The attention habit: How reward learning shapes attentional selection

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Volumn 1369, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 24-39

  Anderson, Brian A ^a  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Attentional capture; Basal ganglia; Incentive salience; Reinforcement; Reward learning; Selective attention

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; ATTENTIONAL BIAS; AWARENESS; BRAIN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INFORMATION PROCESSING BIAS; LEARNING; MOTIVATION; NERVE POTENTIAL; PARIETAL CORTEX; REWARD; SELECTION BIAS; SENSORY SYSTEM; SUPERIOR COLLICULUS; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL STIMULATION; HUMAN; PHYSIOLOGY;

ATTENTION; BRAIN; HUMANS; LEARNING; REWARD;

EID: 84947998602     PISSN: 00778923     EISSN: 17496632     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/nyas.12957     Document Type: Article

References (147)

1. Posner, M.I. 1980. Orienting of attention. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 32: 3-25.
2. Wolfe, J.M., K.R. Cave & S.L. Franzel . 1989. Guided search: an alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 15: 419-433.
3. Egeth, H.E. & S. Yantis . 1997. Visual attention: control, representation, and time course. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 48: 269-297.
4. Yantis, S. & J. Jonides . 1984. Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: evidence from visual search. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 10: 350-374.
5. Yantis, S. & J.C. Johnston . 1990. On the locus of visual selection: evidence from focused attention tasks. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 16: 135-149.
6. Folk, C.L., R.W. Remington & J.C. Johnston . 1992. Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 18: 1030-1044.
7. Theeuwes, J. 1992. Perceptual selectivity for color and form. Percept. Psychophys. 51: 599-606.
8. Desimone, R. & J. Duncan . 1995. Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 18: 193-222.
9. Corbetta, M. & G.L. Shulman . 2002. Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 3: 201-215.
10. Itti, L. & C. Koch . 2001. Computational modelling of visual attention. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2: 194-203.
11. Wolfe, J.M. 1994. Guided search 2.0: a revised model of visual search. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 1: 202-238.
12. Connor, C.E., H.E. Egeth & S. Yantis . 2004. Visual attention: bottom-up vs. top-down. Curr. Biol. 14: 850-852.
13. Awh, E., A.V. Belopolsky & J. Theeuwes . 2012. Top-down versus bottom-up attentional control: a failed theoretical dichotomy. Trends Cogn. Sci. 16: 437-443.
14. Bacon, W.F. & H.E. Egeth . 1994. Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capture. Percept. Psychophys. 55: 485-496.
15. Eimer, M. & M. Kiss . 2008. Involuntary attentional capture is determined by task set: evidence from event-related brain potentials. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 20: 1423-1433.
16. Leber, A.B. & H.E. Egeth . 2006. It's under control: top-down search strategies can override attentional capture. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 13: 132-138.
17. Theeuwes, J. 2010. Top-down and bottom-up control of visual selection. Acta Psychol. 135: 77-99.
18. Theeuwes, J. 2013. Feature-based attention: it is all bottom-up priming. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 368: 20130055.
19. Kiss, M., J. Driver & M. Eimer . 2009. Reward priority of visual target singletons modulates event-related potential signatures of attentional selection. Psychol. Sci. 20: 245-251.
20. Engelmann, J.B. & L. Pessoa . 2007. Motivation sharpens exogenous spatial attention. Emotion 7: 668-674.
21. Pessoa, L. & J.B. Engelmann . 2010. Embedding reward signals into perception and cognition. Front. Neurosci. 4: 17.
22. Kristjansson, A., O. Sigurjonsdottir & J. Driver . 2010. Fortune and reversals of fortune in visual search: reward contingencies for pop-out targets affect search efficiency and target repetition effects. Attent. Percept. Psychophys. 72: 1229-1236.
23. Navalpakkam, V., C. Koch & P. Perona . 2009. Homo economicus in visual search. J. Vis. 9: 31.
24. Navalpakkam, V., C. Koch, A. Rangel, et al. 2010. Optimal reward harvesting in complex perceptual environments. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107: 5232-5237.
