Lineage-Specific Profiling Delineates the Emergence and Progression of Naive Pluripotency in Mammalian Embryogenesis

Developmental Cell

Volumn 35, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 366-382

  Boroviak, Thorsten ^a   Loos, Remco ^b   Lombard, Patrick ^a   Okahara, Junko ^e   Behr, Rüdiger ^c,d   Sasaki, Erika ^e,f   Nichols, Jennifer ^a   Smith, Austin ^a   Bertone, Paul ^a,b,g  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b WELLCOME TRUST SANGER INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

^c GERMAN PRIMATE CENTER   (Germany)

^d DZHK GERMAN CENTRE FOR CARDIOVASCULAR RESEARCH   (Germany)

^e CENTRAL INSTITUTE FOR EXPERIMENTAL ANIMALS   (Japan)

^f KEIO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^g EUROPEAN MOLECULAR BIOLOGY LABORATORY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Diapause; Embryonic stem cell; Inner cell mass; Pluripotency; Primate

Indexed keywords

FIBROBLAST GROWTH FACTOR; RNA; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR; TRANSCRIPTOME; WNT PROTEIN;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; BLASTOCYST; CALLITHRIX JACCHUS; CELL FATE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAPAUSE; ECTODERM; EMBRYO; EMBRYO CELL; EMBRYO CULTURE; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; EMBRYONIC STEM CELL; FEMALE; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; IN VIVO STUDY; INNER CELL MASS; MORULA; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PLURIPOTENT STEM CELL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RNA SEQUENCE; SPECIES COMPARISON; TRANSCRIPTION REGULATION; TRANSCRIPTOMICS; WNT SIGNALING PATHWAY; ANIMAL; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL LINEAGE; CYTOLOGY; GENETICS; GERM LAYER; PHYSIOLOGY;

ANIMALS; BLASTOCYST; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL LINEAGE; EMBRYONIC DEVELOPMENT; EMBRYONIC STEM CELLS; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, DEVELOPMENTAL; GERM LAYERS; MICE; PLURIPOTENT STEM CELLS;

EID: 84946711375     PISSN: 15345807     EISSN: 18781551     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.devcel.2015.10.011     Document Type: Article

References (97)

