Strategies for Integrating Information from Multiple Spatial Resolutions into Land-Use/Land-Cover Classification Routines

Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing

Volumn 69, Issue 11, 2003, Pages 1279-1287

  Chen, DongMei ^a   Stow, Douglas ^b  

^a QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; IMAGE ANALYSIS; LAND USE;

SPECTRAL RESOLUTION IMAGES;

REMOTE SENSING;

ALGORITHM; DATA ASSIMILATION; IMAGE CLASSIFICATION; LAND COVER; LAND USE; REMOTE SENSING; SPATIAL RESOLUTION;

EID: 0242583689     PISSN: 00991112     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14358/PERS.69.11.1279     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Atkinson, P.M., and P.J. Curran, 1997. Choosing an appropriate spatial resolution for remote sensing investigations, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 63(12):1345-1351.
2. Barnsley, M.J., and S.L. Barr, 1996. Inferring urban land use from satellite sensor images using kernel-based spatial reclassification, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 62(8):949-958.
3. Chen, D., D. Stow, and A. Getis, 2002. Multi-resolution classification framework for improving land use/cover mapping, Linking People, Place, and Policy: A GIScience Approach (S. Walsh and K.A. Crews-Meyer, editors), Kluwer Academic Publisher, Boston, Massachusetts, pp. 235-262.
4. Chen, D., and D. Stow, 2002. The effect of training strategies on supervised classification at different spatial resolutions, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 68(11):1155-1161.
5. Cihlar, J., 2000. Land cover mapping of large areas from satellites: Status and research priorities, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 21(6):1097-1114.
6. Civco, D.L., 1993. Artificial neural networks for land-cover classification and mapping, International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 7(2):173-186.
7. Cohen, J., 1960. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1):37-46.
8. Conners, R.W., M.M. Trivedi, and C.A. Harlow, 1984. Segmentation of a high-resolution urban scene using texture operators, Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing, 25:273-310.
9. Couloigner, I., and T. Ranchin, 2000. Mapping of urban areas: A multiresolution modeling approach for semi-automatic extraction of streets, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 66(7):867-875.
10. De Cola, L., 1994. Simulating and mapping spatial complexity using multi-scale techniques, International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 8(5):411-427.
11. _, 1997. Multiresolution covariation among Landsat and AVHRR vegetation indices, Scale in Remote Semsing and GIS (D.A. Quattrochi, and M.F. Goodchild, editors), Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, Florida, pp. 73-93.
12. Foody, G.M., 1996. Approaches for the production and evaluation of fuzzy land cover classification from remotely sensed data, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 17:1317-1340.
13. Friedl, M.A., F.W. Davis, J. Michaelsen, and M.A. Moritz, 1995. Scaling and uncertainty in the relationship between NDVI and land surface biophysical variables: An analysis using a scene simulation model and data from FIFE, Remote Sensing of Environment, 54:233-246.
14. Gong, P., and P.J. Howarth, 1990. An assessment of some factors influencing multispectral land-cover classification, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 56(5):597-603.
15. _, 1992. Frequency-based contextual classification and gray-level vector reduction for land-use identification, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 58(4):423-437.
16. Hlavka, C.A., and G.P. Livingston, 1997. Statistical models of fragmented land cover and the effects of coarse spatial resolution on the estimation of area with satellite sensor imagery, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 18(10):2253-2259.
17. Irons, J.R., B.L. Markham, R.F. Nelson, D.L. Toll, D.L. Williams, S. Latty, and M.L. Staufer, 1985. The effects of spatial resolution on the classification of TM data, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 6(8):1385-1403.
18. Jensen, J.R., 1996. Introductory Digital Image Processing: A Remote Sensing Perspective, Prentice Hall Series in Geographic Information Science, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, 316 p.
19. Johnson, D.D., and P.J. Howarth, 1987. The effects of spatial resolution on land cover/use theme extraction from airborne digital data, Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 13(2):68-74.
20. Kontoes, C.C., and D. Rokos, 1996. The integration of spatial context information in an experimental knowledge-based system and the supervised relaxation algorithms - two successful approaches to improving SPOT-XS classification, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 17(16):3093-3106.
21. Latty, R.S., R.F. Nelson, B.L. Markham, D.L. Williams, D.L. Toll, and J.R. Irons, 1985. Performance comparisons between information extraction techniques using variable spatial resolution data, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 51(9):1159-1170.
22. Li, J., R.M. Gray, and R.A. Olshen, 2000. Multiresolution image classification by hierarchical modeling with two-dimensional hidden Markov models, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 46(5):1826-1841.
23. Marceau, D.J., P.J. Howarth, and D.J. Gratton, 1994a. Remote sensing and the measurement of geographical entities in a forest environment 1: The scale and spatial aggregation problem, Remote Sensing of Environment, 49:93-104.
24. _, 1994b. Remote sensing and the measurement of geographical entities in a forest environment 2: The optimal spatial resolution, Remote Sensing of Environment, 49:105-117.
25. Martin, L.R.G., P.J. Howarth, and G. Holder, 1988. Multispectral classification of land use at the rural-urban fringe using SPOT data, Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 14(2):72-79.
26. Richards, J.A., and X. Jia, 1999. Remote Sensing Digital Image Analysis: An Introduction, Springer-Verlag, New York, N.Y., 384 p.
27. Strahler, A.H., C.E. Woodcock, and J.A. Smith, 1986. On the nature of models in remote sensing, Remote Sensing of Environment, 20:121-139.
28. Toll, D.L., 1985. Effects of Landsat TM sensor parameters on land cover classification, Remote Sensing of Environment, 17(2):129-140.
29. Wang, F., 1990. Improving remote sensing image analysis through fuzzy information representation, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 56(8):1163-1169.
30. Woodcock, C.E., and A.H. Strahler, 1987. The factor of scale in remote sensing, Remote Sensing of Environment, 21:311-332.
31. Woodcock, C.E., and V.J. Harward, 1992. Nested-hierarchical scene models and image segmentation, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 13(16):3167-3187.