Dirac-fermionic dark matter in U(1)X models

Journal of High Energy Physics

Volumn 2015, Issue 10, 2015, Pages

  Alves, Alexandre ^a   Berlin, Asher ^b,c   Profumo, Stefano ^d   Queiroz, Farinaldo S ^d,e,f  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^e TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f MAX PLANCK INSTITUT FÜR KERNPHYSIK   (Germany)

Author keywords

Beyond Standard Model; Cosmology of Theories beyond the SM

Indexed keywords

EID: 84945188121     PISSN: 11266708     EISSN: 10298479     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP10(2015)076     Document Type: Article

References (125)

1. H. Baer, K.-Y. Choi, J.E. Kim and L. Roszkowski, Dark matter production in the early Universe: beyond the thermal WIMP paradigm, Phys. Rept.555 (2014) 1 [arXiv:1407.0017] [INSPIRE].
2. L.E. Strigari, Galactic Searches for Dark Matter, Phys. Rept.531 (2013) 1 [arXiv:1211.7090] [INSPIRE].
3. G. Bertone, D. Hooper and J. Silk, Particle dark matter: Evidence, candidates and constraints, Phys. Rept.405 (2005) 279 [hep-ph/0404175] [INSPIRE].
4. B. Dutta, L. Leblond and K. Sinha, Mirage in the Sky: Non-thermal Dark Matter, Gravitino Problem and Cosmic Ray Anomalies, Phys. Rev.D 80 (2009) 035014 [arXiv:0904.3773] [INSPIRE].
5. T. Bringmann and C. Weniger, Gamma Ray Signals from Dark Matter: Concepts, Status and Prospects, Phys. Dark Univ.1 (2012) 194 [arXiv:1208.5481] [INSPIRE].
6. L. Bergstrom, Dark Matter Candidates, New J. Phys.11 (2009) 105006 [arXiv:0903.4849] [INSPIRE].
7. G. Jungman, M. Kamionkowski and K. Griest, Supersymmetric dark matter, Phys. Rept.267 (1996)195 [hep-ph/9506380] [INSPIRE].
8. P. Cushman et al., Working Group Report: WIMP Dark Matter Direct Detection, arXiv:1310.8327 [INSPIRE].
9. C. Kelso, D. Hooper and M.R. Buckley, Toward A Consistent Picture For CRESST, CoGeNT and DAMA, Phys. Rev.D 85 (2012) 043515 [arXiv:1110.5338] [INSPIRE].
10. E. Del Nobile, G.B. Gelmini, P. Gondolo and J.-H. Huh, Update on the Halo-Independent Comparison of Direct Dark Matter Detection Data, Phys. Procedia61 (2015) 45 [arXiv:1405.5582] [INSPIRE].
11. LUX collaboration, D.S. Akerib et al., First results from the LUX dark matter experiment at the Sanford Underground Research Facility, Phys. Rev. Lett.112 (2014) 091303 [arXiv:1310.8214] [INSPIRE].
12. SuperCDMS collaboration, R. Agnese et al., Search for Low-Mass Weakly Interacting Massive Particles Using Voltage-Assisted Calorimetric Ionization Detection in the SuperCDMS Experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett.112 (2014) 041302 [arXiv:1309.3259] [INSPIRE].
13. J.L. Feng, J. Kumar and D. Sanford, Xenophobic Dark Matter, Phys. Rev.D 88 (2013) 015021 [arXiv:1306.2315] [INSPIRE].
14. J. Kumar, D. Sanford and L.E. Strigari, New Constraints on Isospin-Violating Dark Matter, Phys. Rev.D 85 (2012) 081301 [arXiv:1112.4849] [INSPIRE].
15. V. Cirigliano, M.L. Graesser, G. Ovanesyan and I.M. Shoemaker, Shining LUX on Isospin-Violating Dark Matter Beyond Leading Order, Phys. Lett.B 739 (2014) 293 [arXiv:1311.5886] [INSPIRE].
