ToyLIFE: A computational framework to study the multi-level organisation of the genotype-phenotype map

Scientific Reports

Volumn 4, Issue , 2014, Pages

  Arias, Clemente F ^a,b   Catalán, Pablo ^a,b   Manrubia, Susanna ^a,c   Cuesta, José A ^a,b,d  

^a Grupo Interdisciplinar de Sistemas Complejos (GISC)   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSIDAD CARLOS III DE MADRID   (Spain)

^c CENTRO NACIONAL DE BIOTECNOLOGÍA   (Spain)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ZARAGOZA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIOR; DELETION MUTANT; GENE DELETION; GENE DUPLICATION; GENE REGULATORY NETWORK; GENOTYPE; METABOLITE; MODEL; ORGANIZATION; PHENOTYPE; POINT MUTATION; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOLOGY; GENETICS; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MUTATION; PROCEDURES;

COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENE REGULATORY NETWORKS; GENOTYPE; MODELS, GENETIC; MUTATION; PHENOTYPE;

EID: 84944747353     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/srep07549     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Lewis, N. E., Nagarajan, H. & Palsson, B. O. Constraining the metabolic genotypephenotype relationship using a phylogeny of in silico methods. Nat. Revs. Microbiol. 10, 291-305 (2012).
2. Karlebach, G. & Shamir, R. Modelling and analysis of gene regulatory networks. Nat. Revs. Mol. Cell. Biol. 9, 770-780 (2008).
3. Chandler, C. H., Chari, S. & Dworkin, I. Does your gene need a background check? How genetic background impacts the analysis of mutations, genes, and evolution. Trends Genet. 29, 358-366 (2013).
4. Wagner, G. P. & Zhang, J. The pleiotropic structure of the genotype-phenotype map: the evolvability of complex organisms. Nat. Revs. Genet. 10, 204-213 (2011).
5. Rutherford, S. L. From genotype to phenotype: buffering mechanisms and the storage of genetic information. Bio Essays 22, 1095-1105 (2000).
6. Paaby, A. B. & Rockman, M. V. Cryptic genetic variation: evolution's hidden substrate. Nat. Revs. Genet. 15, 247-258 (2014).
7. Ventura, B. D., Lemerle, C., Michalodimitrakis, K. & Serrano, L. From in vivo to in silico biology and back. Nature 443, 527-533 (2006).
8. Kimura, M. Evolutionary rate at the molecular level. Nature 217, 624-626 (1968).
9. Kimura, M. The Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1984).
10. Watson, J.D. et al. Molecular biology of the gene 7th ed.(Benjamin Cummings, San Francisco, 2013).
11. Lipman, D. J. & Wilbur, W. J. Modelling neutral and selective evolution of protein folding. Proc. Roy. Soc. London B 245, 7-11 (1991).
12. Schuster, P., Fontana, W., Stadler, P. F. & Hofacker, I. L. From sequences to shapes and back:Acase study inRNAsecondary structures. Proc. Roy. Soc. London B 255, 279-284 (1994).
13. Weirauch, M. T. & Hughes, T. R. Conserved expression without conserved regulatory sequence: themore things change, themore they stay the same. Trends Genet. 26, 66-74 (2010).
14. Hare, E. E., Peterson, B., Iyer, V. N., Meier, R. & Eisen, M. B. Sepsid even-skipped enhancers are functionally conserved in Drosophila despite lack of sequence conservation. PLoS Genet. 4, e1000106 (2008).
15. Thatcher, J., Shaw, J. M. & Dickinson, W. Marginal fitness contributions of nonessential genes in yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95, 253-257 (1998).
16. Baba, T. et al. Construction of Escherichia coli k-12 in-frame, single-gene knockout mutants: the keio collection. Mol. Sys. Biol. 20, 20060008 (2006).
17. Wagner, A. Genotype networks shed light on evolutionary constraints. Trends Ecol. Evol. 26, 577-584 (2011).
18. Draghi, J. A., Parsons, T. L., Wagner, G. P. & Plotkin, J. B. Mutational robustness can facilitate adaptation. Nature 463, 353-355 (2010).
19. Wagner, A. The origins of evolutionary innovations (Oxford University Press, New York, 2011).
