Beyond technology acceptance to effective technology use: A parsimonious and actionable model

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 718-729

  Holahan, Patricia J ^a   Lesselroth, Blake J ^b   Adams, Kathleen ^b   Wang, Kai ^a   Church, Victoria ^c  

^a STEVENS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c PORTLAND VA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Effective Technology Use; Medication Reconciliation; Patient Safety; Technology Acceptance; Technology Implementation Effectiveness

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLIMATE; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICATION THERAPY MANAGEMENT; PATIENT SAFETY; WORKPLACE; ANAMNESIS; ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; MASS COMMUNICATION; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; PROCEDURES; THEORETICAL MODEL; UTILIZATION;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; DIFFUSION OF INNOVATION; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; HUMANS; MEDICAL HISTORY TAKING; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; MEDICAL INFORMATICS APPLICATIONS; MEDICATION RECONCILIATION; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PHYSICIANS, PRIMARY CARE; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE;

EID: 84946819595     PISSN: 10675027     EISSN: 1527974X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocu043     Document Type: Article

References (99)

1. Institute of Medicine. To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2000.
2. Protecting 5 million lives from harm. Institute for Healthcare Improvement Website. http://www.ihi.org/IHI/Programs/Campaign/Campaign.htm?TabId=1. Accessed December 10, 2008.
3. Reducing and Preventing Adverse Drug Events to Decrease Hospital Costs. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Website. http://www.ahrq.gov/qual/aderia/aderia.htm. Accessed October 1, 2012.
4. Tam V, Knowles S, Cornish P, et al. Frequency, type, and clinical importance of medication history errors at admission to hospital: a systematic review. CMAJ. 2005;173(5): 510-515. doi:10.1503/cmaj.045311.
5. Mueller SK, Sponsler KC, Kripalani S, et al. Hospital-based medication reconciliation practices: a systematic review [published online ahead of print June 25, 2012]. Arch Intern Med. 2012; 172:1057-1069. doi:10.1001/archinternalmed.2012.2667.
6. Porcelli PJ., Waitman LR, Brown SH. A review of medication reconciliation issues and experiences with clinical staff and information systems [published online ahead of print December 1, 2010]. Appl Clin Inform. 2010;1(4):442-446. doi:10.4338/ACI-2010-02-R0010.
7. Peyton L, Ramser K, Hamann G, et al. Evaluation of medication reconciliation in an ambulatory setting before and after pharmacist intervention. J Am Pharm Assoc. (2003) 2010; 50(4):490-495. doi:10.1331/JAPhA.2010.09055.
8. Pronovost P, Weast B, Schwarz M, et al. Medical reconciliation: a practical tool to reduce the risk of medication errors. J Crit Care 2003;18:201-205.
9. Rozich JD, Howard RJ, Justeson JM, et al. Standardization as a mechanism to improve safety in health care. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2004;30:5-14.
10. Boockvar K, Santos S, Kushniruk A, et al. Medication reconciliation: barriers and facilitators from the perspectives of resident physicians and pharmacists. J Hosp Med. 2011;6: 329-337.
11. Gleason KM, McDaniel MR, Feinglass J, et al. Results of the medications at transitions and clinical handoffs (MATCH) study: analysis of medication reconciliation errors and risk factors at hospital admission [published online ahead of print February 24, 2010]. J Gen Intern Med. 2010;25(5): 441-447. doi:10.1007/s11606-010-1256-6.
12. Lesselroth BJ, Dorr DA, Adams K, Church V, et al. Medication review software to improve the accuracy of outpatient medication histories: protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Hum Factors Man 2011;22:72-86. doi: 10.1002/hfm.20287.
13. Bayoumi I, Howard M, Holbrook A, et al. Interventions to improve medication reconciliation in primary care [published online ahead of print September 2009]. Ann Pharmacother 2009;43(10):1667-1675. doi: 10.1345/aph.1M059.
14. Bayley KB, Savitz L, Maddalone T, Stoner S, et al. Evaluation of patient care interventions and recommendations by a transitional care pharmacist. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2007;3(4)695-703.
15. Gardner B, Graner K. Pharmacists' medication reconciliation - related clinical interventions in a children's hospital. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2009;35(5):278-82.