16. S. Profumo and F.S. Queiroz, GeV WIMPs scattering off of OH impurities cannot explain the DAMA signal, JCAP05 (2014) 038 [arXiv:1401.4253] [INSPIRE].
17. S. Profumo, Astrophysical Probes of Dark Matter, arXiv:1301.0952 [INSPIRE].
18. M. Cirelli, Dark Matter Indirect searches: phenomenological and theoretical aspects, J. Phys. Conf. Ser.447 (2013) 012006 [INSPIRE].
19. Fermi-LAT collaboration, M. Ackermann et al., Searching for Dark Matter Annihilation from Milky Way Dwarf Spheroidal Galaxies with Six Years of Fermi-LAT Data, arXiv:1503.02641 [INSPIRE].
20. J. Goodman, M. Ibe, A. Rajaraman, W. Shepherd, T.M.P. Tait and H.-B. Yu, Constraints on Dark Matter from Colliders, Phys. Rev.D 82 (2010) 116010 [arXiv:1008.1783] [INSPIRE].
21. A. Rajaraman, W. Shepherd, T.M.P. Tait and A.M. Wijangco, LHC Bounds on Interactions of Dark Matter, Phys. Rev.D 84 (2011) 095013 [arXiv:1108.1196] [INSPIRE].
22. Snowmass 2013 Cosmic Frontier Working Groups 1-4, D. Bauer et al., Dark Matter in the Coming Decade: Complementary Paths to Discovery and Beyond, Phys. Dark Univ.7-8 (2015) 16 [arXiv:1305.1605] [INSPIRE].
23. S. Patra, F.S. Queiroz and W. Rodejohann, Stringent Dilepton Bounds on Left-Right Models using LHC data, arXiv:1506.03456 [INSPIRE].
24. ′portal: direct, indirect and collider searches, JHEP04 (2014) 063 [arXiv:1312.5281] [INSPIRE].
25. ′Portal,arXiv:1501.03490[INSPIRE].
26. G. Arcadi, Y. Mambrini and F. Richard, Z-portal dark matter, JCAP03 (2015) 018 [arXiv:1411.2985] [INSPIRE].
27. P. Harris, V.V. Khoze, M. Spannowsky and C. Williams, Constraining Dark Sectors at Colliders: Beyond the Effective Theory Approach, Phys. Rev.D 91 (2015) 055009 [arXiv:1411.0535] [INSPIRE].
28. O. Buchmueller, M.J. Dolan, S.A. Malik and C. McCabe, Characterising dark matter searches at colliders and direct detection experiments: Vector mediators, JHEP01 (2015) 037 [arXiv:1407.8257] [INSPIRE].
29. M. Fairbairn and J. Heal, Complementarity of dark matter searches at resonance, Phys. Rev.D 90 (2014) 115019 [arXiv:1406.3288] [INSPIRE].
30. ′-mediated dark matter and the galactic center gamma ray excess, JHEP08 (2014) 131 [arXiv:1405.7691] [INSPIRE].
31. G. Busoni, A. De Simone, T. Jacques, E. Morgante and A. Riotto, On the Validity of the Effective Field Theory for Dark Matter Searches at the LHC Part III: Analysis for the t-channel, JCAP09 (2014) 022 [arXiv:1405.3101] [INSPIRE].
32. A. Alves, S. Profumo, F.S. Queiroz and W. Shepherd, Effective field theory approach to the Galactic Center gamma-ray excess, Phys. Rev.D 90 (2014) 115003 [arXiv:1403.5027] [INSPIRE].
33. ′, Phys. Lett.B 734 (2014) 350 [arXiv:1403.4837] [INSPIRE].
34. A. De Simone, G.F. Giudice and A. Strumia, Benchmarks for Dark Matter Searches at the LHC, JHEP06 (2014) 081 [arXiv:1402.6287] [INSPIRE].
