Structural insights into the cooperative remodeling of membranes by amphiphysin/BIN1

Scientific Reports

Volumn 5, Issue , 2015, Pages

  Adam, Julia ^a   Basnet, Nirakar ^a   Mizuno, Naoko ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE OF BIOCHEMISTRY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMPHIPHYSIN; NERVE PROTEIN; POLYMER;

ANIMAL; CELL MEMBRANE; CHEMISTRY; DROSOPHILA; METABOLISM; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; PROTEIN TERTIARY STRUCTURE; SKELETAL MUSCLE; SRC HOMOLOGY DOMAIN; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ANIMALS; CELL MEMBRANE; DROSOPHILA; MUSCLE, SKELETAL; NERVE TISSUE PROTEINS; POLYMERS; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; SRC HOMOLOGY DOMAINS;

EID: 84944899244     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/srep15452     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Zimmerberg, J. & Kozlov, M. M. How proteins produce cellular membrane curvature. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 7, 9-19 (2006).
2. Suetsugu, S., Kurisu, S. & Takenawa, T. Dynamic shaping of cellular membranes by phospholipids and membrane-deforming proteins. Physiol. Rev. 94, 1219-1248 (2014).
3. McMahon, H. T. & Boucrot, E. Membrane curvature at a glance. J Cell Sci 128, 1065-1070 (2015).
4. Frost, A., Unger, V. M. & De Camilli, P. The BAR domain superfamily: membrane-molding macromolecules. Cell 137, 191-196 (2009).
5. McMahon, H. T. & Gallop, J. L. Membrane curvature and mechanisms of dynamic cell membrane remodelling. Nature 438, 590-596 (2005).
6. Bhatia, V. K. et al. Amphipathic motifs in BAR domains are essential for membrane curvature sensing. EMBO J 28, 3303-3314 (2009).
7. Daumke, O., Roux, A. & Haucke, V. BAR Domain Scaffolds in Dynamin-Mediated Membrane Fission. Cell 156, 882-892 (2014).
8. Qualmann, B., Koch, D. & Kessels, M. M. Let's go bananas: revisiting the endocytic BAR code. EMBO J 30, 3501-3515 (2011).
9. Mim, C. & Unger, V. M. Membrane curvature and its generation by BAR proteins. Trends Biochem Sci 37, 526-533 (2012).
10. Peter, B. J. et al. BAR domains as sensors of membrane curvature: the amphiphysin BAR structure. Science 303, 495-499 (2004).
11. Gallop, J. L. et al. Mechanism of endophilin N-BAR domain-mediated membrane curvature. EMBO J 25, 2898-2910 (2006).
12. Jao, C. C. et al. Roles of amphipathic helices and the bin/amphiphysin/rvs (BAR) domain of endophilin in membrane curvature generation. J Biol Chem 285, 20164-20170 (2010).
13. Isas, J. M., Ambroso, M. R., Hegde, P. B., Langen, J. & Langen, R. Tubulation by Amphiphysin Requires Concentration-Dependent Switching from Wedging to Scaffolding. Structure 23, 873-81 (2015).
14. Drin, G. & Antonny, B. Amphipathic helices and membrane curvature. FEBS Lett. 584, 1840-1847 (2010).
15. Antonny, B. Mechanisms of membrane curvature sensing. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 80, 101-123 (2011).
16. Mizuno, N. et al. Remodeling of lipid vesicles into cylindrical micelles by-synuclein in an extended-helical conformation. J Biol Chem 287, 29301-29311 (2012).
17. Varkey, J. et al. Membrane curvature induction and tubulation are common features of synucleins and apolipoproteins. J Biol Chem 285, 32486-32493 (2010).
18. Mizuno, N., Jao, C. C., Langen, R. & Steven, A. C. Multiple modes of endophilin-mediated conversion of lipid vesicles into coated tubes: implications for synaptic endocytosis. J Biol Chem 285, 23351-23358 (2010).
19. Mim, C. et al. Structural Basis of Membrane Bending by the N-BAR Protein Endophilin. Cell 149, 137-145 (2012).
20. Yin, Y., Arkhipov, A. & Schulten, K. Simulations of membrane tubulation by lattices of amphiphysin N-BAR domains. Structure (London, England: 1993) 17, 882-892 (2009).
21. Cui, H. et al. Understanding the role of amphipathic helices in N-BAR domain driven membrane remodeling. Biophys. J. 104, 404-411 (2013).
22. David, C., McPherson, P. S., Mundigl, O. & De Camilli, P. A role of amphiphysin in synaptic vesicle endocytosis suggested by its binding to dynamin in nerve terminals. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93, 331-335 (1996).
23. Rao, Y. & Haucke, V. Membrane shaping by the Bin/amphiphysin/Rvs (BAR) domain protein superfamily. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 68, 3983-3993 (2011).
24. Taylor, M. J., Perrais, D. & Merrifield, C. J. A high precision survey of the molecular dynamics of mammalian clathrin-mediated endocytosis. PLoS Biol 9, e1000604 (2011).
25. Lee, E. et al. Amphiphysin 2 (Bin1) and T-tubule biogenesis in muscle. Science 297, 1193-1196 (2002).
