Automatic versus Choice-Dependent Value Representations in the Human Brain

Neuron

Volumn 85, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 874-885

  Grueschow, Marcus ^a   Polania, Rafael ^a   Hare, Todd A ^a   Ruff, Christian C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; BRAIN FUNCTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MEDIAL PREFRONTAL CORTEX; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTION; PERSONAL VALUE; POSTERIOR CINGULATE; PREDICTION; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPONSE TIME; SUBJECTIVE VALUE; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BLOOD; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; COGNITION; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; IMAGE PROCESSING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; VASCULARIZATION; YOUNG ADULT;

OXYGEN;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTENTION; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; OXYGEN; PERCEPTION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; ROC CURVE; VOLITION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84925642975     PISSN: 08966273     EISSN: 10974199     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.12.054     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Anderson B.A. A value-driven mechanism of attentional selection. J.Vis. 2013, 13:7.
2. Anderson B.A., Laurent P.A., Yantis S. Value-driven attentional capture. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108:10367-10371.
3. Awh E., Belopolsky A.V., Theeuwes J. Top-down versus bottom-up attentional control: a failed theoretical dichotomy. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2012, 16:437-443.
4. Bartra O., McGuire J.T., Kable J.W. The valuation system: a coordinate-based meta-analysis of BOLD fMRI experiments examining neural correlates of subjective value. Neuroimage 2013, 76:412-427.
5. Becker G.M., DeGroot M.H., Marschak J. Measuring utility by a single-response sequential method. Behav. Sci. 1964, 9:226-232.
6. Berridge K.C. From prediction error to incentive salience: mesolimbic computation of reward motivation. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2012, 35:1124-1143.
7. Bickel W.K., Miller M.L., Yi R., Kowal B.P., Lindquist D.M., Pitcock J.A. Behavioral and neuroeconomics of drug addiction: competing neural systems and temporal discounting processes. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2007, 90(Suppl 1):S85-S91.
8. Castellanos F.X., Proal E. Large-scale brain systems in ADHD: beyond the prefrontal-striatal model. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2012, 16:17-26.
9. Chau B.K., Kolling N., Hunt L.T., Walton M.E., Rushworth M.F. A neural mechanism underlying failure of optimal choice with multiple alternatives. Nat. Neurosci. 2014, 17:463-470.
10. Clithero J.A., Rangel A. Informatic parcellation of the network involved in the computation of subjective value. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 2014, 9:1289-1302.
11. Constantinidis C., Procyk E. The primate working memory networks. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 2004, 4:444-465.
12. Corbetta M., Shulman G.L. Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2002, 3:201-215.
13. Corbetta M., Miezin F.M., Shulman G.L., Petersen S.E. Selective attention modulates extrastriate visual regions in humans during visual feature discrimination and recognition. Ciba Found. Symp. 1991, 163:165-175.
14. Culham J.C., Cavanagh P., Kanwisher N.G. Attention response functions: characterizing brain areas using fMRI activation during parametric variations of attentional load. Neuron 2001, 32:737-745.
15. Davis C. Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: associations with overeating and obesity. Curr. Psychiatry Rep. 2010, 12:389-395.
16. Della Libera C., Chelazzi L. Visual selective attention and the effects of monetary rewards. Psychol. Sci. 2006, 17:222-227.
17. Desimone R., Duncan J. Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 1995, 18:193-222.
18. Dixon M.R., Jacobs E.A., Sanders S. Contextual control of delay discounting by pathological gamblers. J.Appl. Behav. Anal. 2006, 39:413-422.
19. Eimer M. The N2pc component as an indicator of attentional selectivity. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1996, 99:225-234.
20. Esterman M., Tamber-Rosenau B.J., Chiu Y.C., Yantis S. Avoiding non-independence in fMRI data analysis: leave one subject out. Neuroimage 2010, 50:572-576.
21. Field M., Cox W.M. Attentional bias in addictive behaviors: a review of its development, causes, and consequences. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2008, 97:1-20.
22. Friedman-Hill S.R., Robertson L.C., Desimone R., Ungerleider L.G. Posterior parietal cortex and the filtering of distractors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100:4263-4268.
