Aneuploidy causes premature differentiation of neural and intestinal stem cells

Nature Communications

Volumn 6, Issue , 2015, Pages

  Gogendeau, Delphine ^a   Siudeja, Katarzyna ^b   Gambarotto, Davide ^a   Pennetier, Carole ^a   Bardin, Allison J ^b   Basto, Renata ^a  

^a INSTITUT CURIE   (France)

^b INSTITUT CURIE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HISTONE H2B; PROTEIN MAD2;

APOPTOSIS; BRAIN; FLY; HOMEOSTASIS; MUTATION; NEUROLOGY; PLOIDY;

ADULT; ANEUPLOIDY; ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; APOPTOSIS; ARTICLE; BRAIN SIZE; CELL CYCLE G1 PHASE; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL EXPANSION; CHROMOSOME ABERRATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; HOMEOSTASIS; INTESTINAL STEM CELL; M PHASE CELL CYCLE CHECKPOINT; MALE; MOUSE; NEURAL STEM CELL; NEUROBLAST; NONHUMAN; ANIMAL; BRAIN; CELL PROLIFERATION; CYTOLOGY; DROSOPHILA; EMBRYOLOGY; GENETICS; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; INTESTINE; METABOLISM; ORGAN SIZE; STEM CELL; WING;

ANEUPLOIDY; ANIMALS; BRAIN; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL PROLIFERATION; DROSOPHILA; G1 PHASE; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; INTESTINES; NEURAL STEM CELLS; ORGAN SIZE; STEM CELLS; WINGS, ANIMAL;

