R-parity conservation via the Stueckelberg mechanism: LHC and Dark Matter Signals

Journal of High Energy Physics

Volumn 2012, Issue 1, 2012, Pages

  Feldman, Daniel ^a,b   Perez, Pavel Fileviez ^c   Nath, Pran ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b CERN   (Switzerland)

^c NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Beyond Standard Model; Discrete and Finite Symmetries; Supersymmetric gauge theory

Indexed keywords

EID: 84857263404     PISSN: 11266708     EISSN: 10298479     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP01(2012)038     Document Type: Article

References (137)

1. P. Nath and P. Fileviez Perez, Proton stability in grand unified theories, in strings and in branes, Phys. Rept. 441 (2007) 191 [hep-ph/0601023] [INSPIRE].
2. A.H. Chamseddine, R.L. Arnowitt and P. Nath, Locally supersymmetric grand unification Phys. Rev. Lett. 49 (1982) 970 [INSPIRE].
3. R.L. Arnowitt and P. Nath, SUSY mass spectrum in SU(5) supergravity grand unification Phys. Rev. Lett. 69 (1992) 725 [INSPIRE].
4. P. Nath and R.L. Arnowitt, Radiative breaking, proton stability and the viability of no scale supergravity models, Phys. Lett. B 287 (1992) 89 [INSPIRE].
5. P. Nath, Twenty years of SUGRA, hep-ph/0307123 [INSPIRE].
6. H. Goldberg, Constraint on the photino mass from cosmology, Phys. Rev. Lett. 50 (1983) 1419 [Erratum ibid. 103 (2009) 099905] [INSPIRE].
7. B. K̈ors and P. Nath, A Stueckelberg extension of the standard model, Phys. Lett. B 586 (2004) 366 [hep-ph/0402047] [INSPIRE].
8. B. K̈ors and P. Nath, A supersymmetric Stueckelberg U(1) extension of the MSSM, JHEP 12 (2004) 005 [hep-ph/0406167] [INSPIRE].
9. B. K̈ors and P. Nath, Aspects of the Stueckelberg extension, JHEP 07 (2005) 069 [hep-ph/0503208] [INSPIRE].
10. D. Feldman, Z. Liu and P. Nath, Probing a very narrow Z' boson with CDF and D0 data, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 (2006) 021801 [hep-ph/0603039] [INSPIRE].
11. D. Feldman, Z. Liu and P. Nath, The Stueckelberg Z Prime at the LHC: discovery potential, signature spaces and model discrimination, JHEP 11 (2006) 007 [hep-ph/0606294] [INSPIRE].
12. P. Fileviez Perez and S. Spinner, Spontaneous R-parity breaking and left-right symmetry, Phys. Lett. B 673 (2009) 251 [arXiv:0811.3424] [INSPIRE].
13. V. Barger, P. Fileviez Perez and S. Spinner, Minimal gauged U(1)B-L model with spontaneous R-parity violation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 (2009) 181802 [arXiv:0812.3661] [INSPIRE].
14. P. Fileviez Perez and S. Spinner, Spontaneous R-parity breaking in SUSY models, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 015004 [arXiv:0904.2213] [INSPIRE].
15. L.L. Everett, P. Fileviez Perez and S. Spinner, The right side of TeV scale spontaneous R-parity violation, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 055007 [arXiv:0906.4095] [INSPIRE].
16. P. Fileviez Perez and S. Spinner, The fate of R-parity, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 035004 [arXiv: 1005.4930] [INSPIRE].
17. P. Fileviez Perez, S. Spinner and M.K. Trenkel, The LSP stability and new Higgs signals at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 095028 [arXiv:1103.5504] [INSPIRE].
18. S.P. Martin, Some simple criteria for gauged R-parity, Phys. Rev. D 46 (1992) 2769 [hep-ph/9207218] [INSPIRE].
19. S. Khalil and A. Masiero, Radiative B-L symmetry breaking in supersymmetric models, Phys. Lett. B 665 (2008) 374 [arXiv:0710.3525] [INSPIRE].
20. M. Frank, Phenomenology of left-right supersymmetric models with broken B-L symmetry, Phys. Rev. D 63 (2001) 034009 [INSPIRE].
21. C. Aulakh and R.N. Mohapatra, Neutrino as the supersymmetric partner of the Majoron, Phys. Lett. B 119 (1982) 136 [INSPIRE].
22. L.J. Hall and M. Suzuki, Explicit R-parity breaking in supersymmetric models, Nucl. Phys. B 231 (1984) 419 [INSPIRE].
