Volume regulation and shape bifurcation in the cell nucleus

Journal of Cell Science

Volumn 128, Issue 18, 2015, Pages 3375-3385

  Kim, Dong Hwee ^a,b,c   Li, Bo ^a,b   Si, Fangwei ^a,b   Phillip, Jude M ^a,b   Wirtz, Denis ^a,b   Sun, Sean X ^a,b  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Johns Hopkins University   (United States)

^c HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cell nucleus; Mechanics; Multi bifurcations; Volume change

Indexed keywords

ACTIN FILAMENT; ADHERENT CELL; ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CELL NUCLEUS; CELL NUCLEUS MEMBRANE; CELL SHAPE; CELL STRUCTURE; CELL VOLUME; CONTROLLED STUDY; FIBROBLAST; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MICROENVIRONMENT; MICROTUBULE; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR SHAPE; PRESSURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ANIMAL; CELL LINE; NUCLEAR SIZE; PHYSIOLOGY; THEORETICAL MODEL; TUMOR MICROENVIRONMENT; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ACTIN;

ACTINS; ANIMALS; CELL LINE; CELL NUCLEUS; CELL NUCLEUS SHAPE; CELL NUCLEUS SIZE; CELLULAR MICROENVIRONMENT; FIBROBLASTS; HUMANS; MICE; MICROTUBULES; MODELS, THEORETICAL;