35. D. Cogollo, A.X. Gonzalez-Morales, F.S. Queiroz and P.R. Teles, Excluding the Light Dark Matter Window of a 331 Model Using LHC and Direct Dark Matter Detection Data, JCAP11 (2014) 002 [arXiv:1402.3271] [INSPIRE].
36. P.V. Dong, D.T. Huong, F.S. Queiroz and N.T. Thuy, Phenomenology of the 3-3-1-1 model, Phys. Rev.D 90 (2014) 075021 [arXiv:1405.2591] [INSPIRE].
37. J.K. Mizukoshi, C.A. de S. Pires, F.S. Queiroz and P.S. Rodrigues da Silva, WIMPs in a 3-3-1 model with heavy Sterile neutrinos, Phys. Rev.D 83 (2011) 065024 [arXiv:1010.4097] [INSPIRE].
38. J.D. Ruiz-Alvarez, C.A. de S. Pires, F.S. Queiroz, D. Restrepo and P.S. Rodrigues da Silva, On the Connection of Gamma-Rays, Dark Matter and Higgs Searches at LHC, Phys. Rev.D 86 (2012) 075011 [arXiv:1206.5779] [INSPIRE].
39. K. Ghorbani and H. Ghorbani, Two-portal Dark Matter, Phys. Rev.D 91 (2015) 123541 [arXiv:1504.03610] [INSPIRE].
40. C.E. Yaguna, Gamma rays from the annihilation of singlet scalar dark matter, JCAP03 (2009) 003 [arXiv:0810.4267] [INSPIRE].
41. ′and dark matter: LHC vs LUX constraints, JHEP03 (2014) 134 [arXiv:1401.0221] [INSPIRE].
42. ′mass in 331 models using direct dark matter detection, Eur. Phys. J.C 74 (2014) 2960 [arXiv:1307.7802] [INSPIRE].
43. E. Dudas, L. Heurtier, Y. Mambrini and B. Zaldivar, Extra U(1), effective operators, anomalies and dark matter, JHEP11 (2013) 083 [arXiv:1307.0005] [INSPIRE].
44. ′and dark matter, JHEP08 (2009) 014 [arXiv:0904.1745] [INSPIRE].
45. R. Primulando, E. Salvioni and Y. Tsai, The Dark Penguin Shines Light at Colliders, JHEP07 (2015) 031 [arXiv:1503.04204] [INSPIRE].
46. M. Chala, F. Kahlhoefer, M. McCullough, G. Nardini and K. Schmidt-Hoberg, Constraining Dark Sectors with Monojets and Dijets, JHEP07 (2015) 089 [arXiv:1503.05916] [INSPIRE].
47. D. Feldman, P. Fileviez Perez and P. Nath, R-parity Conservation via the Stueckelberg Mechanism: LHC and Dark Matter Signals, JHEP01 (2012) 038 [arXiv:1109.2901] [INSPIRE].
48. ′model, JHEP03 (2007) 120 [hep-ph/0701107] [INSPIRE].
49. V.M. Lozano, M. Peiró and P. Soler, Isospin violating dark matter in Stückelberg portal scenarios, JHEP04 (2015) 175 [arXiv:1503.01780] [INSPIRE].
50. X. Gao, Z. Kang and T. Li, Origins of the Isospin Violation of Dark Matter Interactions, JCAP01 (2013) 021 [arXiv:1107.3529] [INSPIRE].
51. P. Fileviez Perez and S. Spinner, The Minimal Theory for R-parity Violation at the LHC, JHEP04 (2012) 118 [arXiv:1201.5923] [INSPIRE].
52. J.M. Arnold, P. Fileviez Perez, B. Fornal and S. Spinner, On Higgs Decays, Baryon Number Violation and SUSY at the LHC, Phys. Rev.D 85 (2012) 115024 [arXiv:1204.4458] [INSPIRE].
53. M. Duerr and P. Fileviez Perez, Theory for Baryon Number and Dark Matter at the LHC, Phys. Rev.D 91 (2015) 095001 [arXiv:1409.8165] [INSPIRE].