25. Krebs, R.M., C.N. Boehler, K.C. Roberts, et al. 2012. The involvement of the dopaminergic midbrain and cortico-striatal-thalamic circuits in the integration of reward prospect and attentional task demands. Cereb. Cortex 22: 607-615.
26. Della Libera, C. & L. Chelazzi . 2006. Visual selective attention and the effects of monetary reward. Psychol. Sci. 17: 222-227.
27. Hickey, C., L. Chelazzi & J. Theeuwes . 2010. Reward changes salience in human vision via the anterior cingulate. J. Neurosci. 30: 11096-11103.
28. Hickey, C., L. Chelazzi & J. Theeuwes . 2010. Reward guides vision when it's your thing: trait reward-seeking in reward-mediated visual priming. PLoS One 5: e14087.
29. Hickey, C. & W. van Zoest . 2013. Reward-associated stimuli capture the eyes in spite of strategic attentional set. Vis. Res. 92: 67-74.
30. Della Libera, C. & L. Chelazzi . 2009. Learning to attend and to ignore is a matter of gains and losses. Psychol. Sci. 20: 778-784.
31. Raymond, J.E. & J.L. O'Brien . 2009. Selective visual attention and motivation: the consequences of value learning in an attentional blink task. Psychol. Sci. 20: 981-988.
32. Krebs, R.M., C.N. Boehler & M.G. Woldorff . 2010. The influence of reward associations on conflict processing in the Stroop task. Cognition 117: 341-347.
33. Peck, C.J., D.C. Jangraw, M. Suzuki, et al. 2009. Reward modulates attention independently of action value in posterior parietal cortex. J. Neurosci. 29: 11182-11191.
34. Anderson, B.A., P.A. Laurent & S. Yantis . 2011. Value-driven attentional capture. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 108: 10367-10371.
35. Chelazzi, L., A. Perlato, E. Santandrea, et al. 2013. Rewards teach visual selective attention. Vis. Res. 85: 58-72.
36. Pessoa, L. 2015. Multiple influences of reward on perception and attention. Vis. Cogn. 23: 272-290.
37. Anderson, B.A. 2013. A value-driven mechanism of attentional selection. J. Vis. 13: 7.
38. Anderson, B.A., P.A. Laurent & S. Yantis . 2011. Learned value magnifies salience-based attentional capture. PLoS One 6: e27926.
39. Anderson, B.A. & S. Yantis . 2012. Value-driven attentional and oculomotor capture during goal-directed, unconstrained viewing. Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 74: 1644-1653.
40. Laurent, P.A., M.G. Hall, B.A. Anderson, et al. 2015. Valuable orientations capture attention. Vis. Cogn. 23: 133-146.
41. Theeuwes, J. & A.V. Belopolsky . 2012. Reward grabs the eye: oculomotor capture by rewarding stimuli. Vis. Res. 74: 80-85.
42. Folk, C.L. & B.A. Anderson . 2010. Target uncertainty and attentional capture: color singleton set or multiple top-down control settings? Psychon. Bull. Rev. 17: 421-426.
43. Lee, J. & S. Shomstein . 2014. Reward-based transfer from bottom-up to top-down search tasks. Psychol. Sci. 25: 466-475.
44. Seitz, A.R., D. Kim & T. Watanabe . 2009. Rewards evoke learning of unconsciously processed visual stimuli in adult humans. Neuron 61: 700-707.
45. Hickey, C. & W. van Zoest . 2012. Reward creates oculomotor salience. Curr. Biol. 22: R219-R220.
46. Della Libera, C., A. Perlato & L. Chelazzi . 2011. Dissociable effects of reward on attentional learning: from passive associations to active monitoring. PLoS One 6: e19460.
47. Rutherford, H.J.V., J.L. O'Brien & J.E. Raymond . 2010. Value associations of irrelevant stimuli modify rapid visual orienting. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 17: 536-542.
48. Krebs, R.M., C.N. Boehler, T. Egner, et al. 2011. The neural underpinnings of how reward associations can both guide and misguide attention. J. Neurosci. 31: 9752-9759.
49. Maunsell, J.H.R. 2004. Neuronal representations of cognitive state: reward or attention? Trends Cogn. Sci. 8: 261-265.
