Responsiveness and interpretability of the Portuguese version of the neck disability index in patients with chronic neck pain undergoing physiotherapy

Spine

Volumn 40, Issue 22, 2015, Pages E1180-E1186

  Pereira, Marta ^a   Cruz, Eduardo Brazete ^b   Domingues, Lúcia ^c   Duarte, Susana ^c   Carnide, Filomena ^d   Fernandes, Rita ^b  

^a Policlinica do Satao Unip LDA   (Portugal)

^b INSTITUTO POLITÉCNICO DE SETÚBAL   (Portugal)

^c Centro de Medicina de Reabilitação de Alcoitão   (Portugal)

^d UNIVERSIDADE DE LISBOA   (Portugal)

Author keywords

chronic neck pain; disability; interpretability; Neck Disability Index; patient outcome reported measure; responsiveness

Indexed keywords

ADULT; CHRONIC PAIN; COHORT ANALYSIS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NECK DISABILITY INDEX; NECK PAIN; PHYSIOTHERAPY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUESTIONNAIRE; REVIEW; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TREATMENT DURATION; AGED; DISABILITY; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN MEASUREMENT; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AGED; CHRONIC PAIN; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NECK PAIN; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PHYSICAL THERAPY MODALITIES; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84946595370     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001034     Document Type: Review

References (42)