23. Green D.M., Swets J.A. Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics 1966, Wiley.
24. Hayden B.Y., Nair A.C., McCoy A.N., Platt M.L. Posterior cingulate cortex mediates outcome-contingent allocation of behavior. Neuron 2008, 60:19-25.
25. Heilbronner S.R., Platt M.L. Causal evidence of performance monitoring by neurons in posterior cingulate cortex during learning. Neuron 2013, 80:1384-1391.
26. Hickey C., Chelazzi L., Theeuwes J. Reward has a residual impact on target selection in visual search, but not on the suppression of distractors. Vis. Cogn. 2011, 19:117-128.
27. Kahneman D., Tversky A. Prospect theory: analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 1979, 47:263-291.
28. Kanwisher N., Wojciulik E. Visual attention: insights from brain imaging. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2000, 1:91-100.
29. Kastner S., Pinsk M.A., De Weerd P., Desimone R., Ungerleider L.G. Increased activity in human visual cortex during directed attention in the absence of visual stimulation. Neuron 1999, 22:751-761.
30. Katsuki F., Constantinidis C. Unique and shared roles of the posterior parietal and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in cognitive functions. Front. Integr. Neurosci. 2012, 6:17.
31. Kim H., Adolphs R., O'Doherty J.P., Shimojo S. Temporal isolation of neural processes underlying face preference decisions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104:18253-18258.
32. Kiss M., Driver J., Eimer M. Reward priority of visual target singletons modulates event-related potential signatures of attentional selection. Psychol. Sci. 2009, 20:245-251.
33. Knudsen E.I. Fundamental components of attention. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2007, 30:57-78.
34. Knutson B., Rick S., Wimmer G.E., Prelec D., Loewenstein G. Neural predictors of purchases. Neuron 2007, 53:147-156.
35. Krajbich I., Armel C., Rangel A. Visual fixations and the computation and comparison of value in simple choice. Nat. Neurosci. 2010, 13:1292-1298.
36. Krajbich I., Lu D., Camerer C., Rangel A. The attentional drift-diffusion model extends to simple purchasing decisions. Front. Psychol. 2012, 3:193.
37. Kriegeskorte N., Simmons W.K., Bellgowan P.S.F., Baker C.I. Circular analysis in systems neuroscience: the dangers of double dipping. Nat. Neurosci. 2009, 12:535-540.
38. Lebreton M., Jorge S., Michel V., Thirion B., Pessiglione M. An automatic valuation system in the human brain: evidence from functional neuroimaging. Neuron 2009, 64:431-439.
39. Lennert T., Martinez-Trujillo J. Strength of response suppression to distracter stimuli determines attentional-filtering performance in primate prefrontal neurons. Neuron 2011, 70:141-152.
40. Leotti L.A., Iyengar S.S., Ochsner K.N. Born to choose: the origins and value of the need for control. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2010, 14:457-463.
41. Levy I., Lazzaro S.C., Rutledge R.B., Glimcher P.W. Choice from non-choice: predicting consumer preferences from blood oxygenation level-dependent signals obtained during passive viewing. J.Neurosci. 2011, 31:118-125.
42. Lim S.L., O'Doherty J.P., Rangel A. The decision value computations in the vmPFC and striatum use a relative value code that is guided by visual attention. J.Neurosci. 2011, 31:13214-13223.
43. Luck S.J., Hillyard S.A. Electrophysiological correlates of feature analysis during visual search. Psychophysiology 1994, 31:291-308.
44. Luck S.J., Girelli M., McDermott M.T., Ford M.A. Bridging the gap between monkey neurophysiology and human perception: an ambiguity resolution theory of visual selective attention. Cognit. Psychol. 1997, 33:64-87.
45. Martinez-Trujillo J.C., Treue S. Feature-based attention increases the selectivity of population responses in primate visual cortex. Curr. Biol. 2004, 14:744-751.
46. Moran J., Desimone R. Selective attention gates visual processing in the extrastriate cortex. Science 1985, 229:782-784.
47. Noonan M.P., Walton M.E., Behrens T.E.J., Sallet J., Buckley M.J., Rushworth M.F.S. Separate value comparison and learning mechanisms in macaque medial and lateral orbitofrontal cortex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107:20547-20552.
