Towards a European consensus for reporting incidental findings during clinical NGS testing

European Journal of Human Genetics

Volumn 23, Issue 12, 2015, Pages 1601-1606

  Hehir Kwa, Jayne Y ^a,b   Claustres, Mireille ^c   Hastings, Ros J ^d   Van Ravenswaaij Arts, Conny ^e   Christenhusz, Gabrielle ^f   Genuardi, Maurizio ^g   Melegh, Béla ^h   Cambon Thomsen, Anne ⁱ   Patsalis, Philippos ^j   Vermeesch, Joris ^k   Cornel, Martina C ^l   Searle, Beverly ^m   Palotie, Aarno ⁿ   Capoluongo, Ettore ^o   Peterlin, Borut ^p   Estivill, Xavier ^q,r,s   Robinson, Peter N ^t,u  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b Donders Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging   (Netherlands)

^c UNIV MONTPELLIER   (France)

^d JOHN RADCLIFFE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^e UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^f UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^g CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

^h UNIVERSITY OF PÉCS   (Hungary)

ⁱ Faculté de Médecine Centre Hospitalo universitaire   (France)

^j CYPRUS INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGY AND GENETICS   (Cyprus)

^k UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^l VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^m Unique (Rare Chromosome Disorder Support Group)   (United Kingdom)

ⁿ UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^o CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

^p UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTRE LJUBLJANA   (Slovenia)

^q CENTRE FOR GENOMIC REGULATION CRG   (Spain)

^r UNIVERSITAT POMPEU FABRA   (Spain)

^s INSTITUT UNIVERSITARI DEXEUS   (Spain)

^t CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

^u FREIE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL LABORATORY; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONSENSUS; EUROPE; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC COUNSELING; HUMAN; INCIDENTAL FINDING; INFORMED CONSENT; MEDICAL INFORMATION; NEXT GENERATION SEQUENCING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; CONSENSUS DEVELOPMENT; DNA SEQUENCE; EUROPEAN UNION; HIGH THROUGHPUT SEQUENCING; PROCEDURES; STANDARDS;

CONSENSUS DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCES AS TOPIC; EUROPEAN UNION; HIGH-THROUGHPUT NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCING; INCIDENTAL FINDINGS; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA;

EID: 84948711756     PISSN: 10184813     EISSN: 14765438     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2015.111     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (35)

