Destabilization of strigolactone receptor DWARF14 by binding of ligand and E3-ligase signaling effector DWARF3

Cell Research

Volumn 25, Issue 11, 2015, Pages 1219-1236

  Zhao, Li Hua ^a,b   Zhou, X Edward ^c   Yi, Wei ^a   Wu, Zhongshan ^a,c,d   Liu, Yue ^a   Kang, Yanyong ^c   Hou, Li ^a,c   De Waal, Parker W ^c   Li, Suling ^a   Jiang, Yi ^a   Scaffidi, Adrian ^e   Flematti, Gavin R ^e   Smith, Steven M ^e,f,g   Lam, Vinh Q ^h   Griffin, Patrick R ^h   Wang, Yonghong ^g   Li, Jiayang ^g   Melcher, Karsten ^a,c   Xu, H Eric ^a,c  

^a INSTITUTE OF GEOLOGY AND GEOPHYSICS   (China)

^b EAST CHINA NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c VAN ANDEL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^d HUAZHONG UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^e UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^f UNIVERSITY OF TASMANIA   (Australia)

^g INSTITUTE OF GENETICS AND DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY   (China)

^h SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

D14; D3; GR24; receptor co receptor; Strigolactones

Indexed keywords

FUSED HETEROCYCLIC RINGS; GR24 STRIGOLACTONE; LACTONE; PHYTOHORMONE; PLANT PROTEIN; UBIQUITIN PROTEIN LIGASE;

CHEMISTRY; METABOLISM; ORYZA; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

HETEROCYCLIC COMPOUNDS, 3-RING; LACTONES; ORYZA; PLANT GROWTH REGULATORS; PLANT PROTEINS; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SKP CULLIN F-BOX PROTEIN LIGASES;