54. T. Han, P. Langacker, Z. Liu and L.-T. Wang, Diagnosis of a New Neutral Gauge Boson at the LHC and ILC for Snowmass 2013, arXiv:1308.2738 [INSPIRE].
55. H. An, R. Huo and L.-T. Wang, Searching for Low Mass Dark Portal at the LHC, Phys. Dark Univ.2 (2013) 50 [arXiv:1212.2221] [INSPIRE].
56. ′Dark Force at Colliders, JHEP07 (2012) 182 [arXiv:1202.2894] [INSPIRE].
57. ′Bosons, J. Phys.G 41 (2014) 075011 [arXiv:1312.3377] [INSPIRE].
58. A. Freitas, Weakly coupled neutral gauge bosons at future linear colliders, Phys. Rev.D 70 (2004) 015008 [hep-ph/0403288] [INSPIRE].
59. −colliders, Phys. Rev.D 68 (2003) 113007 [hep-ph/0308053] [INSPIRE].
60. ′Gauge Bosons, Rev. Mod. Phys.81 (2009) 1199 [arXiv:0801.1345] [INSPIRE].
61. T. Jacques and K. Nordström, Mapping monojet constraints onto Simplified Dark Matter Models, JHEP06 (2015) 142 [arXiv:1502.05721] [INSPIRE].
62. CMS collaboration, Search for dark matter, extra dimensions and unparticles in monojet events in proton-proton collisions (Formula presented.), Eur. Phys. J.C 75 (2015) 235 [arXiv:1408.3583] [INSPIRE].
63. P. Agrawal and V. Rentala, Identifying dark matter interactions in monojet searches, JHEP05 (2014) 098 [arXiv:1312.5325] [INSPIRE].
64. CMS collaboration, Search for dark matter and large extra dimensions in monojet events in pp collisions ats=(Formula presented.)TeV, JHEP09 (2012) 094 [arXiv:1206.5663] [INSPIRE].
65. D. Racco, A. Wulzer and F. Zwirner, Robust collider limits on heavy-mediator Dark Matter, JHEP05 (2015) 009 [arXiv:1502.04701] [INSPIRE].
66. M.T. Frandsen, F. Kahlhoefer, A. Preston, S. Sarkar and K. Schmidt-Hoberg, LHC and Tevatron Bounds on the Dark Matter Direct Detection Cross-Section for Vector Mediators, JHEP07 (2012) 123 [arXiv:1204.3839] [INSPIRE].
67. F.S. Queiroz and W. Shepherd, New Physics Contributions to the Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment: A Numerical Code, Phys. Rev.D 89 (2014) 095024 [arXiv:1403.2309] [INSPIRE].
68. ATLAS collaboration, Search for high-mass diboson resonances with boson-tagged jets in proton-proton collisions (Formula presented.) with the ATLAS detector, arXiv:1506.00962 [INSPIRE].
69. H.S. Fukano, M. Kurachi, S. Matsuzaki, K. Terashi and K. Yamawaki, 2 TeV Walking Technirho at LHC?, Phys. Lett.B 750 (2015) 259 [arXiv:1506.03751] [INSPIRE].
70. J. Hisano, N. Nagata and Y. Omura, Interpretations of the ATLAS Diboson Resonances, Phys. Rev.D 92 (2015) 055001 [arXiv:1506.03931] [INSPIRE].
71. D.B. Franzosi, M.T. Frandsen and F. Sannino, Diboson Signals via Fermi Scale Spin-One States, arXiv:1506.04392 [INSPIRE].
72. ′mediated dark matter models for the Galactic Center gamma-ray excess, Phys. Rev.D 91 (2015) 035025 [arXiv:1411.4079] [INSPIRE].
73. ′interactions, Phys. Rev.D 90 (2014) 035027 [arXiv:1407.3001] [INSPIRE].
74. ′-portal(s), JCAP01 (2014) 034 [arXiv:1306.4677] [INSPIRE].
