Consumer involvement in topic and outcome selection in the development of clinical practice guidelines

Health Expectations

Volumn 15, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 410-423

  Tong, Allison ^a,b   Lopez Vargas, Pamela ^a,b   Howell, Martin ^a,b   Phoon, Richard ^c   Johnson, David ^d   Campbell, Denise ^a   Walker, Rowan G ^e   Craig, Jonathan C ^a,b  

^a CHILDREN S HOSPITAL AT WESTMEAD   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^c WESTMEAD HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^d UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^e ROYAL MELBOURNE HOSPITAL   (Australia)

Author keywords

Carer; Consumer; Guideline; Kidney disease; Patient

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; CAREGIVER; CHRONIC KIDNEY FAILURE; CONSUMER; DIET; EXERCISE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PATIENT; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT EDUCATION; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PHYSIOLOGIC MONITORING; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SOCIAL SUPPORT;

ADULT; AGED; AUSTRALIA; CAREGIVERS; CONSUMER PARTICIPATION; CONTINUITY OF PATIENT CARE; DIET; EXERCISE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MONITORING, PHYSIOLOGIC; PATIENT EDUCATION AS TOPIC; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENTS; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; RENAL INSUFFICIENCY, CHRONIC; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SOCIAL SUPPORT;

EID: 84869036273     PISSN: 13696513     EISSN: 13697625     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00676.x     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Krahn M, Naglie G. The next step in guideline development: incorporating patient preferences. Journal of the American Medical Association, 2008; 300: 436-438.
2. Schunemann HJ, Fretheim A, Oxman AD. Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 10. Integrating values and consumer involvement. Health Research Policy and Systems, 2006; 4: 22.
3. Boivin A, Green J, van der Meulen J, Legare F, Nolte E. Why consider patients' preferences? A discourse analysis of clinical practice guideline developersMedical Care, 2009; 47: 908-915.
4. Boivin A, Currie K, Fervers B et al. Patient and public involvement in clinical guidelines: international experiences and future perspectives. Quality and Safety in Health Care. 2010; 19: 1-4.
5. Bastian H. Raising the standard: practice guidelines and consumer participation. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 1996; 8: 485-490.
6. van Wersch A, Eccles M. Involvement of consumers in the development of evidence based clinical guidelines: practical experiences from the North of England evidence based guideline development programme. Quality in Health Care, 2001; 10: 10-16.
7. Tallon D, Chard J, Dieppe P. Relation between agendas of the research community and the research consumer. Lancet, 2000; 355: 2037-2040.
8. The AGREE Collaboration. Appraisal of guidelines for research and evaluation (AGREE) instrument available at http://www.agreecollaboration.org. London: St George's Hospital Medical School, 2001.
9. New Zealand Guidelines Group (NZGG). Handbook for the Preparation of Explicit Evidence-based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Wellington: Effective Practice Institute of the University of Auckland, 2001.
10. NHMRC. A Guide to the Development, Evaluation and Implementation of Clinical practice Guidelines. Canberra: National Health and Medical Research Council, Australian Government, 1999.
11. Entwistle VA, Renfrew MJ, Yearly S, Forrester J, Lamont T. Lay perspectives: advantages for health research. British Medical Journal, 1998; 316: 463-466.
12. Nilsen ES, Myrhaug HT, Johansen M, Oliver S, Oxman AD. Methods of consumer involvement in developing healthcare policy and research, clinical practice guidelines and patient information material (review). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2006; 3: CD004563 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.
13. Saltman RB. Patient choice and patient empowerment in Northern Europe health systems: a conceptual framework. International Journal of Health Services, 1994; 24: 201-229.