Taking time seriously

American Journal of Political Science

Volumn 52, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 184-200

  De Boef, Suzanna ^a   Keele, Luke ^b  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 38549128751     PISSN: 00925853     EISSN: 15405907     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00307.x     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Bannerjee, Anindya, Juan Dolado, John W. Galbraith, and David F. Hendry. 1993. Integration, Error Correction, and the Econometric Analysis of Non-Stationary Data. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
2. Beck, Nathaniel. 1985 Estimating Dynamic Models Is Not Merely a Matter of Technique Political Methodology 11 : 71 89.
3. Beck, Nathaniel. 1991 Comparing Dynamic Specifications: The Case of Presidential Approval Political Analysis 3 : 27 50.
4. Beck, Nathaniel. 1992 The Methodology of Cointegration Political Analysis 4 : 237 48.
5. Beck, Nathaniel, and Jonathan N. Katz. 1995 What to Do (and Not to Do) with Time-Series cross-Section Data American Political Science Review 89 (September 634 47.
6. Beck, Nathaniel, Jonathan N. Katz, and Richard Tucker. 1998 Taking Time Seriously: Time-Series Cross-Section Analysis with a Binary Dependent Variable American Journal of Political Science 42 (October 1260 88.
7. Bewley, R. A. 1979 The Direct Estimation of the Equilibrium Response in a Linear Model Economic Letters 3 : 357 61.
8. Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., and Suzanna De Boef. 2006 Repeated Events Survival Models: The Conditional Frailty Model Statistics in Medicine 25 (December 3518 33.
9. Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., and Bradford S. Jones. 2004. Event History Modeling: A Guide for Social Scientists. New York : Cambridge University Press.
10. Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., and Renée M. Smith. 1998 Investigating Political Dynamics Using Fractional Integration Methods American Journal of Political Science 42 (April 661 89.
11. Brandt, Patrick, and John T. Williams. 2001 A Linear Poisson Autoregressive Model: The Poisson AR(p) Political Analysis 9 (Spring 164 84.
12. Clarke, Harold D., Marianne C. Stewart, Michael Ault, and Euel Elliot. 2005 Men, Women, and the Dynamics of Presidential Approval British Journal of Political Science 35 (January 31 51.
13. Davidson, Russell, and James G. MacKinnon. 1993. Estimation and Inference in Econometrics. New York : Oxford University Press.
14. De Boef, Suzanna. 2001 Testing for Cointegrating Relationships with Near-integrated Data Political Analysis 9 (Winter 78 94.
15. De Boef, Suzanna, and Jim Granato. 1997 Near-integrated Data and the Analysis of Political Relationship American Journal of Political Science 41 (April 619 40.
16. De Boef, Suzanna, and Paul Kellstedt. 2004 The Political (and Economic) Origins of Consumer Confidence American Journal of Political Science 38 (October 633 49.
17. Durr, Robert H. 1992a An Essay on Cointegration and Error Correction Models Political Analysis 4 : 185 228.
18. Durr, Robert H. 1992b Of Forests and Trees Political Analysis 4 : 255 58.
19. Durr, Robert H., John B. Gilmour, and Christina Wolbrecht. 1997 Explaining Congressional Approval American Journal of Political Science 41 (January 175 207.
20. Enders, Walter. 2001. Applied Econometric Time Series. 2nd ed. New York : Wiley and Sons.
21. Freeman, John R., John T. Williams, and Tse-min Lin. 1989 Vector Autoregression and the Study of Politics American Journal of Political Science 33 (November 842 77.
22. Hendry, David F. 1995. Dynamic Econometrics. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
23. Heo, Uk. 1996 The Political Economy of Defense Spending in South Korea Journal of Peace Research 33 (November 483 90.
24. Huber, John D. 1998 How Does Cabinet Instability Affect Political Performance? Portfolio Volatility and Health Care Cost Containment in Parliamentary Democracies American Political Science Review 92 (September 577 91.
25. Keele, Luke J., and Nathan J. Kelly. 2006 Dynamic Models for Dynamic Theories: The Ins and Outs of Lagged Dependent Variables Political Analysis 14 (Spring 186 205.
26. Mishler, William, and Reginald S. Sheehan. 1996 Public Opinion, the Attitudinal Model, and Supreme Court Decision Making: A Micro-Analytic Perspective The Journal of Politics 58 (February 169 200.
27. Mondak, Jeffery J., and Shannon Ishiyama Smithey. 1997 The Dynamics of Public Support for the Supreme Court The Journal of Politics 59 (November 1114 42.
28. Nadeau, Richard, Richard G. Niemi, David P. Fan, and Timothy Amato. 1999 Elite Economic Forecasts, Economic News, Mass Economic Judgments, and Presidential Approval The Journal of Politics 61 (February 109 35.
29. Ostrom, Charles W., Jr. Renée Smith. 1992 Error Correction, Attitude Persistence, and Executive Rewards and Punishments: A Behavioral Theory of Presidential Approval Political Analysis 4 : 127 84.
30. Smith, Renée. 1992 Error Correction, Attractors, and Cointegration: Substantive and Methodological Issues Political Analysis 4 : 249 54.
31. Stimson, James A. 1985 Regression Models in Space and Time: A Statistical Essay American Journal of Political Science 29 (November 914 47.
32. Swank, Duane, and Sven Steinmo. 2002 The New Political Economy of Taxation in Advanced Capitalist Democracies American Journal of Political Science 46 (July 642 55.
33. Williams, John T. 1990 The Political Manipulation of Macroeconomic Policy The American Political Science Review 84 (September 767 95.
34. Williams, John T. 1992 What Goes Around Comes Around: Unit Root Tests and Cointegration Political Analysis 4 : 229 36.
35. Williams, John T., and Brian K. Collins. 1998 The Political Economy of Corporate Taxation American Journal of Political Science 41 (January 208 44.