MODELING MECHANICAL CELL DAMAGE in the BIOPRINTING PROCESS EMPLOYING A CONICAL NEEDLE

Journal of Mechanics in Medicine and Biology

Volumn 15, Issue 5, 2015, Pages

  Li, Minggan ^a   Tian, Xiaoyu ^b   Kozinski, Janusz A ^c   Chen, Xiongbiao ^b   Hwang, Dae Kun ^a  

^a RYERSON UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN   (Canada)

^c York University   (Canada)

Author keywords

Bioprinting; cell damage; fluid structure interaction; immersed boundary method

Indexed keywords

BIOPRODUCTS; CELL CULTURE; CELLS; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; DEFORMATION; FLUID STRUCTURE INTERACTION; NEEDLES; STRAIN ENERGY; TURBULENT FLOW;

BIOPRINTING; CELL DAMAGE; CELL MANIPULATION; COMPLEX FLUID FLOW; FLUID INTERACTIONS; IMMERSED BOUNDARY METHODS; STRAIN ENERGY DENSITY; VELOCITY GRADIENTS;

MOLECULAR BIOLOGY;

EID: 84944173499     PISSN: 02195194     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1142/S0219519415500736     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Mironov V, Kasyanov V, Markwald RR, Organ printing: From bioprinter to organ biofabrication line, Curr Opin Biotechnol 22:667-673, 2011.
2. Mironov V, Trusk T, Kasyanov V, Little S, Swaja R, Markwald R, Biofabrication: A 21st century manufacturing paradigm, Biofabrication 1:2009.
3. Fedorovich NE, Alblas J, Hennink WE, Oner FC, Dhert WJA, Organ printing: The future of bone regeneration? Trends Biotechnol 29:601-606, 2011.
4. Mironov V, Boland T, Trusk T, Forgacs G, Markwald RR, Organ printing: Computer-aided jet-based 3D tissue engineering, Trends Biotechnol 21:157-161, 2003.
5. Mironov V, Visconti RP, Kasyanov V, Forgacs G, Drake CJ, Markwald RR, Organ printing: Tissue spheroids as building blocks, Biomaterials 30:2164-2174, 2009.
6. Chang R, Emami K, Wu HL, Sun W, Biofabrication of a three-dimensional liver micro-organ as an in vitro drug metabolism model, Biofabrication 2:2010.
7. Chang R, Nam Y, Sun W, Direct cell writing of 3D microorgan for in vitro pharmaco-kinetic model, Tissue Eng C-Meth 14:157-166, 2008.
8. Chau DYS, Johnson C, MacNeil S, Haycock JW, Ghaemmaghami AM, The development of a 3D immunocompetent model of human skin, Biofabrication 5:2013.
9. Zhu XC, Zheng Q, Yang H, Cai J, Huang L, Duan YW, Xu ZN, Cen PL, Recent advances in inkjet dispensing technologies: Applications in drug discovery, Expert Opin Drug Disc 7:761-770, 2012.
10. Cui XF, Gao GF, Qiu YJ, Accelerated myotube formation using bioprinting technology for biosensor applications, Biotechnol Lett 35:315-321, 2013.
11. Xu F, Moon S, Hefner E, Beyazoglu T, Emre AE, Manzur T, Demirci U, A high-throughput label-free cell-based biosensor (CBB) system, Unattended Ground Sea Air Sensor Technol Appl Xii 7693:2010.
12. Barbee KA, Mechanical cell injury, Ann N Y Acad Sci 1066:67-84, 2005.
13. Billiet T, Gevaert E, De Schryver T, Cornelissen M, Dubruel P, The 3D printing of gelatin methacrylamide cell-laden tissue-engineered constructs with high cell viability, Biomaterials 35:49-62.
14. Chang R, Nam J, Sun W, Effects of dispensing pressure and nozzle diameter on cell survival from solid freeform fabrication-based direct cell writing, Tissue Eng A 14:41-48, 2008.
15. Chen X, Thibeault S, 35th Annual Int Conf IEEE EMBS 6228-6231, Osaka, Japan, July 2013.
16. Walker PA, Jimenez F, Gerber MH, Aroom KR, Shah SK, Harting MT, Gill BS, Savitz SI, Cox CS, Effect of needle diameter and flow rate on rat and human mesen-chymal stromal cell characterization and viability, Tissue Eng C-Meth 16:989-997, 2010.
17. Li MG, Tian XY, Zhu N, Schreyer DJ, Chen XB, Modeling process-induced cell damage in the biodispensing process, Tissue Eng C-Meth 16:533-542, 2010.
18. Nair K, Gandhi M, Khalil S, Yan KC, Marcolongo M, Barbee K, Sun W, Characterization of cell viability during bioprinting processes, Biotechnol J 4:1168-1177, 2009.
19. Yu Y, Zhang YH, Martin JA, Ozbolat IT, Evaluation of cell viability and functionality in vessel-like bioprintable cell-laden tubular channels, J Biomech Eng-Trans ASME 135:2013.
20. Mittal R, Iaccarino G, Immersed boundary methods, Ann Rev Fluid Mech 37:239-261, 2005.
21. Peskin CS, The immersed boundary method, Acta Numerica 11:479-517, 2002.
22. Bagchi P, Johnson PC, Popel AS, Computational fluid dynamic simulation of aggregation of deformable cells in a shear flow, J Biomech Eng-Trans ASME 127:1070-1080, 2005.
23. Eggleton CD, Popel AS, Large deformation of red blood cell ghosts in a simple shear flow, Phys Fluids 10:1834-1845, 1998.
24. Freund JB, Numerical simulation of flowing blood cells, Annu Rev Fluid Mech 46:67-95, 2014.
25. Li MG, Tian XY, Schreyer DJ, Chen XB, Effect of needle geometry on flow rate and cell damage in the dispensing-based biofabrication process, Biotechnol Progr 27:1777-1784, 2011.
26. Barthes-Biesel D, Diaz A, Dhenin E, Effect of constitutive laws for two-dimensional membranes on flow-induced capsule deformation, J Fluid Mech 460:211-222, 2002.
27. Peskin CS, Mcqueen DM, Modeling prosthetic heart-valves for numerical-analysis of blood-flow in the heart, J Comput Phys 37:113-132, 1980.
28. Bausch AR, Ziemann F, Boulbitch AA, Jacobson K, Sackmann E, Local measurements of viscoelastic parameters of adherent cell surfaces by magnetic bead microrheometry, Biophys J 75:2038-2049, 1998.
29. Macosko CW, Rheology: Principles, Measurements, and Applications, Wiley-VCH, New York, 1994.
30. Li MG, Tian XY, Chen XB, Modeling of flow rate, pore size, and porosity for the dispensing-based tissue scaffolds fabrication, J Manuf Sci Eng-Trans ASME 131:2009.
31. Aguado BA, Mulyasasmita W, Su J, Lampe KJ, Heilshorn SC, Improving viability of stem cells during syringe needle flow through the design of hydrogel cell carriers, Tissue Eng A 18:806-815, 2012.
32. Tanzeglock T, Soos M, Stephanopoulos G, Morbidelli M, Induction of mammalian cell death by simple shear and extensional flows, Biotechnol Bioeng 104:360-370, 2009.