16. Holden RJ, Karsh B. The technology acceptance model: its past and its future in health care. J Biomed Inform. 2010; 43:159-172.
17. Jasperson JS, Carter PE, Zmud RW. A comprehensive conceptualization of the post-adoptive behaviors associated with IT-enabled work systems. MIS Quart. 2005;29: 525-557.
18. Lapointe L, Rivard S. A multilevel model of resistance to information technology implementation. MIS Quart. 2005;29: 461-491.
19. Patterson ES, Rogers ML, Chapman RJ, et al. Compliance with intended use of bar code medication administration in acute and long-tern care: an observational study. Hum Factors Man 2006;48:15-22.
20. Sichel DE. The productivity slowdown: Is a growing unmeasurable sector the culprit? Rev Econ Stat. 1997;79(3): 367-370.
21. Landauer C, Bellman KL. Wrappings for software development. In: Sprague RH, ed. Proceedings of the Thirty-First Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Vol 3. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE; 1998:420-429.
22. Devaraj S, Kohli R. Performance impacts of information technology: is actual usage the missing link? Manag Sci. 2003;49:273-289.
23. Berg M. Implementing information systems in health care organizations: myths and challenges. Int J Med Inform. 2001;64:143-156.
24. Venkatesh V, Davis FD. Theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Manag Sci. 2000;46:186-204.
25. Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD. User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quart 2003;27:425-478.
26. Venkatesh V, Bala H. Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sci. 2008;39: 273-315.
27. Gagnon M, Jacob JD, Guta A. Treatment adherence redefined: a critical analysis of technotherapeutics. Nurs Inq. 2013;20(1):60-70.
28. Holden RJ, Brown RL, Scanlon MC, Karsh B-T. Modeling nurses' acceptance of bar coded medication administration technology at a pediatric hospital. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012;19(6):1050-1058.
29. Ifinedo P. Technology acceptance by health professionals in Canada: an analysis with a modified UTAUT model. In: Sprague RH, ed. Proceedings of the 45th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Los Alamitos, CA: 2012:2937-2946.
30. Liang HG, Xue YJ, Byrd TA, Rainer RK. Electronic data interchange usage in China's healthcare organizations: the case of Beijing's hospitals. Int J Inf Manage. 2004;24(6): 507-522.
31. Moores TT. Towards an integrated model of IT acceptance in healthcare. Decis Support Syst. 2012;53(3): 507-516.
32. Orruno E, Gagnon MP, Asua J, Ben Abdeljelil A. Evaluation of teledermatology adoption by health-care professionals using a modified Technology Acceptance Model. J Telemed Telecare 2011;17(6):303-307.
33. Paré G, Sicotte C, Jacques H. The effects of creating psychological ownership on physicians' acceptance of clinical information systems. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006;13: 197-205.
34. Venkatesh V, Sykes T, Zhang X. 'Just what the doctor ordered': A revised UTAUT for EMR adoption and use by doctors. In: Sprague RH, ed. Proceedings of the 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE; 2011:1-10.
35. Walter Z, Lopez MS. Physician acceptance of information technologies: Role of perceived threat to professional autonomy. Decis Support Syst. 2008;46(1):206-215.
36. Liang H, Xue Y, Byrd T. PDA usage in healthcare professionals: testing an extended Technology Acceptance Model. Int J Mobile Comm. 2003;1(4):372-389.
37. Venkatesh V. Determinants of perceived ease of use: integrating control, intrinsic motivation, & emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model. Inf Syst Res. 2000;11: 342-365.
38. Van Schaik P, Bettany-Saltikov JA, Warren, JG. Clinical acceptance of a low-cost portable system for postural assessment. Behav Inf Technol. 2002;21(1):47-57.
39. Chen CC, Wu J, Crandall RE. Obstacles to the adoption of radio frequency identification technology in the emergency rooms of hospitals. Int J Electron Healthcare 2007;3:193-207.
40. Horan TA, Tulu B, Hilton B, Burton J. Use of online systems in clinical medical assessments: an analysis of physician acceptance of online disability evaluation systems. In: Sprague RH, ed. Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE; 2004:1-10.
41. Tung F-C, Chang S-C, Chou C-M. An extension of trust and TAM model with IDT in the adoption of the electronic logistics information system in HIS in the medical industry. Int J Med Inform. 2008 May;77(5):324-335.
42. Yi MY, Jackson JD, Park JS, Probst JC. Understanding information technology acceptance by individual professionals: toward an integrative view. Inform Manag. 2006;43: 350-363.
43. Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, & user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quart. 1989;13:318-339.
44. Rawstorne P, Jayasuriya R, Caputi P. Issues in predicting and explaining usage behaviors with the technology acceptance model and the theory of planned behavior when usage is mandatory. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Information Systems. Atlanta, GA: Association for Information Systems; 2000:35-44.
45. Novak LL, Brooks J, Anders S, et al. Mediating the intersection of organizational routines during the introduction of health IT systems. Eur J Inf Syst. 2012;21(5). doi: 10.1057/ejis.2012.2.
46. Karahanna E, Agarwal R, Angst CM. Reconceptualizing compatibility beliefs in technology acceptance research. MIS Quart. 2006;30:781-804.
47. Moore GC, Benbasat I. Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Inf Syst Res. 1991;2:192-222.
48. Agarwal R, Prasad J. The role of innovation characteristics and perceived voluntariness in the acceptance of information technologies. Decision Sci. 1997;28(3):557-582.
49. Tornatzky LG, Klein KJ. Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption-implementation: a meta-analysis of findings. IEEE Trans Eng Manage 1982;29(1):28-45.
50. Chau PYK, Hu PJH. Information technology acceptance by individual professionals: a model comparison approach. Decis Sci. 2001;32(4):699-719.
51. Chau PYK, Hu PJ. Examining a model of information technology acceptance by individual professionals: An exploratory study. J Manage Inform Syst. 2002 SPR;18(4):191-229.
52. Schaper L, Pervan G. ICT & OTs: a model of information and communications technology acceptance and utilisation by occupational therapists (part 2). In: Westbrook JI, Coiera EW, Callen JL, Aarts J, eds. Information Technology in Health Care 2007. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: IOS Press; 2007:91-101.
53. Wu J-H, Wang S-C, Lin L-M. Mobile computing acceptance factors in the healthcare industry: a structural equation model. Int J Med Inform. 2007;76(1):66-77.
54. Klein KJ, Sorra JS. The challenge of innovation implementation. Acad Manage. Rev. 1996;21:1055-1080.
55. Kaplan B, Duchon D. Combining qualitative and quantitative methods in informations systems research: a case study. MIS Quart. 1988;12(4):571-586.
56. Akour I, Alshare K, Miller D, et al. An exploratory analysis of culture, perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, and internet acceptance: the case of Jordan. J Internet Commer. 2006;5:83-108.
57. Ajzen I, Fishbein M. Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1980.
58. Casson L, Baumann J, Fisher E, et al. Making Technology Happen: Best Practices and Policies from Exemplary K-12 Schools. Research Triangle Park, NC: The Southern Technology Council; 1997.
59. Leonard-Barton D. Implementation as mutual adaptation of technology and organization. Res Policy. 1988;17: 251-267.
60. Nord WR, Tucker S. Implementing Routine and Radical Innovations. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books; 1987.
61. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Processes 1991;50:179-211.
62. Hartwick J, Barki H. Explaining the role of user participation in information systems use, Manag Sci. 1994; 40:440-465.
63. Venkatesh V. User acceptance enablers in individual decision making about technology: toward an integrated model. Decis Sci. 2002;33:297-316.
64. Tversky A, Kahneman D. Judgment under uncertainty - heuristics and biases. Science 1974;185(4157):1124-1131.
65. McGeoch JA, Irion AL. The psychology of human learning. 2nd ed. Oxford, England: Longmans, Green & Co; 1952: 596.
66. Kuo R-Z, Lee G-G. Knowledge management system adoption: exploring the effects of empowering leadership, tasktechnology fit and compatibility. Behav Inf Technol. 2011; 30(1):113-129.
67. O'Reilly C, Chatman J. Organizational commitment and psychological attachment: the effects of compliance, identification, & internalization on prosocial behavior. J Appl Psychol. 1986;71:492-499.
68. Sussman M, Vecchio RR. A social influence interpretation of worker motivation. In: Steers RM, Porter LW, eds. Motivation and Work Behavior. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 1991:218-220.
69. Lesselroth BJ, Felder RS, Adams SM, et al. Design and implementation of a medication reconciliation kiosk: the automated patient history intake device (APHID). J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009;16:300-304.
70. Klein KJ, Conn AB, Sorra JS. Implementing computerized technology: an organizational analysis. J Appl Psychol. 2001;86:811-834.