75. T. Appelquist, B.A. Dobrescu and A.R. Hopper, Nonexotic neutral gauge bosons, Phys. Rev.D 68 (2003) 035012 [hep-ph/0212073] [INSPIRE].
76. ′gauge bosons at the Tevatron, Phys. Rev.D 70 (2004) 093009 [hep-ph/0408098] [INSPIRE].
77. Particle Data Group collaboration, K.A. Olive et al., Review of Particle Physics, Chin. Phys.C 38 (2014) 090001 [INSPIRE].
78. J. Kopp, L. Michaels and J. Smirnov, Loopy Constraints on Leptophilic Dark Matter and Internal Bremsstrahlung, JCAP04 (2014) 022 [arXiv:1401.6457] [INSPIRE].
79. τextension of MSSM, Phys. Rev.D 89 (2014) 025004 [arXiv:1306.4505] [INSPIRE].
80. P. Agrawal, Z. Chacko and C.B. Verhaaren, Leptophilic Dark Matter and the Anomalous Magnetic Moment of the Muon, JHEP08 (2014) 147 [arXiv:1402.7369] [INSPIRE].
81. S. Chang, R. Edezhath, J. Hutchinson and M. Luty, Leptophilic Effective WIMPs, Phys. Rev.D 90 (2014) 015011 [arXiv:1402.7358] [INSPIRE].
82. A. Hektor and L. Marzola, Coy Dark Matter and the anomalous magnetic moment, Phys. Rev.D 90 (2014) 053007 [arXiv:1403.3401] [INSPIRE].
83. A. Freitas and S. Westhoff, Leptophilic Dark Matter in Lepton Interactions at LEP and ILC, JHEP10 (2014) 116 [arXiv:1408.1959] [INSPIRE].
84. Q.-H. Cao, C.-R. Chen and T. Gong, Leptophilic Dark Matter and AMS-02 Cosmic-ray Positron Flux, arXiv:1409.7317 [INSPIRE].
85. XENON100 collaboration, E. Aprile et al., Limits on spin-dependent WIMP-nucleon cross sections from 225 live days of XENON100 data, Phys. Rev. Lett.111 (2013) 021301 [arXiv:1301.6620] [INSPIRE].
86. H.-Y. Cheng and C.-W. Chiang, Revisiting Scalar and Pseudoscalar Couplings with Nucleons, JHEP07 (2012) 009 [arXiv:1202.1292] [INSPIRE].
87. Fermi-LAT collaboration, M. Ackermann et al., Constraining Dark Matter Models from a Combined Analysis of Milky Way Satellites with the Fermi Large Area Telescope, Phys. Rev. Lett.107 (2011) 241302 [arXiv:1108.3546] [INSPIRE].
88. Fermi-LAT collaboration, M. Ackermann et al., Dark matter constraints from observations of 25 Milky Way satellite galaxies with the Fermi Large Area Telescope, Phys. Rev.D 89 (2014)042001 [arXiv:1310.0828] [INSPIRE].
89. Fermi-LAT collaboration, A.A. Abdo et al., Observations of Milky Way Dwarf Spheroidal galaxies with the Fermi-LAT detector and constraints on Dark Matter models, Astrophys. J.712 (2010)147 [arXiv:1001.4531] [INSPIRE].
90. D. Hooper, C. Kelso and F.S. Queiroz, Stringent and Robust Constraints on the Dark Matter Annihilation Cross Section From the Region of the Galactic Center, Astropart. Phys.46 (2013) 55 [arXiv:1209.3015] [INSPIRE].
91. M. Cirelli et al., PPPC 4 DM ID: A Poor Particle Physicist Cookbook for Dark Matter Indirect Detection, JCAP03 (2011) 051 [Erratum 10 (2012) E01] [arXiv:1012.4515] [INSPIRE].
92. J. Mardon, Y. Nomura, D. Stolarski and J. Thaler, Dark Matter Signals from Cascade Annihilations, JCAP05 (2009) 016 [arXiv:0901.2926] [INSPIRE].
