Predicting cesarean delivery after induction of labor among nulliparouswomen at term

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 126, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 1059-1068

  Tolcher, Mary Catherine ^a   Holbert, Michael R ^a   Weaver, Amy L ^a   McGree, Michaela E ^a   Olson, Janet E ^a   El Nashar, Sherif A ^a   Famuyide, Abimbola O ^a   Brost, Brian C ^a  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BODY HEIGHT; BODY MASS; CESAREAN SECTION; CHOLESTASIS; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEMOGRAPHY; DIABETES MELLITUS; FEMALE; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMAN; ICD-9; LABOR INDUCTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALPRESENTATION; MATERNAL AGE; MATERNAL HYPERTENSION; MEDICAL RECORD; NOMOGRAM; NULLIPARA; PREECLAMPSIA; PREGNANCY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TERTIARY HEALTH CARE; VAGINAL DELIVERY; WEIGHT GAIN; ADVERSE EFFECTS; PARITY; RISK FACTOR; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; TERM BIRTH; TREATMENT FAILURE; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; CESAREAN SECTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; LABOR, INDUCED; NOMOGRAMS; PARITY; PREGNANCY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; TERM BIRTH; TREATMENT FAILURE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84944345361     PISSN: 00297844     EISSN: 1873233X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001083     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Patient safety and quality improvement. reVITALize obstetric data definitions. Available at: http://www.acog.org/About-ACOG/ACOG-Departments/Patient-Safety-and-Quality-Improvement/reVITALize-Obstetric-Data-Definitions. Retrieved April 2015.
2. Induction of labor. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 107. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2009;114:386-97.
3. Laughon SK, Zhang J, Grewal J, Sundaram R, Beaver J, Reddy UM. Induction of labor in a contemporary obstetric cohort. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012;206:486.e1-9.
4. Rouse DJ, Owen J, Hauth JC. Criteria for failed labor induction: prospective evaluation of a standardized protocol. Obstet Gynecol 2000;96:671-7.
5. Darney BG, Caughey AB. Elective induction of labor symposium: nomenclature, research methodological issues, and outcomes. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2014;57:343-62.
6. Darney BG, Snowden JM, Cheng YW, Jacob L, Nicholson JM, Kaimal A, et al. Elective induction of labor at term compared with expectant management: maternal and neonatal outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 2013;122:761-9.
7. Saccone G, Berghella V. Induction of labor at full term in uncomplicated singleton gestations: a systematic review and metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Obstet Gy-necol 2015 [Epub ahead of print].
8. Beckmann M. Predicting a failed induction. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2007;47:394-8.
9. Ennen CS, Bofill JA, Magann EF, Bass JD, Chauhan SP, Morrison JC. Risk factors for cesarean delivery in preterm, term and post-term patients undergoing induction of labor with an unfavorable cervix. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2009;67:113-7.
10. Gunatilake RP, Smrtka MP, Harris B, Kraus DM, Small MJ, Grotegut CA, et al. Predictors of failed trial of labor among women with an extremely obese body mass index. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013;209:562.e1-5.
11. Michelson KA, Carr DB, Easterling TR. The impact of duration of labor induction on cesarean rate. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 199:299.e1-4.
12. Crane JM. Factors predicting labor induction success: a critical analysis. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2006;49:573-84.
13. Crane JM, Delaney T, Butt KD, Bennett KA, Hutchens D, Young DC. Predictors of successful labor induction with oral or vaginal misoprostol. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2004;15:319-23.
14. Parkes I, Kabiri D, Hants Y, Ezra Y. The indication for induction of labor impacts the risk of cesarean delivery. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2014:1-5 [Epub ahead of print].
15. Horowitz KM, Feldman D. Induction of labor for fetal growth restriction: risk factors for primary cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2014;123(suppl 1):56S.
16. Gülmezoglu AM, Crowther CA, Middleton P, Heatley E. Induction of labour for improving birth outcomes for women at or beyond term. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012, Issue 6. Art. No.: CD004945. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004945.pub3.
17. Allen VM, O'Connell CM, Baskett TF. Maternal morbidity associated with cesarean delivery without labor compared with induction of labor at term. Obstet Gynecol 2006;108: 286-94.
18. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gotzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP, et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet 2007;370: 1453-7.
19. Medically indicated late-preterm and early-term deliveries. Committee Opinion No. 560. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2013;121:908-10.
20. Gestational diabetes. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 30. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2001;98:525-38.
21. Management of stillbirth. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 102. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2009;113:748-61.
22. Clark SL, Miller DD, Belfort MA, Dildy GA, Frye DK, Meyers JA. Neonatal and maternal outcomes associated with elective term delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009;200:156. e1-4.