71. Holahan PJ, Aronson ZH, Jurkat MP, et al. Implementing computer technology: a multiorganizational test of Klein and Sorra's model. J Eng Technol Manage. 2004;21:31-50.
72. Ilie V, Van Slyke C, Green G, et al. Gender difference in perception and use of communication technologies: a diffusion of innovation approach. Inf Resources Manage J. 2005;18: 13-31.
73. Karahanna E, Straub DW, Chervany NL. Information technology adoption across time: a cross-sectional comparison of pre-adoption and post-adoption beliefs. MIS Quart. 1999; 23:183-213.
74. Moore GC, Benbasat I. Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Inf Syst Res. 1991;2:192-222.
75. Clay B, Halasyamani L, Stucky E, et al. Results of a medication reconciliation survey from the 2006 Society of Hospital Medicine National Meeting. J Hosp Med. 2008;3: 465-472.
76. Knapp P, Raynor D, Thistlewiate J, et al. A questionnaire to measure health practitioners' attitudes to partnership in medicine taking: LATCon II. Health Expectations 2009;12: 175-186.
77. Wynia M, Johnson M, McCoy T, et al. Validation of an organizational communication climate assessment tool. Am J Med Quality 2010;20:1-8.
78. Fornell C, Larcker DF. Evaluating structural equations with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Market Res. 1981;18:39-50.
79. Chin WW. The partial least squares approach for structural equation modelling. In: Marcoulides GA, ed. Modern Methods for Business Res. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey.
80. Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, & statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986; 51:1173-1183.
81. MacKinnon DP, Lockwood CM, Hoffman JM, et al. A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychol Methods 2002;7:83-104.
82. Sobel ME. Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In: Leinhardt S, ed. Sociological Methodology. Washington, DC: American Sociological Association;1982:290-312.
83. Currie G, Lockett A, Finn R, et al. Institutional work to maintain professional power: recreating the model of medical professionalism. Organ Studies 2012;33:937-962.
84. Ferlie E, Fitzgerald L, Wood M, et al. The (non) diffusion of innovations: the mediating role of professional groups. Acad Manage J. 2005;48:117-134.
85. Gibbons DE. Network structure and innovation ambiguity effects on diffusion in dynamic organizational fields. Acad Manage J. 2004;47:938-951.
86. Greenhalgh T, Robert G, MacFarlane F, et al. Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations. Milbank Q. 2004;82:581-629.
87. Kellogg K. Operating room : relational spaces and microinstitutional change in surgery. Am Sociol Rev. 2009;115: 657-711.
88. Reay T, Chreim S, Golden-Biddle K, et al. Transforming new ideas into practice: an activity based perspective on the institutionalization of practices. Manage Studies 2013;50(6): 963-990.
89. Davidson E, Chiasson M. Contextual influences on technology use mediation: a comparative analysis of electronic medical record systems. Eur J Inf Sys. 2005;14:6-18.
90. Orlikowski WJ, Yates, J, Okamura, et al. Shaping electronic communication - the metastructuring of technology in the context of use. Organ Sci. 1995;6:423-444.
91. Novak LL, Anders S, Gadd CS, et al. Mediation of adoption and use: a key strategy for mitigating unintended consequences of health IT implementation. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013;19:1043-1049.
92. Avolio BJ, Yammarino FJ, Bass BM. Identifying common methods variance with data collected from a single source: An unresolved sticky issue. J Manage. 1991;17: 571-588.
93. Harman HH. Modern Factor Analysis (3rd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press 1976.
94. Ford JD, Ford LW. The role of conversations in producing intentional change in organizations. Acad Manage Rev 1995;20:541-570.
95. Koppel R, Wetterneck T, Telles JL, et al. Workarounds to barcode medication administration system: their occurrences, causes, and threats to patient safety. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2008;15(4):408-423. doi:10.1197/jamia. M2616.
96. Barki, H., Hartwick, J. Measuring user participation, user involvement, and user attitude. MIS Quart. 1994;18: 59-82.
97. Green SE. A rhetorical theory of diffusion. Acad Manage Rev. 2004;29:653-669.
98. Heracleous L, Barrett M. Organizational change as discourse: communicative actions and deep structures in the context of information technology implementation. Acad Manage J. 2001;44:755-778.
99. Suchman MC. Managing legitimacy: strategic and institutional approaches. Acad Manage Rev. 1995;20:571-610.