23. A. Masiero and J. Valle, A model for spontaneous R-parity breaking, Phys. Lett. B 251 (1990) 273 [INSPIRE].
24. R. Mohapatra, New contributions to neutrinoless double β decay in supersymmetric theories, Phys. Rev. D 34 (1986) 3457 [INSPIRE].
25. A. Font, L.E. Ib́añez and F. Quevedo, Does proton stability imply the existence of an extra Z0?, Phys. Lett. B 228 (1989) 79 [INSPIRE].
26. E. Accomando, A. Belyaev, L. Fedeli, S.F. King and C. Shepherd-Themistocleous, Z′ physics with early LHCdata, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 075012 [arXiv:1010.6058] [INSPIRE].
27. L. Basso, Phenomenology of the minimal B-L extension of the standard model at the LHC, arXiv:1106.4462 [INSPIRE].
28. G.M. Pruna, Phenomenology of the minimal B-L model: the Higgs sector at the Large Hadron Collider andfuture Linear Colliders, arXiv:1106.4691 [INSPIRE].
29. L discovery potential at the LHC for √s~ = 7 TeV, PoS(ICHEP2010)381 [arXiv:1011.0872] [INSPIRE].
30. D. Feldman, B. K̈ors and P. Nath, Extra-weakly interacting dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 75 (2007) 023503 [hep-ph/0610133] [INSPIRE].
31. K. Cheung and T.-C. Yuan, Hidden fermion as milli-charged dark matter in Stueckelberg Z' model, JHEP 03 (2007) 120 [hep-ph/0701107] [INSPIRE].
32. D. Feldman, Z. Liu and P. Nath, The Stueckelberg Z' extension with kinetic mixing and milli-charged dark matterfrom the hidden sector, Phys. Rev. D 75 (2007) 115001 [hep-ph/0702123] [INSPIRE].
33. D. Feldman, Z. Liu and P. Nath, Recent developments in supersymmetric and hidden sector dark matter, AIP Conf. Proc. 1078 (2009) 116 [arXiv:0806.4683] [INSPIRE].
34. D. Feldman, Z. Liu and P. Nath, The Stueckelberg extension and milli weak and milli charged dark matter, AIP Conf. Proc. 939 (2007) 50 [arXiv:0705.2924] [INSPIRE].
35. M. Pospelov, A. Ritz and M.B. Voloshin, Secluded WIMP dark matter, Phys. Lett. B 662 (2008) 53 [arXiv:0711.4866] [INSPIRE].
36. J.L. Feng and J. Kumar, The WIMPless miracle: dark-matterparticles without weak-scale masses or weak interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 (2008) 231301 [arXiv:0803.4196] [INSPIRE].
37. A. Ibarra, A. Ringwald and C. Weniger, Hidden gauginos of an unbroken U(1): cosmological constraints and phenomenological prospects, JCAP 01 (2009) 003 [arXiv:0809.3196] [INSPIRE].
38. Y. Cui, D.E. Morrissey, D. Poland and L. Randall, Candidates for inelastic dark matter, JHEP 05 (2009) 076 [arXiv:0901.0557] [INSPIRE].
39. C. Cheung, J.T. Ruderman, L.-T. Wang and I. Yavin, Kinetic mixing as the origin oflight dark scales, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 035008 [arXiv:0902.3246] [INSPIRE].
40. S. Gopalakrishna, S.J. Lee and J.D. Wells, Dark matter and Higgs boson collider implications offermions in an abelian-gauged hidden sector, Phys. Lett. B 680 (2009) 88 [arXiv:0904.2007] [INSPIRE].
41. K. Cheung, K.-H. Tsao and T.-C. Yuan, Hidden sector dirac dark matter, stueckelberg Z' model and the CDMS and XENON experiments, arXiv:1003.4611 [INSPIRE].
42. P. Nath, Predicted signatures at the LHCfrom U(1) extensions of the standard model, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 25 (2010) 3003 [arXiv:0812.0958] [INSPIRE].
43. Z. Liu, Hidden sector models and signatures, Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 200-202 (2010) 133 [arXiv:0910.0061] [INSPIRE].
44. P. Nath et al., The hunt for new physics at the Large Hadron Collider, Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 200-202 (2010) 185 [arXiv:1001.2693] [INSPIRE].
45. D. Feldman, Z. Liu, P. Nath and G. Peim, Multicomponent dark matter in supersymmetric hidden sector extensions, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 095017 [arXiv:1004.0649] [INSPIRE].
