Factors affecting enzyme activity

Improving and Tailoring Enzymes for Food Quality and Functionality

Volumn , Issue , 2015, Pages 11-55

  Grahame, D A S ^a   Bryksa, B C ^a   Yada, Rickey Y ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ENZYME ACTIVITY;

EID: 84946005850     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1016/B978-1-78242-285-3.00002-8     Document Type: Chapter

References (37)

1. Blasie, C.A., Berg, J.M., 1997. Electrostatic interactions across a beta-sheet. Biochemistry 36 (20), 6218-6222.
2. Boyer, P.D., 1960. Mechanism of enzyme action. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 29 (1), 15-44.
3. Cleland, W.W., Kreevoy, M.M., 1994. Low-barrier hydrogen-bonds and enzymatic catalysis. Science 264 (5167), 1887-1890.
4. Dimitrov, R.A., Crichton, R.R., 1997. Self-consistent field approach to protein structure and stability. I: pH dependence of electrostatic contribution. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Bioinform. 27 (4), 576-596.
5. Fersht, A., 1999. Ch. 11. Forces between molecules and binding energies. In: Structure and Mechanism in Protein Science - A Guide to Enzyme Catalysis and Protein Folding W.H. Freeman and Company, New York, pp. 324-331.
6. Fischer, E., 1894. Einfluss der Configuration auf die Wirkung der Enzyme. Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 27 (3), 2985-2993.
7. Gal, J., 2008. The discovery of biological enantioselectivity: Louis Pasteur and the fermentation of tartaric acid, 1857-a review and analysis 150 year later. Chirality 20 (1), 5-19.
8. Gao, J.L., Truhlar, D.G., 2002. Quantum mechanical methods for enzyme kinetics. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 53, 467-505.
9. Gogoleva, O.I., et al., 2003. Tryptophanase in aqueous methanol: the solvent effects and a probable mechanism of the hydrophobic control of substrate specificity. Enzym. Microb. Technol. 32 (7), 843-850.
10. Hammond, G.S., 1955. A correlation of reaction rates. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 77 (2), 334-338.
11. Harris, T.K., Turner, G.J., 2002. Structural basis of perturbed pK(a) values of catalytic groups in enzyme active sites. IUBMB Life 53 (2), 85-98.
12. Henri, V., 1904. Relative theoretical considerations of the general laws on enzyme actions-critique of Herzog's theory. C. R. Seances Soc. Biol. Fil. 56, 173-174.
13. Ho, M.-C., et al., 2009. The origin of the electrostatic perturbation in acetoacetate decarboxylase. Nature 459 (7245), 393-397.
14. Hwang, J.K., Warshel, A., 1996. How important are quantum mechanical nuclear motions in enzyme catalysis? J. Am. Chem. Soc. 118 (47), 11745-11751.
15. Johnson, K.A., Goody, R.S., 2011. The original Michaelis constant: translation of the 1913 Michaelis-Menten paper. Biochemistry 50 (39), 8264-8269.
16. Koshland, D.E., 1958. Application of a theory of enzyme specificity to protein synthesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 44 (2), 98-104.
17. Koshland, D.E., 1994. The key-lock theory and the induced fit theory. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 33 (23-24), 2375-2378.
18. Laidler, K.J., King, M.C., 1983. The development of transition-state theory. J. Phys. Chem. 87 (15), 2657-2664.
19. Lichtenthaler, F.W., 1995. 100 years "Schlüssel-Schloss-Prinzip": what made Emil Fischer use this analogy? Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 33 (23-24), 2364-2374.
20. Lin, Y.Z., et al., 1992. pH dependence of kinetic parameters of pepsin, rhizopus pepsin, and their active-site hydrogen bond mutants. J. Biol. Chem. 267 (26), 18413-18418.
21. McDonald, I.K., Thornton, J.M., 1994. Satisfying hydrogen-bonding potential in proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 238 (5), 777-793.
22. Nozaki, Y., Tanford, C., 1971. Solubility of amino acids and 2 glycine peptides in aqueous ethanol and dioxane solutions - establishment of a hydrophobicity scale. J. Biol. Chem. 246 (7), 2211-2217.
23. Oellermann, M., Portner, H.-O., Mark, F.C., 2014. Simultaneous high-resolution pH and spectrophotometric recordings of oxygen binding in blood microvolumes. J. Exp. Biol. 217 (Pt 9), 1430-1436.
24. Pace, C.N., Grimsley, G.R., Scholtz, J.M., 2009. Protein ionizable groups: pK values and their contribution to protein stability and solubility. J. Biol. Chem. 284 (20), 13285-13289.
25. Pace, C.N., et al., 2011. Contribution of hydrophobic interactions to protein stability. J. Mol. Biol. 408 (3), 514-528.
26. Pauling, L., 1946. Molecular architecture and biological reactions. C&EN Arch. 24 (10), 1375-1377.
27. Radzicka, A., Wolfenden, R., 1995. A proficient enzyme. Science 267 (5194), 90-93.
28. Sheu, S.Y., et al., 2003. Energetics of hydrogen bonds in peptides. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 100 (22), 12683-12687.
29. Tanford, C., 1997. How protein chemists learned about the hydrophobic factor. Protein Sci. 6 (6), 1358-1366.
30. ten Wolde, P.R., 2002. Hydrophobic interactions: an overview. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 14 (40), 9445-9460.
31. Thurlkill, R.L., et al., 2006. pK values of the ionizable groups of proteins. Protein Sci. 15 (5), 1214-1218.
32. Tollinger, M., et al., 2003. Site-specific contributions to the pH dependence of protein stability. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 100 (8), 4545-4550.
33. Trixler, F., 2013. Quantum tunnelling to the origin and evolution of life. Curr. Org. Chem. 17 (16), 1758-1770.
34. Warshel, A., et al., 2006. Electrostatic basis for enzyme catalysis. Chem. Rev. 106 (8), 3210-3235.
35. Westaway, K.C., 2007. Determining transition state structure using kinetic isotope effects. J. Labelled Compd. Radiopharm. 50 (11-12), 989-1005.
36. Williams, I.H., 2010. Catalysis: transition-state molecular recognition? Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 6, 1026-1034.
37. Zhou, H.-X., 2010. Rate theories for biologists. Q. Rev. Biophys. 43 (2), 219-293.