50. Hickey, C., D. Kaiser & M.V. Peelen . 2015. Reward guides attention to object categories in real-world scenes. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 144: 264-273.
51. Hickey, C. & M.V. Peelen . 2015. Neural mechanisms of incentive salience in naturalistic human vision. Neuron 85: 512-518.
52. Failing, M.F. & J. Theeuwes . 2015. Nonspatial attentional capture by previously rewarded scene semantics. Vis. Cogn. 23: 82-104.
53. Anderson, B.A., P.A. Laurent & S. Yantis . 2014. Value-driven attentional priority signals in human basal ganglia and visual cortex. Brain Res. 1587: 88-96.
54. Hickey, C., L. Chelazzi & J. Theeuwes . 2014. Reward priming of location in visual search. PLoS One 9: e103372.
55. Chelazzi, L., J. Estocinova, R. Calletti, et al. 2014. Altering spatial priority maps via reward-based learning. J. Neurosci. 34: 8594-8604.
56. Anderson, B.A. 2015. Value-driven attentional capture is modulated by spatial context. Vis. Cogn. 23: 67-81.
57. Hickey, C. & S.A. Los . 2015. Reward priming of temporal preparation. Vis. Cogn. 23: 25-40.
58. Shuler, M.G. & M.F. Bear . 2006. Reward timing in the primary visual cortex. Science 311: 1606-1609.
59. Anderson, B.A. 2015. Value-driven attentional capture in the auditory domain. Atten. Percept. Psychophys. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-015-1001-7.
60. Pool, E., T. Brosch, S. Delplanque, et al. 2014. Where is the chocolate? Rapid spatial orienting toward stimuli associated with primary reward. Cognition 130: 348-359.
61. Anderson, B.A. 2015. Social reward shapes attentional biases. Cogn. Neurosci. DOI: 10.1080/17588928.2015.1047823.
62. Levy, D.J. & P.W. Glimcher . 2012. The root of all value: a neural common currency for choice. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 22: 1027-1038.
63. Lubman, D.I., L.A. Peters, K. Mogg, et al. 2000. Attentional bias for drug cues in opiate dependence. Psychol. Med. 30: 169-175.
64. Marissen, M.A.E., I.H.A. Franken, A.J. Waters, et al. 2006. Attentional bias predicts heroin relapse following treatment. Addiction 101: 1306-1312.
65. Mogg, K., B.P. Bradley, M. Field, et al. 2003. Eye movements to smoking-related pictures in smokers: relationship between attentional biases and implicit and explicit measures of stimulus valence. Addiction 98: 825-836.
66. Nickolaou, K., M. Field, H. Critchley, et al. 2013. Acute alcohol effects on attentional bias are mediated by subcortical areas associated with arousal and salience attribution. Neuropsychopharmacology 38: 1365-1373.
67. Stromark, K.M., N.P. Field, K. Hugdahl, et al. 1997. Selective processing of visual alcohol cues in abstinent alcoholics: an approach-avoidance conflict? Addict. Behav. 22: 509-519.
68. Field, M. & W.M. Cox . 2008. Attentional bias in addictive behaviors: a review of its development, causes, and consequences. Drug Alcohol Depend. 97: 1-20.
69. Grueschow, M., R. Polania, T.A. Hare, et al. 2015. Automatic versus choice-dependent value representations in the human brain. Neuron 84: 874-885.
70. Le Pelley, M.E., D. Pearson, O. Griffiths, et al. 2015. When goals conflict with values: counterproductive attentional and oculomotor capture by reward-related stimuli. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 144: 158-171.
71. Pearson, D., C. Donkin, S.C. Tran, et al. 2015. Cognitive control and counterproductive oculomotor capture by reward-related stimuli. Vis. Cogn. 23: 41-66.
72. Bucker, B., A.V. Belopolsky & J. Theeuwes . 2015. Distractors that signal reward attract the eyes. Vis. Cogn. 23: 1-24.
73. Mine, C. & J. Saiki . 2015. Task-irrelevant stimulus-reward association induces value-driven attentional capture. Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 77: 1896-1907.
74. Hickey, C., L. Chelazzi & J. Theeuwes . 2011. Reward has a residual impact on target selection in visual search, but not on the suppression of distractors. Vis. Cogn. 19: 117-128.
