Subsentential sentiment on a shoestring: A crosslingual analysis of compositional classification

NAACL HLT 2015 - 2015 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Proceedings of the Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2015, Pages 694-704

  Haas, Michael ^a   Versley, Yannick ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; FORESTRY; SENTIMENT ANALYSIS;

COMPOSITIONAL CLASSIFICATIONS; CROSS-LINGUAL; LEXICAL RESOURCES; SENTIMENT CLASSIFICATION; STANFORD; TREEBANKS;

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION);

EID: 84944121468     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.3115/v1/n15-1071     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (38)

1. Banea, C., Mihalcea, R., andWiebe, J. (2013). Porting multilingual subjectivity resources across languages. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 2(4):211-225.
2. Candito, M.-H. and Seddah, D. (2010). Parsing word clusters. In Proceedings of the First Workshop on Statistical Parsing of Morphologically-Rich Languages (SPMRL 2010).
3. Choi, Y. and Cardie, C. (2008). Learning with compositional semantics as structural inference for subsentential sentiment analysis. In Proceedings of the 2008 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP 2008).
4. Choi, Y. and Cardie, C. (2009). Adapting a polarity lexicon using integer linear programming for domain-specific sentiment classification. In Proceedings of the 2009 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing.
5. Clematide, S., Gindl, S., Klenner, M., Petrakis, S., Remus, R., Ruppenhofer, J., Waltinger, U., and Wiegand, M. (2012). MLSA- A multi-layered reference corpus for german sentiment analysis. In Proceedings of the Eigth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2012).
6. Dong, L., Wei, F., Zhou, M., and Xu, K. (2014). Adaptive multi-compositionality for recursive neural models with applications to sentiment analysis. In AAAI 2014.
7. Duh, K., Fujino, A., and Nagata, M. (2011). Is machine translation ripe for cross-lingual sentiment classification. In Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics:shortpapers.
8. Emerson, G. and Declerck, T. (2014). SentiMerge: Combining sentiment lexicons in a Bayesian framework. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Lexical and Grammatical Resources for Language Processing.
9. Fahrni, A. and Klenner, M. (2008). Old wine or warm beer: Target-specific sentiment analysis of adjectives. In Affective Language in Human and Machine (AISB 2008).
10. Ganchev, K., Graca, J., and Taskar, B. (2008). Better alignments = better translations? In Procecedings of the 46th Annual Meeting of the Association of Computational Linguistics (ACL 2008).
11. Hall, D., Durrett, G., and Klein, D. (2014). Less grammar, more features. In ACL 2014.
12. Klenner, M., Petrakis, S., and Fahrni, A. (2009). PolArt: A robust tool for sentiment analysis. In NODALIDA 2009.
13. Koo, T., Carreras, X., and Collins, M. (2008). Simple semi-supervised dependency parsing. In ACL 2008.
14. Lavelli, A. and Corazza, A. (2009). The Berkeley Parser at the EVALITA constituency parsing task. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Evaluation of NLP Tools for Italian (EVALITA 2009).
15. Nakagawa, T., Inui, K., and Kurohashi, S. (2010). Dependency tree-based sentiment classification using crfs with hidden variables. In Human Language Technologies: The 2010 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the ACL.
16. Pang, B. and Lee, L. (2005). Seeing stars: Exploiting class relationships for sentiment categorization with respect to rating scales. In ACL 2005.
17. Petrov, S., Barett, L., Thibaux, R., and Klein, D. (2006). Learning accurate, compact, and interpretable tree annotation. In COLING-ACL 2006.
18. Popat, K., Balamurali, A. R., Bhattacharyya, P., and Haffari, G. (2013). The haves and the have-nots: Leveraging unlabelled corpora for sentiment analysis. In Proceedings of ACL 2013.
19. Rafferty, A. and Manning, C. D. (2008). Parsing three German treebanks: Lexicalized and unlexicalized baselines. In ACL'08 workshop on Parsing German.
20. Remus, R., Quasthoff, U., and Heyer, G. (2010). SentiWS- A publicly-available German-language resource for sentiment analysis. In Proceedings of the 7th International Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC 2010).
21. Samuelsson, Y. and Volk, M. (2004). Automatic node insertion for treebank deepening. In Proceedings of the III Workshop on Treebanks and Linguistic Theories (TLT 2004).
22. Socher, R., Hurval, B., Manning, C. D., and Ng, A. Y. (2012). Semantic compositionality through recursive matrix-vector spaces. In EMNLP 2012.
23. Socher, R., Pennington, J., Huang, E. H., Ng, A. Y., and Manning, C. D. (2011). Semi-supervised recursive autoencoders for predicting sentiment distributions. In EMNLP 2011.
24. Socher, R., Perelygin, A., Wu, J., Chuang, J., Manning, C., Ng, A., and Potts, C. (2013). Recursive deep models for semantic compositionality over a sentiment treebank. In Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP 2013).
25. Stone, P. J., Dunphy, D. C., and Smith, M. S. (1966). The General Inquirer: A Computer Approach to Content Analysis. MIT Press.
26. Su, F. and Markert, K. (2009). Subjectivity recognition on word senses via semi-supervised mincuts. In Proceedings of NAACL 2009.
27. Taboada, M., Brooke, J., Tofilofski, M., Voll, K., and Stede, M. (2011). Lexicon-based methods for sentiment analysis. Computational Linguistics, 37(2):267-307.
28. Tamura, H., Inui, T., and Okumura, M. (2005). Extracting semantic orientation of words using spin model. In Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2005).
29. Tiedemann, J. (2010). Lingua-align: An experimental toolbox for automatic tree-to-tree alignment. In Proceedings of LREC 2010.
30. Tiedemann, J. (2012). Parallel data, tools and interfaces in OPUS. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC'2012).
31. Volk, M., Göhring, A., Marek, T., and Samuelsson, Y. (2010). SMULTRON (version 3.0)-The Stockholm MULtilingual parallel TReebank. http://www.cl.uzh.ch/research/parallelcorpora/paralleltreebanks-en.html.
32. Waltinger, U. (2010a). GermanPolarityClues: A lexical resource for German sentiment analysis. In Proceedings of the 7th International Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC 2010).
33. Waltinger, U. (2010b). Sentiment analysis reloaded-an empirical study on machine learning.based sentiment classification using polarity clues. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies (WEBIST 2010).
34. Wan, X. (2009). Co-training for cross-lingual sentiment classification. In Proceedings of the 47th Annual Meeting of the ACL and the 4th IJCNLP of the AFNLP (ACL-IJCNLP 2009).
35. Wang, S. and Manning, C. D. (2012). Baselines and bigrams: Simple, good sentiment and topic classification. In Proceedings of ACL 2012.
36. Yessenalina, A. and Cardie, C. (2011). Compositional matrix-space models for sentiment analysis. In EMNLP 2011.
37. Zhao, Y. and Karypis, G. (2005). Hierarchical clustering algorithms for document datasets. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 10:141-168.
38. Zhu, X., Guo, H., Mohammad, S., and Kiritchenko, S. (2014). An empirical study on the effect of negation words on sentiment. In ACL 2014.