-
1
-
-
0032220672
-
Ideological Realignment in the U.S. Electorate
-
A.I.AbramowitzAlan I.K.L.SaundersKyle L.1998. “Ideological Realignment in the U.S. Electorate.” Journal of Politics60:634–52.
-
(1998)
Journal of Politics
, vol.60
, pp. 634-652
-
-
Abramowitz, A.I.1
Saunders, K.L.2
-
2
-
-
84974183585
-
What to Do (And Not to Do) with Time-Series Cross-section Data
-
N.BeckNathanielJ.N.KatzJonathan N.1995. “What to Do (And Not to Do) with Time-Series Cross-section Data.” American Political Science Review89:634–47.
-
(1995)
American Political Science Review
, vol.89
, pp. 634-647
-
-
Beck, N.1
Katz, J.N.2
-
3
-
-
79955972582
-
Modeling Dynamics in Time-Series–Cross-section Political Economy Data
-
N.BeckNathanielJ.N.KatzJonathan N.2011. “Modeling Dynamics in Time-Series–Cross-section Political Economy Data.” Annual Review of Political Science14:331–52.
-
(2011)
Annual Review of Political Science
, vol.14
, pp. 331-352
-
-
Beck, N.1
Katz, J.N.2
-
5
-
-
84890165603
-
A New Measure of State Government Ideology, and Evidence that Both the New Measure and an Old Measure Are Valid
-
W.D.BerryWilliam D.R.C.FordingRichard C.E.J.RingquistEvan J.R.L.HansonRussell L.C.KlarnerCarl. 2013. “A New Measure of State Government Ideology, and Evidence that Both the New Measure and an Old Measure Are Valid.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly13 (2): 164–82.
-
(2013)
State Politics & Policy Quarterly
, vol.13
, Issue.2
, pp. 164-182
-
-
Berry, W.D.1
Fording, R.C.2
Ringquist, E.J.3
Hanson, R.L.4
Klarner, C.5
-
6
-
-
0037996889
-
Reassessing the ‘Race to the Bottom’ in State Welfare Policy
-
W.D.BerryWilliam D.R.C.FordingRichard C.R.L.HansonRussell L.2003. “Reassessing the ‘Race to the Bottom’ in State Welfare Policy.” Journal of Politics65 (2): 327–49.
-
(2003)
Journal of Politics
, vol.65
, Issue.2
, pp. 327-349
-
-
Berry, W.D.1
Fording, R.C.2
Hanson, R.L.3
-
12
-
-
33846623397
-
Rejoinder to Berry, Ringquist, Fording, and Hanson ‘Comment.’
-
P.BracePaulK.ArceneauxKevinM.JohnsonMartinS.G.UlbigStacy G.2006. “Rejoinder to Berry, Ringquist, Fording, and Hanson ‘Comment.’” Political Research Quarterly59 (4): 655.
-
(2006)
Political Research Quarterly
, vol.59
, Issue.4
, pp. 655
-
-
Brace, P.1
Arceneaux, K.2
Johnson, M.3
Ulbig, S.G.4
-
14
-
-
78049402643
-
New Measures of Partisanship, Ideology, and Policy Mood in the American States
-
T.M.CarseyThomas M.J.J.HardenJeffrey J.2010. “New Measures of Partisanship, Ideology, and Policy Mood in the American States.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly10 (2): 136–56.
-
(2010)
State Politics & Policy Quarterly
, vol.10
, Issue.2
, pp. 136-156
-
-
Carsey, T.M.1
Harden, J.J.2
-
15
-
-
84929664284
-
Dynamic Estimation of Latent Opinion Using a Hierarchical Group-Level IRT Model
-
D.CaugheyDevinC.WarshawChristopher. 2015. “Dynamic Estimation of Latent Opinion Using a Hierarchical Group-Level IRT Model.” Political Analysis23(2): 197-211.
-
(2015)
Political Analysis
, vol.23
, Issue.2
, pp. 197-211
-
-
Caughey, D.1
Warshaw, C.2
-
17
-
-
0000520393
-
What Moves Policy Sentiment?
-
R.H.DurrRobert H.1993. “What Moves Policy Sentiment?”American Political Science Review87 (1): 158–70.