26. Razzaq, A. Amphiphysin is necessary for organization of the excitation-contraction coupling machinery of muscles, but not for synaptic vesicle endocytosis in Drosophila. Genes Dev 15, 2967-2979 (2001).
27. Al-Qusairi, L. & Laporte, J. T-tubule biogenesis and triad formation in skeletal muscle and implication in human diseases. Skelet Muscle 1, 26 (2011).
28. Zelhof, A. C. et al. Drosophila Amphiphysin is implicated in protein localization and membrane morphogenesis but not in synaptic vesicle endocytosis. Development 128, 5005-5015 (2001).
29. Leventis, P. A. et al. Drosophila Amphiphysin is a post-synaptic protein required for normal locomotion but not endocytosis. Traffic 2, 839-850 (2001).
30. Takei, K., Slepnev, V. I., Haucke, V. & De Camilli, P. Functional partnership between amphiphysin and dynamin in clathrinmediated endocytosis. Nat Cell Biol 1, 33-39 (1999).
31. Nicot, A.-S. et al. Mutations in amphiphysin 2 (BIN1) disrupt interaction with dynamin 2 and cause autosomal recessive centronuclear myopathy. Nat. Genet. 39, 1134-1139 (2007).
32. Bohm, J. et al. Adult-onset autosomal dominant centronuclear myopathy due to BIN1 mutations. Brain 137, 3160-3170 (2014).
33. Mejaddam, A. Y., Nennesmo, I. & Sejersen, T. Severe phenotype of a patient with autosomal recessive centronuclear myopathy due to a BIN1 mutation. Acta Myol 28, 91-93 (2009).
34. Toussaint, A. et al. Defects in amphiphysin 2 (BIN1) and triads in several forms of centronuclear myopathies. Acta Neuropathol. 121, 253-266 (2011).
35. Frost, A. et al. Structural basis of membrane invagination by F-BAR domains. Cell 132, 807-817 (2008).
36. Pang, X. et al. A PH domain in ACAP1 possesses key features of the BAR domain in promoting membrane curvature. Dev Cell 31, 73-86 (2014).
37. van Weering, J. R. T. et al. Molecular basis for SNX-BAR-mediated assembly of distinct endosomal sorting tubules. EMBO J 31, 4466-4480 (2012).
38. Alushin, G. M. et al. High-resolution microtubule structures reveal the structural transitions in-tubulin upon GTP hydrolysis. Cell 157, 1117-1129 (2014).
39. Ecken, von der, J. et al. Structure of the F-actin-tropomyosin complex. Nature 519, 114-117 (2014)
40. Galkin, V. E., Orlova, A., Vos, M. R., Schroder, G. F. & Egelman, E. H. Near-atomic resolution for one state of f-actin. Structure 23, 173-182 (2015).
41. Zemel, A., Fattal, D. R. & Ben-Shaul, A. Energetics and self-assembly of amphipathic peptide pores in lipid membranes. Biophys. J. 84, 2242-2255 (2003).
42. Masuda, M. et al. Endophilin BAR domain drives membrane curvature by two newly identified structure-based mechanisms. EMBO J 25, 2889-2897 (2006).
43. Weissenhorn, W. Crystal structure of the endophilin-A1 BAR domain. J. Mol. Biol. 351, 653-661 (2005).
44. Parton, R. G., Way, M., Zorzi, N. & Stang, E. Caveolin-3 associates with developing T-tubules during muscle differentiation. J Cell Biol 136, 137-154 (1997).
45. Picas, L. et al. BIN1/M-Amphiphysin2 induces clustering of phosphoinositides to recruit its downstream partner dynamin. Nat Commun 5, 5647 (2014).
46. Wu, T., Shi, Z. & Baumgart, T. Mutations in BIN1 associated with centronuclear myopathy disrupt membrane remodeling by affecting protein density and oligomerization. PLoS ONE 9, e93060 (2014).
47. Sorre, B. et al. Nature of curvature coupling of amphiphysin with membranes depends on its bound density. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109, 173-178 (2012).
48. Li, M. Z. & Elledge, S. J. Harnessing homologous recombination in vitro to generate recombinant DNA via SLIC. Nat. Methods 4, 251-256 (2007).
49. Studier, F. W. Protein production by auto-induction in high density shaking cultures. Protein Expr. Purif. 41, 207-234 (2005).
50. Heymann, J. B. & Belnap, D. M. Bsoft: image processing and molecular modeling for electron microscopy. J Struct Biol 157, 3-18 (2007).
51. Tang, G. et al. EMAN2: an extensible image processing suite for electron microscopy. J Struct Biol 157, 38-46 (2007).
52. Mindell, J. A. & Grigorieff, N. Accurate determination of local defocus and specimen tilt in electron microscopy. J Struct Biol 142, 334-347 (2003).
53. Scheres, S. H. W. RELION: implementation of a Bayesian approach to cryo-EM structure determination. J Struct Biol 180, 519-530 (2012).
54. Egelman, E. H. The iterative helical real space reconstruction method: surmounting the problems posed by real polymers. J Struct Biol 157, 83-94 (2007).
55. Frank, J. et al. SPIDER and WEB: processing and visualization of images in 3D electron microscopy and related fields. J Struct Biol 116, 190-199 (1996).