Maternal Clinical Diagnoses and Hospital Variation in the Risk of Cesarean Delivery: Analyses of a National US Hospital Discharge Database

PLoS Medicine

Volumn 11, Issue 10, 2014, Pages

  Kozhimannil, Katy B ^a   Arcaya, Mariana C ^b   Subramanian, S V ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CESAREAN SECTION; CHILDBIRTH; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; FEMALE; GESTATIONAL AGE; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HIGH RISK PREGNANCY; HOSPITAL BED CAPACITY; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; MATERNAL CARE; PREGNANCY COMPLICATION; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PREGNANT WOMAN; PREVALENCE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; VAGINAL DELIVERY; DELIVERY; FACTUAL DATABASE; HOSPITAL; OBSTETRIC LABOR COMPLICATIONS; PREGNANCY; RISK FACTOR; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

CESAREAN SECTION; DATABASES, FACTUAL; DELIVERY, OBSTETRIC; FEMALE; HOSPITALS; HUMANS; OBSTETRIC LABOR COMPLICATIONS; PREGNANCY; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 84908333993     PISSN: 15491277     EISSN: 15491676     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001745     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2014) FastStats: inpatient surgery. Available: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/inpatient-surgery.htm. Accessed 15 September 2014.
2. Menacker F, Hamilton BE, (2010) Recent trends in cesarean delivery in the United States. NCHS Data Brief 35: 1–8.
3. Osterman MJK, Martin JA, (2013) Changes in cesarean delivery rates by gestational age: United States, 1996–2011. NCHS Data Brief 124: 1–8.
4. Hamilton BE, Martin JA, Ventura SJ, (2012) Births: preliminary data for 2011. Natl Vital Stat Rep 61: 1–18.
5. Ecker J, Frigoletto F, (2007) Cesarean delivery and the risk-benefit calculus. N Engl J Med 356: 885–888.
6. Lydon-Rochelle M, Holt VL, Martin DP, Easterling TR, (2000) Association between method of delivery and maternal rehospitalization. JAMA 283: 2411–2416.
7. Prior E, Santhakumaran S, Gale C, Philipps LH, Modi N, et al. (2012) Breastfeeding after cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of world literature. Am J Clin Nutr 95: 1113–1135.
8. Lewis RM, Mckoy JN, Andrews JC, Jerome RN, Likis FE, et al. (2012) Future research needs for strategies to reduce cesarean birth in low-risk women. Rockville (Maryland): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Available: http://www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/ehc/products/481/1297/FRN22_C-Section_FinalReport_20130107.pdf. Accessed 15 September 2014.
9. Silver RM, Landon MB, Rouse DJ, Leveno KJ, Spong CY, et al. (2006) Maternal morbidity associated with multiple repeat cesarean deliveries. Obstet Gynecol 107: 1226–1232.
10. Silver RM, (2012) Implications of the first cesarean: perinatal and future reproductive health and subsequent cesareans, placentation issues, uterine rupture risk, morbidity, and mortality. Semin Perinatol 36: 315–323.
11. Menacker F, MacDorman MF, Declercq E, (2010) Neonatal mortality risk for repeat cesarean compared to vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) deliveries in the United States, 1998–2002 birth cohorts. Matern Child Health J 14: 147–154.
12. De Luca R, Boulvain M, Irion O, Berner M, Pfister RE, (2009) Incidence of early neonatal mortality and morbidity after late-preterm and term cesarean delivery. Pediatrics 123: e1064–e1071.
13. Queenan JT, (2011) How to stop the relentless rise in cesarean deliveries. Obstet Gynecol 118: 199–200.
14. Scott JR, (2011) Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: a common-sense approach. Obstet Gynecol 118: 342–350.
15. Lowe NK, (2013) The overuse of cesarean delivery. J Obstet Gynecol Neonat Nurs 42: 135–136.
16. Shorten A, (2007) Maternal and neonatal effects of caesarean section. BMJ 335: 1003–1004.
17. Robson M, Hartigan L, Murphy M, (2013) Methods of achieving and maintaining an appropriate caesarean section rate. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 27: 297–308.
18. Clark SL, Belfort MA, Hankins GD, Meyers JA, Houser FM, (2007) Variation in the rates of operative delivery in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol 196: 526.e1–5.
19. Kozhimannil KB, Law MR, Virnig B, (2013) Cesarean delivery rates vary tenfold among US hospitals; reducing variation may address quality and cost issues. Health Aff (Millwood) 32: 527–535.
20. Cáceres I, Arcaya M, Declercq E, Belanoff CM, Janakiraman V, et al. (2013) Hospital differences in cesarean deliveries in Massachusetts (US) 2004–2006: the case against case-mix artifact. PLoS ONE 8: e57817.