1. Adewumi O., Aflatoonian B., Ahrlund-Richter L., Amit M., Andrews P.W., Beighton G., Bello P.A., Benvenisty N., Berry L.S., Bevan S., et al. Characterization of human embryonic stem cell lines by the International Stem Cell Initiative. Nat. Biotechnol. 2007, 25:803-816. International Stem Cell Initiative.
2. Anders S., Huber W. Differential expression analysis for sequence count data. Genome Biol. 2010, 11:R106.
3. Arman E., Haffner-Krausz R., Chen Y., Heath J.K., Lonai P. Targeted disruption of fibroblast growth factor (FGF) receptor 2 suggests a role for FGF signaling in pregastrulation mammalian development. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1998, 95:5082-5087.
4. Artus J., Piliszek A., Hadjantonakis A.K. The primitive endoderm lineage of the mouse blastocyst: sequential transcription factor activation and regulation of differentiation by Sox17. Dev. Biol. 2011, 350:393-404.
5. Bedzhov I., Zernicka-Goetz M. Self-organizing properties of mouse pluripotent cells initiate morphogenesis upon implantation. Cell 2014, 156:1032-1044.
6. Biechele S., Cockburn K., Lanner F., Cox B.J., Rossant J. Porcn-dependent Wnt signaling is not required prior to mouse gastrulation. Development 2013, 140:2961-2971.
7. Blakeley P., Fogarty N.M., Del Valle I., Wamaitha S.E., Hu T.X., Elder K., Snell P., Christie L., Robson P., Niakan K.K. Defining the three cell lineages of the human blastocyst by single-cell RNA-seq. Development 2015, 142:3151-3165.
8. Boroviak T., Loos R., Bertone P., Smith A., Nichols J. The ability of inner-cell-mass cells to self-renew as embryonic stem cells is acquired following epiblast specification. Nat. Cell Biol. 2014, 16:516-528.
9. Bourillot P.Y., Aksoy I., Schreiber V., Wianny F., Schulz H., Hummel O., Hubner N., Savatier P. Novel STAT3 target genes exert distinct roles in the inhibition of mesoderm and endoderm differentiation in cooperation with Nanog. Stem Cells 2009, 27:1760-1771.
10. Brennecke P., Anders S., Kim J.K., Kołodziejczyk A.A., Zhang X., Proserpio V., Baying B., Benes V., Teichmann S.A., Marioni J.C., Heisler M.G. Accounting for technical noise in single-cell RNA-seq experiments. Nat. Methods 2013, 10:1093-1095.
11. Brons I.G., Smithers L.E., Trotter M.W., Rugg-Gunn P., Sun B., Chuva de Sousa Lopes S.M., Howlett S.K., Clarkson A., Ahrlund-Richter L., Pedersen R.A., Vallier L. Derivation of pluripotent epiblast stem cells from mammalian embryos. Nature 2007, 448:191-195.
12. Brook F.A., Gardner R.L. The origin and efficient derivation of embryonic stem cells in the mouse. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1997, 94:5709-5712.
13. Buehr M., Meek S., Blair K., Yang J., Ure J., Silva J., McLay R., Hall J., Ying Q.L., Smith A. Capture of authentic embryonic stem cells from rat blastocysts. Cell 2008, 135:1287-1298.
14. Chan Y.S., Göke J., Ng J.H., Lu X., Gonzales K.A., Tan C.P., Tng W.Q., Hong Z.Z., Lim Y.S., Ng H.H. Induction of a human pluripotent state with distinct regulatory circuitry that resembles preimplantation epiblast. Cell Stem Cell 2013, 13:663-675.
15. Chazaud C., Yamanaka Y., Pawson T., Rossant J. Early lineage segregation between epiblast and primitive endoderm in mouse blastocysts through the Grb2-MAPK pathway. Dev. Cell 2006, 10:615-624.
16. Dunn S.J., Martello G., Yordanov B., Emmott S., Smith A.G. Defining an essential transcription factor program for naïve pluripotency. Science 2014, 344:1156-1160.
17. Evans M.J., Kaufman M.H. Establishment in culture of pluripotential cells from mouse embryos. Nature 1981, 292:154-156.
18. Falcon S., Gentleman R. Using GOstats to test gene lists for GO term association. Bioinformatics 2007, 23:257-258.
19. Fang R., Liu K., Zhao Y., Li H., Zhu D., Du Y., Xiang C., Li X., Liu H., Miao Z., et al. Generation of naive induced pluripotent stem cells from rhesus monkey fibroblasts. Cell Stem Cell 2014, 15:488-496.
