A human-centered framework for innovation in conservation incentive programs

Ambio

Volumn 44, Issue 8, 2015, Pages 788-792

  Sorice, Michael G ^a   Donlan, C Josh ^b,c  

^a VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Advanced Conservation Strategies   (United States)

^c Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics   (United States)

Author keywords

Adaptive governance; Design thinking; Human centered design; Incentive programs; Participation; Stewardship

Indexed keywords

CONSERVATION PLANNING; ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUE; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; INCENTIVE; INNOVATION; NATURE CONSERVATION; PARTICIPATORY APPROACH;

COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION; ECONOMICS; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; HUMAN; MOTIVATION; PROCEDURES;

COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; HUMANS; MOTIVATION;

EID: 84947493236     PISSN: 00447447     EISSN: 16547209     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s13280-015-0650-z     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Banerjee, S., S. Secchi, J. Fargione, S. Polasky, and S. Kraft. 2013. How to sell ecosystem services: A guide for designing new markets. Frontiers in Ecology & the Environment 11: 297–304.
2. Brown, T., and J. Wyatt. 2010. Design thinking for social innovation. Stanford Social Innovation Review 8: 30–35.
3. Bowles, S. 2008. Policies designed for self-interested citizens may undermine “the moral sentiments”: Evidence from economic experiments. Science 320: 1605–1609.
4. Clements, T., A. John, K. Nielsen, D. An, S. Tan, and E.J. Milner-Gulland. 2010. Payments for biodiversity conservation in the context of weak institutions: Comparison of three programs from Cambodia. Ecological Economics 69: 1283–1291.
5. DeCaro, D., and M. Stokes. 2008. Social-psychological principles of community-based conservation and conservancy motivation: Attaining goals within an autonomy-supportive environment. Conservation Biology 22: 1443–1451.
6. Deci, E.L., R. Koestner, and R.M. Ryan. 1999. A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin 125: 627–668.
7. Donlan, C.J. 2015. Proactive strategies for protecting species: Pre-listing conservation and the Endangered Species Act. Oakland: University of California Press.
8. Ferraro, P.J. 2011. The future of payments for environmental services. Conservation Biology 25: 1134–1138.
9. Ferraro, P.J., and A. Kiss. 2002. Direct payments to conserve biodiversity. Science 298: 1718–1719.
10. Frey, B.S., and R. Jegen. 2001. Motivation crowding theory. Journal of Economic Surveys 15: 589.
11. Gelcich, S., and C.J. Donlan. 2015. Incentivizing biodiversity conservation with artisanal fishing communities through territorial user rights and business model innovation. Conservation Biology. doi:10.1111/cobi.12477.
12. Greene, H. 2005. Organisms in nature as a central focus for biology. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 20: 23–27.
13. Heyman, J., and D. Ariely. 2004. Effort for payment. Psychological Science 15: 787–793.
14. Jack, B.K., C. Kousky, and K.R.E. Sims. 2008. Lessons from previous experience with incentive-based mechanisms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105: 9465–9470.
15. Langpap, C. 2006. Conservation of endangered species: Can incentives work for private landowners? Ecological Economics 57: 558–572.
16. Leopold, A. 1949. A sand County Almanac. New York: Oxford University Press.
17. Lett, J. 1990. Emics and etics: Notes on the epistemology of anthropology. In Emics and etics: The insider/outsider debate, ed. T.N. Headland, K.L. Pike, and M. Harris. Frontiers of Anthropology, vol. 7. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
18. Liedtka, J. 2011. Learning to use design thinking tools for successful innovation. Strategy & Leadership 39: 13–19.
19. Liedtka, J., and T. Ogilvie. 2011. Designing for growth. New York: Columbia University Press.
20. Martin, R. 2009. The design of business: Why design thinking is the next competitive advantage. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
21. Melles, G., I. de Vere, and V. Misic. 2011. Socially responsible design: Thinking beyond the triple bottom line to socially responsive and sustainable product design. CoDesign 7: 143–154.
22. Milne, S., and E. Niesten. 2009. Direct payments for biodiversity conservation in developing countries: Practical insights for design and implementation. Oryx 43: 530–541.
23. Muradian, R., E. Corbera, U. Pascual, N. Kosoy, and P.H. May. 2010. Reconciling theory and practice: An alternative conceptual framework for understanding payments for environmental services. Ecological Economics 69: 1202–1208.
24. Naeem, S., J.C. Ingram, A. Varga, T. Agardy, P. Barten, G. Bennett, E. Bloomgarden, L.L. Bremer, et al. 2015. Get the science right when paying for nature’s services. Science 347: 1206–1207.
25. Osbaldiston, R., and K.M. Sheldon. 2003. Promoting internalized motivation for environmentally responsible behavior: A prospective study of environmental goals. Journal of Environmental Psychology 23: 349–357.
26. Peterson, M.N., T.R. Peterson, M.J. Peterson, R.R. Lopez, and N.J. Silvy. 2002. Cultural conflict and the endangered Florida key deer. Journal of Wildlife Management 66: 921–942.
27. Ryan, R.M., and E.L. Deci. 2000. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist 55: 68–78.
28. Scherfig, C., M. Brunander, and C. Melander. 2010. From the world’s first design policy to the world’s best design policy. Design Management Review 21: 6–14.
29. Sommerville, M.M., J.P. Jones, and E. Milner-Gulland. 2009. A revised conceptual framework for payments for environmental services. Ecology & Society 14: 1–14.
30. Sorice, M.G., and T. Abel. 2015. A landowner-centered approach to obtaining participation in pre-compliance conservation programs. In Proactive strategies for protecting species: Pre-listing conservation and the Endangered Species Act, ed. C.J. Donlan, 105–114. Oakland: University of California Press.
31. Sorice, M.G., and J.R. Conner. 2010. Predicting private landowner intentions to enroll in an incentive program to protect endangered species. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 15: 77–89.
32. Sorice, M.G., W. Haider, J.R. Conner, and R.B. Ditton. 2011. Incentive structure of and private landowner participation in an endangered species conservation program. Conservation Biology 25: 587–596.
33. Sorice, M.G., C. Oh, T. Gartner, M. Snieckus, R. Johnson, and C.J. Donlan. 2013. Increasing participation in incentive programs for biodiversity conservation. Ecological Applications 23: 1146–1155.
34. Van Vugt, M. 2009. Averting the tragedy of the commons: Using social psychological science to protect the environment. Current Directions in Psychological Science 18: 169–173.
35. Vohs, K., N.L. Mead, and M.R. Goode. 2006. The psychological consequences of money. Science 314: 1154–1156.
36. Worrell, R., and M.C. Appleby. 2000. Stewardship of natural resources: Definition, ethical and practical aspects. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 12: 263–277.
37. Wunder, S., S. Engel, and S. Pagiola. 2008. Taking stock: A comparative analysis of payments for environmental services programs in developed and developing countries. Ecological Economics 65: 834–852.