Instructor-learner interaction in online courses: The relative perceived importance of particular instructor actions on performance and satisfaction

Distance Education

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 65-79

  Dennen, Vanessa P ^a   Darabi, A Aubteen ^a   Smith, Linda J ^a  

^a FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34248575639     PISSN: 01587919     EISSN: 14750198     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01587910701305319     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Anderson, T. (2002). An updated and theoretical rationale for interaction. IT Forum Paper #63. Retrieved March 8, 2003, from http://it.coe.uga.edu/itforum/paper63/paper63.htm
2. Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing teaching presence in a computer conferencing context. Journal of Asynchronous learning Networks, 5(2), 1-17.
3. Berge, Z. L. (1995). Facilitating computer conferencing: Recommendations from the field. Educational Technology, 15(1), 22-30.
4. Bonk, C. J., Kirkley, J. R., Hara, N., & Dennen, V. (2001). Finding the instructor in post-secondary online learning: Pedagogical, social, managerial, and technological locations. In J. Stephenson (Ed.), Teaching and learning online: New pedagogies for new technologies (pp. 76-97). London: Kogan Page.
5. Concannon, P., Flynn, A., & Campbell, M. (2005). What campus based students think about the quality and benefits of eLearning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(3), 501-512.
6. Conrad, D. L. (2002). Engagement, excitement, anxiety, and fear: Learners' experiences of starting an online course. Distance Education: An International Journal, 76(4), 205-226.
7. Darabi, A., Sikorski, E., & Harvey, R. (2006). Validated competencies for distance teaching. Distance Education, 27(1), 105-122.
8. Dennen, V. P. (2000). Task structuring for on-line problem based learning: A case study. Educational Technology and Society, 3(3), 329-336.
9. Dennen, V. P. (2005). From message posting to learning dialogues: Factors affecting learner participation in asynchronous discussion. Distance Education, 26(1}., 125-146.
10. Dennen, V. P., & Bonk, C. J. (2007). We'll leave a light on for you: Keeping learners motivated in online courses. In B. H. Khan (Ed.), Flexible learning in an information society. Hershey, PA: The Idea Group.
11. Gahungu, A., Dereshiwsky, M. I., & Moan, E. (2006). Finally I can be with my students 24/7, individually and in group: A survey of faculty teaching online. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 5(2), 118-142.
12. Garrison, D. R., & Brook, P. (1992). Getting it right the first session. Adult Learning, 5(6), 25-26.
13. Jung, I. (2001). Building a theoretical framework of web-based instruction in the context of distance education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 32(5), 252-234.
14. Keller, J. M. (1987). Development and use of the ARCS model of motivational design. Journal of Instructional Development, 70(3), 2-10.
15. Kuboni, O., & Martin, A. (2004). An assessment of support strategies used to facilitate distance students' participation in a web-based learning environment in the University of the West Indies. Distance Education, 25(1), 7-29.
16. Marks, R. B., Sibley, S. D., & Arbaugh, J. B. (2005). A structural equation model of predictors for effective online learning. Journal of Management Education, 29(4), 531-563.
17. Matusov, E., Hayes, R., & Pluta, M. J. (2005). Using a discussion web to develop an academic community of learners. Educational Technology and Society, 8(2), 16-39.
18. Mazzolini, M., & Maddison, S. (2003). Sage, guide or ghost? The effect of instructor intervention on student participation in online discussion forums. Computers and Education, 40(3), 237-253.
19. Moore, M. G. (1991). Editorial: Distance education theory. The American Journal of Distance Education, 5(3), 1-6.
20. Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (1996). Distance education: A systems view. New York: Wadsworth.
21. Russo, T. C., & Campbell, S. W. (2004). Perceptions of mediated presence in an asynchronous online course: Interplay of communication behaviors and medium. Distance Education, 25(2), 215-232.
22. Su, B., Bonk, C. J., Magjuka, R. J., Liu, X., & Lee, S. (2005). The importance of interaction in Web-based education: A program-level case study of online MBA courses. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 4(1), 1-18.
23. Wagner, E. D. (1994). In support of a functional definition of interaction. The American Journal of Distance Education, 8(2), 6-26.