23. Spong CY, Mercer BM, D'alton M, Kilpatrick S, Blackwell S, Saade G. Timing of indicated late-preterm and early-term birth. Obstet Gynecol 2011;118:323-33.
24. Tita AT, Landon MB, Spong CY, Lai Y, Leveno KJ, Varner MW, et al. Timing of elective repeat cesarean delivery at term and neonatal outcomes. N Engl J Med 2009;360: 111-20.
25. Laughon SK, Zhang J, Troendle J, Sun L, Reddy UM. Using a simplified Bishop score to predict vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2011;117:805-11.
26. Dystocia and augmentation of labor. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 49. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2003;102:1445-54.
27. R Development Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna (Austria): R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2014. Available at: http://www.R-project.org/. Retrieved March 2015.
28. James G, Witten D, Hastie T, Tibshirani R. An introduction to statistical learning: with applications in R. New York (NY): Springer; 2013.
29. Harrell FE Jr, Lee KL, Mark DB. Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors. Stat Med 1996;15:361-87.
30. Verhoeven CJ, Oudenaarden A, Hermus MA, Porath MM, Oei SG, Mol BW. Validation of models that predict cesarean section after induction of labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009;34:316-21.
31. Brennan DJ, Murphy M, Robson MS, O'Herlihy C. The singleton, cephalic, nulliparous woman after 36 weeks of gestation: contribution to overall cesarean delivery rates. Obstet Gynecol 2011;117:273-9.
32. Spong CY, Berghella V, Wenstrom KD, Mercer BM, Saade GR. Preventing the first cesarean delivery: summary of a joint Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Workshop. Obstet Gynecol 2012;120:1181-93.
33. Grobman WA, Lai Y, Landon MB, Spong CY, Leveno KJ, Rouse DJ, et al. Development of a nomogram for prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 109:806-12.
34. Schuit E, Kwee A, Westerhuis ME, Van Dessel HJ, Graziosi GC, Van Lith JM, et al. A clinical prediction model to assess the risk of operative delivery. BJOG 2012;119:915-23.
35. Ghi T, Maroni E, Youssef A, Morselli-Labate AM, Paccapelo A, Montaguti E, et al. Sonographic pattern of fetal head descent: relationship with duration of active second stage of labor and occiput position at delivery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014;44:82-9.
36. Gawade P, Markenson G, Bsat F, Healy A, Pekow P, Plevyak M. Association of gestational weight gain with cesarean delivery rate after labor induction. J Reprod Med 2011;56:95-102.
37. Goetzinger KR, Odibo AO, Shanks AL, Roehl KA, Cahill AG. Clinical accuracy of estimated fetal weight in term pregnancies in a teaching hospital. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2014;27: 89-93.
38. Melamed N, Yogev Y, Meizner I, Mashiach R, Bardin R, Ben-Haroush A. Sonographic fetal weight estimation: which model should be used? J Ultrasound Med 2009;28:617-29.
39. Jozwiak M, Oude Rengerink K, Ten Eikelder ML, van Pampus MG, Dijksterhuis MG, de Graaf IM, et al. Foley catheter or prostaglandin E2 inserts for induction of labour at term: an open-label randomized controlled trial (PROBAAT-P trial) and systematic review of literature. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Re-prod Biol 2013;170:137-45.
40. Jozwiak M, ten Eikelder M, Oude Rengerink K, de Groot C, Feitsma H, Spaanderman M, et al. Foley catheter versus vaginal misoprostol: randomized controlled trial (PROBAAT-M study) and systematic review and meta-analysis of literature. Am J Perinatol 2014;31:145-56.
41. Kozhimannil KB, Arcaya MC, Subramanian SV. Maternal clinical diagnoses and hospital variation in the risk of cesarean delivery: analyses of a National US Hospital Discharge Database. PLoS Med 2014;11:e1001745.
42. Nassar AH, Adra AM, Chakhtoura N, Gómez-Marin O, Beydoun S. Severe preeclampsia remote from term: labor induction or elective cesarean delivery? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998;179:1210-3.
43. Wing DA, Tran S, Paul RH. Factors affecting the likelihood of successful induction after intravaginal misoprostol application for cervical ripening and labor induction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;186:1237-40.
44. Stamilio DM, Scifres CM. Extreme obesity and postcesarean maternal complications. Obstet Gynecol 2014;124:227-32.
45. Wolfe KB, Rossi RA, Warshak CR. The effect of maternal obesity on the rate of failed induction of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011;205:128.e1-7.
46. Subramaniam A, Jauk VC, Goss AR, Alvarez MD, Reese C, Edwards RK. Mode of delivery in women with class III obesity: planned cesarean compared with induction of labor. Am J Ob-stet Gynecol 2014;211:700.e1-9.