Ideology in America

Ideology in America

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 1-206

  Ellis, Christopher ^a   Stimson, James A ^b  

^a BUCKNELL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84857676016     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139094009     Document Type: Book

References (120)

1. Adams, Greg D. 1997. “Abortion: Evidence of an Issue Evolution.” American Journal of Political Science41:718-737.
2. Alesina, Alberto & Howard Rosenthal. 1995. Partisan Politics, Divided Government, and the Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. Althaus, Scott L. 2003. Collective Preferences in Democratic Politics: Opinion Surveys and the Will of the People. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. Ansolabehere, Stephen, Jonathan Rodden, & James M. Snyder Jr. 2006. “Purple America.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 20(2):97-118.
5. Bafumi, Joseph & Robert Y. Shapiro. 2009. “A New Partisan Voter.” Journal of Politics71(01):1-24.
6. Barker, David C., Jon Hurwitz, & Tracy Nelson. 2008. “Of Crusades and Culture Wars: ‘Messianic’ Militarism and Political Conflict in the United States.” Journal of Politics70:307-322.
7. Barker, David C. & James D. Tinnick. 2006. “Competing Visions of Parental Roles and Ideological Constraint.” American Political Science Review100:249-263.
8. Bartels, Larry M. 2008. Unequal Democracy: The Political Economy of the New Gilded Age. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
9. Bartle, John, Sebastian Dellepiane-Avellaneda, & James A. Stimson. 2011. “The Moving Centre: Preferences for Government Activity in Britain, 1950-2005.” British Journal of Political Science41:259-285.
10. Baumgartner, Frank R., Suzanna DeBoef, & Amber Boydstun. 2008. The Decline of the Death Penalty and the Discovery of Innocence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
11. Beatty, Kathleen & Oliver Walter. 1989. “A Group Theory of Religion and Politics: The Clergy as Group Leaders.” Western Political Quarterly42:29-46.
12. Box, G. E. P. & G. C. Tiao. 1975. “Intervention Analysis with Applications to Economic and Environmental Problems.” Journal of the American Statistical Association70:70-79.
13. Box-Steffensmeier, Janet & Suzanna DeBoef. 2001. “Macropartisanship and Macroideology in the Sophisticated Electorate.” Journal of Politics63:232-248.
14. Box-Steffensmeier, Janet, Kathleen Knight, & Lee Sigelman. 1998. “The Interplay of Macroideology and Macropartisanship: A Time Series Analysis.” Journal of Politics60:131-149.
15. Brady, David W. & Jonathan Ma. 2003. “Spot the Difference.” Hoover Digest1:152-156.
16. Brewer, Mark. 2003. “Values, Political Knowledge, and Public Opinion About Gay Rights: A Framing-Based Account.” Public OpinionQuarterly67(2):173-201.
17. Brewer, Mark. 2005. “The Rise of Partisanship and the Expansion of Partisan Conflict Within the American Electorate.” Political Research Quarterly58:219-229.
18. Campbell, Angus, Philip E. Converse, Warren E. Miller, & Donald E. Stokes. 1960. The American Voter. New York: Wiley.
19. Cantril, Albert H. &Susan D. Cantril. 1999. ReadingMixed Signals: Ambivalence in American Public Opinion about Government.Washington, D.C.:Woodrow Wilson Center Press.
20. Caplan, Brian D. 2007. The Myth of the Rational Voter: Why Democracies Choose Bad Policies. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
21. Carmines, Edward G. & Michael Berkman. 1994. “Ethos, Ideology, and Partisanship: Exploring the Paradox of Conservative Democrats.” Political Behavior 16(2):203-218.
22. Carmines, Edward G. & James A. Stimson. 1980. “The Two Faces of Issue Voting.” American Political Science Review74:78-91.
23. Carmines, Edward G. & James A. Stimson. 1989. Issue Evolution: Race and the Transformation of American Politics. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
24. Carragee, Kei M. & Wim Roefs. 2004. “The Neglect of Power in Recent Framing Research.” Journal of Communication54(2):214-233.
25. Carsey, ThomasM. & Geoffrey C. Layman. 2006. “Changing Sides or Changing Minds? Party Identification and Policy Preferences in the American Electorate.” American Journal of Political Science50(2):464-477.
26. Cavendish, James. 2000. “Church-Based Community Activism: A Comparison of White and Black Catholic Congregations.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion39:64-77.
27. Chanley, Virginia A., Thomas Rudolph, & Wendy M. Rahn. 2000. “The Origin and Consequences of Public Trust in Government: A Time Series Analysis.” Public Opinion Quarterly64:239-257.