EID: 84946052001     PISSN: 00219533     EISSN: 14779137     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1242/jcs.166330     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Abu-Arish, A., Kalab, P., Ng-Kamstra, J., Weis, K. and Fradin, C. (2009). Spatial distribution and mobility of the ran gtpase in live interphase cells. Biophys. J. 97, 2164-2178.
2. Aebi, U., Cohn, J., Buhle, L. and Gerace, L. (1986). The nuclear lamina is a meshwork of intermediate-type filaments. Nature 323, 560-564.
3. Beaudouin, J., Gerlich, D., Daigle, N., Eils, R. and Ellenberg, J. (2002). Nuclear envelope breakdown proceeds by microtubule-induced tearing of the lamina. Cell 108, 83-96.
4. Ben Amar, M. and Goriely, A. (2005). Growth and instability in elastic tissues. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 53, 2284-2319.
5. Bissell, M. J., Weaver, V. M., Lelièvre, S. A., Wang, F., Petersen, O. W. and Schmeichel, K. L. (1999). Tissue structure, nuclear organization, and gene expression in normal and malignant breast. Cancer Res. 59, 1757-1764.
6. Buxboim, A., Ivanovska, I. L. and Discher, D. E. (2010). Matrix elasticity, cytoskeletal forces and physics of the nucleus: how deeply do cells 'feel' outside and in? J. Cell. Sci. 123, 297-308.
7. Buxboim, A., Swift, J., Irianto, J., Spinler, K. R., Dingal, P. C. D. P., Athirasala, A., Kao, Y.-R. C., Cho, S., Harada, T., Shin, J.-W. et al. (2014). Matrix elasticity regulates lamin-a.c. phosphorylation and turnover. Curr. Biol. 24, 1909-1917.
8. Chow, K.-H., Factor, R. E. and Ullman, K. S. (2012). The nuclear envelope environment and its cancer connections. Nat. Rev. Cancer 12, 196-209.
9. Dahl, K. N., Kahn, S. M., Wilson, K. L. and Discher, D. E. (2004). The nuclear envelope lamina network has elasticity and a compressibility limit suggestive of a molecular shock absorber. J. Cell Sci. 117, 4779-4786.
10. Dahl, K. N., Ribeiro, A. J. S. and Lammerding, J. (2008). Nuclear shape, mechanics, and mechanotransduction. Circ. Res. 102, 1307-1318.
11. Datta, S. S., Kim, S.-H., Paulose, J., Abbaspourrad, A., Nelson, D. R. and Weitz, D. A. (2012). Delayed buckling and guided folding of inhomogeneous capsules. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 134302.
12. Dauer, W. T. and Worman, H. J. (2009). The nuclear envelope as a signaling node in development and disease. Dev. Cell 17, 626-638.
13. Funkhouser, C. M., Sknepnek, R., Shimi, T., Goldman, A. E., Goldman, R. D. and Olvera de la Cruz, M. (2013). Mechanical model of blebbing in nuclear lamin meshworks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 3248-3253.
14. Georges, P. C., Miller, W. J., Meaney, D. F., Sawyer, E. S. and Janmey, P. A. (2006). Matrices with compliance comparable to that of brain tissue select neuronal over glial growth in mixed cortical cultures. Biophys. J. 90, 3012-3018.
15. Gerlitz, G., Reiner, O. and Bustin, M. (2013). Microtubule dynamics alter the interphase nucleus. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 70, 1255-1268.
16. Guilak, F., Tedrow, J. R. and Burgkart, R. (2000). Viscoelastic properties of the cell nucleus. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 269, 781-786.
17. Gundersen, G. G. and Worman, H. J. (2013). Nuclear positioning. Cell 152, 1376-1389.
18. Hampoelz, B., Azou-Gros, Y., Fabre, R., Markova, O., Puech, P.-H. and Lecuit, T. (2011). Microtubule-induced nuclear envelope fluctuations control chromatin dynamics in drosophila embryos. Development 138, 3377-3386.
19. Houchmandzadeh, B., Marko, J. K., Chatenay, D. and Libchaber, A. (1997). Elasticity and structure of eukaryote chromosomes studied by micromanipulation and micropipette aspiration. J. Cell Biol. 139, 1-12.
20. Hutchinson, J. W. (1967). Imperfection sensitivity of externally pressurized spherical shells. ASME J. Appl. Mech. 34, 49-55.
21. Irianto, J., Swift, J., Martins, R. P., McPhail, G. D., Knight, M. M., Discher, D. E. and Lee, D. A. (2013). Osmotic challenge drives rapid and reversible chromatin condensation in chondrocytes. Biophys. J. 104, 759-769.
22. Jeffrey, A. and Zwillinger, A. (2007). Gradshteyn and Ryzhik's Table of Integrals, Series, and Products. New York: Academic Press.
23. Jiang, H. and Sun, S. X. (2013). Cellular pressure and volume regulation and implications for cell mechanics. Biophys. J. 105, 609-619.
24. Khatau, S. B., Hale, C. M., Stewart-Hutchinson, P. J., Patel, M. S., Stewart, C. L., Searson, P. C., Hodzic, D. and Wirtz, D. (2009). A perinuclear actin cap regulates nuclear shape. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 19017-19022.
25. Kim, D.-H. and Wirtz, D. (2015). Cytoskeletal tension induces the polarized architecture of the nucleus. Biomaterials 48, 161-172.
