The modulation of reward priority by top-down knowledge

Visual Cognition

Volumn 23, Issue 1-2, 2015, Pages 206-228

  Stankevich, Beth A ^a,b   Geng, Joy J ^a,b  

^a Center for Mind and Brain   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Attention; Attentional capture; Reward; Selection history; Top down

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTIONAL BIAS; EYE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; KNOWLEDGE; MALE; MODULATION; NORMAL HUMAN; PERFORMANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REWARD; STIMULUS RESPONSE;

EID: 84929471671     PISSN: 13506285     EISSN: 14640716     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13506285.2014.981626     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. B.A.Anderson., & S.Yantis, (2012). Value-driven attentional and oculomotor capture during goal-directed, unconstrained viewing. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74(8), 1644–1653. doi:10.3758/s13414-012-0348-2
2. B.A.Anderson., & S.Yantis, (2013). Persistence of value-driven attentional capture. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 39(1), 6–9. doi:10.1037/a0030860
3. B.A.Anderson., P.A.Laurent., & S.Yantis, (2011a). Value-driven attentional capture. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(25), 10367–10371. doi:10.1073/pnas.1104047108
4. B.A.Anderson., P.A.Laurent., & S.Yantis, (2011b). Learned value magnifies salience-based attentional capture. PLoS One, 6(11), e27926. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0027926.g001
5. E.Awh., A.V.Belopolsky., & J.Theeuwes, (2012). Top-down versus bottom-up attentional control: a failed theoretical dichotomy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(8), 437–443. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2012.06.010
6. E.Camara., S.Manohar., & M.Husain, (2013). Past rewards capture spatial attention and action choices. Experimental Brain Research, 230(3), 291–300. doi:10.1007/s00221-013-3654-6
7. C.Della Libera., & L.Chelazzi, (2006). Visual selective attention and the effects of monetary rewards. Psychological Science, 17(3), 222–227. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01689.x
8. C.Della Libera., & L.Chelazzi, (2009). Learning to attend and to ignore is a matter of gains and losses. Psychological Science, 20(6), 778–784. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02360.x
9. C.Della Libera., A.Perlato., & L.Chelazzi, (2011). Dissociable effects of reward on attentional learning: from passive associations to active monitoring. PLoS One, 6(4), e19460. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0019460.g002
10. M.C.Dorris., & P.W.Glimcher, (2004). Activity in posterior parietal cortex is correlated with the relative subjective desirability of action. Neuron, 44(2), 365–378. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2004.09.009
11. H.E.Egeth., & S.Yantis, (1997). Visual attention: control, representation, and time course. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 269–297. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.48.1.269
12. M.F.Failing., & J.Theeuwes, (2014). Exogenous visual orienting by reward. Journal of Vision, 14(5), 6–6. doi:10.1167/14.5.6
13. J.J.Geng., & M.Behrmann, (2005). Spatial probability as an attentional cue in visual search. Perception & Psychophysics, 67(7), 1252–1268.
14. C.Hickey., & W.van Zoest, (2012). Reward creates oculomotor salience. Current Biology, 22(7), R219–R220. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2012.02.007
15. C.Hickey., & W.van Zoest, (2013). Reward-associated stimuli capture the eyes in spite of strategic attentional set. Vision Research, 92, 67–74. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2013.09.008
16. C.Hickey., L.Chelazzi., & J.Theeuwes, (2010). Reward changes salience in human vision via the anterior cingulate. Journal of Neuroscience, 30(33), 11096–11103. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1026-10.2010
17. Y.V.Jiang., K.M.Swallow., & G.M.Rosenbaum, (2013). Guidance of spatial attention by incidental learning and endogenous cuing. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 39(1), 285–297. doi:10.1037/a0028022
18. J.Jonides, (1981). Voluntary vs. automatic control over the mind's eye's movement. In J.B. Long & A.D. Baddeley (Eds.), Attention and Performance IX. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
19. M.Kiss., J.Driver., & M.Eimer, (2009). Reward priority of visual target singletons modulates event-related potential signatures of attentional selection. Psychological Science, 20(2), 245–251. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02281.x