75. Anderson, B.A., H. Kuwabara, E.G. Gean, et al. 2015. The role of dopamine in value-based attentional orienting as revealed by positron emission tomography. Abstract submitted to the 21st Annual Meeting of the Organization for Human Brain Mapping, Honolulu Hawaii.
76. Schultz, W., P. Dayan & P.R. Montague . 1997. A neural substrate of prediction and reward. Science 275: 1593-1599.
77. Waelti, P., A. Dickinson & W. Schultz . 2001. Dopamine responses comply with basic assumptions of formal learning theory. Nature 412: 43-48.
78. Jiao, J., F. Du, X. He, et al. 2015. Social comparison modulates reward-driven attentional capture. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 22: 1278-1284.
79. Robinson, T.E. & K.C. Berridge . 1993. The neural basis of drug craving: an incentive-sensitization theory of addiction. Brain Res. Rev. 18: 247-291.
80. Berridge, K.C. & T.E. Robinson . 1998. What is the role of dopamine in reward: hedonic impact, reward learning, or incentive salience? Brain Res. Rev. 28: 309-369.
81. Robinson, M.J.F. & K.C. Berridge . 2013. Instant transformation of learned repulsion into motivational "wanting." Curr. Biol. 23: 282-289.
82. Sali, A.W., B.A. Anderson & S. Yantis . 2014. The role of reward prediction in the control of attention. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 40: 1654-1664.
83. Shiffrin, R.M. & W. Schneider . 1977. Controlled and automatic human information processing II: perceptual learning, automatic attending, and general theory. Psychol. Rev. 84: 127-190.
84. Kyllingbaek, S., W.X. Schneider & C. Bundesen . 2001. Automatic attraction of attention to former targets in visual displays of letters. Percept. Psychophys. 63: 85-98.
85. Wang, L., H. Yu & X. Zhou . 2013. Interaction between value and perceptual salience in value-driven attentional capture. J. Vis. 13: 5.
86. Anderson, B.A., P.A. Laurent & S. Yantis . 2012. Generalization of value-based attentional priority. Vis. Cogn. 20: 647-658.
87. Wentura, D., P. Muller & K. Rothermund . 2014. Attentional capture by evaluative stimuli: gain- and loss-connoting colors boost the additional-singleton effect. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 21: 701-707.
88. Schmidt, L.J., A.V. Belopolsky & J. Theeuwes . 2015. Attentional capture by signals of threat. Cogn. Emot. 29: 687-694.
89. Schmidt, L.J., A.V. Belopolsky & J. Theeuwes . 2015. Potential threat attracts attention and interferes with voluntary saccades. Emotion 15: 329-338.
90. Koster, E.H.W., G. Crombez, S. Van Damme, et al. 2004. Does imminent threat capture and hold attention? Emotion 4: 312-317.
91. Smith, S.D., S.B. Most, L.A. Newsome, et al. 2006. An "emotional blink" of attention elicited by aversively conditioned stimuli. Emotion 6: 523-527.
92. Anderson, B.A. 2015. Value-driven attentional priority is context specific. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 22: 750-756.
93. Anderson, B.A., M.L. Faulkner, J.J. Rilee, et al. 2013. Attentional bias for non-drug reward is magnified in addiction. Exp. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 21: 499-506.
94. Anderson, B.A. & S. Yantis . 2013. Persistence of value-driven attentional capture. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 39: 6-9.
95. Yamamoto, S., I.E. Monosov, M. Yasuda, et al. 2012. What and where information in the caudate tail guides saccades to visual objects. J. Neurosci. 32: 11005-11016.
96. Yamamoto, S., H.F. Kim & O. Hikosaka . 2013. Reward value-contingent changes in visual responses in the primate caudate tail associated with a visuomotor skill. J. Neurosci. 33: 11227-11238.
97. Hikosaka, O., S. Yamamoto, M. Yasuda, et al. 2013. Why skill matters. Trends Cogn. Sci. 17: 434-441.
98. Wong, D.F., H. Kuwabara, D.J. Schretlen, et al. 2006. Increased occupancy of dopamine receptors in human striatum during cue-elicited cocaine craving. Neuropsychopharmacology 31: 2716-2727.