1. de Ligt J, Willemsen MH, van Bon BW, et al. Diagnostic exome sequencing in persons with severe intellectual disability. N Engl J Medicine 2012; 367: 1921-1929
2. Rauch A, Wieczorek D, Graf E, et al. Range of genetic mutations associated with severe non-syndromic sporadic intellectual disability: an exome sequencing study. Lancet 2012; 380: 1674-1682
3. Yang Y, MuznyDM, ReidJGet al. Clinical whole-exome sequencing for the diagnosis of mendelian disorders. The N Engl J Medicine 2013; 369: 1502-1511
4. Zemojtel T, Kohler S, Mackenroth L, et al. Effective diagnosis of genetic disease by computational phenotype analysis of the disease-Associated genome. Sci Tansl Med 2014; 6: 252ra123
5. McGuire AL, Joffe S, Koenig BA, et al. Point-counterpoint. Ethics and genomic incidental findings. Science (New York, NY) 2013; 340: 1047-1048
6. vanEl CG, Dondorp WJ. de Wert GM, Cornel MC. call for prudence in whole-genome testing. Science (New York, NY) 2013; 341: 958-959
7. Wolf SM, Annas GJ, Elias S. Point-counterpoint. Patient autonomy and incidental findings in clinical genomics. Science (New York, NY) 2013; 340: 1049-1050
8. Burke W, Matheny Antommaria AH, Bennett R, et al. Recommendations for returning genomic incidental findings? We need to talk! Genet Med 2013; 15: 854-859
9. Berg JS, Amendola LM, Eng C, et al. Processes and preliminary outputs for identification of actionable genes as incidental findings in genomic sequence data in the Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research Consortium. Genet Med 2013; 15: 860-867
10. Anderson JA, Hayeems R, Shuman C, et al. Predictive Genetic Testing for Adult-Onset Disorders in Minors: A Critical Analysis of the Arguments For and Against the 2013 ACMG guidelines. Clin Genet 2014; 87: 301-310
11. Cambon-Thomsen A. [Actors and tools of predictive genetics: ethics at the heart of governance] Acteurs et outils de la prédiction génétique: léthique au coeur de la gouvernance. Journal international de bioéthique et déthique des sciences 2014; 25: 165-174
12. Rehm HL, Bale SJ, Bayrak-Toydemir P, et al. ACMG clinical laboratory standards for next-generation sequencing. Genet Med 2013; 15: 733-747
13. Wallis Y, Payne S, McAnulty C, et al Practice Guidelines for the Evaluation of Pathogenicity and the Reporting of Sequence Variants in Clinical Molecular Genetics 2013
14. MacArthur DG, Manolio TA, Dimmock DP, et al. Guidelines for investigating causality of sequence variants in human disease. Nature 2014; 508: 469-476
15. Allyse M, Michie M. Not-so-incidental findings: the ACMG recommendations on the reporting of incidental findings in clinical whole genome and whole exome sequencing. Trends Biotechnol 2013; 31: 439-441
16. Anastasova V, Blasimme A, Julia S, Cambon-Thomsen A. Genomic incidental findings: reducing the burden to be fair. The Am Journal of bioeth 2013; 13: 52-54
17. Dorschner MO, Amendola LM, Turner EH, et al. Actionable, pathogenic incidental findings in 1, 000 participants' exomes. Am J Hum Genet 2013; 93: 631-640
18. Lawrence L, Sincan M, Markello T, et al. The implications of familial incidental findings from exome sequencing: the NIH Undiagnosed Diseases Program experience. Genet Med 2014; 16: 741-750
19. Anastasova V, Mahalatchimy A, Rial-Sebbag E, et al. Communication of results and disclosure of incidental findings in longitudinal paediatric research. Pediatr allergy and immunology: official publication of the European Society of Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2013; 24: 389-394
20. Plon SE, Eccles DM, Easton D, et al. Sequence variant classification and reporting: recommendations for improving the interpretation of cancer susceptibility genetic test results. Human Mutation 2008; 29: 1282-1291
21. Thompson BA, Spurdle AB, Plazzer JP, et al. Application of a 5-Tiered scheme for standardized classification of 2, 360 unique mismatch repair gene variants in the InSiGHT locus-specific database. Nat Genet 2014; 46: 107-115
22. Wallis Y, Payne S, McAnulty C, et al. Practice Guidelines for the Evaluation of Pathogenicity and the Reporting of Sequence Variants in Clinical Molecular Genetics. UK Clinical Molecular Genetics Society (ACGS) & Dutch Society of Clinical Genetic Laboratory Specialists (VKGL) 2013
23. Claustres M, Kozich V, Dequeker E, et al. Recommendations for reporting results of diagnostic genetic testing (biochemical, cytogenetic and molecular genetic). Eur J Hum Genet 2013; 22: 160-170
24. van El CG, Cornel MC, Borry P, et al. Whole-genome sequencing in health care: recommendations of the European Society of Human Genetics. Eur J Hum Genet 2013; 21: 580-584
25. American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics: Incidental findings in clinical genomics: a clarification Genet Med 2013 15 664-666
26. Gout AM, Ravine D. AGV Consortium Analysis of published PKD1 gene sequence variants. Nat Genet 2007; 39: 427-428
27. Bell CJ, Dinwiddie DL, Miller NA, et al. Carrier testing for severe childhood recessive diseases by next-generation sequencing. Sci Transl Med 2011; 3: 65ra64
28. Robinson JG. Management of familial hypercholesterolemia: a review of the recommendations from the National Lipid Association Expert Panel on Familial Hypercholesterolemia. J Manag Care Pharm 2013; 19: 139-149
29. Middleton A, Parker M, Wright CF, Bragin E, Hurles ME. Empirical research on the ethics of genomic research. Am J Med Genet A 2013; 161A: 2099-2101
30. Adzhubei IA, Schmidt S, Peshkin L, et al. A method and server for predicting damaging missense mutations. Nat Methods 2010; 7: 248-249
31. Schwarz JM, Cooper DN, Schuelke M, Seelow D. MutationTaster2: mutation prediction for the deep-sequencing age. Nat Methods 2014; 11: 361-362
32. Capps B, Chadwick R, Chalmers DRC Imagined futures: capturing the benefits of genome sequencing for society 2013
33. O'Rawe J, Jiang T, Sun G, et al. Low concordance of multiple variant-calling pipelines: practical implications for exome and genome sequencing. Genome Med 2013; 5: 28
34. Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, et al. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 2009; 25: 2078-2079
35. Biesecker Leslie G. Incidental Variants Are Critical for Genomics. Am J Hum Genet 2013; 92: 648-651