Irrelevant reward and selection histories have different influences on task-relevant attentional selection

Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics

Volumn 77, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 1515-1528

  MacLean, Mary H ^a   Giesbrecht, Barry ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Attentional capture; Reward; Selective attention

Indexed keywords

ATTENTION; COLOR; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PERCEPTION; PHYSIOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REACTION TIME; REWARD; VISION; YOUNG ADULT;

ATTENTION; COLOR; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; REACTION TIME; REWARD; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84931567258     PISSN: 19433921     EISSN: 1943393X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/s13414-015-0851-3     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Anderson, B. A. (2013). A value-driven mechanism of attentional selection. Journal of Vision, 13(3), 7. doi:10.1167/13.3.7
2. Anderson, B. A., & Folk, C. L. (2012). Dissociating location-specific inhibition and attention shifts: Evidence against the disengagement account of contingent capture. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74, 1183–1198. doi:10.3758/s13414-012-0325-9
3. Anderson, B. A., Laurent, P. A., & Yantis, S. (2011). Value-driven attentional capture. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, 10367–10371. doi:10.1073/pnas.1104047108
4. Anderson, B. A., & Yantis, S. (2012). Value-driven attentional and oculomotor capture during goal-directed, unconstrained viewing. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74, 1644–1653. doi:10.3758/s13414-012-0348-2
5. Awh, E., Belopolsky, A. V., & Theeuwes, J. (2012). Top-down versus bottom-up attentional control: A failed theoretical dichotomy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16, 437–443. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2012.06.010
6. Bisley, J. W., & Goldberg, M. E. (2006). Neural correlates of attention and distractibility in the lateral intraparietal area. Journal of Neurophysiology, 95, 1696–1717. doi:10.1152/jn.00848.2005
7. Bundesen, C. (1990). A theory of visual attention. Psychological Review, 97, 523–547. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.97.4.523
8. Chelazzi, L., Eštočinová, J., Calletti, R., Gerfo, E. L., Sani, I., Della Libera, C., & Santandrea, E. (2014). Altering spatial priority maps via reward-based learning. Journal of Neuroscience, 34, 8594–8604. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI. 0277-14.2014
9. Corbetta, M., & Shulman, G. L. (2002). Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3, 201–215. doi:10.1038/nrn755
10. Della Libera, C., & Chelazzi, L. (2009). Learning to attend and to ignore is a matter of gains and losses. Psychological Science, 20, 778–784. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02360.x
11. Desimone, R., & Duncan, J. (1995). Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 18, 193–222. doi:10.1146/annurev.ne.18.030195.001205
12. Ester, E. F., & Awh, E. (2008). The processing locus of interference from salient singleton distractors. Visual Cognition, 16, 166–181. doi:10.1080/13506280701489510
13. Folk, C. L., & Remington, R. W. (2008). Bottom-up priming of top-down attentional control settings. Visual Cognition, 16, 215–231. doi:10.1080/13506280701458804
14. Giesbrecht, B., Sy, J., Bundesen, C., & Kyllingsbæk, S. (2014). A new perspective on the perceptual selectivity of attention under load. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1316, 71–86. doi:10.1111/nyas.12404
15. Hickey, C., Chelazzi, L., & Theeuwes, J. (2014). Reward-priming of location in visual search. PloS One, 9, e103372. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0103372
16. Itti, L., & Koch, C. (2001). Computational modelling of visual attention. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2, 194–203. doi:10.1038/35058500
17. Kastner, S. K., & Ungerleider, L. G. (2000). Mechanisms of visual attention in the human cortex. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 23, 315–341. doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.23.1.315
18. Kiss, M., Driver, J., & Eimer, M. (2009). Reward priority of visual target singletons modulates event-related potential signatures of attentional selection. Psychological Science, 20, 245–251. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02281.x
19. Kyllingsbæk, S., Sy, J. L., & Giesbrecht, B. (2011). Understanding the allocation of attention when faced with varying perceptual load in partial report: A computational approach. Neuropsychologia, 49, 1487–1497. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.11.039
20. Lavie, N. (2005). Distracted and confused? Selective attention under load. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 75–82. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2004.12.004
21. Lavie, N., Beck, D. M., & Konstantinou, N. (2014). Blinded by the load: Attention, awareness and the role of perceptual load. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 369, 20130205. doi:10.1098/rstb.2013.0205
22. Monsell, S. (2003). Task switching. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 134–140. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00028-7
23. Müller, H. J., Reimann, B., & Krummenacher, J. (2003). Visual search for singleton feature targets across dimensions: Stimulus- and expectancy-driven effects in dimensional weighting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 1021–1035. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.29.5.1021
24. Nordfang, M., Dyrholm, M., & Bundesen, C. (2013). Identifying bottom-up and top-down components of attentional weight by experimental analysis and computational modeling. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142, 510–535. doi:10.1037/a0029631
25. Pashler, H. (1994). Divided attention: Storing and classifying briefly presented objects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 115–118. doi:10.3758/BF03200766
26. Prinzmetal, W., McCool, C., & Park, S. (2005). Attention: Reaction time and accuracy reveal different mechanisms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 73–92. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.134.1.73
27. Raymond, J. E., & O’Brien, J. L. (2009). Selective visual attention and motivation the consequences of value learning in an attentional blink task. Psychological Science, 20, 981–988. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02391.x
28. Santee, J. L., & Egeth, H. E. (1982). Do reaction time and accuracy measure the same aspects of letter recognition? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 489–501. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.8.4.489
29. Stankevich, B. A., & Geng, J. J. (2014). Reward associations and spatial probabilities produce additive effects on attentional selection. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 76, 2315–2325. doi:10.3758/s13414-014-0720-5
30. Sy, J. L., Elliott, J. C., & Giesbrecht, B. (2013). Post-perceptual processing during the attentional blink is modulated by inter-trial task expectancies. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 627. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00627
31. Theeuwes, J. (1992). Perceptual selectivity for color and form. Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 599–606. doi:10.3758/BF03211656
32. Theeuwes, J. (1993). Visual selective attention: A theoretical analysis. Acta Psychologica, 83, 93–154. doi:10.1016/0001-6918(93)90042-P
33. Theeuwes, J. (2010). Top-down and bottom-up control of visual selection. Acta Psychologica, 135, 77–99. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.02.006
34. Theeuwes, J., & Belopolsky, A. V. (2012). Reward grabs the eye: Oculomotor capture by rewarding stimuli. Vision Research, 74, 80–85. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2012.07.024
35. Theeuwes, J., Kramer, A. F., & Belopolsky, A. V. (2004). Attentional set interacts with perceptual load in visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 697–702. doi:10.3758/BF03196622
36. Theeuwes, J., & Van der Burg, E. (2011). On the limits of top-down control of visual selection. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73, 2092–2103. doi:10.3758/s13414-011-0176-9
37. Yantis, S., & Johnson, D. N. (1990). Mechanisms of attentional priority. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 812–825. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.16.4.812