Development of a nomogram for prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 109, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 806-812

  Grobman, William A ^a   Lai, Yinglei ^a   Landon, Mark B ^a   Spong, Catherine Y ^a   Leveno, Kenneth J ^a   Rouse, Dwight J ^a   Varner, Michael W ^a   Moawad, Atef H ^a   Caritis, Steve N ^a   Harper, Margaret ^a   Wapner, Ronald J ^a   Sorokin, Yoram ^a   Miodovnik, Menachem ^a   Carpenter, Marshall ^a   O'Sullivan, Mary J ^a   Sibai, Baha M ^a   Langer, Oded ^a   Thorp, John M ^a   Ramin, Susan M ^a   Mercer, Brian M ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; CESAREAN SECTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA BASE; ETHNICITY; FEMALE; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMAN; LABOR; MATERNAL AGE; MULTIVARIATE LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; NOMOGRAM; NORMAL HUMAN; PREDICTION; PRENATAL CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TREATMENT INDICATION; TRIAL OF LABOR; VAGINAL DELIVERY; VALIDATION PROCESS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BODY MASS INDEX; CONTINENTAL POPULATION GROUPS; FEMALE; FORECASTING; HUMANS; MATERNAL AGE; NOMOGRAMS; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY COMPLICATIONS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROC CURVE; TRIAL OF LABOR; VAGINAL BIRTH AFTER CESAREAN;

EID: 34147141844     PISSN: 00297844     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000259312.36053.02     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Landon MB, Leindecker S, Spong C, Hauth JC, Bloom S, Varner MW, et al. The MFMU Cesarean Registry: factors affecting the success of trial of labor after previous cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;193:1016-23.
2. Troyer AR, Parisi VM. Obstetric parameters affecting success in a trial of labor: designation of a scoring system. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992;167:1099-104.
3. Pickhardt MG, Martin JN Jr, Meydrech EF, Blake PG, Martin RW, Perry KG Jr, et al. Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: are there useful and valid predictors or success or failure? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992;166:1811-9.
4. Flamm BL, Geiger AM. Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: an admission scoring system. Obstet Gynecol 1997;90:907-10.
5. Weinstein D, Benshushan A, Tanos V, Zilberstein R, Rojansky N. Predictive score for vaginal birth after cesarean section. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;174:192-8.
6. Eastham JA, Kattan MW, Scardino PT. Nomograms as predictive models. Semin Urol Oncol 2002;20:108-15.
7. Landon MB, Hauth JC, Leveno KJ, Spong CY, Leindecker S, Varner MW, et al. Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med 2004;351:2581-9.
8. Lemon SC, Roy J, Clark MA, Friedmann PD, Rakowski W. Classification and regression tree analysis in public health: methodological review and comparison with logistic regression, Ann Behav Med 2003;26:172-81.
9. Breiman L. Random forests. Machine Learning 2001;45:5-32.
10. Vapnik V. The nature of statistical learning theory. New York (NY): Springer-Verlag; 1995.
11. Freund Y, Schapire RE. A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting. J Comput System Sci 1997;55:119-39.
12. Guise JM, Merlin M, McDonagh M, Osterweil P, Chan B, Helfand M. Safety of vaginal birth after cesarean: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 2004;103:420-9.