EID: 84946500797     PISSN: 10010602     EISSN: 17487838     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/cr.2015.122     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Xie X, Yoneyama K. The strigolactone story. Annu Rev Phytopathol 2010; 48: 93-117
2. Waldie T, McCulloch H, Leyser O. Strigolactones and the control of plant development: lessons from shoot branching. Plant J 2014; 79: 607-622
3. de Saint Germain A, Bonhomme S, Boyer FD, Rameau C. Novel insights into strigolactone distribution and signalling. Curr Opin Plant Biol 2013; 16: 583-589
4. Brewer PB, Koltai H, Beveridge CA. Diverse roles of strigolactones in plant development. Mol Plant 2013; 6: 18-28
5. Ruyter-Spira C, Al-Babili S, van der Krol S, Bouwmeester H. The biology of strigolactones. Trends Plant Sci 2013; 18: 72-83
6. Tsuchiya Y, McCourt P. Strigolactones as small molecule communicators. Mol Biosyst 2012; 8: 464-469
7. Lopez-Raez JA, Matusova R, Cardoso C, et al. Strigolactones: ecological significance and use as a target for parasitic plant control. Pest Manag Sci 2009; 65: 471-477
8. Arite T, Umehara M, Ishikawa S, et al. d14, a strigolactone-insensitive mutant of rice, shows an accelerated outgrowth of tillers. Plant Cell Physiol 2009; 50: 1416-1424
9. Ishikawa S, Maekawa M, Arite T, Onishi K, Takamure I, Kyozuka J. Suppression of tiller bud activity in tillering dwarf mutants of rice. Plant Cell Physiol 2005; 46: 79-86
10. Stirnberg P, van De Sande K, Leyser HM. MAX1 and MAX2 control shoot lateral branching in Arabidopsis. Development 2002; 129: 1131-1141
11. Beveridge CA, Ross JJ, Murfet IC. Branching in Pea (Action of Genes Rms3 and Rms4). Plant Physiol 1996; 110: 859-865
12. Gomez-Roldan V, Fermas S, Brewer PB, et al. Strigolactone inhibition of shoot branching. Nature 2008; 455: 189-194
13. Umehara M, Hanada A, Yoshida S, et al. Inhibition of shoot branching by new terpenoid plant hormones. Nature 2008; 455: 195-200
14. Beveridge CA, Kyozuka J. New genes in the strigolactone-related shoot branching pathway. Curr Opin Plant Biol 2010; 13: 34-39
15. Murase K, Hirano Y, Sun TP, Hakoshima T. Gibberellin-induced DELLA recognition by the gibberellin receptor GID1. Nature 2008; 456: 459-463
16. Shimada A, Ueguchi-Tanaka M, Nakatsu T, et al. Structural basis for gibberellin recognition by its receptor GID1. Nature 2008; 456: 520-523
17. Bennett T, Leyser O. Strigolactone signalling: standing on the shoulders of DWARFs. Curr Opin Plant Biol 2014; 22: 7-13
18. Nelson DC, Scaffidi A, Dun EA, et al. F-box protein MAX2 has dual roles in karrikin and strigolactone signaling in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2011; 108: 8897-8902
19. Jiang L, Liu X, Xiong G, et al. DWARF 53 acts as a repressor of strigolactone signalling in rice. Nature 2013; 504: 401-405
20. Zhou F, Lin Q, Zhu L, et al. D14-SCF(D3)-dependent degradation of D53 regulates strigolactone signalling. Nature 2013; 504: 406-410
21. Wang Y, Sun S, Zhu W, Jia K, Yang H, Wang X. Strigolactone/MAX2-induced degradation of brassinosteroid transcriptional effector BES1 regulates shoot branching. Dev Cell 2013; 27: 681-688
22. Chevalier F, Nieminen K, Sanchez-Ferrero JC, et al. Strigolactone promotes degradation of DWARF14, an alpha/beta hydrolase essential for strigolactone signaling in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2014; 26: 1134-1150
23. Guo Y, Zheng Z, La Clair JJ, Chory J, Noel JP. Smoke-derived karrikin perception by the alpha/beta-hydrolase KAI2 from Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2013; 110: 8284-8289
24. Zhao LH, Zhou XE, Wu ZS, et al. Crystal structures of two phytohormone signal-transducing alpha/beta hydrolases: karrikin-signaling KAI2 and strigolactone-signaling DWARF14. Cell Res 2013; 23: 436-439
25. Hamiaux C, Drummond RS, Janssen BJ, et al. DAD2 is an α/β hydrolase likely to be involved in the perception of the plant branching hormone, Strigolactone. Curr Biol 2012; 22: 2032-2036
26. Nakamura H, Xue YL, Miyakawa T, et al. Molecular mechanism of strigolactone perception by DWARF14. Nat Commun 2013; 4: 2613
27. Kagiyama M, Hirano Y, Mori T, et al. Structures of D14 and D14L in the strigolactone and karrikin signaling pathways. Genes Cells 2013; 18: 147-160
28. Bythell-Douglas R, Waters MT, Scaffidi A, Flematti GR, Smith SM, Bond CS. The structure of the karrikin-insensitive protein (KAI2) in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS One 2013; 8: e54758
29. Derewenda ZS, Vekilov PG. Entropy and surface engineering in protein crystallization. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 2006; 62: 116-124