-
(1993)
American Political Science Review
, vol.87
, Issue.1
, pp. 158-170
-
-
Durr, R.H.1
-
19
-
-
84911943377
-
-
Paper prepared for presentation at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL:
-
P.K.EnnsPeter K.2013. “Punitive Politics in the U.S. States.” Paper prepared for presentation at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL.
-
(2013)
Punitive Politics in the U.S. States
-
-
Enns, P.K.1
-
20
-
-
84907992917
-
The Public’s Increasing Punitiveness and Its Influence on Mass Incarceration in the United States
-
P.K.EnnsPeter K.2014. “The Public’s Increasing Punitiveness and Its Influence on Mass Incarceration in the United States.” American Journal of Political Science58 (4): 857–72.
-
(2014)
American Journal of Political Science
, vol.58
, Issue.4
, pp. 857-872
-
-
Enns, P.K.1
-
21
-
-
69649107902
-
Policy Mood and Political Sophistication: Why Everybody Moves Mood
-
P.K.EnnsPeter K.P.M.KellstedtPaul M.2008. “Policy Mood and Political Sophistication: Why Everybody Moves Mood.” British Journal of Political Science38 (3): 433–54.
-
(2008)
British Journal of Political Science
, vol.38
, Issue.3
, pp. 433-454
-
-
Enns, P.K.1
Kellstedt, P.M.2
-
22
-
-
84890224093
-
Public Opinion in the U.S. States: 1956 to 2010
-
P.K.EnnsPeter K.J.KochJulianna. 2013. “Public Opinion in the U.S. States: 1956 to 2010.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly13 (3): 349–72.
-
(2013)
State Politics & Policy Quarterly
, vol.13
, Issue.3
, pp. 349-372
-
-
Enns, P.K.1
Koch, J.2
-
24
-
-
84864748666
-
Group Opinion and the Study of Representation
-
Enns P.K., Wlezien C., (eds), New York: Russell Sage Foundation,,.” In, eds.,, pp.
-
P.K.EnnsPeter K.C.WlezienChristopher. 2011. “Group Opinion and the Study of Representation.” In Who Gets Represented? eds. P.K.EnnsPeter K.C.WlezienChristopher. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, pp. 1–25.
-
(2011)
Who Gets Represented?
, pp. 1-25
-
-
Enns, P.K.1
Wlezien, C.2
-
26
-
-
34250182780
-
Measuring the Public’s Ideological Preferences in the 50 States: Survey Responses versus Roll Call Data
-
R.S.EriksonRobert S.G.C.WrightGerald C.J.P.McIverJohn P.2007. “Measuring the Public’s Ideological Preferences in the 50 States: Survey Responses versus Roll Call Data.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly7 (2): 141–51.
-
(2007)
State Politics & Policy Quarterly
, vol.7
, Issue.2
, pp. 141-151
-
-
Erikson, R.S.1
Wright, G.C.2
McIver, J.P.3
-
28
-
-
33947654870
-
The Historical Impact of Welfare Programs on Poverty: Evidence from the American States
-
R.C.FordingRicard C.W.D.BerryWilliam D.2007. “The Historical Impact of Welfare Programs on Poverty: Evidence from the American States.” Policy Studies Journal35 (1): 37–60.
-
(2007)
Policy Studies Journal
, vol.35
, Issue.1
, pp. 37-60
-
-
Fording, R.C.1
Berry, W.D.2
-
29
-
-
79956266032
-
A Bootstrap Method for Conducting Statistical Inference with Clustered Data
-
J.J.HardenJeffrey J.2011. “A Bootstrap Method for Conducting Statistical Inference with Clustered Data.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly11 (2): 223–46.
-
(2011)
State Politics & Policy Quarterly
, vol.11
, Issue.2
, pp. 223-246
-
-
Harden, J.J.1
-
30
-
-
84890164914
-
Improving Statistical Inference with Clustered Data
-
J.J.HardenJeffrey J.2012. “Improving Statistical Inference with Clustered Data.” Statistics, Politics, and Policy3 (1:1-28).
