Setting priorities for optimizing vascular access decision making - An international survey of patients and clinicians

PLoS ONE

Volumn 10, Issue 7, 2015, Pages

  Van Der Veer, Sabine N ^a,b   Haller, Maria C ^a,c,d   Pittens, Carina A C M ^e   Broerse, Jacqueline ^e   Castledine, Clare ^f   Gallieni, Maurizio ^g,h   Inston, Nicholas ^i,j   Monros, Anna Marti ^k   Peek, Niels ^b   Van Biesen, Wim ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^c MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

^d ELISABETHINEN HOSPITAL   (Austria)

^e ATHENA INSTITUTE   (Netherlands)

^f Worthing Hospital   (United Kingdom)

^g Vascular Access Society (VAS)   (Netherlands)

^h SAN CARLO BORROMEO HOSPITAL   (Italy)

ⁱ Vascular Access Society of Britain and Ireland (VASBI)   (United Kingdom)

^j QUEEN ELIZABETH HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^k CHGU Valencia ^*  (Spain)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE ACCESS; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH CARE SURVEY; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; INFECTION PREVENTION; INJECTION SITE INFECTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; RENAL REPLACEMENT THERAPY; SEX DIFFERENCE; TREATMENT PLANNING; VASCULAR ACCESS; DECISION MAKING; KIDNEY DISEASE; METABOLISM; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; PATIENT; PHYSICIAN; PSYCHOLOGY; QUESTIONNAIRE;