48. O'Connell R.G., Dockree P.M., Kelly S.P. A supramodal accumulation-to-bound signal that determines perceptual decisions in humans. Nat. Neurosci. 2012, 15:1729-1735.
49. Padoa-Schioppa C. Neuronal origins of choice variability in economic decisions. Neuron 2013, 80:1322-1336.
50. Pearson J.M., Hayden B.Y., Raghavachari S., Platt M.L. Neurons in posterior cingulate cortex signal exploratory decisions in a dynamic multioption choice task. Curr. Biol. 2009, 19:1532-1537.
51. Pearson J.M., Heilbronner S.R., Barack D.L., Hayden B.Y., Platt M.L. Posterior cingulate cortex: adapting behavior to a changing world. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2011, 15:143-151.
52. Plassmann H., O'Doherty J., Rangel A. Orbitofrontal cortex encodes willingness to pay in everyday economic transactions. J.Neurosci. 2007, 27:9984-9988.
53. Polanía R., Krajbich I., Grueschow M., Ruff C.C. Neural oscillations and synchronization differentially support evidence accumulation in perceptual and value-based decision making. Neuron 2014, 82:709-720.
54. Poldrack R.A., Mumford J.A. Independence in ROI analysis: where is the voodoo?. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 2009, 4:208-213.
55. Rangel A., Camerer C., Montague P.R. A framework for studying the neurobiology of value-based decision making. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2008, 9:545-556.
56. Reddy L., Quiroga R.Q., Wilken P., Koch C., Fried I. A single-neuron correlate of change detection and change blindness in the human medial temporal lobe. Curr. Biol. 2006, 16:2066-2072.
57. Reynolds J.H., Chelazzi L. Attentional modulation of visual processing. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2004, 27:611-647.
58. Reynolds J.H., Heeger D.J. The normalization model of attention. Neuron 2009, 61:168-185.
59. Reynolds J.H., Pasternak T., Desimone R. Attention increases sensitivity of V4 neurons. Neuron 2000, 26:703-714.
60. Rieger J.W., Gegenfurtner K.R., Schalk F., Koechy N., Heinze H.J., Grueschow M. BOLD responses in human V1 to local structure in natural scenes: implications for theories of visual coding. J.Vis. 2013, 13:19.
61. Rolls E.T., Grabenhorst F. The orbitofrontal cortex and beyond: from affect to decision-making. Prog. Neurobiol. 2008, 86:216-244.
62. Sasson N.J., Turner-Brown L.M., Holtzclaw T.N., Lam K.S., Bodfish J.W. Children with autism demonstrate circumscribed attention during passive viewing of complex social and nonsocial picture arrays. Autism Res. 2008, 1:31-42.
63. Sasson N.J., Elison J.T., Turner-Brown L.M., Dichter G.S., Bodfish J.W. Brief report: circumscribed attention in young children with autism. J.Autism Dev. Disord. 2011, 41:242-247.
64. Skudlarski P., Constable R.T., Gore J.C. ROC analysis of statistical methods used in functional MRI: individual subjects. Neuroimage 1999, 9:311-329.
65. Sorenson J.A., Wang X. ROC methods for evaluation of fMRI techniques. Magn. Reson. Med. 1996, 36:737-744.
66. Spitzer H., Desimone R., Moran J. Increased attention enhances both behavioral and neuronal performance. Science 1988, 240:338-340.
67. Strait C.E., Blanchard T.C., Hayden B.Y. Reward value comparison via mutual inhibition in ventromedial prefrontal cortex. Neuron 2014, 82:1357-1366.
68. Theeuwes J., Belopolsky A.V. Reward grabs the eye: oculomotor capture by rewarding stimuli. Vision Res. 2012, 74:80-85.
69. Todd J.J., Marois R. Capacity limit of visual short-term memory in human posterior parietal cortex. Nature 2004, 428:751-754.
70. Towal R.B., Mormann M., Koch C. Simultaneous modeling of visual saliency and value computation improves predictions of economic choice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110:E3858-E3867.
71. Tusche A., Bode S., Haynes J.D. Neural responses to unattended products predict later consumer choices. J.Neurosci. 2010, 30:8024-8031.
72. Woodman G.F., Luck S.J. Electrophysiological measurement of rapid shifts of attention during visual search. Nature 1999, 400:867-869.