EID: 84947211425     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20411723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms9894     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Siegel, J. J. & Amon, A. New insights into the troubles of aneuploidy. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 28, 189-214 (2012).
2. Behrens, A., van Deursen, J. M., Rudolph, K. L. & Schumacher, B. Impact of genomic damage and ageing on stem cell function. Nat. Cell Biol. 16, 201-207 (2014).
3. Boveri, T. Concerning the origin of malignant tumours by Theodor Boveri. Translated and annotated by Henry Harris. J. Cell Sci. 121(Suppl 1): 1-84 (2008).
4. Antonarakis, S. E., Lyle, R., Dermitzakis, E. T., Reymond, A. & Deutsch, S. Chromosome 21 and down syndrome: from genomics to pathophysiology. Nat. Rev. Genet. 5, 725-738 (2004).
5. Lippe, B. Turner syndrome. Endocrinol. Metab. Clin. North Am. 20, 121-152 (1991).
6. Hanks, S. et al. Constitutional aneuploidy and cancer predisposition caused by biallelic mutations in BUB1B. Nat. Genet. 36, 1159-1161 (2004).
7. Marthiens, V. et al. Centrosome amplification causes microcephaly. Nat. Cell Biol. 15, 731-740 (2013).
8. Gatti, M. & Goldberg, M. L. Mutations affecting cell division in Drosophila. Methods Cell Biol. 35, 543-586 (1991).
9. Homem, C. C. & Knoblich, J. A. Drosophila neuroblasts: a model for stem cell biology. Development 139, 4297-4310 (2012).
10. Doe, C. Q. Neural stem cells: balancing self-renewal with differentiation. Development 135, 1575-1587 (2008).
11. Castellanos, E., Dominguez, P. & Gonzalez, C. Centrosome dysfunction in Drosophila neural stem cells causes tumors that are not due to genome instability. Curr. Biol. 18, 1209-1214 (2008).
12. Basto, R. et al. Centrosome amplification can initiate tumorigenesis in flies. Cell 133, 1032-1042 (2008).
13. Dekanty, A., Barrio, L., Muzzopappa, M., Auer, H. & Milan, M. Aneuploidy-induced delaminating cells drive tumorigenesis in Drosophila epithelia. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 20549-20554 (2012).
14. Sabino, D. et al. Moesin is a major regulator of centrosome behavior in epithelial cells with extra centrosomes. Curr. Biol. 25, 879-889 (2015).
15. Weaver, B. A., Silk, A. D., Montagna, C., Verdier-Pinard, P. & Cleveland, D. W. Aneuploidy acts both oncogenically and as a tumor suppressor. Cancer Cell 11, 25-36 (2007).
16. Sotillo, R. et al. Mad2 overexpression promotes aneuploidy and tumorigenesis in mice. Cancer Cell 11, 9-23 (2007).
17. Buffin, E., Emre, D. & Karess, R. E. Flies without a spindle checkpoint. Nat. Cell Biol. 9, 565-572 (2007).
18. Ganem, N. J., Godinho, S. A. & Pellman, D. A mechanism linking extra centrosomes to chromosomal instability. Nature 460, 278-282 (2009).
19. Silkworth, W. T., Nardi, I. K., Scholl, L. M. & Cimini, D. Multipolar spindle pole coalescence is a major source of kinetochore mis-attachment and chromosome mis-segregation in cancer cells. PLoS ONE 4, e6564 (2009).
20. Crasta, K. et al. DNA breaks and chromosome pulverization from errors in mitosis. Nature 482, 53-58 (2012).
21. Janssen, A., van der Burg, M., Szuhai, K., Kops, G. J. & Medema, R. H. Chromosome segregation errors as a cause of DNA damage and structural chromosome aberrations. Science 333, 1895-1898 (2011).
22. Lara-Gonzalez, P., Westhorpe, F. G. & Taylor, S. S. The spindle assembly checkpoint. Curr. Biol. 22, R966-R980 (2012).
23. Yang, Z., Loncarek, J., Khodjakov, A. & Rieder, C. L. Extra centrosomes and/or chromosomes prolong mitosis in human cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 10, 748-751 (2008).
24. Meraldi, P., Draviam, V. M. & Sorger, P. K. Timing and checkpoints in the regulation of mitotic progression. Dev. Cell 7, 45-60 (2004).
25. Rahmani, Z., Gagou, M. E., Lefebvre, C., Emre, D. & Karess, R. E. Separating the spindle, checkpoint, and timer functions of BubR1. J. Cell Biol. 187, 597-605 (2009).
26. Kwon, M. et al. Mechanisms to suppress multipolar divisions in cancer cells with extra centrosomes. Genes Dev. 22, 2189-2203 (2008).
27. Lai, S. L., Miller, M. R., Robinson, K. J. & Doe, C. Q. The snail family member Worniu is continuously required in neuroblasts to prevent Elav-induced premature differentiation. Dev. Cell 23, 849-857 (2012).
28. Truman, J. W. & Bate, M. Spatial and temporal patterns of neurogenesis in the central nervous system of Drosophila melanogaster. Dev. Biol. 125, 145-157 (1988).
29. Sousa-Nunes, R., Cheng, L. Y. & Gould, A. P. Regulating neural proliferation in the Drosophila CNS. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 20, 50-57 (2010).
30. Pandey, R., Heeger, S. & Lehner, C. F. Rapid effects of acute anoxia on spindle kinetochore interactions activate the mitotic spindle checkpoint. J. Cell Sci. 120, 2807-2818 (2007).
31. Lopes, C. S., Sampaio, P., Williams, B., Goldberg, M. & Sunkel, C. E. The Drosophila Bub3 protein is required for the mitotic checkpoint and for normal accumulation of cyclins during G2 and early stages of mitosis. J. Cell Sci. 118, 187-198 (2005).
32. Morais da Silva, S., Moutinho-Santos, T. & Sunkel, C. E. A tumor suppressor role of the Bub3 spindle checkpoint protein after apoptosis inhibition. J. Cell Biol. 201, 385-393 (2013).
33. Thompson, S. L. & Compton, D. A. Proliferation of aneuploid human cells is limited by a p53-dependent mechanism. J. Cell Biol. 188, 369-381 (2010).
