Incentives and power: An organizational perspective

Incentives and Performance: Governance of Research Organizations

Volumn , Issue , 2015, Pages 69-86

  Hüther, Otto ^a   Krücken, Georg ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KASSEL   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84944530238     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-09785-5_5     Document Type: Chapter

References (95)

1. Askling B (2001) Higher education and academic staff in a period of policy and system change. High Educ 41(1–2):157–181
2. Baker DP, Lenhardt G (2008) The institutional crisis of the German research university. High Educ Pol 21(1):49–64
3. Ben-David J (1971) The scientist’s role in society. A comparative study. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs
4. Blau PM, Scott RW (1969) Formal organizations. A comparative approach. Routledge; Kegan Paul, London
5. BMBF (2014) Datenportal. Studienanfänger/-innen im 1. Hochschulsemester und Studienanfängerquoten nach Geschlecht und Land des Erwerbs der Hochschulzugangsberechtigung. http://www.datenportal.bmbf.de/portal/Tabelle-2.5.73.xls. Accessed 18 May 2014
6. Bode I (2010) Der Zweck heil(ig)t die Mittel? Ökonomisierung und Organisationsdynamik im Krankenhaussektor. In: Endreß M, Matys T (eds) Die Ökonomie der Organisation-die Organisation der Ökonomie. VS Verlag, Wiesbaden, pp 63–92
7. Bosbach E (2009) Von Bologna nach Boston? Perspektiven und Reformansätze in der Doktorandenausbildung anhand eines Vergleichs zwischen Deutschland und den USA. Akademische Verlags-Anstalt, Leipzig
8. Brown AD, Lewis MA (2011) Identities, discipline and routines. Organ Stud 32(7):871–895
9. Bruneau W, Savage DC (2002) Counting out the scholars: the case against performance indicators in higher education. James Lorimer and Company, Toronto
10. Brunsson N, Sahlin-Andersson K (2000) Constructing organizations: the example of public sector reform. Organ Stud 21(4):721–746
11. Bundesamt S (2013) Bildung und Kultur: Personal an Hochschulen 2012. Statistisches Bundesamt, Wiesbaden
12. Butler L (2003) Explaining Australia’s increased share of ISI publications—the effects of a funding formula based on publication counts. Res Policy 32(1):143–155
13. BVerfG (2010) 1 BvR 748/06 vom 20.7.2010
14. BVerfG (2012) 2 BvL 4/10 vom 14.02.2012
15. Capano G (2008) Looking for serendipity: the problematical reform of government within Italy’s universities. High Educ 55(4):481–504
16. Chait R (2002) The questions of tenure. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
17. Clegg SR, Courpasson D, Phillips N (2006) Power and organizations. SAGE Publications, Los Angeles, CA
18. Cyert RM, March JG (1963) A behavioral theory of the firm. Prentice-Hall, Englewood
19. Cliffs, NJ de Boer H, Enders J, Leisyte L (2007a) Public sector reform in Dutch higher education: the organizational transformation of the university. Public Adm 85(1):27–46
20. de Boer H, Enders J, Schimank U (2007b) On the way towards new public management? The governance of university systems in England, the Netherlands, Austria, and Germany. In: Jansen D (ed) New forms of governance in research organizations, Disciplinary approaches, interfaces and integration. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 137–152
21. de Weert E (2000) Academic staff in the Netherlands. In: Enders J (ed) Employment and working conditions of academic staff in Europe. German Trade Union for Education and Science, Frankfurt/Main, pp 168–180
22. Diefenbach T, Sillince JAA (2011) Formal and informal hierarchy in different types of organization. Organ Stud 32(11):1515–1537
23. Diefenbach T, By RT, Klarner P (2009) A multi-dimensional analysis of managers’ power. Functional, socio-political, interpretive-discursive, and socio-cultural approaches. Manag Rev 20(4):413–431
24. Dilger A (2007) German universities as state-sponsored co-operatives. Manag Rev 18(2):102–116
25. Donoghue F (2008) The last professors: the corporate university and the fate of the humanities. Fordham University Press, New York
26. Emerson RM (1962) Power-dependence relations. Am Sociol Rev 27(1):31–41
27. Enders J (2000a) Academic staff in the European Union. In: Enders J (ed) Employment and working conditions of academic staff in Europe. German Trade Union for Education and Science, Frankfurt/Main, pp 29–53
28. Enders J (ed) (2000b) Employment and working conditions of academic staff in Europe. GEW, Frankfurt/Main
29. Enders J (2008) Professor werden ist sehr schwer, professor sein dann gar nicht mehr? Ein Betrag zur Personalstrukturreform an den Hochschulen. In: Matthies H, Simon D (eds) Wissenschaft unter Beobachtung. Effekte und Defekte von Evaluationen. VS Verlag, Wiesbaden, pp 83–99
30. Enders J, Bornmann L (2001) Karriere mit Doktortitel? Ausbildung, Berufsverlauf und Berufserfolg von Promovierten. Campus-Verlag, Frankfurt/Main u.a
