Determination of the 90% effective dose (ED 90 ) of phenylephrine for hypotension during elective cesarean delivery using a continual reassessment method

European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology

Volumn 194, Issue , 2015, Pages 136-140

  Liu, Hui ^a   Huang, Yan ^a   Diao, Min ^a   Li, Hao ^a   Ma, Yushan ^a   Lin, Xuemei ^a   Zhou, Jie ^b  

^a SICHUAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Continual reassessment; Hypotension; Phenylephrine

Indexed keywords

BUPIVACAINE; CHLOROPROCAINE; PHENYLEPHRINE; LOCAL ANESTHETIC AGENT; PROCAINE; VASOCONSTRICTOR AGENT;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BAYESIAN LEARNING; CESAREAN SECTION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CONTINUAL REASSESSMENT METHOD; CONTROLLED STUDY; EFFECTIVE DOSE (PHARMACOLOGY); ELECTIVE SURGERY; EPIDURAL ANESTHESIA; FEMALE; HEART RATE; HUMAN; HYPOTENSION; MANAGED CARE; PREGNANT WOMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPINAL ANESTHESIA; SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; TACHYCARDIA; TREATMENT RESPONSE; ADVERSE EFFECTS; ANALOGS AND DERIVATIVES; APGAR SCORE; BLOOD PRESSURE; BRADYCARDIA; CHEMICALLY INDUCED; DRUG EFFECTS; NEWBORN; OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA; PREGNANCY;

ADULT; ANESTHESIA, EPIDURAL; ANESTHESIA, OBSTETRICAL; ANESTHESIA, SPINAL; ANESTHETICS, LOCAL; APGAR SCORE; BLOOD PRESSURE; BRADYCARDIA; BUPIVACAINE; CESAREAN SECTION; ELECTIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYPOTENSION; INFANT, NEWBORN; PHENYLEPHRINE; PREGNANCY; PROCAINE; TACHYCARDIA; VASOCONSTRICTOR AGENTS;

