Evaluation of teledermatology adoption by health-care professionals using a modified Technology Acceptance Model

Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare

Volumn 17, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 303-307

  Orruño, Estibalitz ^a   Gagnon, Marie Pierre ^b,c   Asua, José ^d   Abdeljelil, Anis Ben ^b  

^a Basque Government   (Spain)

^b LAVAL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITÉ LAVAL   (Canada)

^d Department of Health and Consumer Affairs   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; DERMATOLOGY; FEMALE; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSICIAN; PILOT STUDY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE; SPAIN; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS; TELEMEDICINE; THEORETICAL MODEL; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

ADULT; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; DERMATOLOGY; FEMALE; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PHYSICIANS; PILOT PROJECTS; QUESTIONNAIRES; SPAIN; TELEMEDICINE;

EID: 80052142967     PISSN: 1357633X     EISSN: 17581109     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1258/jtt.2011.101101     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Al-Qirim NA. Teledermatology: the case of adoption and diffusion of telemedicine health Waikato in New Zealand. Telemed J E Health 2003;9:167-77
2. Rogers EM. The Diffusion of Innovations. (4th ed). New York: Free Press, 1995
3. Stronge AJ, Nichols T, Rogers WA, Fisk AD. Systematic human factors evaluation of a teledermatology system within the U.S. military. Telemed J E Health 2008;14:25-34
4. Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly 1989;13:319-40
5. Fishbein M, Azjen I. Belief, Attitude, Intentions and Behavior: an introduction to theory and research. Boston: Addison-Westley, 1975
6. Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD. User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly 2003;27:425-78
7. Yang H-d, Yoo Y. It's all about attitude: revisiting the technology acceptance model. Decision Support Systems 2004;38:19-31
8. Croteau AM, Vieru Di. Telemedicine adoption by different groups of physicians. Proceedings of the 35th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. HICSS, vol. 6, pp. 151, 2002
9. Hu PJ, Chau PYK, Liu Sheng OR, Yan Tam K. Examining the technology acceptance model using physician acceptance of telemedicine technology. Journal of Management Information Systems 1999;16:91-112
10. Yarbrough AK, Smith TB. Technology acceptance among physicians: a new take on TAM. Med Care Res Rev 2007;64:650-72
11. King WR, He J. A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model. Information and Management 2006;43:740-755
12. Burton-Jones A, Hubona GS. The mediation of external variables in the technology acceptance model. Information and Management 2006;43:706-717
13. Mathieson K, Peacock E, Chin WW. Extending the technology acceptance model: the influence of perceived user resources. Database for Advances in Information Systems 2001;32:86-113
14. Chau PYK, Hu PJ. Examining a model of information technology acceptance by individual professionals: an exploratory study. Journal of Management Information Systems 2002;18:191-229
15. Triandis HC. Values, attitudes and interpersonal behavior. In: Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 1979: beliefs, attitudes and values. Page MM (ed). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1980
16. Gagnon MP, Godin G, Gagné C, et al. An adaptation of the theory of interpersonal behaviour to the study of telemedicine adoption by physicians. Int J Med Inform 2003;71:103-15