46. D. Feldman, Z. Liu and P. Nath, PAMELA positron excess as a signal from the hidden sector, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 063509 [arXiv:0810.5762] [INSPIRE].
47. N. Arkani-Hamed, D.P. Finkbeiner, T.R. Slatyer and N. Weiner, A theory of dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 015014 [arXiv:0810.0713] [INSPIRE].
48. D. Feldman, Z. Liu, P. Nath and B.D. Nelson, Explaining PAMELA and WMAP data through coannihilations in extended SUGRA with collider implications, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 075001 [arXiv:0907.5392] [INSPIRE].
49. N. Chen, D. Feldman, Z. Liu, P. Nath and G. Peim, Higgsino dark matter model consistent with galactic cosmic ray data and possibility of discovery at LHC-7, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 023506 [arXiv:1010.0939] [INSPIRE].
50. N. Chen, D. Feldman, Z. Liu, P. Nath and G. Peim, Low mass gluino within the sparticle landscape, implications for dark matter and early discovery prospects at LHC-7, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 035005 [arXiv:1011.1246] [INSPIRE].
51. D. Feldman, Superparticle signatures: from PAMELA to the LHC, Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 200-202 (2010) 82 [arXiv:0908.3727] [INSPIRE].
52. A. Arvanitaki, N. Craig, S. Dimopoulos, S. Dubovsky and J. March-Russell, String photini at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 075018 [arXiv:0909.5440] [INSPIRE].
53. M. Ahlers, J. Jaeckel, J. Redondo and A. Ringwald, Probing hidden sectorphotons through the Higgs window, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 075005 [arXiv:0807.4143] [INSPIRE].
54. M. Goodsell, J. Jaeckel, J. Redondo and A. Ringwald, Naturally light hidden photons in LARGEvolume string compactifications, JHEP 11 (2009) 027 [arXiv:0909.0515] [INSPIRE].
55. J. Jaeckel and A. Ringwald, The low-energy frontier ofparticle physics, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 60 (2010) 405 [arXiv:1002.0329] [INSPIRE].
56. M. Williams, C. Burgess, A. Maharana and F. Quevedo, New constraints (and motivations) for abelian gauge bosons in the MeV-TeVmass range, arXiv:1103.4556 [INSPIRE].
57. Y. Mambrini, The ZZ' kinetic mixing in the light of the recent direct and indirect dark matter searches, JCAP 07 (2011) 009 [arXiv:1104.4799] [INSPIRE].
58. A.E. Nelson and J. Scholtz, Dark light, dark matter and the misalignment mechanism, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 103501 [arXiv:1105.2812] [INSPIRE].
59. Y. Mambrini, Specific Dark Matter signatures from hidden U(1), PoS(QFTHEP2010)027 [arXiv :1012. 0447] [INSPIRE].
60. WMAP collaboration, E. Komatsu et al., Seven-year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) observations: cosmological interpretation, Astrophys. J. Suppl. 192 (2011) 18 [arXiv:1001.4538] [INSPIRE].
61. XENON100 collaboration, E. Aprile et al., Dark matter results from 100 live days of XENON100 data, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 (2011) 131302 [arXiv:1104.2549] [INSPIRE].
62. CDMS-II collaboration, Z. Ahmed et al., Dark matter search results from the CDMS II experiment, Science 327 (2010) 1619 [arXiv:0912.3592] [INSPIRE].
63. S. Abel, M. Goodsell, J. Jaeckel, V. Khoze and A. Ringwald, Kinetic mixing of the photon with hidden U(1)s in string phenomenology, JHEP 07 (2008) 124 [arXiv:0803.1449] [INSPIRE].
64. Y. Zhang, Z' mixing effect in Stueckelberg extended effective theory, Chin. Phys. Lett. 26 (2009) 081102.
65. Y. Zhang, Z' phenomenology: a model-independent analysis and fit in combination of chiral effective theory and anomaly cancellation, arXiv:1106.0163 [INSPIRE].
66. Y. Zhang and Q. Wang, Parameterization of general Z-γ-Z' mixings in an electroweak chiral theory, arXiv:1011.4418 [INSPIRE].
67. C. Burgess et al., Continuous global symmetries and hyperweak interactions in string compactifications, JHEP 07 (2008) 073 [arXiv:0805.4037] [INSPIRE].
68. J. Heeck and W. Rodejohann, Kinetic and mass mixing with three abelian groups, Phys. Lett. B 705 (2011) 369 [arXiv:1109.1508] [INSPIRE].
