Systems analysis for interpretation of phosphoproteomics data

Methods in Molecular Biology

Volumn 1355, Issue , 2016, Pages 341-360

  Munk, Stephanie ^a   Refsgaard, Jan C ^a   Olsen, Jesper V ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Cytoscape; Functional networks; Gene ontology; Phosphoproteomics; Sequence motifs; STRING; Systems analysis

Indexed keywords

APOPTOSIS; BIOINFORMATICS; CELL DEATH; CELLULAR DISTRIBUTION; ENZYME ACTIVITY; GENE ONTOLOGY; MASS SPECTROMETRY; MOLECULAR BIOLOGY; PROTEOMICS; SYSTEM ANALYSIS; ALGORITHM; ANIMAL; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DATA MINING; HUMAN; METABOLISM; PHOSPHORYLATION; PROCEDURES; PROTEIN DATABASE; PROTEIN PROCESSING; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY; WORKFLOW;

PHOSPHOPROTEIN;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; DATA MINING; DATABASES, PROTEIN; HUMANS; MASS SPECTROMETRY; PHOSPHOPROTEINS; PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEIN PROCESSING, POST-TRANSLATIONAL; PROTEOMICS; SOFTWARE; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY; SYSTEMS INTEGRATION; WORKFLOW;

EID: 84947968065     PISSN: 10643745     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-3049-4_23     Document Type: Chapter

References (34)

1. Suderman M, Hallett M (2007) Tools for visually exploring biological networks. Bioinformatics 23(20):2651–9
2. Gehlenborg N et al (2010) Visualization of omics data for systems biology. Nat Methods 7(3 Suppl):S56–68
3. da Huang W, Sherman BT, Lempicki RA (2009) Bioinformatics enrichment tools: paths toward the comprehensive functional analysis of large gene lists. Nucleic Acids Res 37(1):1–13
4. Schnoes AM et al (2013) Biases in the experimental annotations of protein function and their effect on our understanding of protein function space. PLoS Comput Biol 9(5), e1003063
5. Ashburner M et al (2000) Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat Genet 25(1): 25–9
6. Kanehisa M, Goto S (2000) KEGG: kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 28(1):27–30
7. Croft D et al (2014) The Reactome pathway knowledgebase. Nucleic Acids Res 42(Database issue):D472–7
8. Dennis G Jr et al (2003) DAVID: Database for Annotation, Visualization, and Integrated Discovery. Genome Biol 4(5):P3
9. Finn RD et al (2014) Pfam: the protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res 42(Database issue):D222–30
10. Schultz J et al (1998) SMART, a simple modular architecture research tool: identification of signaling domains. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95(11):5857–64
11. Barabasi AL, Gulbahce N, Loscalzo J (2011) Network medicine: a network-based approach to human disease. Nat Rev Genet 12(1): 56–68
12. von Stechow L, van de Water B, Danen EH (2013) Unraveling DNA damage response- signaling networks through systems approaches. Arch Toxicol 87(9):1635–48
13. Szklarczyk D et al (2011) The STRING database in 2011: functional interaction networks of proteins, globally integrated and scored. Nucleic Acids Res 39(Database issue): D561–8
14. Franceschini A et al (2013) STRING v9.1: protein-protein interaction networks, with increased coverage and integration. Nucleic Acids Res 41(Database issue):D808–15
15. Jensen LJ et al (2009) STRING 8–a global view on proteins and their functional interactions in 630 organisms. Nucleic Acids Res 37(Database issue):D412–6
16. Shannon P et al (2003) Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res 13(11):2498–504
17. Licata L et al (2012) MINT, the molecular interaction database: 2012 update. Nucleic Acids Res 40(Database issue):D857–61
18. Gao J et al (2009) Integrating and annotating the interactome using the MiMI plugin for cytoscape. Bioinformatics 25(1):137–8
19. Bader GD, Hogue CW (2003) An automated method for finding molecular complexes in large protein interaction networks. BMC Bioinformatics 4:2
20. Ideker T et al (2002) Discovering regulatory and signalling circuits in molecular interaction networks. Bioinformatics 18(Suppl 1):S233–40
21. Bindea G et al (2009) ClueGO: a Cytoscape plug-in to decipher functionally grouped gene ontology and pathway annotation networks. Bioinformatics 25(8):1091–3
22. Bindea G, Galon J, Mlecnik B (2013) CluePedia Cytoscape plugin: pathway insights using integrated experimental and in silico data. Bioinformatics 29(5):661–3
23. Maere S, Heymans K, Kuiper M (2005) BiNGO: a Cytoscape plugin to assess overrepresentation of gene ontology categories in biological networks. Bioinformatics 21(16): 3448–9
24. Wu G, Feng X, Stein L (2010) A human functional protein interaction network and its application to cancer data analysis. Genome Biol 11(5):R53
25. Wu G, Stein L (2012) A network modulebased method for identifying cancer prognostic signatures. Genome Biol 13(12):R112
26. Schneider TD, Stephens RM (1990) Sequence logos: a new way to display consensus sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 18(20):6097–100
27. Colaert N et al (2009) Improved visualization of protein consensus sequences by iceLogo. Nat Methods 6(11):786–7
28. Lynn DJ et al (2008) InnateDB: facilitating systems-level analyses of the mammalian innate immune response. Mol Syst Biol 4:218
29. Okuda S et al (2008) KEGG Atlas mapping for global analysis of metabolic pathways. Nucleic Acids Res 36(Web Server issue):W423–6
30. Zeeberg BR et al (2003) GoMiner: a resource for biological interpretation of genomic and proteomic data. Genome Biol 4(4):R28
31. Hu Z et al (2009) VisANT 3.5: multi-scale network visualization, analysis and inference based on the gene ontology. Nucleic Acids Res 37(Web Server issue):W115–21
32. Baitaluk M et al (2006) BiologicalNetworks: visualization and analysis tool for systems biology. Nucleic Acids Res 34(Web Server issue): W466–71
33. Junker BH, Klukas C, Schreiber F (2006) VANTED: a system for advanced data analysis and visualization in the context of biological networks. BMC Bioinformatics 7:109
34. Kutmon M et al (2013) CyTargetLinker: a cytoscape app to integrate regulatory interactions in network analysis. PLoS One 8(12), e82160