Foley catheter or prostaglandin E2 inserts for induction of labour at term: An open-label randomized controlled trial (PROBAAT-P trial) and systematic review of literature

European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology

Volumn 170, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 137-145

  Jozwiak, Marta ^a   Oude Rengerink, Katrien ^b   Ten Eikelder, Mieke L G ^a   Van Pampus, Maria G ^c   Dijksterhuis, Marja G K ^d   De Graaf, Irene M ^e   Van Der Post, Joris A M ^b   Van Der Salm, Paulien ^f   Scheepers, Hubertina C J ^g   Schuitemaker, Nico ^h   De Leeuw, Jan Willem ⁱ   Mol, Ben W J ^b   Bloemenkamp, Kitty W M ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^c ONZE LIEVE VROUWE GASTHUIS   (Netherlands)

^d AMPHIA HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^e Department of Orthopaedic Surgery   (Netherlands)

^f MEANDER MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^g MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^h DEPARTMENT OF SURGERY   (Netherlands)

ⁱ IKAZIA HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Caesarean section rate; Cervical ripening; E2 insert; Foley catheter; Labour induction; Prostaglandin

Indexed keywords

OXYTOCIN; PROSTAGLANDIN E2;

ADULT; APGAR SCORE; ARTICLE; CATHETERIZATION; CESAREAN SECTION; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FETUS DISTRESS; FOLEY BALLOON CATHETER; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTAL DELIVERY; LABOR INDUCTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MATERNAL AGE; META ANALYSIS; NETHERLANDS; NEWBORN MORBIDITY; OPEN STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SAFETY; POSTPARTUM HEMORRHAGE; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; UTERUS RUPTURE;

CAESAREAN SECTION RATE; CERVICAL RIPENING; FOLEY CATHETER; LABOUR INDUCTION; PROSTAGLANDIN E2 INSERT;

ADMINISTRATION, INTRAVAGINAL; ADULT; CATHETERS; DINOPROSTONE; FEMALE; HUMANS; LABOR, INDUCED; OXYTOCICS; PREGNANCY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC;

EID: 84883055709     PISSN: 03012115     EISSN: 18727654     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.06.017     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. EURO-PERISTAT Project, with SCPE EUROCAT EURONEOSTAT European Perinatal Health report; data from 2004 2008 Available at: http://www.europeristat.com/ images/doc/EPHR/european-perinatal-health-report.pdf
2. J.A. Martin, B.E. Hamilton, and S.J. Ventura Births: final data for 2009 Natl Vital Stat Rep 60 2011 1 70
3. The Health and Social Care Informatin Centre NHS Maternity Statistics, England 2007-8 2010 Available at: http://www.ic.nhs.uk/pubs/maternity0910
4. Z. Alfirevic, A.J. Kelly, and T. Dowswell Intravenous oxytocin alone for cervical ripening and induction of labour Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009 CD003246
5. Induction of labor Int J Gynecol Obstet 69 2000 283 292
6. ACOG practice bulletin no. 107: induction of labor Obstet Gynecol 114 2009 386 397
7. Guideline Development Group RCOG NICE guideline Induction of labour 2001 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists London
8. W.F. Rayburn Preinduction cervical ripening: basis and methods of current practice Obstet Gynecol Surv 57 2002 683 692
9. Inductie van de baring Guidline 2006 Nederlandse vereniging voor Obstetrie en Gynaecologie Utrecht
10. M. Jozwiak, R.K. Oude, and M. Benthem Foley catheter versus vaginal prostaglandin E2 gel for induction of labour at term (PROBAAT trial): an open-label, randomised controlled trial Lancet 378 2011 2095 2103
11. M. Jozwiak, K.W. Bloemenkamp, A.J. Kelly, B.W. Mol, O. Irion, and M. Boulvain Mechanical methods for induction of labour Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3 2012 CD001233
12. A. Cromi, F. Ghezzi, and M. Agosti Is transcervical Foley catheter actually slower than prostaglandins in ripening the cervix?. A randomized study Am J Obstet Gynecol 204 2011 338 347
13. E.G. Hughes, A.J. Kelly, and J. Kavanagh Dinoprostone vaginal insert for cervical ripening and labor induction: a meta-analysis Obstet Gynecol 97 2001 847 855
14. L. Sanchez-Ramos, A.M. Kaunitz, I. Delke, and F.L. Gaudier Cervical ripening and labor induction with a controlled-release dinoprostone vaginal insert: a meta-analysis Obstet Gynecol 94 1999 878 883
15. IBMIBM SPSS statistics., 2010.
16. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions 2009 The Cochrane Collaboration and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Chichester
17. The Cochrane CollaborationReview Manager (RevMan). Version 5.1. 2011 http://ims.cochrane.org/revman
18. Stichting Perinatale Registratie Nederland Perinatale Zorg in Nederland 2008 2011
19. A. Cromi, F. Ghezzi, and S. Uccella A randomized trial of preinduction cervical ripening: dinoprostone vaginal insert versus double-balloon catheter Am J Obstet Gynecol 207 2012 125 127
20. C.E. Pennell, J.J. Henderson, M.J. O'Neill, S. McChlery, D.A. Doherty, and J.E. Dickinson Induction of labour in nulliparous women with an unfavourable cervix: a randomised controlled trial comparing double and single balloon catheters and PGE2 gel BJOG 116 2009 1443 1452
21. R. Salim, N. Zafran, Z. Nachum, G. Garmi, N. Kraiem, and E. Shalev Single-balloon compared with double-balloon catheters for induction of labor: a randomized controlled trial Obstet Gynecol 118 2011 79 86
22. J.E. Norman, and S. Stock Intracervical Foley catheter for induction of labour Lancet 378 2011 2054 2055
23. M. Prager, G.E. Eneroth, M. Edlund, and L. Marions A randomised controlled trial of intravaginal dinoprostone, intravaginal misoprostol and transcervical balloon catheter for labour induction BJOG 115 2008 1443 1450