31. Enders J, Boer H, Weyer E (2013) Regulatory autonomy and performance: the reform of higher education re-visited. High Educ 65(1):5–23
32. Espeland WN, Sauder M (2007) Rankings and reactivity: how public measures recreate social worlds. Am J Sociol 113(1):1–40
33. Etzioni A (1964) Modern organizations. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
34. Flexner A (1930) Universities-American, English, German. Oxford University Press, Oxford
35. Frey BS, Oberholzer-Gee F (1997) The cost of price incentives: an empirical analysis of motivation crowding-out. Am Econ Rev 87:746–755
36. Frey BS, Homberg F, Osterloh M (2013) Organizational control systems and pay-for-performance in the public service. Organ Stud 34(7):949–972
37. Fulton O (2000) Academic staff in the United Kingdom. In: Enders J (ed) Employment and working conditions of academic staff in Europe. German Trade Union for Education and Science, Frankfurt/Main, pp 224–234
38. Hagstrom WO (1965) The scientific community. Basic Books, New York
39. Hannan MT, Freeman J (1984) Structural inertia and organizational change. Am Sociol Rev 49 (2):149–164
40. Heinz JP, Nelsen RL, Sandefur RL, Laumann EO (2005) Urban lawyers: the new social structure of the bar. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
41. Heinze T, Shapira PRJ, Senker J (2009) Organizational and institutional influences on creativity in scientific research. Res Policy 38:610–623
42. HRK (2012) HRK Senate criticises the draft amendments to the “W” professorial salary scale. http://www.hrk.de/press/press-releases/press-release/meldung/hrk-senate-criticises-the-draftamendments-to-the-w-professorial-salary-scale-2340/
43. Hüther O (2008) Starke Dekane-Schwache Professoren? Vergleich und Analyse der deutschen Landeshochschulgesetze. Hochschulmanagement 3(1):23–27
44. Hüther O (2010) Von der Kollegialität zur Hierarchie? Eine Analyse des New Managerialism in den Landeshochschulgesetzen. VS Verlag, Wiesbaden
45. Hüther O, Krücken G (2011) Wissenschaftliche Karriere und Beschäftigungsbedingungen–organisationssoziologische Überlegungen zu den Grenzen neuer Steuerungsmodelle an deutschen Hochschulen. Soziale Welt 62(3):305–325
46. Hüther O, Krücken G (2013) Hierarchy and power: a conceptual analysis with particular reference to new public management reforms in German universities. Eur J High Educ 3(4):307–323
47. Jacob AK, Teichler U (2011) Der Wandel des Hochschullehrerberufs im internationalen Vergleich. Ergebnisse einer Befragung in den Jahren 2007/08. BMBF, Bonn
48. Jansen D, Wald A, Franke K, Schmoch U, Schubert T (2007) Drittmittel als Performanzindikator der wissenschaftlichen Forschung. Zum Einfluss von Rahmenbedingungen auf Forschungsleistungen.Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 59(1):125–149
49. Kärreman D, Alvesson M (2004) Cages in tandem: management control, social identity, and identification in a knowledge-intensive firm. Organization 11(1):149–175
50. Kreckel R (2008) Großbritannien. In: Kreckel R (ed) Zwischen promotion und professur. Akademische Verlags-Anstalt, Leipzig, pp 124–165
51. Krücken G (2003) Learning the ‘new, new thing’: on the role of path dependency in university structures. High Educ 46(3):315–339
52. Krücken G (2008) Lässt sich Wissenschaft managen? Wissenschaftsrecht 41(4):345–358
53. Krücken G (2014) Higher education reforms and unintended consequences: a research agenda. Studies of Higher Education.
54. Krücken G, Meier F (2006) Turning the university into an organizational actor. In: Drori GS, Meyer JW, Hwang H (eds) Globalization and organization. World society and organizational change. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 241–257
55. Krücken G, Blümel A, Kloke K (2013) The managerial turn in higher education? On the interplay of organizational and occupational change in German academica. Minerva 51(5):417–442
56. Lee FS (2007) The research assessment exercise, the state and the dominance of mainstream economics in British universities. Camb J Econ 31(2):309–325
57. Luhmann N (1964) Funktionen und Folgen formaler Organisation. Duncker and Humblot, Berlin
58. Luhmann N (1980) Trust and power. Two works by Niklas Luhmann. Wiley, Chichester
59. Luhmann N (1992) Die Wissenschaft der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt/M, Suhrkamp
60. Maasen S, Weingart P (2006) Unternehmerische Universität und neue Wissenskultur. die hochschule 15(1):19–45
61. MacRoberts MH, MacRoberts BR (1996) Problems of citation analysis. Scientometrics 36 (3):435–444
62. Martin B, Whitley R (2010) The UK research exercise: a case of regulatory capture? In: Whitley R, Gläser J, Engwall L (eds) Reconfiguring knowledge production. Changing authority relationships in the sciences and their consequences for intellectual innovation. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 51–80