20. Frum T., Halbisen M.A., Wang C., Amiri H., Robson P., Ralston A. Oct4 cell-autonomously promotes primitive endoderm development in the mouse blastocyst. Dev. Cell 2013, 25:610-622.
21. Gerbe F., Cox B., Rossant J., Chazaud C. Dynamic expression of Lrp2 pathway members reveals progressive epithelial differentiation of primitive endoderm in mouse blastocyst. Dev. Biol. 2008, 313:594-602.
22. Grün D., Kester L., van Oudenaarden A. Validation of noise models for single-cell transcriptomics. Nat. Methods 2014, 11:637-640.
23. Guo G., Huss M., Tong G.Q., Wang C., Li Sun L., Clarke N.D., Robson P. Resolution of cell fate decisions revealed by single-cell gene expression analysis from zygote to blastocyst. Dev. Cell 2010, 18:675-685.
24. Hall J., Guo G., Wray J., Eyres I., Nichols J., Grotewold L., Morfopoulou S., Humphreys P., Mansfield W., Walker R., et al. Oct4 and LIF/Stat3 additively induce Krüppel factors to sustain embryonic stem cell self-renewal. Cell Stem Cell 2009, 5:597-609.
25. Hamilton T.G., Klinghoffer R.A., Corrin P.D., Soriano P. Evolutionary divergence of platelet-derived growth factor alpha receptor signaling mechanisms. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2003, 23:4013-4025.
26. Hanazawa K., Mueller T., Becker T., Heistermann M., Behr R., Sasaki E. Minimally invasive transabdominal collection of preimplantation embryos from the common marmoset monkey (Callithrix jacchus). Theriogenology 2012, 78:811-816.
27. Handyside A.H. Time of commitment of inside cells isolated from preimplantation mouse embryos. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 1978, 45:37-53.
28. Hooper M., Hardy K., Handyside A., Hunter S., Monk M. HPRT-deficient (Lesch-Nyhan) mouse embryos derived from germline colonization by cultured cells. Nature 1987, 326:292-295.
29. Kalkan T., Smith A. Mapping the route from naive pluripotency to lineage specification. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2014, 369:20130540.
30. Ketchel M.M., Banik U.K., Mantalenakis S.J. A study of delayed implantation caused by parabiosis in pregnant rats. J. Reprod. Fertil. 1966, 11:213-219.
31. Kharchenko P.V., Silberstein L., Scadden D.T. Bayesian approach to single-cell differential expression analysis. Nat. Methods 2014, 11:740-742.
32. Kishi N., Sato K., Sasaki E., Okano H. Common marmoset as a new model animal for neuroscience research and genome editing technology. Dev. Growth Differ. 2014, 56:53-62.
33. Kuijk E.W., van Tol L.T., Van de Velde H., Wubbolts R., Welling M., Geijsen N., Roelen B.A. The roles of FGF and MAP kinase signaling in the segregation of the epiblast and hypoblast cell lineages in bovine and human embryos. Development 2012, 139:871-882.
34. Kunath T., Saba-El-Leil M.K., Almousailleakh M., Wray J., Meloche S., Smith A. FGF stimulation of the Erk1/2 signalling cascade triggers transition of pluripotent embryonic stem cells from self-renewal to lineage commitment. Development 2007, 134:2895-2902.
35. Kurimoto K., Yabuta Y., Ohinata Y., Ono Y., Uno K.D., Yamada R.G., Ueda H.R., Saitou M. An improved single-cell cDNA amplification method for efficient high-density oligonucleotide microarray analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006, 34:e42.
36. Kutmon M., van Iersel M.P., Bohler A., Kelder T., Nunes N., Pico A.R., Evelo C.T. PathVisio 3: an extendable pathway analysis toolbox. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2015, 11:e1004085.
37. Lafon S., Keller Y., Coifman R.R. Data fusion and multicue data matching by diffusion maps. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2006, 28:1784-1797.