-
(2012)
Statistics, Politics, and Policy
, vol.3
, Issue.1-28
-
-
Harden, J.J.1
-
31
-
-
62549086601
-
A New Measure of Policy Spending Priorities in the American States
-
W.G.JacobyWilliam G.S.K.SchneiderSaundra K.2009. “A New Measure of Policy Spending Priorities in the American States.” Political Analysis17 (1): 1–24.
-
(2009)
Political Analysis
, vol.17
, Issue.1
, pp. 1-24
-
-
Jacoby, W.G.1
Schneider, S.K.2
-
32
-
-
78651473205
-
Inequality and the Dynamics of Public Opinion: The Self-reinforcing Link between Economic Inequality and Mass Preferences
-
N.J.KellyNathan J.P.K.EnnsPeter K.2010. “Inequality and the Dynamics of Public Opinion: The Self-reinforcing Link between Economic Inequality and Mass Preferences.” American Journal of Political Science54 (4): 855–70.
-
(2010)
American Journal of Political Science
, vol.54
, Issue.4
, pp. 855-870
-
-
Kelly, N.J.1
Enns, P.K.2
-
34
-
-
33746822466
-
-
Princeton: Princeton University Press
-
D.LublinDavid. 2004. The Republican South. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
-
(2004)
The Republican South
-
-
Lublin, D.1
-
36
-
-
0000604269
-
Biases in Dynamic Models with Fixed Effects
-
S.NickellStephen. 1981. “Biases in Dynamic Models with Fixed Effects.” Econometrica49 (6): 1417–26.
-
(1981)
Econometrica
, vol.49
, Issue.6
, pp. 1417-1426
-
-
Nickell, S.1
-
37
-
-
0003259762
-
Measuring State Public Opinion with the Senate National Election Study
-
B.NorranderBarbara. 2001. “Measuring State Public Opinion with the Senate National Election Study.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly1 (1): 111–25.
-
(2001)
State Politics & Policy Quarterly
, vol.1
, Issue.1
, pp. 111-125
-
-
Norrander, B.1
-
38
-
-
84857170708
-
Using National Surveys to Measure Dynamic U.S. State Public Opinion: A Guideline for Scholars and an Application
-
J.PachecoJulianna. 2011. “Using National Surveys to Measure Dynamic U.S. State Public Opinion: A Guideline for Scholars and an Application.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly11 (4): 415–539.
-
(2011)
State Politics & Policy Quarterly
, vol.11
, Issue.4
, pp. 415-539
-
-
Pacheco, J.1
-
39
-
-
84907535614
-
Measuring and Evaluating Changes in State Opinion across Eight Issues
-
J.PachecoJulianna. 2014. “Measuring and Evaluating Changes in State Opinion across Eight Issues.” American Politics Research42 (6): 986–1009.
-
(2014)
American Politics Research
, vol.42
, Issue.6
, pp. 986-1009
-
-
Pacheco, J.1
-
41
-
-
21144438842
-
Bayesian Multilevel Estimation with Poststratification: State-Level Estimates from National Polls
-
D.K.ParkDavid K.A.GelmanAndrewJ.BafumiJoseph. 2004. “Bayesian Multilevel Estimation with Poststratification: State-Level Estimates from National Polls.” Political Analysis12:375–85.
-
(2004)
Political Analysis
, vol.12
, pp. 375-385
-
-
Park, D.K.1
Gelman, A.2
Bafumi, J.3
-
42
-
-
84916603078
-
Hierarchical Models for Estimating State and Demographic Trends in US Death Penalty Public Opinion
-
K.E.ShirleyKenneth E.A.GelmanAndrew. 2015. “Hierarchical Models for Estimating State and Demographic Trends in US Death Penalty Public Opinion.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society178 (1): 1–28.
-
(2015)
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society
, vol.178
, Issue.1
, pp. 1-28
-
-
Shirley, K.E.1
Gelman, A.2
-
45
-
-
84974308018
-
Measuring State Partisanship and Ideology Using Survey Data
-
G.WrightGeraldR.S.EriksonRobert S.J.P.McIverJohn P.1985. “Measuring State Partisanship and Ideology Using Survey Data.” Journal of Politics47 (2): 469–89.
-
(1985)
Journal of Politics
, vol.47
, Issue.2
, pp. 469-489
-
-
Wright, G.1
Erikson, R.S.2
McIver, J.P.3
|