99. Volkow, N.D., G.-J. Wang, F. Telang, et al. 2006. Cocaine cues and dopamine in dorsal striatum: mechanism of craving in cocaine addiction. J. Neurosci. 26: 6583-6588.
100. Graybiel, A.M. 2008. Habits, rituals, and the evaluative brain. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 31: 359-387.
101. Anderson, B.A., P.A. Laurent & S. Yantis . 2013. Reward predictions bias attentional selection. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 7: 262.
102. Seger, C.A. 2013. The visual corticostriatal loop through the tail of the caudate: circuitry and function. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 7: 104.
103. Krauzlis, R.J., L.P. Lovejoy & A. Zenon . 2013. Superior colliculus and visual spatial attention. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 36: 165-182.
104. Qi, S., Q. Zeng, C. Ding, et al. 2013. Neural correlates of reward-driven attentional capture in visual search. Brain Res. 1532: 32-43.
105. Buschschulte, A., C.N. Boehler, H. Strumpf, et al. 2014. Reward- and attention-related biasing of sensory selection in visual cortex. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 26: 1049-1065.
106. Hopf, J.M., M.A. Schoenfeld, A. Buschschulte, et al. 2015. The modulatory impact of reward and attention on global feature selection in human visual cortex. Vis. Cogn. 23: 229-248.
107. Serences, J.T., S. Shomstein, A.B. Leber, et al. 2005. Coordination of voluntary and stimulus-driven attentional control in human cortex. Psychol. Sci. 16: 114-122.
108. Serences, J.T. & S. Yantis . 2007. Representation of attentional priority in human occipital, parietal, and frontal cortex. Cereb. Cortex 17: 284-293.
109. Peck, C.J., B. Lau & C.D. Salzman . 2013. The primate amygdala combines information about space and value. Nat. Neurosci. 16: 340-348.
110. Peck, C.J. & C.D. Salzman . 2014. Amygdala neural activity reflects spatial attention towards stimuli promising reward or threatening punishment. eLife 3: e04478.
111. Peck, C.J. & C.D. Salzman . 2014. The amygdala and basal forebrain as a pathway for motivationally guided attention. J. Neurosci. 34: 13757-13767.
112. Ousdal, O.T., K. Specht, A. Server, et al. 2014. The human amygdala encodes value and space during decision making. NeuroImage 101: 712-719.
113. Rombouts, J.O., S.M. Bohte, J. Martinez-Trujillo, et al. 2015. A learning rule that explains how rewards teach attention. Vis. Cogn. 23: 179-205.
114. Arsenault, J.T., K. Nelissen, B. Jarraya, et al. 2013. Dopaminergic reward signals selectively decrease fMRI activity in primate visual cortex. Neuron 77: 1174-1186.
115. Serences, J.T. 2008. Value-based modulations in human visual cortex. Neuron 60: 1169-1181.
116. Serences, J.T. & S. Saproo . 2010. Population response profiles in early visual cortex are biased in favor of more valuable stimuli. J. Neurophysiol. 104: 76-87.
117. MacLean, M.H. & B. Giesbrecht . 2015. Neural evidence reveals the rapid effects of reward history on selective attention. Brain Res. 1606: 86-94.
118. Itthipuripat, S., K. Cha, N. Rangsipat, et al. 2015. Value-based attentional capture influences context dependent decision-making. J. Neurophysiol. 114: 560-569.
119. Yokoyama, T., S. Padmala & L. Pessoa . 2015. Reward learning and negative emotion during rapid attentional competition. Front. Psychol. 6: 269.
120. MacLean, M.H. & B. Giesbrecht . 2015. Irrelevant reward and selection histories have different influences on task-relevant attentional selection. Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 77: 1515-1528.
121. Stankevich, B. & J.J. Geng . 2015. The modulation of reward priority by top-down knowledge. Vis. Cogn. 23: 206-228.
122. Stankevich, B. & J.J. Geng . 2014. Reward associations and spatial probabilities produce additive effects on attentional selection. Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 76: 2315-2325.