69. C. Coriaǹo, M. Guzzi, N. Irges and A. Mariano, Axion and neutralinos from supersymmetric extensions of the standard model with anomalous U(1) 's, Phys. Lett. B 671 (2009) 87 [arXiv:0811.0117] [INSPIRE].
70. C. Coriaǹo, M. Guzzi, A. Mariano and S. Morelli, A light supersymmetric axion in an anomalous abelian extension of the standard model, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 035006 [arXiv:0811.3675] [INSPIRE].
71. C. Coriaǹo, M. Guzzi, G. Lazarides and A. Mariano, Cosmological properties ofagauged axion, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 065013 [arXiv:1005.5441] [INSPIRE].
72. P. Anastasopoulos et al., Minimal anomalous U(1)' extension of the MSSM, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 085014 [arXiv:0804.1156] [INSPIRE].
73. T. Aoyama, M. Hayakawa, T. Kinoshita and M. Nio, Dark matter in anomalous U(1)' models with neutral mixing, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 051702 [arXiv:1105.4753] [INSPIRE].
74. F. Fucito, A. Lionetto, A. Mammarella and A. Racioppi, Stueckelino dark matter in anomalous U(1)' models, Eur. Phys. J. C 69 (2010) 455 [arXiv:0811.1953] [INSPIRE].
75. G. Panotopoulos and P. Tuzon, The physics of a new gauge boson in a Stueckelberg extension of the two-Higgs-doublet model, JHEP 07 (2011) 039 [arXiv:1102.5726] [INSPIRE].
76. P.G. Camara, L.E. Ib́añez and F. Marchesano, RR photons, JHEP 09 (2011) 110 [arXiv:1106.0060] [INSPIRE].
77. M.J. Dolan, J. Marsano, N. Saulina and S. Scḧafer-Nameki, F-theory GUTs with U(1) symmetries: generalities and survey, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 066008 [arXiv:1102.0290] [INSPIRE].
78. M. Cveti?c, J. Halverson and P. Langacker, Implications of string constraints for exotic matter and Z' s beyond the standard model, JHEP 11 (2011) 058 [arXiv:1108.5187] [INSPIRE].
79. M. Kalb and P. Ramond, Classical direct interstring action, Phys. Rev. D 9 (1974) 2273 [INSPIRE].
80. P. Fayet and J. Iliopoulos, Spontaneously broken supergauge symmetries and goldstone spinors, Phys. Lett. B 51 (1974) 461 [INSPIRE].
81. S.P. Martin and M.T. Vaughn, Two loop renormalization group equations for soft supersymmetry breaking couplings, Phys. Rev. D 50 (1994) 2282 [Erratum ibid. D 78 (2008) 039903] [hep-ph/9311340] [INSPIRE].
82. P. Nath and R.L. Arnowitt, Nonuniversal soft SUSY breaking and dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 56 (1997) 2820 [hep-ph/9701301] [INSPIRE].
83. M. Ambroso and B. Ovrut, The B-L/electroweak hierarchy in heterotic string and M-theory, JHEP 10 (2009) 011 [arXiv:0904.4509] [INSPIRE].
84. M. Ambroso and B.A. Ovrut, The B-L/electroweak hierarchy in smooth heterotic compactifications, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 25 (2010) 2631 [arXiv:0910.1129] [INSPIRE].
85. M. Ambroso and B.A. Ovrut, The mass spectra, hierarchy and cosmology of B-L MSSM heterotic compactifications, arXiv:1005.5392 [INSPIRE].
86. M.S. Carena, A. Daleo, B.A. Dobrescu and T.M. Tait, Z′ gauge bosons at the Tevatron, Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 093009 [hep-ph/0408098] [INSPIRE].
87. Muon g-2 collaboration, G.W. Bennett et al., Measurement of the negative muon anomalous magnetic moment to 0.7ppm, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 (2004) 161802 [hep-ex/0401008] [INSPIRE].
88. 1 ofppbar collisions at ^̄s = 1.96 TeV, Phys. Lett. B 695 (2011) 88 [arXiv:1008.2023] [INSPIRE].
89. T. Sj̈ostrand, S. Mrenna and P.Z. Skands, PYTHIA 6.4 physics and manual, JHEP 05 (2006) 026 [hep-ph/0603175] [INSPIRE].
90. J. Conway et al., PGS4 \- Pretty Good Simulation of high energy collision http://physics.ucdavis.edu/̃conway/research/software/pgs/pgs4-general.htm.
91. G. Aad et al., Search for dilepton resonances in pp collisions at y?s = 7 TeV with the ATLAS detector, arXiv:1108.1582 [INSPIRE].
92. E. Salvioni, G. Villadoro and F. Zwirner, Minimal Z′ models: present bounds and early LHCreach, JHEP 11 (2009) 068 [arXiv:0909.1320] [INSPIRE].
93. M.S. Chanowitz, A heavy little higgs and a light Z′ under the radar, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 035014 [arXiv:1102.3672] [INSPIRE].
94. CMS collaboration, S. Chatrchyan et al., Search for resonances in the dilepton mass distribution in pp collisions at^̄s = 7 TeV, JHEP 05 (2011) 093 [arXiv:1103.0981] [INSPIRE].
95. A. Djouadi, Squark effects on Higgs boson production and decay at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 435 (1998) 101 [hep-ph/9806315] [INSPIRE].
96. M. Spira, QCD effects in Higgs physics, Fortsch. Phys. 46 (1998) 203 [hep-ph/9705337] [INSPIRE].
97. G.F. Giudice, R. Rattazzi and J.D. Wells, Graviscalars from higher dimensional metrics and curvature Higgs mixing, Nucl. Phys. B 595 (2001) 250 [hep-ph/0002178] [INSPIRE].
98. A. De Rujula, J. Lykken, M. Pierini, C. Rogan and M. Spiropulu, Higgs look-alikes at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 013003 [arXiv:1001.5300] [INSPIRE].
99. I. Low, J. Lykken and G. Shaughnessy Singlet scalars as Higgs imposters at the Large Hadron Collider, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 035027 [arXiv:1105.4587] [INSPIRE].
100. P.J. Fox, D. Tucker-Smith and N. Weiner, Higgs friends and counterfeits at hadron colliders, JHEP 06 (2011) 127 [arXiv:1104.5450] [INSPIRE].
101. D. Feldman and G. Kane, A Wino-like LSP world: theoretical and phenomenological motivations, in Perspectives on Supersymmetry II, G.K. Kane ed., World Scientific, Singapore (2010).
102. M. Drees and M. Nojiri, Neutralino-nucleon scattering revisited, Phys. Rev. D 48 (1993) 3483 [hep-ph/9307208] [INSPIRE].
103. M. Drees and M.M. Nojiri, New contributions to coherent neutralino-nucleus scattering, Phys. Rev. D 47 (1993) 4226 [hep-ph/9210272] [INSPIRE].
104. J. Hisano, K. Ishiwata and N. Nagata, Gluon contribution to the dark matter direct detection, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 115007 [arXiv:1007.2601] [INSPIRE].
105. U. Chattopadhyay, T. Ibrahim and P. Nath, Effects of CP-violation on event rates in the direct detection of dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 60 (1999) 063505 [hep-ph/9811362] [INSPIRE].
106. A. Corsetti and P. Nath, Gaugino mass nonuniversality and dark matter in SUGRA, strings and D-brane models, Phys. Rev. D 64 (2001) 125010 [hep-ph/0003186] [INSPIRE].
107. G. B́elanger, F. Boudjema, A. Pukhov and A. Semenov, Dark matter direct detection rate in a generic model with micrOMEGAs 2.2, Comput. Phys. Commun. 180 (2009) 747 [arXiv: 0803. 2360] [INSPIRE].
108. ATLAS collaboration, G. Aad et al., Search for supersymmetry using final states with one lepton, jets and missing transverse momentum with the ATLAS detector in√s = 7 TeVpp, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 (2011) 131802 [arXiv:1102.2357] [INSPIRE].
109. CMS collaboration, V. Khachatryan et al., Search for supersymmetry in pp collisions at 7 TeVin events withjets and missing transverse energy, Phys. Lett. B 698 (2011) 196 [arXiv:1101.1628] [INSPIRE].
110. ATLAS collaboration, G. Aad et al., Search for supersymmetry in pp collisions at √s=7TeVin final states with missing transverse momentum and b-jets, Phys. Lett. B 701 (2011) 398 [arXiv:1103.4344] [INSPIRE].
111. CMS collaboration, S. Chatrchyan et al., Search for supersymmetry at the LHCin events withjets and missing transverse energy, arXiv:1109.2352 [INSPIRE].
112. S. Akula, D. Feldman, Z. Liu, P. Nath and G. Peim, New constraints on dark matter from CMS and ATLAS data, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 26 (2011) 1521 [arXiv:1103.5061] [INSPIRE].
113. S. Akula, D. Feldman, P. Nath and G. Peim, Excess observed in CDF B0 → μ + μ ~ and SUSYat the LHC, arXiv:1107.3535 [INSPIRE].
114. S. Akula et al., Interpreting the first CMS and ATLAS SUSY results, Phys. Lett. B 699 (2011) 377 [arXiv:1103.1197] [INSPIRE].
115. O. Buchmueller et al., Supersymmetry and dark matter in light ofLHC 2010 and Xenon100 data, Eur. Phys. J. C 71 (2011) 1722 [arXiv:1106.2529] [INSPIRE].
116. C. Boehm, A. Djouadi and M. Drees, Light scalar top quarks and supersymmetric dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 62 (2000) 035012 [hep-ph/9911496] [INSPIRE].
117. Y. Santoso, Neutralino stop coannihilation in the CMSSM, Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 124 (2003) 166 [hep-ph/0205026] [INSPIRE].
118. P. Nath and R.L. Arnowitt, Predictions in SU(5) supergravity grand unification with proton stability and relic density constraints, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70 (1993) 3696 [hep-ph/9302318] [INSPIRE] .
119. K. Griest and D. Seckel, Three exceptions in the calculation of relic abundances, Phys. Rev. D43(1991)3191 [INSPIRE].
120. P. Gondolo and G. Gelmini, Cosmic abundances of stable particles: Improved analysis, Nucl. Phys. B 360 (1991) 145 [INSPIRE].
121. E.J. Chun, J.-C. Park and S. Scopel, Dark matter and a new gauge boson through kinetic mixing, JHEP 02 (2011) 100 [arXiv:1011.3300] [INSPIRE].
122. P. Gondolo, P. Ko and Y. Omura, Light dark matter in leptophobic Z' models, arXiv:1106.0885 [INSPIRE].
123. PAMELA collaboration, O
124. 2011 Fermi Symposium, May 9-12, Roma, Italy (2011), http://fermi.gsfc. nasa.gov/science/symposium/2011/.
125. G. Angloher et al., Results from 730 kg days of the CRESST-II dark matter search, arXiv:1109.0702 [INSPIRE].
126. CoGeNT collaboration, C. Aalseth et al., Resultsfrom a search for light-mass dark matter with a p-type point contact germanium detector, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 (2011) 131301 [arXiv: 1002.4703] [INSPIRE] .
127. s → μ + μ ~ and Higgs search limits, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 117701 [arXiv: 1003. 0437] [INSPIRE] .
128. E. Kuflik, A. Pierce and K.M. Zurek, Light neutralinos with large scattering cross sections in the minimal supersymmetric standard model, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 111701 [arXiv: 1003. 0682] [INSPIRE] .
129. D.A. Vasquez, G. B́elanger, C. Boehm, A. Pukhov and J. Silk, Can neutralinos in the MSSM and NMSSM scenarios still be light?, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 115027 [arXiv: 1009 .4380] [INSPIRE] .
130. J.-J. Cao et al., Light dark matter in NMSSM and implication on Higgs phenomenology, Phys. Lett. B 703 (2011) 292 [arXiv:1104.1754] [INSPIRE].
131. D.T. Cumberbatch, D.E. Lopez-Fogliani, L. Roszkowski, R.R. de Austri and Y.-L.S. Tsai, Is light neutralino as dark matter still viable?, arXiv:1107.1604 [INSPIRE].
132. M. Vazques Acosta, Higgs searches at the LHC, talk given at the SUSY 2011, August 28-September 2, Fermilab, U.S.A. (2011).
133. D. Feldman, K. Freese, P. Nath, B.D. Nelson and G. Peim, Predictive signatures of supersymmetry: measuring the dark matter mass and gluino mass with early LHC data, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 015007 [arXiv:1102.2548] [INSPIRE].
134. L.M. Krauss and F. Wilczek, Discrete gauge symmetry in continuum theories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62 (1989) 1221 [INSPIRE].
135. S.P. Martin, Implications of supersymmetric models with natural R-parity conservation, Phys. Rev. D 54 (1996) 2340 [hep-ph/9602349] [INSPIRE].
136. G. Cacciapaglia, C. Cśaki, G. Marandella and A. Strumia, The minimal set of electroweak precisionparameters, Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 033011 [hep-ph/0604111] [INSPIRE].
137. R. Barbier et al., R-parity violating supersymmetry, Phys. Rept. 420 (2005) 1 [hep-ph/0406039] [INSPIRE].