93. AMS collaboration, M. Aguilar et al., First Result from the Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer on the International Space Station: Precision Measurement of the Positron Fraction in Primary Cosmic Rays of 0.5-350 GeV, Phys. Rev. Lett.110 (2013) 141102 [INSPIRE].
94. I. Cholis and D. Hooper, Dark Matter and Pulsar Origins of the Rising Cosmic Ray Positron Fraction in Light of New Data From AMS, Phys. Rev.D 88 (2013) 023013 [arXiv:1304.1840] [INSPIRE].
95. S.-J. Lin, X.-J. Bi, P.-F. Yin and Z.-H. Yu, Implications for dark matter annihilation from the AMS-(Formula presented.)ratio, arXiv:1504.07230 [INSPIRE].
96. K. Hamaguchi, T. Moroi and K. Nakayama, AMS-02 Antiprotons from Annihilating or Decaying Dark Matter, Phys. Lett.B 747 (2015) 523 [arXiv:1504.05937] [INSPIRE].
97. H.-B. Jin, Y.-L. Wu and Y.-F. Zhou, Upper limits on dark matter annihilation cross sections from the first AMS-02 antiproton data, Phys. Rev.D 92 (2015) 055027 [arXiv:1504.04604] [INSPIRE].
98. T. Bringmann, M. Vollmann and C. Weniger, Updated cosmic-ray and radio constraints on light dark matter: Implications for the GeV gamma-ray excess at the Galactic center, Phys. Rev.D 90 (2014) 123001 [arXiv:1406.6027] [INSPIRE].
99. J. Hisano, S. Matsumoto, M.M. Nojiri and O. Saito, Non-perturbative effect on dark matter annihilation and gamma ray signature from galactic center, Phys. Rev.D 71 (2005) 063528 [hep-ph/0412403] [INSPIRE].
100. A. Goudelis, Y. Mambrini and C. Yaguna, Antimatter signals of singlet scalar dark matter, JCAP12 (2009) 008 [arXiv:0909.2799] [INSPIRE].
101. S. Esch, M. Klasen and C.E. Yaguna, Detection prospects of singlet fermionic dark matter, Phys. Rev.D 88 (2013) 075017 [arXiv:1308.0951] [INSPIRE].
102. J. Hisano, S. Matsumoto and M.M. Nojiri, Explosive dark matter annihilation, Phys. Rev. Lett.92 (2004) 031303 [hep-ph/0307216] [INSPIRE].
103. M. Duerr, P. Fileviez Perez and J. Smirnov, Simplified Dirac Dark Matter Models, arXiv:1506.05107 [INSPIRE].
104. Muong − 2 collaboration, G.W. Bennett et al., Measurement of the negative muon anomalous magnetic moment to 0.7 ppm, Phys. Rev. Lett.92 (2004) 161802 [hep-ex/0401008] [INSPIRE].
105. Muong − 2 collaboration, G.W. Bennett et al., Final Report of the Muon E821 Anomalous Magnetic Moment Measurement at BNL, Phys. Rev.D 73 (2006) 072003 [hep-ex/0602035] [INSPIRE].
106. μ, electroweak, dark matter and collider constraints on 331 models, Phys. Rev.D 90 (2014) 113011 [arXiv:1408.6203] [INSPIRE].
107. C. Kelso, P.R.D. Pinheiro, F.S. Queiroz and W. Shepherd, The Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment in the Reduced Minimal 3-3-1 Model, Eur. Phys. J.C 74 (2014) 2808 [arXiv:1312.0051] [INSPIRE].
108. ATLAS collaboration, Search for high-mass dilepton resonances in pp collisions (Formula presented.)TeV with the ATLAS detector,Phys. Rev.D 90 (2014) 052005[arXiv:1405.4123] [INSPIRE].
109. J. Alwall, M. Herquet, F. Maltoni, O. Mattelaer and T. Stelzer, MadGraph 5: Going Beyond, JHEP06 (2011) 128 [arXiv:1106.0522] [INSPIRE].
