Assessment of learning gains in a flipped biochemistry classroom

Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education

Volumn 44, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 20-27

  Ojennus, Deanna Dahlke ^a  

^a WHITWORTH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Biochemistry; Flipped classroom; Hybrid course; Inverted classroom; Learning gains

Indexed keywords

BIOCHEMISTRY; EDUCATION; HUMAN; LEARNING; PROGRAM EVALUATION;

BIOCHEMISTRY; HUMANS; LEARNING; PROGRAM EVALUATION;

EID: 84947975781     PISSN: 14708175     EISSN: 15393429     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bmb.20926     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Barrows, H. S. (1996) Problem-based learning in medicine and beyond: A brief overview. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 3-12.
2. D. Boud, F.I. Feletti, Eds. (1997) The Challenge of Problem-Based Learning, 2nd ed., Kogan Page, London.
3. Schwab, J. (1960) Inquiry, the science teacher, and the educator. The School Review, the University of Chicago Press 68, 176-195.
4. V.S. Lee, Ed. (2004) Teaching and Learning Through Inquiry: A Guidebook for Institutions and Instructors, Stylus Publishing, Sterling, VA.
5. Prince, M. J. and Felder, R. M. (2006) Inductive teaching and learning methods: Definitions, comparisons, and research bases. J. Eng. Educ. 95, 123-138.
6. Prince, M. J. and Felder, R. M. (2007) The many faces of inductive teaching and learning. J. College Sci. Teach. 36, 533-568.
7. Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R. T., Smith, K.A. (1991) Active Learning: Cooperation in the College Classroom, Interaction Book Company, Edina, MN.
8. Bergmann, J. and Sams, A. (2012) Flip Your Classroom: Reach Every Student in Every Class Every Day, 1st ed., International Society for Technology in Education.
9. Lage, M. J., Platt, G. J., and Treglia, M. (2000) Inverting the classroom: A gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment. J. Econ. Educ. 31, 30-43.
10. Strayer, J. F. (2012) How learning in an inverted classroom influences cooperation, innovation and task orientation. Learn. Environ. Res. 15, 171-193.
11. Clemens, B. M., Nivargi, C., Jan, A., Lu, Y., Schneider, E., and Manning, J. (2013) Adventures with a flipped classroom and a materials science and engineering MOOC: "Fools Go Where Angels Fear to Tread." MRS Online Proceedings Library 1583, opl.2013.774/1-opl.2013.774/6.
12. Smith, J. D. (2013) Student attitudes toward flipping the general chemistry classroom. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. 14, 607-614.
13. Fautch, J. M. (2015) The flipped classroom for teaching organic chemistry in small classes: is it effective? Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. 16, 179-186.
14. Christiansen, M. A. (2014) Inverted teaching: Applying a new pedagogy to a University organic chemistry class. J. Chem. Ed. 91, 1845-1850.
15. Fitzgerald, N. and Li, L. (2015) Using presentation software to flip an undergraduate analytical chemistry course. J. Chem. Ed. (10.1021/ed500667c).
16. th ACS National Meeting & Exposition, Dallas, TX.
17. Quirk Dorr, D. R. (2013) Flipping to adapt to multiple learning styles at Minnesota State University, Campus Technology, Available at: http://campustechnology.com/Articles/2013/03/27/Flipping-To-Adapt-to-Multiple-Learning-Styles-at-Minnesota-State-University.aspx?Page=1.
18. Minderhout, V. and Loertscher, J. (2007) Lecture-free biochemistry. Biochem. Mol. Biol. Educ. 35, 172-180.
19. Parslow, G. R. (2012) The Khan academy and the day-night flipped classroom. Biochem. Mol. Biol. Educ. 40, 337-338.
20. Stockwell, B. R. and Cennamo, M. (2014) Reimagining the undergraduate science course, ASBMB Today, Available at: http://www.asbmb.org/asbmbtoday/201405/Education/.
21. Prober, C. G. and Heath, C. (2012) Lecture halls without lectures-A proposal for medical education. N Engl. J. Med. 366, 1657-1659.
22. Panopto Video Platform for Businesses and Universities: http://panopto.com.
23. BlackBoard Learn|Learning Management System: http://www.blackboard.com/learning-management-system/blackboard-learn.aspx.
24. Sapling Learning | Engaging Students, Empowering Educators: http://www2.saplinglearning.com/.
25. Voet, D., Voet, J. G., and Pratt, C. W. (2013) Fundamentals of Biochemistry, 4th ed., John Wiley & Sons Inc, Hoboken, NJ.
26. Bloom, B. S., Englehart, M. B., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., Krathwohl, D. R. (1956) Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, the classification of educational goals-Handbook I: Cognitive Domain, David McKay Company, New York.
27. Hake, R. (1998) Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. Am. J. Phys. 66, 64-74.
28. Seymour, E., Wiese, D., Hunter, A., Daffinrud, S. (2000) Creating a Better Mousetrap: On-line Student Assessment of their Learning Gains, National Meetings of the American Chemical Society Symposium, San Francisco, Available at: http://www.flaguide.org/resource/articles.php.
29. Ruddick, K. W. (2012) Improving chemical education from high school to college using a more hands-on approach, unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN.