Comparative analysis of label-free and 8-plex iTRAQ approach for quantitative tissue proteomic analysis

PLoS ONE

Volumn 10, Issue 9, 2015, Pages

  Latosinska, Agnieszka ^a,b   Vougas, Konstantinos ^a   Makridakis, Manousos ^a   Klein, Julie ^c,d   Mullen, William ^e   Abbas, Mahmoud ^f   Stravodimos, Konstantinos ^g   Katafigiotis, Ioannis ^g   Merseburger, Axel S ^h   Zoidakis, Jerome ^a   Mischak, Harald ^e,i   Vlahou, Antonia ^a   Jankowski, Vera ^j  

^a BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION   (Greece)

^b CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

^c INSERM   (France)

^d UNIVERSITÉ PAUL SABATIER   (France)

^e UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

^f HANNOVER MEDICAL SCHOOL   (Germany)

^g LAIKO GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Greece)

^h UNIVERSITY OF LÜBECK   (Germany)

ⁱ MOSAIQUES DIAGNOSTICS GMBH   (Germany)

^j RWTH AACHEN UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PEPTIDE DERIVATIVE; TUMOR PROTEIN;

8 PLEX ISOBARIC TAG FOR RELATIVE AND ABSOLUTE QUANTIFICATION; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; CANCER TISSUE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOWN REGULATION; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LABEL FREE ISOBARIC TAG FOR RELATIVE AND ABSOLUTE QUANTIFICATION; LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; MASS SPECTROMETRY; MUSCLE INVASIVE BLADDER CANCER; NON MUSCLE INVASIVE BLADDER CANCER; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEOMICS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; UPREGULATION; BLADDER TUMOR; COMPARATIVE STUDY; METABOLISM; PROCEDURES; TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY;

CHROMATOGRAPHY, LIQUID; HUMANS; NEOPLASM PROTEINS; PROTEOMICS; TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY; URINARY BLADDER NEOPLASMS;