28. Chong, Denis & James N. Druckman. 2007. “Framing Theory.” Annual Review of Political Science10:103-126.
29. Claggett, William J. M. & Byran E. Shafer. 2010. The American Public Mind: The Issues Structure of Mass Politics in the Postwar United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30. Conover, Pamela Johnston & Stanley Feldman. 1981. “The Origins and Meaning of Liberal/Conservative Self-Identifications.” American Journal of Political Science25:617-645.
31. Converse, Philip E. 1962. “Information Flow and the Stability of Partisan Attitudes.” Public Opinion Quarterly26:578-599.
32. Converse, Philip E. 1964. The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics. In Ideology and Discontent, ed. David E. Apter, pp. 206-261. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
33. Devine, Christopher J. 2010. “Why Liberals Don’t Call Themselves Liberals: An Empirical Assessment of Party Elites’ Disparate Use of Ideological and Group-Based Public Rhetoric.” Paper presented at the 2010 Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.
34. Durr, Robert H., Andrew D. Martin, & Christina Wolbrecht. 1993. “Ideological Divergence and Public Support for the Supreme Court.” American Journal of Political Science44:768-776.
35. Eisinger, Robert M., Loring R. Veenstra, & John P. Koehn. 2007. “What Media Bias? Conservative and Liberal Labeling in Major US Newspapers.” Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics12(1):17.
36. Ellis, Christopher. 2010. “Why the New Deal Still Matters: Public Preferences, Elite Context, and AmericanMass Party Change.” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion, and Parties20(1):103-132.
37. Ellis, Christopher & James A. Stimson. 2009. “Symbolic Ideology in the American Electorate.” Electoral Studies28(3):388-402.
38. Ellis, Christopher R., Joseph D. Ura, & Jenna Ashley-Robinson. 2006. “The Dynamic Consequences of Nonvoting in American National Elections.” Political Research Quarterly59(2):2-27.
39. Entman, Robert M. 2004. Projections of Power: Framing News, Public Opinion, and US Foreign Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
40. Erikson, Robert S., Michael B. MacKuen, & James A. Stimson. 2002. The Macro Polity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
41. Eveland, William P. & Ivan Dylko. 2007. “Reading Political Blogs During the 2004 Election Campaign: Correlates and Political Consequences.” Blogging, Citizenship, and the Future of Media, ed. Mark Tremayne. New York: Routledge.
42. Fiorina, Morris P., Samuel J. Abrams, & Jeremy C. Pope. 2004. Culture War? The Myth of a Polarized America. New York: Longman.
43. Frank, Thomas. 2005. What’s the Matter with Kansas? How Conservatives Won the Heart of America. Woodacre, Calif.: Owl Books.
44. Free, Lloyd A. & Hadley Cantril. 1967. The Political Beliefs of Americans. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press.
45. Freidel, F. 1991. Franklin D. Roosevelt: A Rendezvous with Destiny. Boston: Back Bay Books.
46. Friedman, M. & R. Friedman. 1990. Free to Choose: A Personal Statement. Fort Myers, Fla.: Mariner Books.
47. Gamson, William A. 1992. Talking Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
48. Gelman, Andrew, David Park, Boris Shor, & Joseph Bafumi. 2008. Red State, Blue State, Rich State, Poor State: Why Americans Vote the Way They Do. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
49. Gilens, Martin. 2000. Why Americans Hate Welfare. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
50. Goldberg, Bernard. 2002. Bias: A CBS Insider Exposes How the Media Distort the News. Washington, D.C.: Regnery Publishing.
51. Goldwater, Barry. 1960. The Conscience of a Conservative. Shepherdsville, Ky.: Victor Publishing.
52. Green, John C. 2003. “A Liberal Dynamo: The Political Activism of the Unitarian-Universalist Clergy.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion42: 577-590.
53. Green, John C., James L. Guth, Corwin E. Smidt, & Lyman A. Kellstedt. 1996. Religion and the Culture Wars: Dispatches from the Front. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
54. Guth, James L. 1996. The Politics of the Christian Right. In Religion and the Culture Wars: Dispatches from the Front, ed. John C. Green, James L. Guth, Corwin E. Smidt, & Lyman A. Kellstedt. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
55. Guth, James L., Lyman A. Kellstedt, Corwin E. Smidt, & John C. Green. 1997. The Bully Pulpit: The Politics of Protestant Clergy. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.
56. Hetherington, Marc J. 2001. “Resurgent Mass Partisanship: The Role of Elite Polarization.” American Political Science Review95:619-631.
57. Hillygus, D. Sunshine & Todd G. Shields. 2005. “Moral Issues and Voter Decision Making in the 2004 Presidential Election.” PS: Political Science and Politics38(2):201-209.