21. Bragg F, Cromwell DA, Edozien LC, Gurol-Urganci I, Mahmood TA, et al. (2010) Variation in rates of caesarean section among English NHS trusts after accounting for maternal and clinical risk: cross sectional study. BMJ 341: c5065.
22. Paranjothy S, Frost C, Thomas J, (2005) How much variation in CS rates can be explained by case mix differences? BJOG 112: 658–666.
23. Newhouse JP, Garber A, Graham RP, McCoy MA, Mancher M, et al., editors (2013) Interim report of the Committee on Geographic Variation in Health Care Spending and Promotion of High-Value Care: preliminary committee observations. Washington (District of Columbia): National Academies Press.
24. Fisher ES, Bynum JP, Skinner JS, (2009) Slowing the growth of health care costs—lessons from regional variation. N Engl J Med 360: 849–852.
25. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (2013) Introduction to the HCUP nationwide inpatient sample (NIS): 2011. Rockville (Maryland): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Available: http://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/nation/nis/NIS_Introduction_2011.pdf. Accessed 18 September 2014.
26. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (2014) NIS database documentation: the National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample (NIS). Rockville (Maryland): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Available: http://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/nation/nis/nisdbdocumentation.jsp. Accessed 15 September 2014.
27. Dimick JB, Nicholas LH, Ryan AM, Thumma JR, Birkmeyer JD, (2013) Bariatric surgery complications before vs after implementation of a national policy restricting coverage to centers of excellence. JAMA 309: 792–799.
28. Barbash GI, Glied SA, (2010) New technology and health care costs: the case of robot-assisted surgery. N Engl J Med 363: 701–704.
29. Kuklina E V, Whiteman MK, Hillis SD, Jamieson DJ, Meikle SF, et al. (2008) An enhanced method for identifying obstetric deliveries: implications for estimating maternal morbidity. Matern Child Health J 12: 469–477.
30. Kuklina EV, Meikle SF, Jamieson DJ, Whiteman MK, Barfield WD, et al. (2009) Severe obstetric morbidity in the United States: 1998–2005. Obstet Gynecol 113: 293–299.
31. Technical specifications, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (2014) AHRQ Inpatient Quality Indicator #33: primary cesarean delivery rate, uncomplicated. Technical specifications. Washington (District of Columbia): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
32. Robson M, (2001) Classification of caesarean sections. Fetal Matern Med Rev 12: 23–39.
33. Spiegelhalter DJ, (2005) Funnel plots for comparing institutional performance. Stat Med 24: 1185–1202.
34. Subramanian SV, Jones K, Duncan C (2003) Multilevel methods for public health research. In: Kawachi I, Berkman L, eds. Neighborhoods and health. New York: Oxford University Press.
35. Rasbash J, Charlton C, Browne WJ, Healy M, Cameron B (2009) MLwiN version 2.1. Bristol: Centre for Multilevel Modelling, University of Bristol.
36. Coonrod DV, Drachman D, Hobson P, Manriquez M, (2008) Nulliparous term singleton vertex cesarean delivery rates: institutional and individual level predictors. Am J Obstet Gynecol 198: 694.e1–11.
37. Linton A, Peterson MR, Williams TV, (2005) Clinical case mix adjustment of cesarean delivery rates in U.S. military hospitals, 2002. Obstet Gynecol 105: 598–606.
38. Corallo AN, Croxford R, Goodman DC, Bryan EL, Srivastava D, et al. (2014) A systematic review of medical practice variation in OECD countries. Health Policy 114: 5–14.
39. Schoen C, Osborn R, Squires D, Doty MM, (2013) Access, affordability, and insurance complexity are often worse in the United States compared to ten other countries. Health Aff (Millwood) 32: 2205–2215.
40. McCourt C, Weaver J, Statham H, Beake S, Gamble J, et al. (2007) Elective cesarean section and decision making: a critical review of the literature. Birth 34: 65–79.
41. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Society for Maternal–Fetal Medicine (2014) Obstetric care consensus no. 1: safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 123: 693–711.
42. Brennan DJ, Robson MS, Murphy M, O'Herlihy C, (2009) Comparative analysis of international cesarean delivery rates using 10-group classification identifies significant variation in spontaneous labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 201: 308.e1–8.
43. Angood PB, Armstrong EM, Ashton D, Burstin H, Corry MP, et al. (2010) Blueprint for action steps toward a high-quality, high-value maternity care system. Womens Health Issues 20 (Suppl 1) S18–S49.
44. Spong CY, Berghella V, Saade GR, Wenstrom KD, Mercer BM, (2012) Preventing the first cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 120: 1181–1193.