63. Mayntz R (ed) (1968) Bürokratische organisation. Kiepenheuer and Witsch, Köln
64. Merton RK (1973) The sociology of science. Theoretical and empirical investigations. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL
65. Mignot G (2003) Who are the actors in the government of French universities? The paradoxal victory of deliberative leadership. High Educ 45(1):71–89
66. Minssen H, Wilkesmann U (2003) Lassen Hochschulen sich steuern? Soziale Welt 54(2):123–141
67. Münch R (2006) Die Entsorgung wissenschaftlicher Kreativität Latente Effekte der kennzifferngesteuerten Mittelverteilung im akademischen Feld. die hochschule 15(2):98–122
68. Musselin C (2005) European academic labor markets in transition. High Educ 49(1):135–154
69. Musselin C (2010) The market for academics. Routledge, New York
70. Musselin C (2013) Redefinition of the relationships between academics and their university. High Educ 65(1):25–37
71. Neave G, Rhoades G (1987) The academic estate in western Europe. In: Clark B (ed) The academic profession. National, disciplinary and institutional settings. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, pp 211–270
72. OECD (2012) Education at a glance 2012. OECD Publishing, Paris
73. Osterloh M (2012) New public management‘versus ‚Gelehrtenrepublik’-rankings als instrument der qualitÄtsbeurteilung in der wissenschaft? In: Wilkesmann U, Schmid C (eds) Hochschule als organisation. Organisationssoziologie. VS Verlag, Wiesbaden, pp 209–221
74. Osterloh M, Frey BS (2000) Motivation, knowledge transfer, and organizational forms. Organ Sci 11(5):538–550
75. Osterloh M, Frey BS (2009) Research governance in academia: are there alternatives to academic rankings? CESifo working paper. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Delivery.cfm/SSRN_ID1460691_code968850.pdf?abstractid¼1460691andmirid¼1. Accessed 15 Apr 2014
76. Paradeise C, Bleiklie I, Ferlie E, Reale E (eds) (2009) University governance: western European comparative perspectives. Springer, Dordrecht
77. Partha D, David PA (1994) Toward a new economics of science. Res Policy 23(5):487–521
78. Pollitt C, Bouckaert G (2004) Public management reform: a comparative analysis. Oxford University Press, Oxford
79. Preston AM (1992) The birth of clinical accounting: a study of the emergence and transformations of discourses on costs and practices of accounting in U.S. hospitals. Acc Organ Soc 17(1):63–100
80. Reay T, Hinings CR (2005) The recomposition of an organizational field: health care in Alberta. Organ Stud 26(3):351–384
81. Röbken H (2007) Postgraduate studies in Germany-how much structure is not enough? South Afr J High Educ 21(8):1054–1066
82. Royston G, Hinings CR (1996) Understanding radical organizational change: bringing together the old and the new institutionalism. Acad Manag Rev 21(4):1022–1054
83. Schimank U (2001) Festgefahrene Gemischtwarenläden-Die deutschen Hochschulen als erfolgreich scheiternde Organisationen. In: Stölting E, Schimank U (eds) Die Krise der Universitäten. Westdeutscher Verlag, Wiesbaden, pp 223–242
84. Schofer E, Meyer JW (2005) The worldwide expansion of higher education in the twentieth century. Am Sociol Rev 70(6):898–920
85. Scholkmann A (2011) Deans in German universities: goal acceptance and task characteristics. Tert Educ Manag 17(4):337–353
86. Schubert T, Schmoch U (2010) Finanzierung der Hochschulforschung. In: Simon D, Knie A, Hornbostel S (eds) Handbuch Wissenschaftspolitik. VS Verlag, Wiesbaden, pp 244–261
87. Scott RW (1966) Professionals in bureaucracies-areas of conflict. In: Vollmer HM, Mills DL (eds) Professionalization. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, pp 265–275
88. Scott RW (1981) Organizations: rational, natural, and open systems. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
89. Seidler HH (2004) Hochschulfinanzierung, evaluation und mittelvergabe. In: Hartmer M, Detmer H (eds) Hochschulrecht. Ein Handbuch für die Praxis. Verlagsgruppe Hüthig-Jehle-Rehm, Heidelberg, pp 478–510
90. Shils E (1991) The idea of a university and the right to academic freedom. In: Altbach PG (ed) International higher education. An encyclopedia, vol 1. New York; London, pp. 1–22
91. Stern S (2004) Do scientists pay to be scientists? Manag Sci 50(6):835–853
92. Sutton JR (1984) Organizational autonomy and professional norms in science: a case study of the Lawrence Livermore Laboratory. Soc Stud Sci 14(2):197–224
93. Trow M (2010) Twentieth-century higher education: elite to mass to universal. JHU, Baltimore, MD
94. Wilkesmann U (2010) Die vier Dilemmata der wissenschaftlichen Weiterbildung. Zeitschrift für Soziologie der Erziehung und Sozialisation 30(1):28–42
95. Wilkesmann U, Schmid CJ (2012) The impacts of new governance on teaching at german universities. Findings from a national survey. High Educ 63(1):33–52