30. Krishna MM, Hoang L, Lin Y, Englander SW. Hydrogen exchange methods to study protein folding. Methods 2004; 34: 51-64
31. Scaffidi A, Waters MT, Sun YK, et al. Strigolactone hormones and their stereoisomers signal through two related receptor proteins to induce different physiological responses in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 2014; 165: 1221-1232
32. Fukui K, Ito S, Ueno K, Yamaguchi S, Kyozuka J, Asami T. New branching inhibitors and their potential as strigolactone mimics in rice. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 2011; 21: 4905-4908
33. Fukui K, Ito S, Asami T. Selective mimics of strigolactone actions and their potential use for controlling damage caused by root parasitic weeds. Mol Plant 2013; 6: 88-99
34. Boyer FD, de Saint Germain A, Pillot JP, et al. Structure-activity relationship studies of strigolactone-related molecules for branching inhibition in garden pea: molecule design for shoot branching. Plant Physiol 2012; 159: 1524-1544
35. Waters MT, Scaffidi A, Moulin SL, Sun YK, Flematti GR, Smith SM. A Selaginella moellendorffii ortholog of KARRIKIN INSENSITIVE2 functions in Arabidopsis development but cannot mediate responses to Karrikins or Strigolactones. Plant Cell 2015; 27: 1925-1944
36. Flematti GR, Goddard-Borger ED, Merritt DJ, Ghisalberti EL, Dixon KW, Trengove RD. Preparation of 2H-furo[2,3-c] pyran-2-one derivatives and evaluation of their germination-promoting activity. J Agric Food Chem 2007; 55: 2189-2194
37. Wang X, Yan Y, Gong B, et al. Efficient synthesis of functionalized 1-oxo-1-phenyl-2-acetic acids through Ru(II)-catalyzed transfer hydrogenation. Bull Korean Chem Soc 2013; 34: 3143-3146
38. Lee B, Schrader T, Martian-Matute B, Kauffman C, Zhang P, Snapper M. (PCy3)2Cl2Ru=CHPh Catalyzed Kharasch additions. Application in a formal ole?n carbonylation. Tetrahedron 2004; 60: 7391-7396
39. Otwinowski Z, Borek D, Majewski W, Minor W. Multiparametric scaling of diffraction intensities. Acta Crystallogr A 2003; 59: 228-234
40. McCoy AJ, Grosse-Kunstleve RW, Adams PD, Winn MD, Storoni LC, Read RJ. Phaser crystallographic software. J Appl Crystallogr 2007; 40: 658-674
41. Kleywegt GJ, Jones TA. Efficient rebuilding of protein structures. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 1996; 52: 829-832
42. Emsley P, Cowtan K. Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 2004; 60: 2126-2132
43. Brunger AT, Adams PD, Clore GM, et al. Crystallography & NMR system: A new software suite for macromolecular structure determination. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 1998; 54: 905-921
44. Murshudov GN, Vagin AA, Lebedev A, Wilson KS, Dodson EJ. Efficient anisotropic refinement of macromolecular structures using FFT. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 1999; 55: 247-255
45. Kleywegt GJ, Jones TA. Detection, delineation, measurement and display of cavities in macromolecular structures. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 1994; 50: 178-185
46. Mukherjee S, Balius TE, Rizzo RC. Docking validation resources: protein family and ligand flexibility experiments. J Chem Inf Model 2010; 50: 1986-2000
47. Allen WJ, Balius TE, Mukherjee S, et al. DOCK 6: Impact of new features and current docking performance. J Comput Chem 2015; 36: 1132-1156
48. Maier JA, Martinez C, Kasavajhala K, Wickstrom L, Hauser K, Simmerling C. ff14SB: Improving the accuracy of protein side chain and backbone parameters from ff99SB. J Chem Theory Comput 2015
49. Case D, Babin J, Berryman J, et al. AMBER 14. University of California, San Francisco 2014
50. Wang J, Wolf RM, Caldwell JW, Kollman PA, Case DA. Development and testing of a general amber force field. J Comput Chem 2004; 25: 1157-1174
51. Li H, Robertson AD, Jensen JH. Very fast empirical prediction and rationalization of protein pKa values. Proteins 2005; 61: 704-721
52. de Waal PW, Sunden KF, Furge LL. Molecular dynamics of CYP2D6 polymorphisms in the absence and presence of a mechanism-based inactivator reveals changes in local flexibility and dominant substrate access channels. PLoS One 2014; 9: e108607
53. Chalmers MJ, Busby SA, Pascal BD, et al. Probing protein ligand interactions by automated hydrogen/deuterium exchange mass spectrometry. Anal Chem 2006; 78: 1005-1014
54. Pascal BD, Willis S, Lauer JL, et al. HDX workbench: software for the analysis of H/D exchange MS data. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 2012; 23: 1512-1521