EID: 84945905074     PISSN: 03012115     EISSN: 18727654     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.07.001     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. F.J. Mercier, M. Auge, C. Hoffmann, C. Fischer, and A. Le Gouez Maternal hypotension during spinal anesthesia for caesarean delivery Minerva Anestesiol 79 2013 62 73
2. D.W. Cooper Caesarean delivery vasopressor management Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 25 2012 300 308
3. R.B. George, D. McKeen, M.O. Columb, and A.S. Habib Up-down determination of the 90% effective dose of phenylephrine for the treatment of spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension in parturients undergoing cesarean delivery Anesth Analg 110 2010 154 158
4. J. McKinlay, and G. Lyons Obstetric neuraxial anaesthesia: which pressor agents should we be using Int J Obstet Anesth 11 2002 117 121
5. A. Lee, W.D. Ngan Kee, and T. Gin A quantitative, systematic review of randomized controlled trials of ephedrine versus phenylephrine for the management of hypotension during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery Anesth Analg 94 2002 920 926
6. M. Tanaka, M. Balki, R.K. Parkes, and J.C. Carvalho ED95 of phenylephrine to prevent spinal-induced hypotension and/or nausea at elective cesarean delivery Int J Obstet Anesth 18 2009 125 130
7. J. O'Quigley, M. Pepe, and L. Fisher Continual reassessment method: a practical design for phase 1 clinical trials in cancer Biometrics 46 1990 33 48
8. J.M. Treluyer, S. Zohar, E. Rey, and et al. Minimum effective dose of midazolam for sedation of mechanically ventilated neonates J Clin Pharm Ther 30 2005 479 485
9. H. Beloeil, M. Eurin, A. Thevenin, D. Benhamou, and J.X. Mazoit Effective dose of nefopam in 80% of patients (ED80): a study using the continual reassessment method Br J Clin Pharmacol 64 2007 686 693
10. P.K. Gupta, S. Chevret, S. Zohar, and P.M. Hopkins What is the ED95 of prilocaine for femoral nerve block using ultrasound Br J Anaesth 110 2013 832 836
11. A. Kant, P.K. Gupta, S. Zohar, S. Chevret, and P.M. Hopkins Application of the continual reassessment method to dose-finding studies in regional anesthesia: an estimate of the ED95 dose for 0.5% bupivacaine for ultrasound-guided supraclavicular block Anesthesiology 119 2013 29 35
12. S. Zohar, M. Resche-Rigon, and S. Chevret Using the continual reassessment method to estimate the minimum effective dose in phase II dose-finding studies: a case study Clin Trials 10 2013 414 421
13. Obstetric anesthesia handbook 5th ed. S. Datta, B.S. Kodali, and S. Segal Anesthesia for cesarean delivery:Summary of Epidural Anesthesia for Cesarean Section 2010 Springer Science + Business Media New York
14. D.W. Cooper, M. Carpenter, P. Mowbray, and et al. Fetal and maternal effects of phenylephrine and ephedrine during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery Anesthesiology 97 2002 1582 1590
15. E. Garrett-Mayer The continual reassessment method for dose-finding studies: a tutorial Clin Trials 3 2006 57 71
16. A. Stewart, R. Fernando, S. McDonald, R. Hignett, T. Jones, and M. Columb The dose-dependent effects of phenylephrine for elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia Anesth Analg 111 2010 1230 1237
17. S. Zohar, and S. Chevret The continual reassessment method: comparison of Bayesian stopping rules for dose-ranging studies Stat Med 20 2001 2827 2843
18. L. Desfrere, S. Zohar, P. Morville, and et al. Dose-finding study of ibuprofen in patent ductus arteriosus using the continual reassessment method J Clin Pharm Ther 30 2005 121 132
19. R.L. Carpenter, R.A. Caplan, D.L. Brown, C. Stephenson, and R. Wu Incidence and risk factors for side effects of spinal anesthesia Anesthesiology 76 1992 906 916
20. L.Z. Wang, Y.F. Zhang, X.X. Hu, and X.Y. Chang A randomized comparison of onset of anesthesia between spinal bupivacaine 5 mg with immediate epidural 2% lidocaine 5 mL and bupivacaine 10 mg for cesarean delivery Int J Obstet Anesth 23 2014 40 44
21. L. Bouvet, X. Da-Col, D. Chassard, and et al. ED(5)(0) and ED(9)(5) of intrathecal levobupivacaine with opioids for caesarean delivery Br J Anaesth 106 2011 215 220
22. Y.Y. Tang, J. Zhou, X.H. Ren, and X.M. Lin Comparison of spinal block levels between laboring and nonlaboring parturients using combined spinal epidural technique with intrathecal plain bupivacaine Anesthesiol Res Pract 18713 2012 2 10.1155/2012/187132 [Epub 2012 Jun 20]
23. R. Ousley, C. Egan, K. Dowling, and A.M. Cyna Assessment of block height for satisfactory spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section Anaesthesia 67 2012 1356 1363
24. J.B. Dahl, I.S. Jeppesen, H. Jørgensen, J. Wetterslev, and S. Møiniche Intraoperative and postoperative analgesic efficacy and adverse effects of intrathecal opioids in patients undergoing cesarean section with spinal anesthesia: a qualitative and quantitative systematic review of randomized controlled trials Anesthesiology 91 1999 1919 1927
25. S. Klöhr, R. Roth, T. Hofmann, R. Rossaint, and M. Heesen Definitions of hypotension after spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section: literature search and application to parturients Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 54 2010 909 921
26. M. Vagero, and R. Sundberg The distribution of the maximum likelihood estimator in up-and-down experiments for quantal dose-response data J Biopharm Stat 9 1999 499 519
27. A. Iasonos, A.S. Wilton, E.R. Riedel, V.E. Seshan, and D.R. Spriggs A comprehensive comparison of the continual reassessment method to the standard 3 + 3 dose escalation scheme in phase I dose-finding studies Clin Trials 5 2008 465 477
28. N.L. Pace, and M.P. Stylianou Advances in and limitations of up-and-down methodology: a precis of clinical use, study design, and dose estimation in anesthesia research Anesthesiology 107 2007 144 152
29. E. Fabre, S. Chevret, J.F. Piechaud, and et al. An approach for dose finding of drugs in infants: sedation by midazolam studied using the continual reassessment method Br J Clin Pharmacol 46 1998 395 401
30. Y. Zhou Choice of designs and doses for early phase trials Fundam Clin Pharmacol 18 2004 373 378