20. R.Klein, (1988). Inhibitory tagging system facilitates visual search. Nature, 334(6181), 430–431.
21. R.M.Klein, (2000). Inhibition of return. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(4), 138–147.
22. B.Knutson., & S.M.Greer, (2008). Anticipatory affect: neural correlates and consequences for choice. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 363(1511), 3771–3786. doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0155
23. R.M.Krebs., C.N.Boehler., L.G.Appelbaum., & M.G.Woldorff, (2013). Reward associations reduce behavioral interference by changing the temporal dynamics of conflict processing. PLoS One, 8(1), e53894. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0053894.t001
24. R.M.Krebs., C.N.Boehler., T.Egner., & M.G.Woldorff, (2011). The neural underpinnings of how reward associations can both guide and misguide attention. Journal of Neuroscience, 31(26), 9752–9759. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0732-11.2011
25. R.M.Krebs., C.N.Boehler., K.C.Roberts., A.W.Song., & M.G.Woldorff, (2012). The involvement of the dopaminergic midbrain and cortico-striatal-thalamic circuits in the integration of reward prospect and attentional task demands. Cerebral Cortex, 22(3), 607–615. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhr134
26. A.Kristjánsson., O.Sigurjónsdóttir., & J.Driver, (2010). Fortune and reversals of fortune in visual search: Reward contingencies for pop-out targets affect search efficiency and target repetition effects. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72(5), 1229–1236. doi:10.3758/APP.72.5.1229
27. M.E.Le Pelley., C.J.Mitchell., & A.M.Johnson, (2013). Outcome value influences attentional biases in human associative learning: Dissociable effects of training and instruction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 39(1), 39–55. doi:10.1037/a0031230
28. M.E.Le Pelley., D.Pearson., O.Griffiths., & T.Beesley, (2014). When goals conflict with values: Counterproductive attentional and oculomotor capture by reward-related stimuli. Journal of Experiment Psychology: General. Advance online publication.
29. J.Lee., & S.Shomstein, (2013). The differential effects of reward on space- and object-based attentional allocation. Journal of Neuroscience, 33(26), 10625–10633. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5575-12.2013
30. S.J.Luck., & S.A.Hillyard, (1994). Spatial filtering during visual search: evidence from human electrophysiology. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 20(5), 1000–1014.
31. V.Maljkovic., & K.Nakayama, (1994). Priming of pop-out: I. Role of features. Memory & Cognition, 22(6), 657–672.
32. H.J.Müller., & P.M.Rabbitt, (1989). Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: time course of activation and resistance to interruption. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 15(2), 315.
33. J.P.O'Doherty., T.W.Buchanan., B.Seymour., & R.J.Dolan, (2006). Predictive neural coding of reward preference involves dissociable responses in human ventral midbrain and ventral striatum. Neuron, 49(1), 157–166. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2005.11.014
34. C.J.Peck., D.C.Jangraw., M.Suzuki., R.Efem., & J.Gottlieb, (2009). Reward modulates attention independently of action value in posterior parietal cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 29(36), 11182–11191. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1929-09.2009
35. M.L.Platt., & P.W.Glimcher, (1999). Neural correlates of decision variables in parietal cortex. Nature, 400(6741), 233–238. doi:10.1038/22268
36. M.I.Posner, (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32(1), 3–25.
37. S.Qi., Q.Zeng., C.Ding., & H.Li, (2013). Neural correlates of reward-driven attentional capture in visual search. Brain Research, 1532, 32–43. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2013.07.044
38. J.E.Raymond., & J.L.O'Brien, (2009). Selective visual attention and motivation: the consequences of value learning in an attentional blink task. Psychological Science, 20(8), 981–988.
39. H.Schevernels., R.M.Krebs., P.,.Santens, M.G.Woldorff., & C.N.Boehler, (2014). Task preparation processes related to reward prediction precede those related to task-difficulty expectation. NeuroImage, 84, 639–647. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.09.039
40. B.A.Stankevich., & J.J.Geng, (2014). Reward associations and spatial probabilities produce additive effects on attentional selection. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 76(8), 2315–2325. doi:10.1037/xge0000037