26. Kim, D.-H., Chambliss, A. B. and Wirtz, D. (2013). The multi-faceted role of the actin cap in cellular mechanosensation and mechanotransduction. Soft Matter 9, 5516-5523.
27. Kim, D.-H., Cho, S. and Wirtz, D. (2014). Tight coupling between nucleus and cell migration through the perinuclear actin cap. J. Cell Sci. 127, 2528-2541.
28. Lammerding, J., Hsiao, J., Schulze, P. C., Kozlov, S., Stewart, C. L. and Lee, R. T. (2005). Abnormal nuclear shape and impaired mechanotransduction in emerin-deficient cells. J. Cell Biol. 170, 781-791.
29. Laporte, D., Courtout, F., Salin, B., Ceschin, J. and Sagot, I. (2013). An array of nuclear microtubules reorganizes the budding yeast nucleus during quiescence. J. Cell Biol. 203, 585-594.
30. Lidmar, J., Mirny, L. and Nelson, D. R. (2003). Virus shapes and buckling transitions in spherical shells. Phys. Rev. E 68, 051910.
31. Macara, I. G. (2001). Transport into and out of the nucleus. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 65, 570-594.
32. Maeshima, K., Iino, H., Hihara, S., Funakoshi, T., Watanabe, A., Nishimura, M., Nakatomi, R., Yahata, K., Imamoto, F., Hashikawa, T. et al. (2010). Nuclear pore formation but not nuclear growth is governed by cyclin-dependent kinases (cdks) during interphase. Nat. Strut. Mol. Biol. 17, 1065-1071.
33. Munevar, S., Wang, Y.-L. and Dembo, M. (2001). Traction force microscopy of migrating normal and h-ras transformed 3t3 fibroblasts. Biophys. J. 80, 1744-1757.
34. Ogden, R. W. (1997). Non-linear Elastic Deformations. New York: Dover Publications.
35. Panorchan, P., Schafer, B. W., Wirtz, D. and Tseng, Y. (2004). Nuclear envelope breakdown requires overcoming the mechanical integrity of the nuclear lamina. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 43462-43467.
36. Quemeneur, F., Quilliet, C., Faivre, M., Viallat, A. and Pépin-Donat, B. (2012). Gel phase vesicles buckle into specific shapes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 108303.
37. Roca-Cusachs, P., Alcaraz, J., Sunyer, R., Samitier, J., Farre, R. and Navajas, D. (2008). Micropatterning of single endothelial cell shape reveals a tight coupling between nuclear volume in g1 and proliferation. Biophys. J. 94, 4984-4995.
38. Sabass, B., Gardel, M. L., Waterman, C. M. and Schwarz, U. S. (2008). High resolution traction force microscopy based on experimental and computational advances. Biophys. J. 94, 207-220.
39. Salbreux, G., Joanny, J. F., Prost, J. and Pullarkat, P. (2007). Shape oscillations of non-adhering fibroblast cells. Phys. Biol. 4, 268-284.
40. Shimi, T., Butin-Israeli, V., Adam, S. A. and Goldman, R. D. (2010). Nuclear lamins in cell regulation and disease. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 75, 525-531.
41. Simon, D. N. and Wilson, K. L. (2011). The nucleoskeleton as a genomeassociated dynamic 'network of networks'. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 12, 695-708.
42. Swift, J., Ivanovska, I. L., Buxboim, A., Harada, T., Dingal, P. C. D. P., Pinter, J., Pajerowski, J. D., Spinler, K. R., Shin, J.-W., Tewari, M. et al. (2013). Nuclear lamin-a scales with tissue stiffness and enhances matrix-directed differentiation. Science 341, 1240104.
43. Tamura, K., Iwabuchi, K., Fukao, Y., Kondo, M., Okamoto, K., Ueda, H., Nishimua, M. and Hara-Nishimura, I. (2013). Myosin xi-i links the nuclear membrane to the cytoskeleton to control nuclear movement and shape in arabidopsis. Curr. Biol. 23, 1776-1781.
44. Tinevez, J.-Y., Schulze, U., Salbreux, G., Roensch, J., Joanny, J.-F. and Paluch, E. (2009). Role of cortical tension in bleb growth. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 18581-18586.
45. Vaziri, A., Lee, H. and Kaazempur Mofrad, M. R. (2006). Deformation of the cell nucleus under indentation: mechanics and mechanisms. J. Mater. Res. 21, 2126-2135.
46. Versaevel, M., Grevesse, T. and Gabriele, S. (2012). Spatial coordination between cell and nuclear shape within micropatterned endothelial cells. Nat. Commun. 3, 671.
47. Weiss, P. and Garber, B. (1952). Shape and movement of mesenchyme cells as functions of the physical structure of the medium: contributions to a quantitative morphology. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 38, 264-280.
48. Wirtz, D., Konstantopoulos, K. and Searson, P. C. (2011). The physics of cancer: the role of physical interactions and mechanical forces in metastasis. Nat. Rev. Cancer 11, 512-522.
49. Zhao, T., Graham, O. S., Raposo, A. and St Johnston, D. (2012). Growing microtubules push the oocyte nucleus to polarize the drosophila dorsal-ventral axis. Science 336, 999-1003.
50. Zink, D., Fischer, A. H. and Nickerson, J. A. (2004). Nuclear structure in cancer cells. Nat. Rev. Cancer 4, 677-687.