20. Schuster, P. Prediction of RNA secondary structures: From theory to models and real molecules. Rep. Prog. Phys. 69, 1419-1477 (2006).
21. Dill, K. A. Theory for the folding and stability of globular proteins. Biochemistry 24, 1501-1509 (1985).
22. Bastolla, U., Vendruscolo, M. & Knapp, E.-W. A statistical mechanical method to optimize energy functions for protein folding. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97, 3977-3981 (1999).
23. Kauffman, S. A. The origins of order: self-organization and selection in evolution (Oxford University Press, New York, 1993).
24. Ciliberti, S., Martin, O. C. & Wagner, A. Innovation and robustness in complex regulatory gene networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 13591-13596 (2007).
25. Payne, J. L., Moore, J. H. & Wagner, A. Robustness, evolvability, and the logic of genetic regulation. Artificial Life 20, 111-126 (2013).
26. Rodrigues, J. F. M. & Wagner, A. Evolutionary plasticity and innovations in complex metabolic reaction networks. PLoS Comp. Biol. 5(12), e1000613 (2009).
27. Schultes, E. A. & Bartel, D. P. One sequence, two ribozymes: implications for the emergence of new ribozyme folds. Science 289, 448-452 (2000).
28. Greenbury, S. F., Johnston, I. G., Louis, A. A. & Ahnert, S. E. A tractable genotypephenotype map modelling the self-assembly of protein quaternary structure. J. Roy. Soc. Interface 6, 20140249 (2014).
29. Piatigorsky, J. Gene sharing and evolution: the diversity of protein functions (Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA, 2007).
30. Kauffman, S. A. Metabolic stability and epigenesis in randomly constructed genetic nets. J. Theor. Biol. 22, 437-467 (1969).
31. Cheng, D., Qi, H. & Li, Z. Analysis and control of boolean networks (Springer, New York, 2011).
32. Li, H., Helling, R., Tang, C. & Wingreen, N. Emergence of preferred structures in a simple model of protein folding. Science 273, 666-669 (1996).
33. Radivojac, P. et al. Intrinsic disorder and functional proteomics. Biophys. J. 92, 1439-1456 (2007).
34. Hoque, T., Chetty, M. & Sattar, A. Extended HP model for protein structure prediction. J. Comp. Biol. 16, 85-103 (2009).
35. Srere, P. A. The metabolon. Trends Biochem. Sci. 10, 109-110 (1985).
36. Holzgräfe, C., Irbäck, A. & Troein, C. Mutation-induced fold switching among lattice proteins. J. Chem. Phys. 135, 195101 (2011).
37. Babajide, A., Hofacker, I. L., Sippl, M. J. & Stadler, P. F. Neutral networks in protein space: a computational study based on knowledge-based potentials of mean force. Fold. Des. 2, 261-269 (1997).
38. Lau, K. F. & Dill, K. A. A lattice statistical mechanics model of the conformational and sequence spaces of proteins. Macromolecules 22, 3986-3997 (1989).
39. Huynen, M. A., Stadler, P. F. & Fontana, W. Smoothness within ruggedness: The role of neutrality in adaptation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93, 397-401 (1996).
40. Aguirre, J., Buldú, J. M., Stich, M. & Manrubia, S. C. Topological structure of the space of phenotypes: the case of RNA neutral networks. PLoS ONE 6, e26324 (2011).
41. Bloom, J. D., Raval, A. & Wilke, C. O. Thermodynamics of neutral protein evolution. Genetics 175, 255-266 (2007).
42. Dall'Olio, G. M., Bertranpetit, J., Wagner, A. & Laayouni, H. Human genome variation and the concept of genotype networks. PLoS ONE 9, e99424 (2014).
43. Davidich, M. I. & Bornholdt, S. Boolean network model predicts cell cycle sequence of fission yeast. PLoS ONE 3, e1672 (2008).
44. Eyre-Walker, A. & Keightley, P. D. The distribution of fitness effects of new mutations. Nat. Rev. Genet. 8, 610-618 (2007).
45. Lynch, M. & Conery, J. S. The evolutionary fate and consequences of duplicate genes. Science 290, 1151-1155 (2000).
46. Kondrashov, F. A. Gene duplication as a mechanism of genomic adaptation to a changing environment. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 279, 5048-5057 (2012).