110. A. Alloul, J. D’Hondt, K. De Causmaecker, B. Fuks and M. Rausch de Traubenberg, Automated mass spectrum generation for new physics, Eur. Phys. J.C 73 (2013) 2325 [arXiv:1301.5932] [INSPIRE].
111. T. Sjöstrand, S. Mrenna and P.Z. Skands, PYTHIA 6.4 Physics and Manual, JHEP05 (2006)026 [hep-ph/0603175] [INSPIRE].
112. DELPHES 3 collaboration, J. de Favereau et al., DELPHES 3, A modular framework for fast simulation of a generic collider experiment, JHEP02 (2014) 057 [arXiv:1307.6346] [INSPIRE].
113. M.L. Mangano, M. Moretti, F. Piccinini and M. Treccani, Matching matrix elements and shower evolution for top-quark production in hadronic collisions, JHEP01 (2007) 013 [hep-ph/0611129] [INSPIRE].
114. P.M. Nadolsky et al., Implications of CTEQ global analysis for collider observables, Phys. Rev.D 78 (2008) 013004 [arXiv:0802.0007] [INSPIRE].
115. G. Bélanger, F. Boudjema, A. Pukhov and A. Semenov, MicrOMEGAs 2.0: A Program to calculate the relic density of dark matter in a generic model, Comput. Phys. Commun.176 (2007) 367 [hep-ph/0607059] [INSPIRE].
116. F. D’Eramo and M. Procura, Connecting Dark Matter UV Complete Models to Direct Detection Rates via Effective Field Theory, JHEP04 (2015) 054 [arXiv:1411.3342] [INSPIRE].
117. A. Crivellin, F. D’Eramo and M. Procura, New Constraints on Dark Matter Effective Theories from Standard Model Loops, Phys. Rev. Lett.112 (2014) 191304 [arXiv:1402.1173] [INSPIRE].
118. D. Hooper, F.S. Queiroz and N.Y. Gnedin, Non-Thermal Dark Matter Mimicking An Additional Neutrino Species In The Early Universe, Phys. Rev.D 85 (2012) 063513 [arXiv:1111.6599] [INSPIRE].
119. R. Allahverdi, B. Dutta and K. Sinha, Non-thermal Higgsino Dark Matter: Cosmological Motivations and Implications for a 125 GeV Higgs, Phys. Rev.D 86 (2012) 095016 [arXiv:1208.0115] [INSPIRE].
120. R. Allahverdi, B. Dutta, F.S. Queiroz, L.E. Strigari and M.-Y. Wang, Dark Matter from Late Invisible Decays to/of Gravitinos, Phys. Rev.D 91 (2015) 055033 [arXiv:1412.4391] [INSPIRE].
121. R. Allahverdi, M. Cicoli, B. Dutta and K. Sinha, Nonthermal dark matter in string compactifications, Phys. Rev.D 88 (2013) 095015 [arXiv:1307.5086] [INSPIRE].
122. A. Anandakrishnan and K. Sinha, Viability of thermal well-tempered dark matter in SUSY GUTs, Phys. Rev.D 89 (2014) 055015 [arXiv:1310.7579] [INSPIRE].
123. C. Kelso, C.A. de S. Pires, S. Profumo, F.S. Queiroz and P.S. Rodrigues da Silva, A 331 WIMPy Dark Radiation Model, Eur. Phys. J.C 74 (2014) 2797 [arXiv:1308.6630] [INSPIRE].
124. C. Kelso, S. Profumo and F.S. Queiroz, Non-thermal WIMPs as “Dark Radiation” in Light of ATACAMA, SPT, WMAP9 and Planck, Phys. Rev.D 88 (2013) 023511 [arXiv:1304.5243] [INSPIRE].
125. P.S. Bhupal Dev, A. Mazumdar and S. Qutub, Constraining Non-thermal and Thermal properties of Dark Matter, Front. Phys.2 (2014) 26 [arXiv:1311.5297] [INSPIRE].