123. Levinson, D.B., E.L. Stoll, S.D. Kindy, et al. 2014. A mind you can count on: validating breath counting as a behavioral measure of mindfulness. Front. Psychol. 5: 1202.
124. de Fockert, J., G. Rees, C. Frith, et al. 2004. Neural correlates of attentional capture in visual search. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 16: 751-759.
125. Hu, S., Y. Bu, Y. Song, et al. 2009. Dissociation of attention and intention in human posterior parietal cortex: an fMRI study. Eur. J. Neurosci. 29: 2083-2091.
126. Balan, P.F. & J. Gottlieb . 2006. Integration of exogenous input into a dynamic salience map revealed by perturbing attention. J. Neurosci. 26: 9239-9249.
127. Gottlieb, J.P., M. Kusunoki & M.F. Goldberg . 1998. The representation of visual salience in monkey parietal cortex. Nature 391: 481-484.
128. Chapman, C.S., J.P. Gallivan & J.T. Enns . 2015. Separating value from selection frequency in rapid reaching biases to visual targets. Vis. Cogn. 23: 249-271.
129. Moher, J., B.A. Anderson & J.-H. Song . 2015. Dissociable effects of salience on attention and goal-directed action. Curr. Biol. 25: 2040-2046.
130. San Martin, R., L.G. Appelbaum, S.A. Huettel, et al. 2014. Cortical brain activity reflecting attentional biasing toward reward-predicting cues covaries with economic decision-making performance. Cereb. Cortex DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhu160.
131. Gong, M. & S. Li . 2014. Learned reward association improves visual working memory. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 40: 841-856.
132. Infanti, E., C. Hickey & M. Turatto . 2015. Reward associations impact both iconic and visual working memory. Vis. Res. 107: 22-29.
133. Wallis, G., M.G. Stokes, C. Arnold, et al. 2015. Reward boosts working memory encoding over a brief temporal window. Vis. Cogn. 23: 291-312.
134. Doallo, S., E.Z. Patai & A.C. Nobre . 2013. Reward associations magnify memory-based biases on perception. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 25: 245-257.
135. + individuals. Neurobiol. Dis. DOI: 10.1016/j.nbd.2015.10.018.
136. Roper, Z.J.J., S.P. Vecera & J.G. Vaidya . 2014. Value-driven attentional capture in adolescents. Psychol. Sci. 25: 1987-1993.
137. Anderson, B.A., S.L. Leal, M.G. Hall, et al. 2014. The attribution of value-based attentional priority in individuals with depressive symptoms. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 14: 1221-1227.
138. Sigurjonsdottir, O., A.S. Bjornsson, S.J. Ludvigsdottir, et al. 2015. Money talks in attention bias modification: reward in a dot-probe task affects attentional biases. Vis. Cogn. 23: 118-132.
139. Moher, J. & H.E. Egeth . 2012. The ignoring paradox: cueing distractor features leads to selection first, then to inhibition of to-be-ignored items. Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 74: 1590-1605.
140. Maljkovic, V. & K. Nakayama . 1994. Priming of pop-out: I. role of features. Mem. Cogn. 22: 657-672.
141. Kristjansson, A. & G. Campana . 2010. Where perception meets memory: a review of repetition priming in visual search tasks. Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 72: 5-18.
142. Belopolsky, A.V., D. Schreij & J. Theeuwes . 2010. What is top-down about contingent capture? Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 72: 326-341.
143. Chun, M.M. & Y.H. Jiang . 1998. Contextual cueing: implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention. Cogn. Psychol. 36: 28-71.
144. Jiang, Y.V., K.M. Swallow, G.M. Rosenbaum, et al. 2013. Rapid acquisition but slow extinction of an attentional bias in space. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 39: 87-99.
145. Zhao, J., N. Al-Aidroos & N.B. Turk-Browne . 2013. Attention is spontaneously biased towards regularities. Psychol. Sci. 24: 667-677.
146. Sali, A.W., B.A. Anderson & S. Yantis . 2015. Learned states of preparatory attentional control. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 41: 1790-1805.
147. Yassa, M.A. & C.E.L. Stark . 2011. Pattern separation in the hippocampus. Trends Neurosci. 34: 515-525.