38. Le Bin G.C., Muñoz-Descalzo S., Kurowski A., Leitch H., Lou X., Mansfield W., Etienne-Dumeau C., Grabole N., Mulas C., Niwa H., et al. Oct4 is required for lineage priming in the developing inner cell mass of the mouse blastocyst. Development 2014, 141:1001-1010.
39. Lee H.J., Hore T.A., Reik W. Reprogramming the methylome: erasing memory and creating diversity. Cell Stem Cell 2014, 14:710-719.
40. Leitch H.G., McEwen K.R., Turp A., Encheva V., Carroll T., Grabole N., Mansfield W., Nashun B., Knezovich J.G., Smith A., et al. Naive pluripotency is associated with global DNA hypomethylation. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2013, 20:311-316.
41. Li P., Tong C., Mehrian-Shai R., Jia L., Wu N., Yan Y., Maxson R.E., Schulze E.N., Song H., Hsieh C.L., et al. Germline competent embryonic stem cells derived from rat blastocysts. Cell 2008, 135:1299-1310.
42. Loh K.M., Lim B. A precarious balance: pluripotency factors as lineage specifiers. Cell Stem Cell 2011, 8:363-369.
43. Lustig B., Jerchow B., Sachs M., Weiler S., Pietsch T., Karsten U., van de Wetering M., Clevers H., Schlag P.M., Birchmeier W., Behrens J. Negative feedback loop of Wnt signaling through upregulation of conductin/axin2 in colorectal and liver tumors. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2002, 22:1184-1193.
44. Mantalenakis S.J., Ketchel M.M. Frequency and extent of delayed implantation in lactating rats and mice. J. Reprod. Fertil. 1966, 12:391-394.
45. Marks H., Kalkan T., Menafra R., Denissov S., Jones K., Hofemeister H., Nichols J., Kranz A., Stewart A.F., Smith A., Stunnenberg H.G. The transcriptional and epigenomic foundations of ground state pluripotency. Cell 2012, 149:590-604.
46. Martello G., Sugimoto T., Diamanti E., Joshi A., Hannah R., Ohtsuka S., Göttgens B., Niwa H., Smith A. Esrrb is a pivotal target of the Gsk3/Tcf3 axis regulating embryonic stem cell self-renewal. Cell Stem Cell 2012, 11:491-504.
47. Martello G., Bertone P., Smith A. Identification of the missing pluripotency mediator downstream of leukaemia inhibitory factor. EMBO J. 2013, 32:2561-2574.
48. Martin G.R. Isolation of a pluripotent cell line from early mouse embryos cultured in medium conditioned by teratocarcinoma stem cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1981, 78:7634-7638.
49. Matter K., Balda M.S. Occludin and the functions of tight junctions. Int. Rev. Cytol. 1999, 186:117-146.
50. Mead R.A. Embryonic diapause in vertebrates. J. Exp. Zool. 1993, 266:629-641.
51. Nakatsuji N., Suemori H. Embryonic stem cell lines of nonhuman primates. ScientificWorldJournal 2002, 2:1762-1773.
52. Nichols J., Gardner R.L. Heterogeneous differentiation of external cells in individual isolated early mouse inner cell masses in culture. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 1984, 80:225-240.
53. Nichols J., Smith A. Naive and primed pluripotent states. Cell Stem Cell 2009, 4:487-492.
54. Nichols J., Smith A. Pluripotency in the embryo and in culture. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2012, 4:a008128.
55. Nichols J., Zevnik B., Anastassiadis K., Niwa H., Klewe-Nebenius D., Chambers I., Schöler H., Smith A. Formation of pluripotent stem cells in the mammalian embryo depends on the POU transcription factor Oct4. Cell 1998, 95:379-391.
56. Nichols J., Chambers I., Taga T., Smith A. Physiological rationale for responsiveness of mouse embryonic stem cells to gp130 cytokines. Development 2001, 128:2333-2339.
57. Nichols J., Silva J., Roode M., Smith A. Suppression of Erk signalling promotes ground state pluripotency in the mouse embryo. Development 2009, 136:3215-3222.
58. Niwa H., Ogawa K., Shimosato D., Adachi K. A parallel circuit of LIF signalling pathways maintains pluripotency of mouse ES cells. Nature 2009, 460:118-122.
