Measuring student engagement in the online course: The online student engagement scale (OSE)

Online Learning Journal

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2015, Pages

  Dixson, Marcia D ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY PURDUE UNIVERSITY FORT WAYNE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84944768836     PISSN: 24725749     EISSN: 24725730     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.24059/olj.v19i4.561     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Akyol, Z., & Garrison, D. R. (2014). The development of community of inquiry over time in an online course: Understanding the progression and integration of social, cognitive and teaching presence. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 12(3-4), 3-22.
2. Akyol, Z., & Garrison, D. R. (2011). Understanding cognitive presence in an online and blended community of inquiry: Assessing outcomes and processes for deep approaches to learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(2), 233-250.
3. Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2013). Changing course: Ten years of tracking online education in the United States. Babson Survey Research Group.
4. Ally, M. (2004). Foundations of educational theory for online learning. In T. Anderson & F. Elloumi (Eds.), Theory and practice of online learning (2nd ed.). Athabasca, Canada: Athabasca University. Retrieved from http://cde.athabascau.ca/online_book/index.html
5. Anderson, T. (2004). Toward a theory of online learning. In T. Anderson & F. Elloumi (Eds.) Theory and practice of online learning (2nd ed.). Athabasca, Canada: Athabasca University. Retrieved from http://cde.athabascau.ca/online_book/index.html
6. Annand, D. (2011). Social presence within the community of inquiry framework. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(5), 40-56.
7. Arbaugh, J. B. (2008). Does the Community of Inquiry framework predict outcomes in online MBA courses? The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 9(2).
8. Ashcraft, D., Treadwell, T., & Kumar, V. K. (2008). Collaborative online learning: A constructivist example. MERLOT Journal of Online Teaching, 4(1), 109-116.
9. Azvedo, R. (2015). Defining and measuring engagement and learning in science: Conceptual, theoretical, methodological, and analytical issues. Educational Psychologist, 50(1), 84-94. doi:10.1080/00461520.2015.1004069
10. Bandura, A., Ross, D., & Ross, S. A. (1961). Transmission of aggression through imitation of aggressive models. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 63(3), 575-582.
11. Bandura, A., Ross, D., & Ross, S. A. (1963). Imitation of film-mediated aggressive models. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66(1), 3-11.
12. Bigatel, P. M., Ragan, L. C., Kenan, S., May, J., & Redmond, B. F. (2012). The identification of competencies for online teaching success. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 16(1), 59-77.
13. Chickering, A. W., & Ehrmann, S. C. (1996, October). Implementing the seven principles: Technology as a lever. AAHE Bulletin, 3-6. Retrieved from http://www.tltgroup.org/programs/seven.html
14. Dennen, V. P., Darabi, A. A., & Smith, L. J. (2007). Instructor-learner interaction in online courses: The relative perceived importance of particular instructor actions on performance and satisfaction. Distance Education, 28(1), 65-79.
15. Dixson, M. D. (2010). Creating effective student engagement in online courses: What do students find engaging? Journal of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 10(2), 1-13. Retrieved from http://josotl.indiana.edu/article/view/1744
16. Dow, M. J. (2008). Implications of social presence for online learning: A case study of MLS students. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 49(4), 231-242.
17. Durrington, V. A., Berryhill, A., & Swafford, J. (2006). Strategies for enhancing student interactivity in an online environment. College Teaching, 54(1), 190-193.
18. Garrison, D. R. (2007). Online community of inquiry review: Social, cognitive, and teaching presence issues. Journal of Asynchronous Networks, 11(1), 61-72.
19. Garrison, D. R., & Anderson, T. (2003). E-learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice. Retrieved from http://portal.ou.nl/documents/89037/89380/Garrison+%26%20Anderson+(2003).pdf
20. Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2-3), 87-105.
21. Garrison, R., & Arbaugh, J. B. (2007). Researching the Community of Inquiry framework: Review, issues, and future directions. Internet and Higher Education, 10, 157-172.
22. Gaytan, J., & McEwen, B. C. (2007). Effective online instructional and assessment strategies. The American Journal of Distance Education, 21(3), 117-132.
23. Ghani, S. A. (2009). Cooperative learning versus the lecture method of instruction in an introductory statistics course. Jurnal Sains dan Matematik, 1(1), 59-71. Retrieved from http://www.academia.edu/993985/Cooperative_Learning_Versus_The_Lecture_Method_of_Instruction_in_An_Introductory_Statistics_Course
24. Handelsman, M. M., Briggs, W. L., Sullivan, N., & Towler, A. (2005). A measure of college student course engagement. The Journal of Educational Research, 93(3), 184-191.
25. Hill, J. R., Song, L., & West, R. E. (2009). Social learning theory and web-based learning environments: A review of research and discussion of implication. American Journal of Distance Education, 23(2), 88-103.