45. Carter MC, Corry M, Delbanco S, Foster TC, Friedland R, et al. (2010) 2020 vision for a high-quality, high-value maternity care system. Womens Health Issues 20 (Suppl 1) S7–S17.
46. Main EK, Morton CH, Melsop K, Hopkins D, Giuliani G, et al. (2012) Creating a public agenda for maternity safety and quality in cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 120: 1194–1198.
47. Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Osterman MJK, Curtain SC, Matthews TJ, et al. (2013) Births: final data for 2012. Natl Vital Stat Rep 62: 1–72 Available: Accessed 18 September 2014.
48. Markus AR, Rosenbaum S, (2010) The role of Medicaid in promoting access to high-quality, high-value maternity care. Womens Health Issues 20 (Suppl 1) S67–S78.
49. Sakala C, Yang YT, Corry MP, (2013) Maternity care and liability: pressing problems, substantive solutions. Womens Health Issues 23: e7–13.
50. Kozhimannil KB, Shippee TP, Adegoke O, Vimig B, (2013) Trends in hospital-based childbirth care: the role of health insurance. Am J Manag Care 19: e125–e132.
51. Shorten A, (2010) Bridging the gap between mothers and medicine: “new insights” from the NIH Consensus Conference on VBAC. Birth 37: 181–183.
52. Main EK, (2009) New perinatal quality measures from the National Quality Forum, the Joint Commission and the Leapfrog Group. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 21: 532–540.
53. James BC, Savitz LA, (2011) How intermountain trimmed health care costs through robust quality improvement efforts. Health Aff (Millwood) 30: 1185–1191.
54. Mazza F, Kitchens J, Kerr S, Markovich A, Best M, et al. (2007) Eliminating birth trauma at Ascension Health. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 33: 15–24.
55. Gholitabar M, Ullman R, James D, Griffiths M, (2011) Caesarean section: summary of updated NICE guidance. BMJ 343: d7108.
56. Bailit J, (2012) Impact of non-clinical factors on primary cesarean deliveries. Semin Perinatol 36: 395–398.
57. Lipkind HS, Duzyj C, Rosenberg TJ, Funai EF, Chavkin W, et al. (2009) Disparities in cesarean delivery rates and associated adverse neonatal outcomes in New York City hospitals. Obstet Gynecol 113: 1239–1247.
58. Murthy K, Grobman W, Lee T, Holl JL, (2007) Association between rising professional liability insurance premiums and primary cesarean delivery rates. Obstet Gynecol 110: 1264–1269.
59. Epstein AJ, Nicholson S, (2009) The formation and evolution of physician treatment styles: an application to cesarean sections. J Health Econ 28: 1126–1140.
60. Rosenblatt RA, Dobie SA, Hart LG, Schneeweiss R, Gould D, et al. (1997) Interspecialty differences in the obstetric care of low-risk women. Am J Public Health 87: 344–351.
61. Kozhimannil KB, Avery MD, Terrell CA, (2012) Recent trends in clinicians providing care to pregnant women in the United States. J Midwifery Womens Health 57: 433–438.
62. Kozhimannil KB, Hardeman RR, Attanasio LB, Blauer-Peterson C, Brien MO, (2013) Doula care, birth outcomes, and costs among Medicaid beneficiaries. Am J Public Health 103: 113–121.
63. Hodnett ED, Gates S, Hofmeyr GJ, Sakala C, (2013) Continuous support for women during childbirth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 7: CD003766.
64. Goyert GL, Bottoms SF, Treadwell MC, Nehra PC, (1989) The physician factor in cesarean birth rates. N Engl J Med 320: 706–709.
65. Burns LR, Geller SE, Wholey DR, (1995) The effect of physician factors on the cesarean section decision. Med Care 33: 365–382.
66. Main EK, Moore D, Farrell B, Schimmel LD, Altman RJ, et al. (2006) Is there a useful cesarean birth measure? Assessment of the nulliparous term singleton vertex cesarean birth rate as a tool for obstetric quality improvement. Am J Obstet Gynecol 194: 1644–1651.
67. Mazza F, Kitchens J, Akin M, Elliott B, Fowler D, et al. (2008) The road to zero preventable birth injuries. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 34: 201–205.
68. Mann S, Pratt S, Gluck P, Nielsen P, Risser D, et al. (2006) Assessing quality in obstetrical care: development of standardized measures. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 32: 497–505.
69. Greene SM, Reid RJ, Larson EB, (2012) Implementing the learning health system: from concept to action. Ann Intern Med 157: 207–210.
70. Berthelsen CL, (2000) Evaluation of coding data quality of the HCUP Nationwide Inpatient Sample. Top Health Inf Manage 21: 10–23.