34. Rujano, M. A., Sanchez-Pulido, L., Pennetier, C., le Dez, G. & Basto, R. The microcephaly protein Asp regulates neuroepithelium morphogenesis by controlling the spatial distribution of myosin II. Nat. Cell Biol. 15, 1294-1306 (2013).
35. Bello, B., Holbro, N. & Reichert, H. Polycomb group genes are required for neural stem cell survival in postembryonic neurogenesis of Drosophila. Development 134, 1091-1099 (2007).
36. Siegrist, S. E., Haque, N. S., Chen, C. H., Hay, B. A. & Hariharan, I. K. Inactivation of both Foxo and reaper promotes long-term adult neurogenesis in Drosophila. Curr. Biol. 20, 643-648 (2010).
37. Kuang, C. et al. A novel fizzy/Cdc20-dependent mechanism suppresses necrosis in neural stem cells. Development 141, 1453-1464 (2014).
38. Vanden Berghe, T., Linkermann, A., Jouan-Lanhouet, S., Walczak, H. & Vandenabeele, P. Regulated necrosis: the expanding network of non-apoptotic cell death pathways. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 15, 135-147 (2014).
39. Lu, W. J., Chapo, J., Roig, I. & Abrams, J. M. Meiotic recombination provokes functional activation of the p53 regulatory network. Science 328, 1278-1281 (2010).
40. Brodsky, M. H. et al. Drosophila p53 binds a damage response element at the reaper locus. Cell 101, 103-113 (2000).
41. Basler, K. & Struhl, G. Compartment boundaries and the control of Drosophila limb pattern by hedgehog protein. Nature 368, 208-214 (1994).
42. Weissbein, U., Benvenisty, N. & Ben-David, U. Quality control: genome maintenance in pluripotent stem cells. J. Cell Biol. 204, 153-163 (2014).
43. Becker, K. A. et al. Self-renewal of human embryonic stem cells is supported by a shortened G1 cell cycle phase. J. Cell Physiol. 209, 883-893 (2006).
44. Coronado, D. et al. A short G1 phase is an intrinsic determinant of naive embryonic stem cell pluripotency. Stem Cell Res. 10, 118-131 (2013).
45. Pauklin, S. & Vallier, L. The cell-cycle state of stem cells determines cell fate propensity. Cell 155, 135-147 (2013).
46. Lange, C., Huttner, W. B. & Calegari, F. Cdk4/cyclinD1 overexpression in neural stem cells shortens G1, delays neurogenesis, and promotes the generation and expansion of basal progenitors. Cell Stem Cell 5, 320-331 (2009).
47. Calegari, F., Haubensak, W., Haffner, C. & Huttner, W. B. Selective lengthening of the cell cycle in the neurogenic subpopulation of neural progenitor cells during mouse brain development. J. Neurosci. 25, 6533-6538 (2005).
48. Arai, Y. et al. Neural stem and progenitor cells shorten S-phase on commitment to neuron production. Nat. Commun. 2, 154 (2011).
49. Torres, E. M. et al. Effects of aneuploidy on cellular physiology and cell division in haploid yeast. Science 317, 916-924 (2007).
50. Zielke, N. et al. Fly-FUCCI: A versatile tool for studying cell proliferation in complex tissues. Cell Rep. 7, 588-598 (2014).
51. Hammerle, B. et al. Transient expression of Mnb/Dyrk1a couples cell cycle exit and differentiation of neuronal precursors by inducing p27KIP1 expression and suppressing NOTCH signaling. Development 138, 2543-2554 (2011).
52. Maurange, C., Cheng, L. & Gould, A. P. Temporal transcription factors and their targets schedule the end of neural proliferation in Drosophila. Cell 133, 891-902 (2008).
53. Ikeshima-Kataoka, H., Skeath, J. B., Nabeshima, Y., Doe, C. Q. & Matsuzaki, F. Miranda directs Prospero to a daughter cell during Drosophila asymmetric divisions. Nature 390, 625-629 (1997).
54. Choksi, S. P. et al. Prospero acts as a binary switch between self-renewal and differentiation in Drosophila neural stem cells. Dev. Cell 11, 775-789 (2006).
55. Boone, J. Q. & Doe, C. Q. Identification of Drosophila type II neuroblast lineages containing transit amplifying ganglion mother cells. Dev. Neurobiol. 68, 1185-1195 (2008).
56. Weaver, B. A. & Cleveland, D. W. The role of aneuploidy in promoting and suppressing tumors. J. Cell Biol. 185, 935-937 (2009).
57. Caussinus, E. & Gonzalez, C. Induction of tumor growth by altered stem-cell asymmetric division in Drosophila melanogaster. Nat. Genet. 37, 1125-1129 (2005).
58. Novorol, C. et al. Microcephaly models in the developing zebrafish retinal neuroepithelium point to an underlying defect in metaphase progression. Open Biol. 3, 130065 (2013).
59. Vernon, A. E., Devine, C. & Philpott, A. The cdk inhibitor p27Xic1 is required for differentiation of primary neurones in Xenopus. Development 130, 85-92 (2003).
60. Uetake, Y. & Sluder, G. Prolonged prometaphase blocks daughter cell proliferation despite normal completion of mitosis. Curr. Biol. 20, 1666-1671 (2010).
61. Bardin, A. J., Perdigoto, C. N., Southall, T. D., Brand, A. H. & Schweisguth, F. Transcriptional control of stem cell maintenance in the Drosophila intestine. Development 137, 705-714 (2010).
62. Brand, A. H. & Perrimon, N. Targeted gene expression as a means of altering cell fates and generating dominant phenotypes. Development 118, 401-415 (1993).
63. Lee, T. & Luo, L. Mosaic analysis with a repressible cell marker (MARCM) for Drosophila neural development. Trends Neurosci. 24, 251-254 (2001).
64. Joyce, E. F., Williams, B. R., Xie, T. & Wu, C. T. Identification of genes that promote or antagonize somatic homolog pairing using a high-throughput FISH-based screen. PLoS Genet. 8, e1002667 (2012).
65. Dernburg, A. F. Hybridization to tissues in suspension for whole-mount FISH in Drosophila. Cold Spring Harb. Protoc. 2011, 1534-1537 (2011).
66. O'Brien, L. E., Soliman, S. S., Li, X. & Bilder, D. Altered modes of stem cell division drive adaptive intestinal growth. Cell 147, 603-614 (2011).