Foucault, panopticism and school surveillance research

Social Theory and Education Research: Understanding Foucault, Habermas, Bourdieu and Derrida

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 35-51

  Hope, Andrew ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84906057192     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203557686     Document Type: Chapter

References (59)

1. Bash, L., D. Coulby and C. Jones. 1985. Urban schooling: Theory and practice. London: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
2. Bauman, Z. 1992. Intimations of postmodernity. London: Routledge.
3. BBC News. 1999. School puts spy cameras in toilets. 5 November. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/education/506140.stm.
4. BBC News. 2003. Eye scan school opens doors. 17 September. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/wear/3115428.stm.
5. Bell, D. 2009. Surveillance is sexy. Surveillance and Society 6, 3: 203–212.
6. Bogard, W. 1996. The simulation of surveillance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7. Boyne, R. 2000. Post-Panopticism. Economy and Society 29, 2: 285–307.
8. Casella, R. 2010. Safety or social control? The security fortification of schools in a capitalist society. In Schools under surveillance: Cultures ofcontrol in public education, ed. T. Monahan and R. Torres, 73–86. New York: Rutgers University Press.
9. Clarke, R. 1992. The resistible rise of the national personal data system. Software Law Journal 5, 1: 25–59.
10. De Certeau, M. 2002. The practice ofeveryday life. Berkeley: University of California Press.
11. Doyle, A. 2011. Revisiting the synopticon: Reconsidering Mathiesen’s ‘The Viewer Society’ in the age of Web 2.0. Theoretical Criminology 15, 3: 283–299.
12. Feeley, M. 2003. Crime, social order and the rise of neo-Conservative politics. Theoretical Criminology 7, 1: 111–130.
13. Fernandez, L. A. and L. Huey. 2009. Is resistance futile? Thoughts on resisting surveillance. Surveillance & Society 6, 3: 198–202.
14. Foucault, M. 1977.Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. London: Allen Lane.
15. Foucault, M. 1982. Space, knowledge and power. In The Foucault reader: An introduction to Foucault’s thought, ed. P. Rabinow, 239–256. London: Penguin.
16. Foucault, M. and G. Deleuze. 1980. Intellectuals & power: A conversation between Michel Foucault and Giles Deleuze. In Language, counter-memory, practice: Selected essays and interviews by Michel Foucault, ed. D. F. Bouchard, 205–217. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
17. Gallagher, M. 2010. Are schools panoptic? Surveillance & Society 7, 3–4: 262–272.
18. Haggerty, K. D. and R. V. Ericson. 2000. The surveillant assemblage. British Journal of Sociology 51, 4: 605–622.
19. Hall, N. 2003. The role of the slate in Lancastrian schools as evidenced by their manuals and handbooks. Paradigm 2, 7: 46–54.
20. Harrington, A. ed. 2005. Modern social theory: An introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21. Hier, S. 2003. Probing the surveillant assemblage: On the dialectics of surveillance practices as processes of social control. Surveillance & Society 1, 3: 399–411.
22. Hollander, J. A. and R. L. Einwohner. 2004. Conceptualizing resistance. Sociological Forum 19, 4: 533–554.
23. Hope, A. 2007. Risk-taking, boundary-performance and intentional school internet ‘misuse’. Discourse: Studies in the cultural politics ofeducation 28, 1: 87–99.
24. Hope, A. 2010. Student resistance to the surveillance curriculum. International Studies in Sociology of Education 20, 4: 319–334.
25. Hope, A. 2011.Internet risk @ school: Cultures of control in state education. Saarbrucken: Lambert Press.
26. ICO (Information Commissioners Office). 2006. A Report on the Surveillance Society. www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/library/data_protection/practical_application/surveillance_society_full_report_2006.pdf.
27. Koskela, H. 2003. ‘Cam era’ - the contemporary urban panopticon. Surveillance & Society 1, 3: 292–313.
28. Kuehn, L. 2008. Surveillance 2.0: The ‘information panopticon’ and education. Our schools/our selves. 1 July, 81–91. www.policyalternatives.ca/sites/default/files/uploads/publications/Our_Schools_Ourselve/10_Kuehn_surveillance_2.pdf.