EID: 84947281676     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0137048     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Ong SE, Mann M. Mass spectrometry-based proteomics turns quantitative. Nat Chem Biol. 2005; 1:252-262. PMID: 16408053
2. Ralhan R, Desouza LV, Matta A, Chandra Tripathi S, Ghanny S, Datta Gupta S, et al. Discovery and verification of head-and-neck cancer biomarkers by differential protein expression analysis using iTRAQ labeling, multidimensional liquid chromatography, and tandem mass spectrometry. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2008; 7:1162-1173. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M700500-MCP200 PMID: 18339795
3. Schiess R, Wollscheid B, Aebersold R. Targeted proteomic strategy for clinical biomarker discovery. Mol Oncol. 2009; 3:33-44. doi: 10.1016/j.molonc.2008.12.001 PMID: 19383365
4. Eriksson H, Lengqvist J, Hedlund J, Uhlen K, Orre LM, Bjellqvist B, et al. Quantitative membrane proteomics applying narrow range peptide isoelectric focusing for studies of small cell lung cancer resistance mechanisms. Proteomics. 2008; 8:3008-3018. doi: 10.1002/pmic.200800174 PMID: 18654985
5. Qattan AT, Mulvey C, Crawford M, Natale DA, Godovac-Zimmermann J. Quantitative organelle proteomics of MCF-7 breast cancer cells reveals multiple subcellular locations for proteins in cellular functional processes. J Proteome Res. 2010; 9:495-508. doi: 10.1021/pr9008332 PMID: 19911851
6. Baker CL, Kettenbach AN, Loros JJ, Gerber SA, Dunlap JC. Quantitative proteomics reveals a dynamic interactome and phase-specific phosphorylation in the Neurospora circadian clock. Mol Cell. 2009; 34:354-363. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2009.04.023 PMID: 19450533
7. Hubner NC, Bird AW, Cox J, Splettstoesser B, Bandilla P, Poser I, et al. Quantitative proteomics combined with BAC TransgeneOmics reveals in vivo protein interactions. J Cell Biol. 2010; 189:739-754. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200911091 PMID: 20479470
8. Husi H, Sanchez-Nino MD, Delles C, Mullen W, Vlahou A, Ortiz A, et al. A combinatorial approach of Proteomics and Systems Biology in unravelling the mechanisms of acute kidney injury (AKI): involvement of NMDA receptor GRIN1 in murine AKI. BMC Syst Biol. 2013; 7:110. doi: 10.1186/1752-0509-7-110 PMID: 24172336
9. Bantscheff M, Schirle M, Sweetman G, Rick J, Kuster B. Quantitative mass spectrometry in proteomics: a critical review. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2007; 389:1017-1031. PMID: 17668192
10. Pottiez G, Wiederin J, Fox HS, Ciborowski P. Comparison of 4-plex to 8-plex iTRAQ quantitative measurements of proteins in human plasma samples. J Proteome Res. 2012; 11:3774-3781. doi: 10.1021/pr300414z PMID: 22594965
11. Werner T, Sweetman G, Savitski MF, Mathieson T, Bantscheff M, Savitski MM. Ion coalescence of neutron encoded TMT 10-plex reporter ions. Anal Chem. 2014; 86:3594-3601. doi: 10.1021/ac500140s PMID: 24579773
12. Li Z, Adams RM, Chourey K, Hurst GB, Hettich RL, Pan C. Systematic comparison of label-free, metabolic labeling, and isobaric chemical labeling for quantitative proteomics on LTQ Orbitrap Velos. J Proteome Res. 2012; 11:1582-1590. doi: 10.1021/pr200748h PMID: 22188275
13. Patel VJ, Thalassinos K, Slade SE, Connolly JB, Crombie A, Murrell JC, et al. A comparison of labeling and label-free mass spectrometry-based proteomics approaches. J Proteome Res. 2009; 8:3752-3759. doi: 10.1021/pr900080y PMID: 19435289
14. Sjodin MO, Wetterhall M, Kultima K, Artemenko K. Comparative study of label and label-free techniques using shotgun proteomics for relative protein quantification. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2013; 928:83-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2013.03.027 PMID: 23608324
15. Trinh HV, Grossmann J, Gehrig P, Roschitzki B, Schlapbach R, Greber UF, et al. iTRAQ-Based and Label-Free Proteomics Approaches for Studies of Human Adenovirus Infections. Int J Proteomics. 2013; 2013:581862. doi: 10.1155/2013/581862 PMID: 23555056
16. Wang H, Alvarez S, Hicks LM. Comprehensive comparison of iTRAQ and label-free LC-based quantitative proteomics approaches using two Chlamydomonas reinhardtii strains of interest for biofuels engineering. J Proteome Res. 2012; 11:487-501. doi: 10.1021/pr2008225 PMID: 22059437
17. Jain R, Kulkarni P, Dhali S, Rapole S, Srivastava S. Quantitative proteomic analysis of global effect of LLL12 on U87 cell's proteome: An insight into the molecular mechanism of LLL12. J Proteomics. 2015; 113:127-142. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2014.09.020 PMID: 25286751
18. Sharma S, Ray S, Moiyadi A, Sridhar E, Srivastava S. Quantitative proteomic analysis of meningiomas for the identification of surrogate protein markers. Sci Rep. 2014; 4:7140. doi: 10.1038/srep07140 PMID: 25413266
19. Sobin L, Gospodarowicz K, Wittekind C. TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours, 7th edition. UICC International Union Against Cancer Wiley-Blackwell. 2009.
20. Wisniewski JR, Zougman A, Nagaraj N, Mann M. Universal sample preparation method for proteome analysis. Nat Methods. 2009; 6:359-362. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1322 PMID: 19377485
21. Bairoch A, Apweiler R. The SWISS-PROT protein sequence database and its supplement TrEMBL in 2000. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000; 28:45-48. PMID: 10592178
22. UniProt C. UniProt: a hub for protein information. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015; 43:D204-212. doi: 10.1093/nar/gku989 PMID: 25348405
23. Eng JK, McCormack AL, Yates JR. An approach to correlate tandem mass spectral data of peptides with amino acid sequences in a protein database. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 1994; 5:976-989. doi: 10.1016/1044-0305(94)80016-2 PMID: 24226387