59. Ohnishi Y., Huber W., Tsumura A., Kang M., Xenopoulos P., Kurimoto K., Oleś A.K., Araúzo-Bravo M.J., Saitou M., Hadjantonakis A.K., Hiiragi T. Cell-to-cell expression variability followed by signal reinforcement progressively segregates early mouse lineages. Nat. Cell Biol. 2014, 16:27-37.
60. Palmieri S.L., Peter W., Hess H., Schöler H.R. Oct-4 transcription factor is differentially expressed in the mouse embryo during establishment of the first two extraembryonic cell lineages involved in implantation. Dev. Biol. 1994, 166:259-267.
61. Pilon N., Oh K., Sylvestre J.R., Savory J.G., Lohnes D. Wnt signaling is a key mediator of Cdx1 expression in vivo. Development 2007, 134:2315-2323.
62. Plusa B., Piliszek A., Frankenberg S., Artus J., Hadjantonakis A.K. Distinct sequential cell behaviours direct primitive endoderm formation in the mouse blastocyst. Development 2008, 135:3081-3091.
63. Ralston A., Rossant J. Genetic regulation of stem cell origins in the mouse embryo. Clin. Genet. 2005, 68:106-112.
64. Renfree M.B., Shaw G. Diapause. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 2000, 62:353-375.
65. Roode M., Blair K., Snell P., Elder K., Marchant S., Smith A., Nichols J. Human hypoblast formation is not dependent on FGF signalling. Dev. Biol. 2012, 361:358-363.
66. Rossant J., Lis W.T. Potential of isolated mouse inner cell masses to form trophectoderm derivatives in vivo. Dev. Biol. 1979, 70:255-261.
67. Schrode N., Saiz N., Di Talia S., Hadjantonakis A.K. GATA6 levels modulate primitive endoderm cell fate choice and timing in the mouse blastocyst. Dev. Cell 2014, 29:454-467.
68. Shin K., Fogg V.C., Margolis B. Tight junctions and cell polarity. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2006, 22:207-235.
69. Sleeman J.P., Thiery J.P. SnapShot: the epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Cell 2011, 145:162-162.e1.
70. Smith Z.D., Chan M.M., Mikkelsen T.S., Gu H., Gnirke A., Regev A., Meissner A. A unique regulatory phase of DNA methylation in the early mammalian embryo. Nature 2012, 484:339-344.
71. Smoot M.E., Ono K., Ruscheinski J., Wang P.L., Ideker T. Cytoscape 2.8: new features for data integration and network visualization. Bioinformatics 2011, 27:431-432.
72. Solter D., Knowles B.B. Immunosurgery of mouse blastocyst. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1975, 72:5099-5102.
73. Som A., Harder C., Greber B., Siatkowski M., Paudel Y., Warsow G., Cap C., Schöler H., Fuellen G. The PluriNetWork: an electronic representation of the network underlying pluripotency in mouse, and its applications. PLoS ONE 2010, 5:e15165.
74. Tachibana M., Sparman M., Ramsey C., Ma H., Lee H.S., Penedo M.C., Mitalipov S. Generation of chimeric rhesus monkeys. Cell 2012, 148:285-295.
75. Takahashi T., Hanazawa K., Inoue T., Sato K., Sedohara A., Okahara J., Suemizu H., Yagihashi C., Yamamoto M., Eto T., et al. Birth of healthy offspring following ICSI in in vitro-matured common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) oocytes. PLoS ONE 2014, 9:e95560.
76. Takashima Y., Guo G., Loos R., Nichols J., Ficz G., Krueger F., Oxley D., Santos F., Clarke J., Mansfield W., et al. Resetting transcription factor control circuitry toward ground-state pluripotency in human. Cell 2014, 158:1254-1269.
77. Tang F., Barbacioru C., Wang Y., Nordman E., Lee C., Xu N., Wang X., Bodeau J., Tuch B.B., Siddiqui A., et al. mRNA-seq whole-transcriptome analysis of a single cell. Nat. Methods 2009, 6:377-382.
78. Tang F., Barbacioru C., Bao S., Lee C., Nordman E., Wang X., Lao K., Surani M.A. Tracing the derivation of embryonic stem cells from the inner cell mass by single-cell RNA-seq analysis. Cell Stem Cell 2010, 6:468-478.
79. Tang F., Barbacioru C., Nordman E., Li B., Xu N., Bashkirov V.I., Lao K., Surani M.A. RNA-seq analysis to capture the transcriptome landscape of a single cell. Nat. Protoc. 2010, 5:516-535.
