Separating value from selection frequency in rapid reaching biases to visual targets

Visual Cognition

Volumn 23, Issue 1-2, 2015, Pages 249-271

  Chapman, Craig S ^a   Gallivan, Jason P ^b   Enns, James T ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^b QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Action; Rapid reaching; Reward; Selection frequency; Selective attention; Visual targets

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; COGNITIVE BIAS; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LEARNING; MALE; MENTAL TASK; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAPID REACHING TASK; REWARD; SELECTION FREQUENCY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84928938621     PISSN: 13506285     EISSN: 14640716     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13506285.2014.976604     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. B.A.Anderson, (2013). A value-driven mechanism of attentional selection. Journal of Vision, 13(3):7, 1–16. doi:10.1167/13.3.7
2. B.A.Anderson., P.A.Laurent., & S.Yantis, (2011). Value-driven attentional capture. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108(25), 10367–10371. doi:10.1073/pnas.1104047108
3. E.Awh., A.V.Belopolsky., & J.Theeuwes, (2012). Top-down versus bottom-up attentional control: A failed theoretical dichotomy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(8), 437–443.
4. D.Baldauf., & H.Deubel, (2010). Attentional landscapes in reaching and grasping. Vision Research, 50(11), 999–1013. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2010.02.008
5. A.V.Belopolsky., D.Schreij., & J.Theeuwes, (2010). What is top-down about contingent capture?Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72(2), 326–341.
6. J.W.Bisley., & M.E.Goldberg, (2010). Attention, intention, and priority in the parietal lobe. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 33, 1–21. doi:10.1146/annurev-neuro-060909-152823
7. D.H.Brainard, (1997). The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433–436.
8. C.S.Chapman., J.P.Gallivan., D.K.Wood., J.L.Milne., D.Ansari., J.C.Culham., & M.A.Goodale, (2014). Counting on the motor system: Rapid action planning reveals the format- and magnitude-dependent extraction of numerical quantity. Journal of Vision, 14(3), 30. doi:10.1167/14.3.30
9. C.S.Chapman., J.P.Gallivan., D.K.Wood., J.L.Milne., J.C.Culham., & M.A.Goodale, (2010a). Reaching for the unknown: Multiple target encoding and real-time decision-making in a rapid reach task. Cognition, 116(2), 168–176. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2010.04.008
10. C.S.Chapman., J.P.Gallivan., D.K.Wood., J.L.Milne., J.C.Culham., & M.A.Goodale, (2010b). Short-term motor plasticity revealed in a visuomotor decision-making task. Behavioural Brain Research, 214(1), 130–134. doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2010.05.012
11. L.Chelazzi., A.Perlato., E.Santandrea., & C.Della Libera, (2013). Rewards teach visual selective attention. Vision Research, 85, 58–72.
12. P.Cisek, (2012). Making decisions through a distributed consensus. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 22(6), 927–936. doi:10.1016/j.conb.2012.05.007
13. P.Cisek., & J.F.Kalaska, (2010). Neural mechanisms for interacting with a world full of action choices. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 33, 269–298. doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.051508.135409
14. J.H.Fecteau., & D.P.Munoz, (2006). Salience, relevance, and firing: A priority map for target selection. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(8), 382–390. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.06.011
15. J.B.Freeman., R.Dale., & T.A.Farmer, (2011). Hand in motion reveals mind in motion. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 59. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00059
16. J.P.Gallivan., & C.S.Chapman, (2014). Three-dimensional reach trajectories as a probe of real-time decision-making between multiple competing targets. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 8, 215. doi:10.3389/fnins.2014.00215
17. J.P.Gallivan., C.S.Chapman., D.K.Wood., J.L.Milne., D.Ansari., J.C.Culham., & M.A.Goodale, (2011). One to four, and nothing more: Nonconscious parallel individuation of objects during action planning. Psychological Science, 22(6), 803–811. doi:10.1177/0956797611408733
18. J.Gottlieb, (2012). Attention, learning, and the value of information. Neuron, 76(2), 281–295.
19. C.Hickey., & W.van Zoest, (2012). Reward creates oculomotor salience. Current Biology, 22(7), R219–R220.
20. T.E.Hudson., L.T.Maloney., & M.S.Landy, (2007). Movement planning with probabilistic target information. Journal of Neurophysiology, 98(5), 3034–3046. doi:10.1152/jn.00858.2007
21. A.Jarvstad., U.Hahn., S.K.Rushton., & P.A.Warren, (2013). Perceptuo-motor, cognitive, and description-based decision-making seem equally good. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110(40), 16271–16276. doi:10.1073/pnas.1300239110
22. M.Kleiner., D.Brainard., & D.Pelli, (2007). What's new in psychtoolbox-3. Perception, 36(ECVP Abstract Supplement). 36(14), 1–1.
23. Á.Kristjánsson., & G.Campana, (2010). Where perception meets memory: A review of repetition priming in visual search tasks. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72(1), 5–18.
24. C.McKinstry., R.Dale., & M.J.Spivey, (2008). Action dynamics reveal parallel competition in decision making. Psychological Science, 19(1), 22–24. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02041.x
25. J.L.Milne., C.S.Chapman., J.P.Gallivan., D.K.Wood., J.C.Culham., & M.A.Goodale, (2013). Connecting the dots: Object connectedness deceives perception but not movement planning. Psychological Science, 24(8), 1456–1465. doi:10.1177/0956797612473485
26. J.L.O'Brien., & J.E.Raymond, (2012). Learned predictiveness speeds visual processing. Psychological Science, 23(4), 359–363. doi:10.1177/0956797611429800
27. D.O'Hora., R.Dale., P.T.Piiroinen., & F.Connolly, (2013). Local dynamics in decision making: The evolution of preference within and across decisions. Scientific Reports, 3, 2210. doi:10.1038/srep02210
28. D.R.Painter., A.Kritikos., & J.E.Raymond, (2013). Value learning modulates goal-directed actions. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(6), 1166–1175. doi:10.1080/17470218.2013.848913
29. D.G.Pelli, (1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10, 437–442.
30. J.E.Raymond., & J.L.O'Brien, (2009). Selective visual attention and motivation: The consequences of value learning in an attentional blink task. Psychological Science, 20(8), 981–988. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02391.x
31. A.Resulaj., R.Kiani., D.M.Wolpert., & M.N.Shadlen, (2009). Changes of mind in decision-making. Nature, 461(7261), 263–266.
32. H.J.Rutherford., J.L.O'Brien., & J.E.Raymond, (2010). Value associations of irrelevant stimuli modify rapid visual orienting. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17(4), 536–542.
33. J.H.Song., & K.Nakayama, (2009). Hidden cognitive states revealed in choice reaching tasks. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(8), 360–366. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2009.04.009
34. M.J.Spivey., & R.Dale, (2006). Continuous dynamics in real-time cognition. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15(5), 207–211. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2006.00437.x
35. J.Theeuwes., & A.V.Belopolsky, (2012). Reward grabs the eye: Oculomotor capture by rewarding stimuli. Vision Research, 74, 80–85.
36. J.Theeuwes., & E.Van der Burg, (2011). On the limits of top-down control of visual selection. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73(7), 2092–2103.
37. D.M.Wolpert., & M.S.Landy, (2012). Motor control is decision-making. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 22(6), 996–1003.
38. D.K.Wood., J.P.Gallivan., C.S.Chapman., J.L.Milne., J.C.Culham., & M.A.Goodale, (2011). Visual salience dominates early visuomotor competition in reaching behavior. Journal of Vision, 11(10):16, 1–11. doi:10.1167/11.10.16