Risk factors for cesarean delivery in preterm, term and post-term patients undergoing induction of labor with an unfavorable cervix

Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation

Volumn 67, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 113-117

  Ennen, Christopher S ^a,f   Bofill, James A ^b   Magann, Everett F ^a,c   Bass, John D ^d   Chauhan, Suneet P ^e   Morrison, John C ^b  

^a NAVAL MEDICAL CENTER PORTSMOUTH   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^d TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH   (United States)

^e AURORA HEALTH CARE   (United States)

^f JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Cesarean delivery; Induction of labor; Risk factors

Indexed keywords

MISOPROSTOL; PROSTAGLANDIN E2;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; BALLOON CATHETER; BODY MASS; CESAREAN SECTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIABETES MELLITUS; FEMALE; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMAN; LABOR INDUCTION; NULLIPARA; OBESITY; PREMATURE LABOR; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK FACTOR; SCORING SYSTEM; UTERINE CERVIX; VAGINAL DELIVERY;

ADULT; CERVICAL RIPENING; CESAREAN SECTION; CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; DELIVERY, OBSTETRIC; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; LABOR, INDUCED; MATERNAL AGE; ODDS RATIO; PARITY; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PREGNANCY, PROLONGED; PREMATURE BIRTH; PROBABILITY; REGISTRIES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; TERM BIRTH;

EID: 54849439187     PISSN: 03787346     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000166307     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Sutton PD, Ventura SJ, Menacker F, Munson ML: Births: Final Data for 2003. Hyattsville, National Center for Health Statistics, National Vital Statistics Reports, 2003, p 54.
2. Vrouenraets F, Roumen F, Dehing C, van den Akker E, Aarts M, Scheve E: Bishop score and risk of cesarean delivery after induction of labor in nulliparous women. Obstet Gynecol 2005;105:690-697.
3. Maslow AS, Sweeny AL: Elective induction of labor as a risk factor for cesarean delivery among low-risk women at term. Obstet Gynecol 2000;95:917-922.
4. Seyb ST, Berka RJ, Socol ML, Dooley SL: Risk of cesarean delivery with elective induction of labor at term in nulliparous women. Obstet Gynecol 1999;94:600-607.
5. Hook B, Kiwi R, Amini SB, Fanaroff A, Hack M: Neonatal morbidity after elective repeat cesarean section and trial of labor. Pediatrics 1997;100;348-353.
6. Fogelson NS, Menard MK, Hulsey T, Ebeling M: Neonatal impact of elective repeat cesarean delivery at term: a comment on patient choice cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet and Gynecol 2005;192:1433-1436.
7. Luthy DA, Malmgren JA, Zingheim RW: Cesarean delivery after elective induction in nulliparous women: the physician effect. Am J Obstet and Gynecol 2004;191:1511-1515.
8. Heffner LJ: Impact of labor induction, gestational age, and maternal age on cesarean delivery rates. Obstet Gynecol 2003;102:287-293.
9. Barrilleaux PS, Bofill JA, Terrone DA, Magann EF, May EL, Morrison JC: Cervical ripening and induction of labor with misoprostol, dinoprostone gel, and a Foley catheter: a randomized trial of 3 techniques. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;186:1124-1129.
10. Alexander JM, McIntire DD, Leveno KJ: Prolonged pregnancy: induction of labor and cesarean births. Obstet Gynecol 2001;97:911-915.
11. Shin KS, Brubaker KL, Ackerson LM: Risk of cesarean delivery in nulliparous women at greater than 41 weeks' gestational age with an unengaged vertex. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;190:129-134.
12. Maslow AS, Sweeny AL: Elective induction of labor as a risk factor for cesarean delivery among low-risk women at term. Obstet Gynecol 2000;95:917-922.
13. Nuthalapaty FS, Rouse DJ, Owen J: The association of maternal weight with cesarean risk, labor duration, and cervical dilation rate during labor induction. Obstet Gynecol 2004;103:452-456.
14. Cnattingius R, Hoglund B, Kieler H: Emergency cesarean delivery in induction of labor: an evaluation of risk factors. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2005;84:456-462.
15. Yeast JD, Jones A, Poskin M: Induction of labor and the relationship to cesarean delivery: a review of 7001 consecutive inductions. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;180:628-633.
16. Peregrine E, O'Brien P, Omar R, Jauniaux E: Clinical and ultrasound parameters to predict the risk of cesarean delivery after induction of labor. Obstet Gynecol 2006;107:227-233.