Modeling dynamics in time-series-cross-section political economy data

Annual Review of Political Science

Volumn 14, Issue , 2011, Pages 331-352

  Beck, Nathaniel ^a   Katz, Jonathan N ^b  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

correlated errors; error correction model; lagged dependent variables; model specification; non stationarity

Indexed keywords

EID: 79955972582     PISSN: 10942939     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-polisci-071510-103222     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Achen C. 2000. Why lagged dependent variables can suppress the explanatory power of other independent variables. Presented at Annu. Meet. Soc. Polit. Methodol., Jul. 20-22, Univ. Calif. Los Angeles
2. Adolph C, Butler DM,Wilson SE. 2005. Which time-series cross-section estimator should I use now? Guidance from Monte Carlo experiments. Presented at Annu. Meet. Am. Polit. Sci. Assoc., Sep. 1-4, Washington, DC
3. Alvarez RM, Katz JN. 2000. Aggregation and dynamics of survey responses: the case of presidential approval. Soc. Sci. Work. Pap. 1103, Div. Hum. Soc. Sci., Calif. Inst. Technol.
4. Anderson TW, Hsiao C. 1982. Formulation and estimation of dynamic models using panel data. J. Econ. 18:47-82
5. Beck N. 1985. Estimating dynamic models is not merely a matter of technique. Polit. Methodol. 11:71-90
6. Beck N. 1991. Comparing dynamic specifications: the case of presidential approval. Polit. Anal. 3:51-87
7. Beck N. 1992. The methodology of cointegration. Polit. Anal. 4:237-47
8. Beck N. 2001. Time-series-cross-section data: What have we learned in the past few years? Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci. 4:271-93 (Pubitemid 33403106)
9. Beck N, Gleditsch KS, Beardsley K. 2006. Space is more than geography: using spatial econometrics in the study of political economy. Int. Stud. Q. 50:27-44
10. Beck N, Katz JN. 1995. What to do (and not to do) with time-series cross-section data. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 89:634-47
11. Beck N, Katz JN. 1996. Nuisance versus substance: specifying and estimating time-series-cross-section models. Polit. Anal. 6:1-36
12. Beck N, Katz JN. 2007. Random coefficient models for time-series-cross- section data: Monte Carlo experiments. Polit. Anal. 15:182-95
13. Beck N, Katz JN. 2009. Modeling dynamics in time-series-cross-section political economy data. Soc. Sci. Work. Pap. 1304, Div. Hum. Soc. Sci., Calif. Inst. Technol.
14. Beck N, Katz JN, Tucker R. 1998. Taking time seriously: time series cross section analysis with a binary dependent variable. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 42:1260-88
15. Davidson JH,Hendry DF, Srba F, Yeo S. 1978. Econometric modelling of the aggregate time-series relationship between consumers' expenditures and income in the United Kingdom. Econ. J. 88:661-92
16. De Boef S, Keele L. 2008. Taking time seriously: dynamic regression. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 52:184-200
17. Engle R, Granger CW. 1987. Co-integration and error correction: representation, estimation and testing. Econometrica 55:251-76
18. Franzese RJ, Hayes JC. 2007. Spatial econometric models of cross-sectional interdependence in political science panel and time-series-cross-section data. Polit. Anal. 15:140-64
19. Garrett G. 1998. Partisan Politics in the Global Economy. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
20. Garrett G, Mitchell D. 2001. Globalization, government spending and taxation in the OECD. Eur. J. Polit. Res. 39:144-77
21. Granger CW, Newbold P. 1974. Spurious regressions in econometrics. J. Econometrics 2:111-20
22. GreeneW. 2008. Econometric Analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall. 6th ed.
23. Hamilton JD. 1994. Time Series Analysis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
24. Hendry D, Mizon G. 1978. Serial correlation as a convenient simplification, not a nuisance: a comment on a study of the demand for money by the Bank of England. Econ. J. 88:549-63
25. Hibbs D. 1974. Problems of statistical estimation and causal inference in time-series regression models. In Sociological Methodology 1973-1974, ed. H Costner, pp. 252-308. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
26. Honaker J, King G. 2010. What to do about missing values in time series cross-section data. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 54:561-81
27. Huber E, Stephens JD. 2001. Development and Crisis of the Welfare State. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
28. Huber PJ. 1967. The behavior of maximum likelihood estimates under non-standard conditions. In Proc. Fifth Annu. Berkeley Symp. Math. Stat. Probab., ed. LM LeCam, J Neyman, I:221-33. Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
29. Im KS, Pesaran MH, Shin Y. 2003. Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. J. Econometrics 115:53-74
30. Judson KA, Owen AL. 1999. Estimating dynamic panel data models: a guide for macroeconomists. Econ. Lett. 65:9-15
31. Keele L,Kelly NJ. 2006. Dynamicmodels for dynamic theories: the ins and outs of lagged dependent variables. Polit. Anal. 14:186-205
32. Kiviet JF. 1995. On bias, inconsistency, and efficiency of various estimators in dynamic panel models. J. Econometrics 68:53-78
33. Levin A, Lin C-F, Chu C-SJ. 2002. Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite-sample properties. J. Econometrics 108:1-24
34. Little RJA, Rubin DB. 1987. Statistical Analysis with Missing Data. New York:Wiley
35. Mizon G. 1984. The encompassing approach in econometrics. In Econometrics and Quantitative Economics, ed. D Hendry, K Wallis, pp. 135-72. Oxford, UK: Blackwell
36. Newey WK, West KD. 1987. A simple positive semi-definite heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix estimator. Econometrica 55:703-8
37. Nickell S. 1981. Biases in dynamic models with fixed effects. Econometrica 49:1417-26
38. StoneM. 1974. Crossvalidatory choice and assessment of statistical prediction. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B 36:111-33