Foucault's toolbox: critical insights for education and technology researchers

Learning, Media and Technology

Volumn 40, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 536-549

  Hope, Andrew ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

Author keywords

discourse; education; Foucault; panopticism; technology

Indexed keywords

EID: 84944894947     PISSN: 17439884     EISSN: 17439892     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17439884.2014.953546     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. S.Ball, 2013. Foucault, Power, and Education. Abingdon, OX: Routledge.
2. M.Behrent, 2013. “Foucault and Technology.” History and Technology 29 (1): 54–104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07341512.2013.780351
3. G.Biesta, 2006. Beyond Learning: Democratic Education for a Human Future (Interventions: Education, Philosophy, and Culture). Boulder, CO: Paradigm.
4. W.Bogard, 1996. The Simulation of Surveillance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. D.D.Buckingham, 1987. “The Construction of Subjectivity in Educational Television. Part 1: Towards a New Agenda.” Journal of Educational Television 13 (2): 137–145.
6. I.Burkitt, 2002. “Technologies of the Self: Habitus and Capacities.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 32 (2): 219–237.
7. A.Chronaki,, and A.Matos. 2014. “Technology use and Mathematics Teaching: Teacher Change as Discursive Identity Work.” Learning, Media and Technology 39 (1): 107–125.
8. J.C.Dalton,, and P.C.Crosby. 2013. “Digital Identity: How Social Media Are Influencing Student Learning and Development in College.” Journal of College & Character 14 (1): 1–4.
9. N.M.Doerr,, and S.Sato. 2011. “Modes of Governmentality in an Online Space: A Case Study of Blog Activities in an Advanced Level Japanese-as-a-Foreign-Language Classroom.” Learning, Media and Technology 36 (1): 69–83.
10. A.Doyle, 2011. “Revisiting the Synopticon: Reconsidering Mathiesen's ‘The Viewer Society’ in the Age of Web 2.0.” Theoretical Criminology 15 (3): 283–299.
11. I.Dussel, 2010. “Foucault and Education.” In The Routledge International Handbook of the Sociology of Education, edited by M.Apple, S.Ball, and L.Gandin, 27–36. Abingdon, OX: Routledge.
12. Education Week. 30.06.11. “Schools Find Uses for Predictive Data Techniques.” Accessed March 15, 2013. www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2011/06/22/36analytics.h30.html
13. D.Eribon, 1991. Michel Foucault. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
14. M.Foucault, 1970. The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. London: Tavistock.
15. M.Foucault, [1971] 1996. “The Discourse on Language.” In The Continental Philosophy Reader, edited by R.Kearney and M.Rainwater, 339–360. London: Routledge.
16. M.Foucault, 1972. The Archaeology of Knowledge. London: Tavistock.
17. M.Foucault, 1975. “Des Supplices Aux Cellules [The punishment cells] (interview with R.-P. Law).” Le Monde, February 21, 9363.
18. M.Foucault, 1977. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. London: Allen Lane.
19. M.Foucault, 1984. “Space, Knowledge, and Power.” In The Foucault Reader, edited by P.Rabinow, 239–256. New York, NY: Pantheon.
20. M.Foucault, 1988. “Technologies of the Self.” In Technologies of the Self, edited by L.H.Martin, H.Gutman, and P.H.Hutton, 16–49. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
21. M.Foucault, 1991. “Politics and the Study of Discourse.” In The Foucault Effect, edited by G.Burchell, C.Gordon, and P.Miller, 53–72. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
22. M.Gallagher, 2010. “Are Schools Panoptic?” Surveillance & Society 7 (3/4): 262–272.
23. G.Gutting, 2005. Foucault: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
24. K.D.Haggerty,, and R.V.Ericson. 2000. “The Surveillant Assemblage.” British Journal of Sociology 51 (4): 605–622.
25. R.Hall, 2014. “The Implications of Autonomist Marxism for Research and Practice in Education and Technology.” Learning, Media and Technology. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2014.911189
26. A.Hope, 2013a. “Foucault, Panopticism and School Surveillance Research.” In Social Theory and Education Research, edited by M.Murphy, 35–51. London: Routledge.
27. A.Hope, 2013b. “The Shackled School Internet: Zemiological Solutions to the Problem of Over-Blocking.” Learning, Media and Technology 38 (3): 270–283.
28. A.Hope, 2013c. “Clouds’ that Reign Over: Learning to be Surveilled in the ‘Database School’.” Learning with New Media Research Group, Monash University [blog]. Accessed December 15, 2013. http://newmediaresearch.educ.monash.edu.au/lnmrg/blog/learning-to-be-surveilled
29. A.Hope, forthcoming. “Schoolchildren, Governmentality and National E-Safety Policy Discourse.” Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 36 (4). http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/01596306.2013.871237
30. ITnews. 29.11.11. Victorian Schools Trial Predictive Analytics. Accessed March 15, 2013. http://www.itnews.com.au/News/281477,victorian-schools-trial-predictive-analytics.aspx
31. J.Jenson,, and S.De Castell. 2004. “Turn It in: Technological Challenges to Academic Ethics.” Education, Communication & Information 4 (2–3): 311–330.
32. D.Lupton, 1999. Risk. London: Routledge.
33. D.Lyon, 1994. The Electronic Eye: The Rise of Surveillance Society. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
34. T.Mathiesen, 1997. “The Viewer Society: Michel Foucault's ‘Panopticon’ Revisited.” Theoretical Criminology 1 (2): 215–234.
35. L.McNay, 1992. Foucault and Feminism: Power, Gender and Self. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
36. S.Mills, 2003. Michel Foucault. Abingdon, OX: Routledge.
37. C.Norris, 2003. “From Personal to Digital: CCTV, the Panopticon, and the Technological Mediation of Suspicion and Social Control.” In Surveillance as Social Sorting: Privacy, Risk and Digital Discrimination, edited by D.Lyon, 249–281. London: Routledge.
38. C.O'Farrell, 2005. Michel Foucault. London: Sage.
39. C.O'Farrell, 2007. “Key Concepts.” Michel-Foucault.com. Accessed July 15, 2014. http://www.michel-foucault.com/concepts/
40. P.Paton, 1979. “Of power and Prisons.” In Michel Foucault: Power/Truth/Strategy, edited by M.Morris and P.Patton, 109–146. Sydney: Feral.
41. J.Potter, 2012. Digital Media and Learner Identity: The New Curatorship. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
42. N.Selwyn, 2012. “Bursting out of the ‘ed-tech’ Bubble.” Learning, Media and Technology 37 (4): 331–334.
43. N.Selwyn,, and K.Facer. 2013. “Introduction: The Need for a Politics of Education and Technology.” In The Politics of Education and Technology: Conflicts, Controversies and Connections, edited by N.Selwyn and K.Facer, 1–17. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave MacMillan.
44. B.Somekh, 2001. “The Role of Evaluation in Ensuring Excellence in Communications and Information Technology Initiatives.” Education, Communication & Information 1 (1): 75–101.
45. W.G.Staples, 2000. Everyday Surveillance: Vigilance and Visibility in Postmodern Life. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.
46. Times Higher Education. 28.03.09. “Most Cited Authors of Books in the Humanities, 2007.” Accessed January 8, 2014. http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/405956.article
47. G.Veletsianos, 2012. “Higher Education Scholars’ Participation and Practices on Twitter.” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 28 (4): 336–349.
48. S.Warburton,, and S.Hatzipanagos, eds. 2012. Digital Identity and Social Media. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.