58. Hillygus, D. Sunshine & Todd G. Shields. 2008. The Persuadable Voter: Wedge Issues in Presidential Campaigns. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
59. Hoover, Herbert. 1934. The Challenge to Liberty. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
60. Hunter, James D. 1991. Culture Wars: The Struggle to Define America. New York: Basic Books.
61. Iyengar, Shanto. 1991. Is Anyone Responsible? How Television News Frames the Issues. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
62. Jacoby, William G. 1986. “Levels of Conceptualization and Reliance on the Liberal-Conservative Continuum.” Journal of Politics48:423-432.
63. Jacoby, William G. 1991. “Ideological Identification and Issue Attitudes.” American Journal of Political Science35:178-205.
64. Jacoby, William G. 1995. “The Structure of Ideological Thinking in the American Electorate.” American Journal of Political Science39:314-335.
65. Jacoby, William G. 2000. “Issue Framing and Public Opinion on Government Spending.” American Journal of Political Science44:750-767.
66. Jacoby, William G. 2005. Is It Really Ambivalence: Public Opinion Toward Government Spending. In Ambivalence and the Structure of Political Opinion, ed. Stephen C. Craig&Michael DMartinez, pp. 149-172. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
67. Jennings, M. Kent. 1992. “Ideological Thinking Among Mass Publics and Political Elites.” Public Opinion Quarterly56:419-441.
68. Jennings, Will. 2009. “The Public Thermostat, Political Responsiveness and Error-Correction: Border Control and Asylum in Britain, 1994-2007.” British Journal of Political Science39(04):847-870.
69. Johnson, Martin, Paul Brace, & Kevin Arceneaux. 2005. “Public Opinion and Dynamic Representation in the American States: The Case of Environmental Attitudes.” Social Science Quarterly86(1):87-108.
70. Keith, Bruce E., David B. Magleby, Candice J. Nelson, Elizabeth Orr, Mark C. Westlye, & Raymond E. Wolfinger. 1992. TheMyth of the Independent Voter. Berkeley: University of California Press.
71. Kellstedt, Lyman A. & Corwin Smidt. 1991. “Measuring Fundamentalism: An Analysis of Different Operational Strategies.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion30:259-278.
72. Kellstedt, Paul M. 2000. “Media Framing and the Dynamics of Racial Policy Preferences.” American Journal of Political Science44:245-260.
73. Kellstedt, Paul M. 2003. The Mass Media and the Dynamics of American Racial Attitudes. New York: Cambridge University Press.
74. Kellstedt, Paul M., David A. M. Peterson, & Mark D. Ramirez. 2010. “The Macro Politics of a Gender Gap.” Public Opinion Quarterly74:477-498.
75. Knight, Kathleen. 1985. “Ideology in the 1980 Election: Ideological Sophistication Does Matter.” Journal of Politics47:828-853.
76. Lakoff, George. 2002. Moral Politics: How Liberals and Conservatives Think. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
77. Layman, Geoffrey. 2001. The Great Divide: Religious and Cultural Conflict in American Party Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.
78. Layman, Geoffrey C. & Thomas Carsey. 2002. “Party Polarization and ‘Conflict Extension’ in the American Electorate.” American Journal of Political Science46:786-802.
79. Layman, Geoffrey C., Thomas M. Carsey, John C. Green, Richard Herrera, & Rosalyn Cooperman. 2010. “Activists and Conflict Extension in American Party Politics.” American Political Science Review104(02):324-346.
80. Leege, David C. & Lyman A. Kellstedt. 1993. Rediscovering the Religious Factor in American Politics. London: M. E. Sharpe.
81. Lindamin, Kara & Donald P. Haider-Markel. 2002. “Issue Evolution, Political Parties, and the Culture Wars.” Political Research Quarterly55:91-110.
82. Loftus, Jeni. 2001. “America’s Liberalization in Attitudes Toward Homosexuality, 1973-1998.” American Sociological Review66:762-782.
83. Luskin, Robert C. 1987. “Measuring Political Sophistication.” American Journal of Political Science31:856-899.
84. Luttbeg, Norman R. & Michael M. Gant. 1985. “The Failure of Liberal-Conservative Ideology as a Cognitive Structure.” Public Opinion Quarterly49:80-93.
85. MacKuen, Michael B., Robert S. Erikson, James A. Stimson, & Kathleen Knight. 2003. Elections and the Dynamics of Ideological Representation. In Electoral Democracy, ed. M. B. MacKuen & G. Rabinowitz. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
86. McCarty, Nolan, Kieth T. Poole, & Howard Rosenthal. 2006. Polarized America: The Dance of Inequality and Unequal Riches. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
87. Miller, Alan S. 1992. “Are Self-Proclaimed Conservatives Really Conservative? Trends in Attitudes and Self-Identification Among the Young.” Social Forces71(1):195-210.
88. Miller, Gary & Norman Schofeld. 2003. “Activists and Partisan Realignment in the United States.” American Political Science Review97:245-260.
