M.R. Olah, and O. Williams, 1998. Imaging spectroscopy and the Airborne Visible Infrared Imaging Spectrometer (AVIRIS), Remote Sensing of Environment, 65:227-248.
13. Hepner, G.F., B. Houshmand, I. Kulikov, and N. Bryant, 1998. Investigation of the integration of AVIRIS and IFSAR for urban analysis, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 64:813-820.
14. Qu, Z., Goetz, A.F.H, Heidebrecht, K.B., 2000. High-Accuracy Atmosphere Correction for Hyperspectral Data (HATCH), Proceedings of the Airborne Visible/Infrared Imaging Spectrometer (AVIRIS) 2000 Workshop. Jet Propulsion Laboratories Publication 00-18.
15. Qu, Z., B.C. Kindel, and A.F.H. Goetz, 2002. The High-Accuracy Atmospheric Correction for Hyperspectral Data (HATCH) Model, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, in press.
16. Richards, J.A., 1999. Remote Sensing Digital Image Analysis, Springer Verlag, New York.
17. Ridd, M.K., 1995. Exploring a V-I-S (Vegetation-Impervious Surface-Soil) Model for Urban Ecosystem Analysis through Remote Sensing: Comparative Anatomy for Cities, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 16(12):2165-2185.
18. Ridd, M.K., N.D. Ritter, N.A. Bryant, and R.O. Green, 1992. AVIRIS data and neural networks applied to an urban ecosystem, 3rd Annual JPL Airborne Geoscience Workshop, Pasadena, California.
19. Roessner, S., K. Segl, U. Heiden, and H. Kaufmann, 2001. Automated differentiation of urban surfaces based on airborne hyperspectral imagery, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 39:1525-1532.
20. Rogan, J., J. Franklin, and D.A. Roberts, 2002. A comparison of methods for monitoring multitemporal vegetation change using Thematic Mapper imagery, Remote Sensing of Environment, 80:143-156.
21. Salu, Y., 1995. Sub pixel localization of highways in AVIRIS images, 5th Annual JPL Airborne Geoscience Workshop, Pasadena, CA.
22. Smailbegovic, A., J.V. Taranik, and F. Kruse, 2000. Importance of Spatial and Radiometric Resolution of AVIRIS Data for Recognition of Mineral Endmembers in the Geiger Grade Area, Nevada, U.S.A., Proceedings of the Airborne Visible/Infrared Imaging Spectrometer (AVIRIS) 2000 Workshop, Jet Propulsion Laboratories Publication 00-18.
23. Vogelmann, J.E., T. Sohl, and S.M. Howard, 1998. Regional characterization of land cover using multiple sources of data, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 64:45-57.