1. Hill JC, Lewis M, Sim J, et al. Predictors of poor outcome in patients with neck pain treated by physical therapy. Clin J Pain 2007; 23: 683-90
2. Klaber Moffett JA, Jackson DA, Richmond S, et al. Randomised trial of a brief physiotherapy intervention compared with usual physiotherapy for neck pain patients: outcomes and patients? preference. BMJ 2005; 330: 75-8
3. Bot SD, van Der Waal JM, Terwee CB, et al. Predictors of outcome in neck and shoulder symptoms: a cohort study in general practice. Spine 2005; 30: E459-70
4. Di Fabio RP, Boissonnault W. Physical therapy and health-related outcomes for patients with common orthopaedic diagnoses. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1998; 27: 219-30
5. Jette DU, Jette AM. Physical therapy and health outcomes in patients with spinal impairments. Phys Ther 1996; 76: 930-41
6. Childs JD, Cleland JA, Elliott JM, et al. Neck pain: Clinical practice guidelines linked to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health from the Orthopedic Section of the American Physical Therapy Association. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2008; 38: A1-34
7. Vernon H, Humphreys BK, Hagino C. Chronic mechanical neck pain in adults treated with manual therapy: a systematic review of change scores in randomized clinical trials. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2007; 30: 215-27
8. Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, et al. The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Qua Life Res 2010; 19: 539-49
9. de Vet HC, Ostelo RW, Terwee CB, et al. Minimally important change determined by a visual method integrating an anchor-based and a distribution-based approach. Qual Life Res 2007; 16: 131-42
10. Vernon H. The Neck Disability Index: state-of-the-art, 1991-2008. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2008; 31: 491-502
11. Macdermid JC, Walton DM, Avery S, et al. Measurement properties of the neck disability index: a systematic review. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2009; 39 (5): 400-17
12. Misterska E, Jankowski R, Glowacki M. Cross-cultural adaptation of the Neck Disability Index and Copenhagen Neck Functional Disability Scales for patients with neck pain due to degenerative and discopathic disorders. Psychometric properties of the Polish versions. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2011; 12: 84
13. Andrade Ortega JA, Delgado Martinez AD, Almecija Ruiz R. Validation of the Spanish version of the Neck Disability Index. Spine 2010; 35: E114-8
14. Kovacs FM, Bago J, Royuela A, et al. Psychometric characteristics of the Spanish version of instruments to measure neck pain disability. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2008; 9: 42
15. Mousavi SJ, Parnianpour M, Montazeri A, et al. Translation and validation study of the Iranian versions of the Neck Disability Index and the Neck Pain and Disability Scale. Spine 2007; 32: E825-31
16. Davidson M, Keating J. A comparison of five low back disability questionnaires: reliability and responsiveness. Phys Ther 2002; 82: 8-24
17. de Vet HC, Terwee CB, Ostelo RW, et al. Minimal changes in health status questionnaires: distinction between minimally detectable change and minimally important change. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2006; 4: 54
18. Haley SM, Fragala-Pinkham MA. Interpreting change scores of tests and measures used in physical therapy. Phys Ther 2006; 86: 735-43
19. Jorritsma W, de Vries GE, Dijkstra PU, et al. Neck Pain and Disability Scale and Neck Disability Index: validity of Dutch language versions. Eur Spine J 2012; 21: 93-100
20. Young I, Cleland JA, Michener LA, et al. Reliability, construct validity, and responsiveness of the neck disability index, patientspecific functional scale, and numeric pain rating scale in patients with cervical radiculopathy. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2010; 89: 831-9
21. Young IA, Michener LA, Cleland JA, et al. Manual therapy, exercise, and traction for patients with cervical radiculopathy: a randomized clinical trial. Phys Ther 2009; 89: 632-42
22. Cleland JA, Childs JD, Whitman JM. Psychometric properties of the Neck Disability Index and Numeric Pain Rating Scale in patients with mechanical neck pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008; 89: 69-74
23. Pool JJ, Ostelo RW, Hoving J, et al. Minimal clinically important change of the Neck Disability Index and the Numerical Rating Scale for patients with neck pain. Spine 2007; 3226: 3047-51
24. Cleland JA, Fritz JM, Whitman JM, et al. The reliability and construct validity of the Neck Disability Index and patient specific functional scale in patients with cervical radiculopathy. Spine 2006; 31: 598-602
25. Stratford PW, Riddle DL, Binkley JM, et al. Using the Neck Disability Index to make decisions concerning individual patients. Physiother Canada 1999; 51: 107-12
26. International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems categories ICD-10. Genebra Switzerland. World Health Organization 2005
27. Cruz EB, Fernandes R, Carnide F, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Neck Disability Index to European Portuguese language. Spine 2015; 40: E77-82
28. Domingues L, Cruz EB. Adaptação cultural e contributo para a validação da escala patient global impression of change. Ifisionline 2011; 2: 31-7
29. Vernon H, Mior S. The Neck Disability Index: a study of reliability and validity. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1991; 14: 409-15
30. Hurst H, Bolton J. Assessing the clinical significance of change scores recorded on subjective outcome measures. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2004; 27: 26-35
31. Straford PW, Binkley J, Solomon P, et al. Defining the minimum level of detectable change for the Roland-Morris questionnaire. Phys Ther 1996; 76: 359-65
32. Beurskens AJ, de Vet HC, Koke AJ. Responsiveness of functional status in low back pain: a comparison of different instruments. Pain 1996; 65: 71-6
33. Farrar JT, Young JPJ, LaMoreaux L, et al. Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale. Pain 2001; 94: 149-58
34. Deyo RA, Centor RM. Assessing the responsiveness of functional scales to clinical change: an analogy to diagnostic test performance. J Chronic Dis 1986; 39: 897-906
35. Farrar JT, Portenoy RK, Berlin JA, et al. Defining the clinically importantdifference inpainoutcomemeasures.Pain 2000; 88: 287-94
36. Terwee CB, Roorda LD, Knola DL, et al. Linking measurement error to minimal important change of patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol 2009; 62: 1062-7
37. McHorney CA, Tarlov AR. Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate? Qual Life Res 1995; 4: 293-307
38. Demoulin C, Ostelo R, Knottnerus JA, et al. What factors influence the measurement properties of the Roland-Morris disability questionnaire? Eur J Pain 2010; 14: 200-6
39. Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of Clinical Research: Applications to Practice (3rd Ed) Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall; 2009
40. Demoulin C, Ostelo R, Knottnerus JA, et al. Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale was responsive and showed reasonable interpretability after a multidisciplinary treatment. J Clin Epidemiol 2010; 63: 1249-55
41. Monticone M, Ferrante S, Vernon H, et al. Development of the Italian Version of the Neck Disability Index: cross-cultural adaptation, factor analysis, reliability, validity and sensitivity to change. Spine 2012; 37: E1038-44
42. Kamper S, Ostelo R, Knol D, et al. Global Perceived Effect scales provided reliable assessments of health transition in people with musculoskeletal disorders, but ratings are strongly influenced by current status. J Clin Epidemiol 2010; 63: 760-6