26. Hrastinski, S. (2009). A theory of online learning as online participation. Computers & Education, 52, 78-82.
27. Kehrwald, B. (2008). Understanding social presence in text-based online learning environments. Distance Education, 29(1), 89-106.
28. Keyser, M. (2000). Active learning versus and cooperative learning: Understanding the differences and using both styles effectively. Research Strategies, 17(1), 35-44. Retrieved from http://escholarshare.drake.edu/bitstream/handle/2092/251/Keyser%23251.pdf?sequence=1
29. Kuh, G. D. (March/April, 2003). What we are learning about student engagement from NSSE: Benchmarks for effective educational practices. Changes, 24-32.
30. Levy, Y. (2008). An empirical development of critical value factors (CVF) of online learning activities: An application of activity theory and cognitive value theory. Computers & Education, 51, 1664-1675.
31. Lewis, C. C., & Abdul-Hamid, H. (2006). Implementing effective online teaching practices: Voices of exemplary faculty. Innovative Higher Education, 31(2), 83-98.
32. Maki, R. H., & Maki, W. S. (2007). Online courses. In F.T. Durso (Ed.), Handbook of applied cognition (2nd ed.) (pp. 527-552). West Sussex, England: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
33. Margurber, D. R. (2005). Comparing student performance using cooperative learning. International Review of Economics Education, 4(1), 46-57.
34. Ortiz-Rodríguez, M., Telg, R. W., Irani, T., Roberts, T. G., & Rhoades, E. (2005). College students’ perceptions of quality in distance education: The importance of communication. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 6, 97-105.
35. Ouimet, J. A., & Smallwood, B. (2005). CLASSE - The class level survey of student engagement. Assessment Update, 17(6), 13-15.
36. Picciano, A. G. (2002). Beyond student perceptions: Issues of interaction, presence, and performance in an online course. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 6(1), 21-40. Retrieved from http://sloanconsortium.org/jaln/v6n1/beyond-student-perceptions-issues-interaction-presence-and-performance-online-course
37. Robertson, J. S., Grant, M. M., & Jackson, L. (2005). Is online instruction perceived as effective as campus instruction by graduate students in education? Internet and Higher Education, 8, 73-86.
38. Robinson, C. C., & Hullinger, H. (2008). New benchmarks in higher education: Student engagement in online learning [Electronic version]. Journal of Education for Business, 84(2), 101-109.
39. Roblyer, M. D., & Wiencke, W. R. (2004). Exploring the interaction equation: Validating a rubric to assess and encourage interaction in distance courses. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 8(4), 25-37.
40. Russo, T. C., & Campbell, S. W. (2004). Perceptions of mediated presence in an asynchronous online course: Interplay of communication behaviors and medium. Distance Education, 25, 215-232.
41. Shea, P., Li, C. S., & Pickett, A. (2006). A study of teaching presence and student sense of learning community in fully online and web-enhanced college courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 9, 175-190.
42. Shea, P., Hayes, S., Vickers, J., Gozza-Cohen, M., Uzuner, S., Mehta, R., Valchova, A., & Rangan, P. (2010). A re-examination of the Community of Inquiry framework: Social network and content analysis. Internet and Higher Education, 13, 10-21.
43. Song, L., & Singleton, E. S. (2004). Improving online learning: Student perceptions of useful and challenging characteristics. Internet & Higher Education, 7, 59-70.
44. Stacey, E. (2002). Learning links online: Establishing constructivist and collaborative learning environments. In S. McNamara & E. Stacey (Eds.), Untangling the Web: Establishing learning links. Proceedings from the ASET 2002 Conference. Melbourne, July 7-10.
45. Stodel, E. J., Thompson, T. L., & MacDonald, C. J. (2006). Learners’ perspectives on what is missing from online learning: Interpretations through the Community of Inquiry framework. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 7(3).
46. Swan, K., Shea, P., Fredericksen, E., Pickett, A., Pelz, W., & Maher, G. (2000). Building knowledge building communities: Consistency, contact and communication in the virtual classroom. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 23(4), 359-383.
47. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Interaction between learning and development. In Mind and society (pp. 79-91). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Reprinted from Readings on the development of children, pp. 29-36, by M. Gauvain & M. Cole, Eds., 1997 New York: W. H. Freeman and Co.).
48. Wang, Q. (2008). A generic model for guiding the integrations of ICT into teaching and learning. Innovations in Educational and Teaching International, 45(4), 411-19.
49. Woo, Y., & Reeves, T. C. (2007). Meaningful interaction in web-based learning: A social constructivist interpretation. Issues in Higher Education, 10, 15-25.
50. Young, S. (2006). Student views of effective online teaching in higher education. The American Journal of Distance Education, 20(2), 65-77.
51. Zhao, Y., Lei, J., Lai, B. Y. C., & Tan, H. S. (2005). What makes the difference? A practical analysis of research on the effectiveness of distance education. Teachers College Record, 107(8), 1836-1884