29. Kupchik, A. and T. Monahan. 2006. The new American school: Preparation for postindustrial discipline. British Journal ofSociology of Education 27, 5: 617–631.
30. Lyon, D. 1994.The electronic eye: The rise of surveillance society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
31. Lyon, D. 2001. Surveillance society: Monitoring everyday life. Buckingham: Open University Press.
32. Lyon, D. 2003. Surveillance as social sorting: Computer codes and mobile bodies. In Surveillance as social sorting: Privacy, risk and digital discrimination, ed. D. Lyon, 13–30. London: Routledge.
33. Man, S., J. Nolan and B. Wellman. 2003. Sousveillance: Inventing and using wearable computing devices for data collection in surveillance environments. Surveillance & Society 1, 3: 331–355.
34. Manchester Metro News. 2008. Fingerprint scheme launched by school. 15 February.
35. Markus, T. A. 1993. Buildings and power. London: Routledge.
36. Martin, A. K., R. E. van Brakel and D. J. Bernhard. 2009. Understanding resistance to digital surveillance: Towards a multi-disciplinary, multi-actor framework. Surveillance & Society 6, 3: 213–232.
37. Marx, G. 1988. Undercover: Police surveillance in America. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
38. Marx, G. 2003. A tack in the shoe: Neutralising and resisting the new surveillance. Journal of Social Issues 59, 2: 369–390.
39. Marx, G. 2009. A tack in the shoe and taking off the shoe: Neutralization and counter-neutralization dynamics. Surveillance & Society 6, 3: 294–306.
40. Mathiesen, T. 1997. The viewer society. Theoretical Criminology 1, 2: 215–234.
41. McCahill, M. and R. Finn. 2010. The social impact of surveillance in three UK schools: ‘Angels’, ‘devils’ and ‘teen mums’. Surveillance & Society 7, 3–4: 273–289.
42. New York Times.2003. Cameras watching students, especially in Biloxi. 24 September.
43. Norris, C. 2003. From personal to digital: CCTV, the panopticon, and the technological mediation of suspicion and social control. In Surveillance as social sorting: Privacy, risk and digital discrimination, ed. D. Lyon, 249–281. London: Routledge.
44. Norris, C. and G. Armstrong. 1999.The maximum surveillance society: The rise of CCTV. Oxford: Berg.
45. Pike, J. 2008. Foucault, space and primary school dining rooms. Children’s Geographies 6, 4: 413–422.
46. Poster, M. 1989. Critical theory and poststructuralism: In search of a context. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
47. Poster, M. 1990. Mode ofinformation: Poststructuralism and social context. Cambridge: Polity Press.
48. Poster, M. 1995. The second media age. Cambridge: Polity Press.
49. Selwyn, N. 2000. The National Grid for Learning: Panacea or panopticon? British Journal of Sociology of Education 21, 2: 243–255.
50. Selwyn, N. 2011. ‘It’s all about standardisation’ - Exploring the digital (re) configuration of school management and administration. Cambridge Journal of Education 41, 4: 473–488.
51. Simon, B. 2005. The return of panopticism: Supervision, subjection and the new surveillance. Surveillance & Society 3, 1: 1–20.
52. Spencer, J. 1996. Resistance. In Encyclopedia of social and cultural anthropology, ed. A. Barnard and J. Spencer, 489. London: Routledge.
53. Staples, W. G. 2000. Everyday surveillance: Vigilance and visibility in postmodern life. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers Inc.
54. Steeves, V. 2010. Online surveillance in Canadian schools. In Schools under surveillance: Cultures of control in public education, ed. T. Monahan and R. Torres, 87–103. New York: Rutgers University Press.
55. Toronto Star. 2008. School Uniform Sexy Says Group. 22 May. http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2008/5/22/nation/21326822&sec=nation.
56. UK Press Association. 2009. School dinners spy website launched. 8 October. http://latestnews.virginmedia.com/news/tech/2009/10/08/school_dinners_spy_website_launched.
57. Weiss, J. 2010. Scan this: Examining student resistance to surveillance. In Schools under surveillance: Cultures of control in public education, ed. T. Monahan and R. Torres, 213–229. New York: Rutgers University Press.
58. Willis, P. 1977.Learning to labour: How working class kids get working class jobs. Farnham: Ashgate.
59. Yar, M. 2003. Panoptic power and the pathologisation of vision: Critical reflections on the Foucauldian thesis. Surveillance & Society 1, 3: 254–271.