89. Moynihan, Daniel Patrick. 1969. Maximum Feasible Misunderstanding: Community Action in the War on Poverty. New York: Free Press.
90. Nelson, Thomas E. 2008. “Policy Goals, Public Rhetoric, and Political Attitudes.” Journal of Politics66(02):581-605.
91. Nelson, Thomas E. & Donald R. Kinder. 1996. “Issue Frames and Groupcentrism in American Public Opinion.” Journal of Politics58:1055-1078.
92. Newport, Frank. 2004. PollingMatters: Why Leaders Must Listen to theWisdom of the People. New York: Warner Books.
93. Nicholson-Crotty, Sean, David A. M. Petersen, & Mark D. Ramirez. 2009. “Dynamic Representation(s): Federal Criminal Justice Policy and an Alternative Dimension of Public Mood.” Political Behavior31(4):629-655.
94. Page, Benjamin I. & Robert Y. Shapiro. 1992. The Rational Public: Fifty Years of Trends in Americans’ Policy Preferences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
95. Pew Research Center for People & the Press. 2009. “Trends in Political Values and Core Attitudes, 1987-2009.” Report available at: http://peoplepress.org/report/517/political-values-and-core-attitudes.
96. Reese, Stephen D., Oscar H. Gandy, & August E. Grant. 2001. Framing Public Life: Perspectives on Media and Our Understanding of the Social World. Mahwah, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
97. Robinson, John P., & John A. Fleishman. 1988. “Ideological Identification: Trends and Interpretations of the Liberal-Conservative Balance.” Public Opinion Quarterly52:134-145.
98. Rotunda, Ronald D. 1986. The Politics of Language: Liberalism as Word and Symbol. Iowa City: University of Iowa Press.
99. Schiffer, Adam J. 2000. “I’m Not That Liberal: Explaining Conservative Democratic Identification.” Political Behavior22:293-310.
100. Sears, David O. & Jack Citrin. 1985. Tax Revolt: Something for Nothing in California. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
101. Shafer, Byron E. 2003. The Two Majorities and the Puzzle of Modern American Politics. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
102. Smith, Tom W. 1990. “Liberal and Conservative Trends in the United States Since World War II.” Public Opinion Quarterly54:479-507.
103. Soroka, Stuart N. & Christopher Wlezien. 2005. “Opinion Representation and Policy Feedback: Canada in Comparative Perspective.” Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique37(03):531-559.
104. Soroka, Stuart N. & Christopher Wlezien. 2010. Degrees of Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
105. Stimson, James A. 1975. “Belief Systems: Constraint, Complexity, and the 1972 Election.” American Journal of Political Science9:393-417.
106. Stimson, James A. 1991. Public Opinion in America:Moods, Cycles, and Swings. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press, 1991.
107. Stimson, James A. 2004. Tides of Consent: How Public Opinion Shapes American Politics. New York and London: Cambridge University Press.
108. Stimson, James A., Vincent Tiberj, & Cyrille Thiébaut. N.d. “The Evolution of Policy Attitudes in France.” Unpublished manuscipt under review.
109. Stokes, Donald E. 1966. “Some Dynamic Elements of Contests for the Presidency.” American Political Science Review60:19-28.
110. Stonecash, Jeffrey M. 2001. Class and Party in American Politics. Boulder, Colo.: Westview.
111. Stonecash, Jeffrey M., Mark D. Brewer, & Mack D. Mariani. 2003. Diverging Parties: Realignment, SocialChange, and Political Polarization. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.
112. Treier, Shawn & D. Sunshine Hillygus. 2009. “The Nature of Political Ideology in the Contemporary Electorate.” Public Opinion Quarterly73:679-703.
113. Vavreck, Lynn. 2001. “The Reasoning Voter Meets the Strategic Candidate: Signals and Specificity in Campaign Advertising, 1998.” American Politics Research29(5):507.
114. Wald, Kenneth D. 2003. Religion and Politics in the United States. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
115. Wald, Kenneth D. & Allison Calhoun-Brown. 2006. Religion and Politics in the United States. Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield.
116. Wlezien, Christopher. 1995. “The Public as Thermostat: Dynamics of Preferences for Spending.” American Journal of Political Science39(4):981-1000.
117. Wuthnow, Robert. 1988. The Restructuring of American Religion. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
118. Zaller, John R. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinions. New York: Cambridge University Press.
119. Zaller, John R. 2003. Coming to Grips with Key’s Concept of Latent Opinion. In Elecoral Democracy, ed. M. B. MacKuen & G. Rabinowitz. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
120. Zaller, John & Stanley Feldman. 1992. “A Simple Theory of the Survey Response: Answering Questions and Revealing Preferences.” American Journal of Political Science36:579-616.