Polar Ejection Forces Promote the Conversion from Lateral to End-on Kinetochore-Microtubule Attachments on Mono-oriented Chromosomes

Cell Reports

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 460-468

  Drpic, Danica ^a,b,c   Pereira, António J ^a,b   Barisic, Marin ^a,b   Maresca, Thomas J ^d   Maiato, Helder ^a,b,e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PORTO   (Portugal)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PORTO   (Portugal)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PORTO   (Portugal)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

^e University of Porto   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Chromokinesins; Kinetochore; Mitosis; Mitosis with unreplicated genomes; Spindle assembly checkpoint

Indexed keywords

CELL PROTEIN; CHROMOKINESIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; KINESIN; PROTEIN BINDING;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CELL ADHESION; CELL POLARITY; CHROMATID EXCHANGE; CHROMOSOME CONDENSATION; CHROMOSOME STRUCTURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DROSOPHILA; INSECT CELL; INSECT GENOME; KINETOCHORE MICROTUBULE; MITOSIS; MITOSIS SPINDLE; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; S2 CELL LINE; SPINDLE CELL; ANIMAL; BIOMECHANICS; CELL LINE; CENTROMERE; GENETICS; INSECT CHROMOSOME; METABOLISM; MICROTUBULE; SPINDLE APPARATUS;

ANIMALS; BIOMECHANICAL PHENOMENA; CELL LINE; CHROMOSOMES, INSECT; DROSOPHILA; KINESIN; KINETOCHORES; MICROTUBULES; MITOSIS; PROTEIN BINDING; SPINDLE APPARATUS;