80. ten Berge D., Kurek D., Blauwkamp T., Koole W., Maas A., Eroglu E., Siu R.K., Nusse R. Embryonic stem cells require Wnt proteins to prevent differentiation to epiblast stem cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 2011, 13:1070-1075.
81. Tesar P.J., Chenoweth J.G., Brook F.A., Davies T.J., Evans E.P., Mack D.L., Gardner R.L., McKay R.D. New cell lines from mouse epiblast share defining features with human embryonic stem cells. Nature 2007, 448:196-199.
82. Theunissen T.W., Powell B.E., Wang H., Mitalipova M., Faddah D.A., Reddy J., Fan Z.P., Maetzel D., Ganz K., Shi L., et al. Systematic identification of culture conditions for induction and maintenance of naive human pluripotency. Cell Stem Cell 2014, 15:471-487.
83. Thomson J.A., Kalishman J., Hearn J.P. Nonsurgical uterine stage preimplantation embryo collection from the common marmoset. J. Med. Primatol. 1994, 23:333-336.
84. Thomson J.A., Kalishman J., Golos T.G., Durning M., Harris C.P., Hearn J.P. Pluripotent cell lines derived from common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) blastocysts. Biol. Reprod. 1996, 55:254-259.
85. Thomson J.A., Itskovitz-Eldor J., Shapiro S.S., Waknitz M.A., Swiergiel J.J., Marshall V.S., Jones J.M. Embryonic stem cell lines derived from human blastocysts. Science 1998, 282:1145-1147.
86. Turksen K., Troy T.C. Claudin-6: a novel tight junction molecule is developmentally regulated in mouse embryonic epithelium. Dev. Dyn. 2001, 222:292-300.
87. Van der Jeught M., Heindryckx B., O'Leary T., Duggal G., Ghimire S., Lierman S., Van Roy N., Chuva de Sousa Lopes S.M., Deroo T., Deforce D., De Sutter P. Treatment of human embryos with the TGFβ inhibitor SB431542 increases epiblast proliferation and permits successful human embryonic stem cell derivation. Hum. Reprod. 2014, 29:41-48.
88. Weitlauf H.M., Greenwald G.S. Survival of blastocysts in the uteri of ovariectomized mice. J. Reprod. Fertil. 1968, 17:515-520.
89. Wray J., Kalkan T., Gomez-Lopez S., Eckardt D., Cook A., Kemler R., Smith A. Inhibition of glycogen synthase kinase-3 alleviates Tcf3 repression of the pluripotency network and increases embryonic stem cell resistance to differentiation. Nat. Cell Biol. 2011, 13:838-845.
90. Wu T.D., Nacu S. Fast and SNP-tolerant detection of complex variants and splicing in short reads. Bioinformatics 2010, 26:873-881.
91. Xue Z., Huang K., Cai C., Cai L., Jiang C.Y., Feng Y., Liu Z., Zeng Q., Cheng L., Sun Y.E., et al. Genetic programs in human and mouse early embryos revealed by single-cell RNA sequencing. Nature 2013, 500:593-597.
92. Yamanaka Y., Lanner F., Rossant J. FGF signal-dependent segregation of primitive endoderm and epiblast in the mouse blastocyst. Development 2010, 137:715-724.
93. Yan L., Yang M., Guo H., Yang L., Wu J., Li R., Liu P., Lian Y., Zheng X., Yan J., et al. Single-cell RNA-seq profiling of human preimplantation embryos and embryonic stem cells. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2013, 20:1131-1139.
94. Ye S., Li P., Tong C., Ying Q.L. Embryonic stem cell self-renewal pathways converge on the transcription factor Tfcp2l1. EMBO J. 2013, 32:2548-2560.
95. Yi F., Pereira L., Merrill B.J. Tcf3 functions as a steady-state limiter of transcriptional programs of mouse embryonic stem cell self-renewal. Stem Cells 2008, 26:1951-1960.
96. Yi F., Pereira L., Hoffman J.A., Shy B.R., Yuen C.M., Liu D.R., Merrill B.J. Opposing effects of Tcf3 and Tcf1 control Wnt stimulation of embryonic stem cell self-renewal. Nat. Cell Biol. 2011, 13:762-770.
97. Ying Q.L., Wray J., Nichols J., Batlle-Morera L., Doble B., Woodgett J., Cohen P., Smith A. The ground state of embryonic stem cell self-renewal. Nature 2008, 453:519-523.