24. Kall L, Canterbury JD, Weston J, Noble WS, MacCoss MJ. Semi-supervised learning for peptide identification from shotgun proteomics datasets. Nat Methods. 2007; 4:923-925. PMID: 17952086
25. Kil YJ, Becker C, Sandoval W, Goldberg D, Bern M. Preview: a program for surveying shotgun proteomics tandem mass spectrometry data. Anal Chem. 2011; 83:5259-5267. doi: 10.1021/ac200609a PMID: 21619057
26. Vizcaino JA, Cote RG, Csordas A, Dianes JA, Fabregat A, Foster JM, et al. The PRoteomics IDEntifications (PRIDE) database and associated tools: status in 2013. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013; 41:D1063-1069. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks1262 PMID: 23203882
27. Serang O, Noble W. A review of statistical methods for protein identification using tandem mass spectrometry. Stat Interface. 2012; 5:3-20. PMID: 22833779
28. Sandberg A, Branca RM, Lehtio J, Forshed J. Quantitative accuracy in mass spectrometry based proteomics of complex samples: the impact of labeling and precursor interference. J Proteomics. 2014; 96:133-144. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2013.10.035 PMID: 24211767
29. Deutsch EW, Mendoza L, Shteynberg D, Farrah T, Lam H, Tasman N, et al. A guided tour of the Trans-Proteomic Pipeline. Proteomics. 2010; 10:1150-1159. doi: 10.1002/pmic.200900375 PMID: 20101611
30. Uhlen M, Bjorling E, Agaton C, Szigyarto CA, Amini B, Andersen E, et al. A human protein atlas for normal and cancer tissues based on antibody proteomics. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2005; 4:1920-1932. PMID: 16127175
31. Wilhelm M, Schlegl J, Hahne H, Moghaddas Gholami A, Lieberenz M, Savitski MM, et al. Mass-spectrometry-based draft of the human proteome. Nature. 2014; 509:582-587. doi: 10.1038/nature13319 PMID: 24870543
32. Bastian F, Parmentier G, Roux J, Moretti S, Laudet V. Bgee: Integrating and Comparing Heterogeneous Transcriptome Data Among Species. In: Bairoch A, Cohen-Boulakia S, Froidevaux C, editors. Data Integration in the Life Sciences. Berlin Heidelberg: Spinger; 2008. p. 124-131.
33. Dyrskjot L, Kruhoffer M, Thykjaer T, Marcussen N, Jensen JL, Moller K, et al. Gene expression in the urinary bladder: a common carcinoma in situ gene expression signature exists disregarding histopathological classification. Cancer Res. 2004; 64:4040-4048. PMID: 15173019
34. Edgar R, Domrachev M, Lash AE. Gene Expression Omnibus: NCBI gene expression and hybridization array data repository. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002; 30:207-210. PMID: 11752295
35. Kawakami K, Enokida H, Tachiwada T, Gotanda T, Tsuneyoshi K, Kubo H, et al. Identification of differentially expressed genes in human bladder cancer through genome-wide gene expression profiling. Oncol Rep. 2006; 16:521-531. PMID: 16865252
36. Liu Y, Noon AP, Aguiar Cabeza E, Shen J, Kuk C, Ilczynski C, et al. Next-generation RNA Sequencing of Archival Formalin-fixed Paraffin-embedded Urothelial Bladder Cancer. Eur Urol. 2014; 66:982-986. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.07.045 PMID: 25199720
37. Barrett T, Wilhite SE, Ledoux P, Evangelista C, Kim IF, Tomashevsky M, et al. NCBI GEO: archive for functional genomics data sets-update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013; 41:D991-995. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks1193 PMID: 23193258
38. Ruifrok AC, Johnston DA. Quantification of histochemical staining by color deconvolution. Anal Quant Cytol Histol. 2001; 23:291-299. PMID: 11531144
39. Abdallah C, Sergeant K, Guillier C, Dumas-Gaudot E, Leclercq CC, Renaut J. Optimization of iTRAQ labelling coupled to OFFGEL fractionation as a proteomic workflow to the analysis of microsomal proteins of Medicago truncatula roots. Proteome Sci. 2012; 10:37. doi: 10.1186/1477-5956-10-37 PMID: 22672774
40. McDowell GS, Gaun A, Steen H. iFASP: combining isobaric mass tagging with filter-aided sample preparation. J Proteome Res. 2013; 12:3809-3812. doi: 10.1021/pr400032m PMID: 23692318
41. Zhang SY, Li BY, Li XL, Cheng M, Cai Q, Yu F, et al. Effects of phlorizin on diabetic retinopathy according to isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantification-based proteomics in db/db mice. Mol Vis. 2013; 19:812-821. PMID: 23592918
42. Ross PL, Huang YN, Marchese JN, Williamson B, Parker K, Hattan S, et al. Multiplexed protein quantitation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using amine-reactive isobaric tagging reagents. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2004; 3:1154-1169. PMID: 15385600
43. Simpson DM, Beynon RJ. Acetone precipitation of proteins and the modification of peptides. J Proteome Res. 2010; 9:444-450. doi: 10.1021/pr900806x PMID: 20000691
44. Thingholm TE, Palmisano G, Kjeldsen F, Larsen MR. Undesirable charge-enhancement of isobaric tagged phosphopeptides leads to reduced identification efficiency. J Proteome Res. 2010; 9:4045-4052. doi: 10.1021/pr100230q PMID: 20515019
45. Pejchinovski M, Klein J, Ramirez-Torres A, Bitsika V, Mermelekas G, Vlahou A, et al. Comparison of higher-energy collisional dissociation and collision-induced dissociation MS/MS sequencing methods for identification of naturally occurring peptides in human urine. Proteomics Clin Appl. 2015.
46. Karp NA, Huber W, Sadowski PG, Charles PD, Hester SV, Lilley KS. Addressing accuracy and precision issues in iTRAQ quantitation. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2010; 9:1885-1897. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M900628-MCP200 PMID: 20382981
47. Ow SY, Salim M, Noirel J, Evans C, Rehman I, Wright PC. iTRAQ underestimation in simple and complex mixtures: "the good, the bad and the ugly". J Proteome Res. 2009; 8:5347-5355. doi: 10.1021/pr900634c PMID: 19754192
48. Drabovich AP, Diamandis EP. Combinatorial peptide libraries facilitate development of multiple reaction monitoring assays for low-abundance proteins. J Proteome Res. 2010; 9:1236-1245. doi: 10.1021/pr900729g PMID: 20070123