EID: 84944683483     PISSN: None     EISSN: 22111247     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.08.008     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Barisic M., Aguiar P., Geley S., Maiato H. Kinetochore motors drive congression of peripheral polar chromosomes by overcoming random arm-ejection forces. Nat. Cell Biol. 2014, 16:1249-1256.
2. Barisic M., Silva e Sousa R., Tripathy S.K., Magiera M.M., Zaytsev A.V., Pereira A.L., Janke C., Grishchuk E.L., Maiato H. Mitosis. Microtubule detyrosination guides chromosomes during mitosis. Science 2015, 348:799-803.
3. Biggins S., Murray A.W. The budding yeast protein kinase Ipl1/Aurora allows the absence of tension to activate the spindle checkpoint. Genes Dev. 2001, 15:3118-3129.
4. Brinkley B.R., Zinkowski R.P., Mollon W.L., Davis F.M., Pisegna M.A., Pershouse M., Rao P.N. Movement and segregation of kinetochores experimentally detached from mammalian chromosomes. Nature 1988, 336:251-254.
5. Brito D.A., Rieder C.L. Mitotic checkpoint slippage in humans occurs via cyclin B destruction in the presence of an active checkpoint. Curr. Biol. 2006, 16:1194-1200.
6. Brouhard G.J., Hunt A.J. Microtubule movements on the arms of mitotic chromosomes: polar ejection forces quantified in vitro. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102:13903-13908.
7. Cane S., Ye A.A., Luks-Morgan S.J., Maresca T.J. Elevated polar ejection forces stabilize kinetochore-microtubule attachments. J. Cell Biol. 2013, 200:203-218.
8. Cheerambathur D.K., Gassmann R., Cook B., Oegema K., Desai A. Crosstalk between microtubule attachment complexes ensures accurate chromosome segregation. Science 2013, 342:1239-1242.
9. Cheeseman I.M., Anderson S., Jwa M., Green E.M., Kang Js., Yates J.R., Chan C.S., Drubin D.G., Barnes G. Phospho-regulation of kinetochore-microtubule attachments by the Aurora kinase Ipl1p. Cell 2002, 111:163-172.
10. Collin P., Nashchekina O., Walker R., Pines J. The spindle assembly checkpoint works like a rheostat rather than a toggle switch. Nat. Cell Biol. 2013, 15:1378-1385.
11. DeLuca J.G., Gall W.E., Ciferri C., Cimini D., Musacchio A., Salmon E.D. Kinetochore microtubule dynamics and attachment stability are regulated by Hec1. Cell 2006, 127:969-982.
12. Dick A.E., Gerlich D.W. Kinetic framework of spindle assembly checkpoint signalling. Nat. Cell Biol. 2013, 15:1370-1377.
13. Drpic D., Barisic M., Pinheiro D., Maiato H. Selective tracking of template DNA strands after induction of mitosis with unreplicated genomes (MUGs) in Drosophila S2 cells. Chromosome Res. 2013, 21:329-337.
14. Foley E.A., Kapoor T.M. Microtubule attachment and spindle assembly checkpoint signalling at the kinetochore. Nat. Rev. 2013, 14:25-37.
15. Gorbsky G.J., Ricketts W.A. Differential expression of a phosphoepitope at the kinetochores of moving chromosomes. J. Cell Biol. 1993, 122:1311-1321.
16. Howell B.J., Moree B., Farrar E.M., Stewart S., Fang G., Salmon E.D. Spindle checkpoint protein dynamics at kinetochores in living cells. Curr. Biol. 2004, 14:953-964.
17. Kabeche L., Compton D.A. Cyclin A regulates kinetochore microtubules to promote faithful chromosome segregation. Nature 2013, 502:110-113.
18. Kalantzaki M., Kitamura E., Zhang T., Mino A., Novák B., Tanaka T.U. Kinetochore-microtubule error correction is driven by differentially regulated interaction modes. Nat. Cell Biol. 2015, 17:421-433.
19. King J.M., Nicklas R.B. Tension on chromosomes increases the number of kinetochore microtubules but only within limits. J. Cell Sci. 2000, 113:3815-3823.
20. Lampson M.A., Renduchitala K., Khodjakov A., Kapoor T.M. Correcting improper chromosome-spindle attachments during cell division. Nat. Cell Biol. 2004, 6:232-237.
21. Levesque A.A., Compton D.A. The chromokinesin Kid is necessary for chromosome arm orientation and oscillation, but not congression, on mitotic spindles. J. Cell Biol. 2001, 154:1135-1146.
22. Li X., Nicklas R.B. Mitotic forces control a cell-cycle checkpoint. Nature 1995, 373:630-632.
23. Liu D., Vader G., Vromans M.J., Lampson M.A., Lens S.M. Sensing chromosome bi-orientation by spatial separation of aurora B kinase from kinetochore substrates. Science 2009, 323:1350-1353.
24. Magidson V., O'Connell C.B., Lončarek J., Paul R., Mogilner A., Khodjakov A. The spatial arrangement of chromosomes during prometaphase facilitates spindle assembly. Cell 2011, 146:555-567.
25. Maiato H., Sampaio P., Lemos C.L., Findlay J., Carmena M., Earnshaw W.C., Sunkel C.E. MAST/Orbit has a role in microtubule-kinetochore attachment and is essential for chromosome alignment and maintenance of spindle bipolarity. J. Cell Biol. 2002, 157:749-760.
26. Maresca T.J., Salmon E.D. Intrakinetochore stretch is associated with changes in kinetochore phosphorylation and spindle assembly checkpoint activity. J. Cell Biol. 2009, 184:373-381.
27. Mirkovic M., Hutter L.H., Novák B., Oliveira R.A. Premature sister chromatid separation is poorly detected by the spindle assembly checkpoint as a result of system-level feedback. Cell Rep. 2015, 13:469-478. this issue.
28. Nicklas R.B., Koch C.A. Chromosome micromanipulation. 3. Spindle fiber tension and the reorientation of mal-oriented chromosomes. J. Cell Biol. 1969, 43:40-50.
29. Nicklas R.B., Ward S.C. Elements of error correction in mitosis: microtubule capture, release, and tension. J. Cell Biol. 1994, 126:1241-1253.
30. Nicklas R.B., Ward S.C., Gorbsky G.J. Kinetochore chemistry is sensitive to tension and may link mitotic forces to a cell cycle checkpoint. J. Cell Biol. 1995, 130:929-939.
31. O'Connell C.B., Loncarek J., Hergert P., Kourtidis A., Conklin D.S., Khodjakov A. The spindle assembly checkpoint is satisfied in the absence of interkinetochore tension during mitosis with unreplicated genomes. J. Cell Biol. 2008, 183:29-36.
32. O'Connell C.B., Loncarek J., Kaláb P., Khodjakov A. Relative contributions of chromatin and kinetochores to mitotic spindle assembly. J. Cell Biol. 2009, 187:43-51.
33. Rieder C.L., Maiato H. Stuck in division or passing through: what happens when cells cannot satisfy the spindle assembly checkpoint. Dev. Cell 2004, 7:637-651.
34. Rieder C.L., Davison E.A., Jensen L.C., Cassimeris L., Salmon E.D. Oscillatory movements of monooriented chromosomes and their position relative to the spindle pole result from the ejection properties of the aster and half-spindle. J. Cell Biol. 1986, 103:581-591.
35. Shrestha R.L., Draviam V.M. Lateral to end-on conversion of chromosome-microtubule attachment requires kinesins CENP-E and MCAK. Curr. Biol. 2013, 23:1514-1526.
36. Uchida K.S., Takagaki K., Kumada K., Hirayama Y., Noda T., Hirota T. Kinetochore stretching inactivates the spindle assembly checkpoint. J. Cell Biol. 2009, 184:383-390.
37. Wandke C., Barisic M., Sigl R., Rauch V., Wolf F., Amaro A.C., Tan C.H., Pereira A.J., Kutay U., Maiato H., et al. Human chromokinesins promote chromosome congression and spindle microtubule dynamics during mitosis. J. Cell Biol. 2012, 198:847-863.
38. Wang E., Ballister E.R., Lampson M.A. Aurora B dynamics at centromeres create a diffusion-based phosphorylation gradient. J. Cell Biol. 2011, 194:539-549.
39. Welburn J.P., Vleugel M., Liu D., Yates J.R., Lampson M.A., Fukagawa T., Cheeseman I.M. Aurora B phosphorylates spatially distinct targets to differentially regulate the kinetochore-microtubule interface. Mol. Cell 2010, 38:383-392.
40. Whittaker A.J., Royzman I., Orr-Weaver T.L. Drosophila double parked: a conserved, essential replication protein that colocalizes with the origin recognition complex and links DNA replication with mitosis and the down-regulation of S phase transcripts. Genes Dev. 2000, 14:1765-1776.
41. Yajima J., Edamatsu M., Watai-Nishii J., Tokai-Nishizumi N., Yamamoto T., Toyoshima Y.Y. The human chromokinesin Kid is a plus end-directed microtubule-based motor. EMBO J. 2003, 22:1067-1074.