Get the science right when paying for nature's services: Few projects adequately address design and evaluation

Science

Volumn 347, Issue 6227, 2015, Pages 1206-1207

  Naeem, S ^a   Ingram, J C ^a   Varga, A ^a   Agardy, T ^a   Barten, P ^a   Bennett, G ^a   Bloomgarden, E ^a   Bremer, L L ^a   Burkill, P ^a   Cattau, M ^a   Ching, C ^a   Colby, M ^a   Cook, D C ^a   Costanza, R ^a   DeClerck, F ^a   Freund, C ^a   Gartner, T ^a   Goldman Benner, R ^a   Gunderson, J ^a   Jarrett, D ^a   Kinzig, A P ^a   Kiss, A ^a   Koontz, A ^a   Kumar, P ^a   Lasky, J R ^a   Masozera, M ^a   Meyers, D ^a   Milano, F ^a   Naughton Treves, L ^a   Nichols, E ^a   Olander, L ^a   Olmsted, P ^a   Perge, E ^a   Perrings, C ^a   Polasky, S ^a   Potent, J ^a   Prager, C ^a   Quetier F ^a   Redford, K ^a   Saterson, K ^a   Thoumi, G ^a   Vargas, M T ^a   Vickerman, S ^a   Weisser, W ^a   Wilkie, D ^a   Wunder, S ^a   more..

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DESIGN METHOD; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; MODEL VALIDATION; PROJECT ASSESSMENT; SUSTAINABILITY; WILLINGNESS TO PAY;

ECOSYSTEM; EVALUATION STUDY; MARKET; NATURAL SCIENCE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; REVIEW; STANDARD; ECONOMICS; ENVIRONMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; POLICY;

CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENT; GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; POLICY;

EID: 84924777971     PISSN: 00368075     EISSN: 10959203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1126/science.aaa1403     Document Type: Review

References (18)

1. G. C. Daily, P. A. Matson, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105, 9455 (2008).
2. S. Wunder, S. Engel, S. Pagiola, Ecol. Econ. 65, 834 (2008).
3. J. C. Ingram et al., Ecosystem Services 7, 10 (2014).
4. P. J. Ferraro, S. K. Pattanayak, PLOS Biol. 4, e105 (2006).
5. S. K. Pattanayak, S. Wunder, P. J. Ferraro, Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy 4, 254 (2010).
6. R. Pirard, R. Lapeyre, Ecosystem Services 9, 106 (2014).
7. P. Ina, Payments for environmental services: Lessons from the Costa Rican PES programme. IIED (2013). http://pubs.iied.org/pdfs/G03561.pdf
8. G. Grolleau, L. M. J. McCann, Ecol. Econ. 76, 87 (2012).
9. T. Clements et al., Ecol. Econ. 69, 1283 (2010).
10. R. Muradian et al., Conserv. Lett. 6, 274 (2013).
11. S. Wunder, Conserv. Lett. 6, 230 (2013).
12. R. Yin, T. Liu, S. Yao, M. Zhao, For. Policy Econ. 35, 66 (2013).
13. A. P. Kinzig et al., Science 334, 603 (2011).
14. P. Kareiva, A. Chang, M. Marvier, Science 321, 1638 (2008).
15. K. Ellison, Front. Ecol. Environ 7, 60 (2009).
16. R. Muradian, E. Corbera, U. Pascual, N. Kosoy, P. H. May, Ecol. Econ. 69, 1202 (2010).
17. W. J. Sutherland, T. A. Gardner, L. J. Haider, L. V. Dicks, Oryx 48, 1 (2014).
18. J. Farley, R. Costanza, Ecol. Econ. 69, 2060 (2010).