ADULT; AGED; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMANS; KIDNEY DISEASES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENTS; PHYSICIANS; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 84943777094     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0128228     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. 111th United States Congress; 2010 pp. Public law no. 111-148,§3506, 124 Stat. p119-1025.
2. Health and Social Care Act [Internet]. Parliament of the United Kingdom; 2012 p. Chapter 7. Available: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2012/7/contents/enacted
3. Institute of Medicine. Crossing the quality chasm. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press; 2001.
4. Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model. Soc Sci Med. 1999; 49: 651-61. PMID: 10452420
5. Casey JR, Hanson CS, Winkelmayer WC, Craig JC, Palmer S, Strippoli GFM, et al. Patients' perspectives on hemodialysis vascular access: a systematic review of qualitative studies. Am J Kidney Dis. Elsevier Inc; 2014; doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2014.06.024
6. Sousa CN, Apóstolo JL, Figueiredo MH, Martins MM, Dias VF. Interventions to promote self-care of people with arteriovenous fistula. J Clin Nurs. 2014; 23: 1796-802. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12207 PMID: 23773233
7. Wong CS, McNicholas N, Healy D, Clarke-Moloney M, Coffey JC, Grace P a, et al. A systematic review of preoperative duplex ultrasonography and arteriovenous fistula formation. J Vasc Surg. Society for Vascular Surgery; 2013; 57: 1129-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.11.094 PMID: 23535043
8. Ravani P, Palmer SC, Oliver MJ, Quinn RR, MacRae JM, Tai DJ, et al. Associations between hemodialysis access type and clinical outcomes: a systematic review. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013; 24: 465-73. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2012070643 PMID: 23431075
9. Morton RL, Tong A, Howard K, Snelling P, Webster AC. The views of patients and carers in treatment decision making for chronic kidney disease: systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies. BMJ. 2010; 340: c112. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c112 PMID: 20085970
10. Fissell RB, Fuller DS, Morgenstern H, Gillespie BW, Mendelssohn DC, Rayner HC, et al. Hemodialysis patient preference for type of vascular access: variation and predictors across countries in the DOPPS. J Vasc Access. 2013; 14: 264-72. doi: 10.5301/jva.5000140 PMID: 23599135
11. Xi W, Harwood L, Diamant MJ, Brown JB, Gallo K, Sontrop JM, et al. Patient attitudes towards the arteriovenous fistula: a qualitative study on vascular access decision making. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2011; 26: 3302-8. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfr055 PMID: 21406543
12. Van Biesen W, van der Veer SN, Jager KJ, Fouque D, Wanner C, Vanholder R. What guidelines should or should not be: implications for guideline production. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2013; 28: 1980-4. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gft291 PMID: 23990354
13. Raats CJI, van Veenendaal H, Versluijs MM, Burgers JS. A generic tool for development of decision aids based on clinical practice guidelines. Patient Educ Couns. 2008; 73: 413-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.07.038 PMID: 18768285
14. Van der Weijden T, Pieterse AH, Koelewijn-van Loon MS, Knaapen L, Légaré F, Boivin A, et al. How can clinical practice guidelines be adapted to facilitate shared decision making? A qualitative key-informant study. BMJ Qual Saf. 2013; 22: 855-63. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001502 PMID: 23748154
15. Wyatt KD, Stuart LM, Brito JP, Carranza Leon B, Domecq JP, Prutsky GJ, et al. Out of context: clinical practice guidelines and patients with multiple chronic conditions: a systematic review. Med Care. 2014; 52 Suppl 3: S92-S100. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182a51b3d PMID: 23969592
16. Tordoir J, Canaud B, Haage P, Konner K, Basci A, Fouque D, et al. EBPG on Vascular Access. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2007; 22 Suppl 2: ii88-117. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfm021 PMID: 17507428
17. Polkinghorne KR, Chin GK, MacGinley RJ, Owen AR, Russell C, Talaulikar GS, et al. KHA-CARI Guideline: vascular access - central venous catheters, arteriovenous fistulae and arteriovenous grafts. Nephrol. 2013; 18: 701-5. doi: 10.1111/nep.12132
18. Fluck R, Kumwenda M. UK Renal Association clinical practice guidelines vascular access for haemodialysis [Internet]. 2011 p. (5th edition). Available: http://www.renal.org/guidelines/modules/vascular-access-for-haemodialysis
19. National Kidney Foundation Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative. 2006 Updates Clinical Practice Guidelines Vascular Access [Internet]. 2006 pp. 227-409. Available: http://www2.kidney.org/professionals/KDOQI/guideline-upHD-PD-VA
20. Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health Measurement Scales. A practical guide to their development and use. 3rd ed. Oxford (United Kingdom): Oxford University Press; 2003. pp. p93-94.
21. Murphy M, Black N, Lamping D, McKee C, Sanderson C, Askham J, et al. Consensus development methods, and their use in clinical guideline development. Health Technol Assess (Rockv). 1998; 2.
22. Eccles MP, Grimshaw JM, Shekelle P, Schünemann HJ, Woolf S. Developing clinical practice guidelines: target audiences, identifying topics for guidelines, guideline group composition and functioning and conflicts of interest. Implement Sci. 2012; 7: 60. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-60 PMID: 22762776
23. Altman DG. Practical statistics for medical research. 1st ed. London (UK): Chapman & Hall; 1991. pp. 54-60.
24. Haller MC, van der Veer SN, Nagler E V, Tomson C, Lewington A, Hemmelgarn BR, et al. A survey on the methodological processes and policies of renal guideline groups as a first step to harmonize renal guidelines. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2014; [ePub ahead of print]. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfu288
25. Lopez-Vargas P, Polkinghorne K. KHA-CARI guideline for Selection of type of access [Internet]. 2012. Available: http://www.cari.org.au/Dialysis/dialysis-guidelines.html
26. Lopez-Vargas P, Polkinghorne K. KHA-CARI guideline for Nursing care of central venous catheters [Internet]. 2012. Available: http://www.cari.org.au/Dialysis/dialysis-guidelines.html
27. Chin GK. KHA-CARI guideline for Prevention of tunnelled dialysis catheter infection [Internet]. 2012. Available: http://www.cari.org.au/Dialysis/dialysis-guidelines.html
28. Dember LM, Imrey PB, Beck GJ, Cheung AK, Himmelfarb J, Huber TS, et al. Objectives and design of the hemodialysis fistula maturation study. Am J Kidney Dis. Elsevier Inc; 2014; 63: 104-12. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2013.06.024 PMID: 23992885
29. ReDVA research collaboration. Development of hemodynamic solutions in Renal Dialysis Venous Access failure [Internet]. 2013. Available: http://www.redva.eu/
30. Moura A, Madureira J, Alija P, Fernandes J, Oliviera J, Lopez M, et al. Type of vascular access and location in online hemodiafiltration and its association with patient's perception of health-related quality of life. J Vasc Access. 2014; 15: 175-82. doi: 10.5301/jva.5000182 PMID: 24170586
31. Quinn R, Lamping D, Lok CE, Meyer R, Hiller J, Lee J, et al. The vascular access questionnaire: assessing patient-reported views of vascular access. J Vasc Access. 2008; 9: 122-8. PMID: 18609528
32. Tong A, Lopez-Vargas P, Howell M, Phoon R, Johnson D, Campbell D, et al. Consumer involvement in topic and outcome selection in the development of clinical practice guidelines. Heal Expect. 2012; 15: 410-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00676.x
33. Ahmad N, Ellins J, Krelle H, Lawrie M. Person-centred care : from ideas to action. Bringing together the evidence on shared decision making and self-management support. The Health Foundation, London (UK); 2014.
34. Légaré F, Ratté S, Gravel K, Graham ID. Barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice: update of a systematic review of health professionals' perceptions. Patient Educ Couns. 2008; 73: 526-35. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.07.018 PMID: 18752915
35. Manns B, Hemmelgarn B, Lillie E, Dip SCPG, Cyr A, Gladish M, et al. Setting research priorities for patients on or nearing dialysis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014; 9: 1813-21. doi: 10.2215/CJN.01610214 PMID: 24832095
36. Brouwers MC, Kho ME, Browman GP, Burgers JS, Cluzeau F, Feder G, et al. AGREE II: advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in health care. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010; 63: 1308-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.07.001 PMID: 20656455
37. Institute of Medicine. Clinical practice guidelines we can trust. Graham R, Mancher M, Wolman DM, Greenfield S, Steinberg E, editors. Washington, D.C.: The national academies press; 2011.
38. Guideline International Network (G-I-N). G-I-N PUBLIC Toolkit : Patient and public involvement in guidelines [Internet]. 2012. Available: http://www.g-i-n.net/working-groups/gin-public/toolkit
39. Flynn KE, Smith M a, Vanness D. A typology of preferences for participation in healthcare decision making. Soc Sci Med. 2006; 63: 1158-69. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.03.030 PMID: 16697096